ProjNet-closed_report.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: FY19 63rd RD Facility Investment Services Region 1 AR/OK Review: RFI Review (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 8 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

7875317 Contracting Section M, Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Do the 3 to 4 projects submitted need to be completed, or can they be ongoing? If on-going, what percentage complete must they be to count?

On: Mar 06 2019.

Government Response. . See Amendment 2 - updated Factor 1 - Offerors shall submit evidence of a minimum of three (3), but no more than four (4) contracts that are similar in scope and size to the requirement and are at least 60% (in terms of period of performance) complete in the last five years as the prime/Joint Venture. On: Mar 08 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7875322 Contracting Section M, Factor 3, Past Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are offerors allowed to submit final CPARS evaluations instead of PPQs? Some agencies won't completed PPQs if they have already issued final CPARS evaluations.

On: Mar 06 2019.

Government Response. . Yes, offerors are allowed to submit final CPARS evaluations instead of PPQs.

On: Mar 07 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7881248 Contracting Section M, Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We have already bought plane tickets, hotel and car rental for the site visit and with this new information presented in Q&A stating 3 min as Prime/Joint Venture with 5 yrs and 60% we are unable to propose. As a small business this puts unfair restrictions after making our decision to bid.

We have a subcontract that is $33M annual making that far more relevant than a small $3M annual as prime. Will contracting consider removing the Prime as long as the subcontract is relevant?

(Attachment: ProjNet__Logged_In_User_(3-8-19).pdf) On: Mar 08 2019.

Government Response. . Experience as a subcontractor will be considered if you can explain why the subcontractor experience is relevant. On: Mar 11 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7883068 Contracting Section M, Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Factor 1 Corporate Experience states: "...shall submit evidence of a minimum of three (3), but no more than four (4) contracts that are similar in scope and size to the requirement and are at least 60% (in terms of period of performance) complete in the last five years."

Question - If an offeror submits a contract that is Base + 4 option years, and the Base year is complete, with the 1st Option Year exercised and half complete, is that sufficient to meet the 60% requirement (since technically >60% of awarded & exercised period of performance is completed)?

On: Mar 11 2019.

Page 1 of 2ProjNet: Logged In User

3/20/2019https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Government Response. . The answer is 60% of the total contract: base +4 option years, therefore 60% of 5 years. On: Mar 12 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7884385 Contracting Page 7 - Tab B - Factor 2 - see Section D

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Instruction say See Section D; Section D says "not used"

On: Mar 11 2019.

Government Response. . Should read: see Section M - Evaluation Factors / Evaluation Approach On:

Mar 12 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7889385 Contracting Cost validity

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the pricing, is there a # of days we must validate our pricing for?

On: Mar 13 2019.

Government Response. . Currently there are none which must be validated from the contractors pricing.

On: Mar 20 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7891430 Contracting REPS & CERTS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Not exactly what you need to be included as "Representations and Certifications" the "FAR" report from SAM or each section that is mentioned on pg 40 (2), Core, Assertions and Reps and Certs and POC?

On: Mar 14 2019.

Government Response. . Offeror use Representations and Certifications from the SAM report. On: Mar 20 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7891480 Contracting clarifying my previous question pg 40 (2) REPS & CERTS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

I'm not sure exactly what you need to be included as "Representations and Certifications" the "FAR" report from SAM or each section that is mentioned on pg 40 (2), Core, Assertions and Reps and Certs and POC?

On: Mar 14 2019.

Government Response. . Offeror use Representations and Certifications from the SAM report. On: Mar 20 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 2 of 2ProjNet: Logged In User

3/20/2019https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...