R4_FIS_Amend_0002_W9127S19Q0019.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to modify the Evaluation Approach: Factor 1, Corporate Experience and Evaluation Criteria.

All other solicitation requirements remain the same.

See following highlighted Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Feb-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

Amendment 0002

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Mar-2019

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S19Q0019

W9127S19Q0019

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

EVALUATION APPROACH

The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror demonstrates the ability to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. This assessment will be based on consideration of all the technical factors and price. The approach to the selection for this procurement will be pursuant to a best value concept.

The objective is to select the quote that offers the best value for the Government, not necessarily the lowest price.

The technical factors used in this evaluation are listed below. Please note that factor 1 and factor 2 are the most important factors. They are equal with respect to each other, but are more important than factor 3 or price. Factor 3 is more important than price. Moreover, collectively, all of the technical factors are significantly more important than price. However, as quotes become more equal technically, price may become a determining factor in award selection.

Factor 1: Corporate Experience Factor 2: Understanding of the Work Factor 3: Past Performance

EVALUATION APPROACH

The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror demonstrates the ability to accomplish the work specified under the RFQ. This assessment will be based on consideration of all the technical factors and price.

Factor 1, Corporate Experience: The offer will be evaluated based on the demonstrated ability to execute the requirements of the Performance Work Statement. Offerors shall submit evidence of a minimum of three (3), but no more than four (4) similar requirements. If there is a teaming arrangement, a minimum of 3 similar contracts are required from the prime. Offeror's shall complete and provide a Corporate Experience Data Sheet for each similar contract; refer to Appendix A. The Corporate Experience Data Sheet shall not exceed 2 pages per contract.

Offerors shall submit evidence of a minimum of three (3), but no more than four (4) contracts that are similar in scope and size to the requirement and are at least 60% (in terms of period of performance) complete in the last five years as the prime/Joint Venture. If there is a teaming arrangement, a minimum of 3 similar contracts are required from the prime/Joint Venture.

Offerors may submit experience of an affiliated entity where that affiliated entity has made a firm commitment to participate meaningfully in the performance of the contract. Offerors shall complete and provide a Corporate Experience Data Sheet for each similar contract; refer to Appendix A. The Corporate Experience Data Sheet shall not exceed 2 pages per contract.

m4ct9ejm Highlight m4ct9ejm Highlight m4ct9ejm Cross-Out m4ct9ejm Cross-Out

(End of Summary of Changes)

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the corporate experience of the offeror to determine if the offeror has the experience necessary to successfully perform the required effort.

The offer will be evaluated based on the demonstrated ability to execute the requirements of the Performance Work Statement.

For evaluation purposes, the definition of a similar requirement is as follows: A recent contract awarded to the Offeror (or in the case of an Offeror which is a Joint Venture (JV), a contract awarded to either member of the JV as the prime contractor. The contract should be 60% complete in terms of period of performance or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of scope and cost to the requirement.

W9127S19Q0019

All other solicitation requirements remain the same.

m4ct9ejm Cross-Out m4ct9ejm Highlight