W9127Q24R0026 EVALUATION CRITERIA.pdf
PDF 210 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127Q24R0026
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria attachment for a federal contract solicitation. It outlines the source selection evaluation criteria that will be used to evaluate proposals for the "Cryptocurrency in Drug Investigations and Cryptocurrency in Drug Investigations Seminar" contract opportunity.
The technical factors to be evaluated include topics related to cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin and other popular coins, coin wallets and exchanges, using blockchain explorers, pseudo-anonymous vs. anonymous coins, coin hard forks, and finding crypto resources. Past performance will be evaluated based on recency and relevancy of previous cryptocurrency-related training. The solicitation is a total small business set-aside with NAICS code 611699, contemplating a one-year firm-fixed-price contract for technical instructional services. Proposals are due by 5:00 pm CST on 08/23/2024 and must be submitted to the Mississippi Army National Guard.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria A Source Selection Evaluation Board and Source Selection Evaluation Criteria are required. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1)- (3), price, past performance, and technical evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used as the source selection evaluation criteria. Trade-Offs will be used as the basis for award. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation— Commercial Items, Technical and Past Performance, when combined, will be approximately equal to price for this acquisition. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will assess the technical sub-factors utilizing a Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method. All technical sub-factors and past performance sub-factors are listed below.
1. Technical Factors:
• The basics of Bitcoin and other popular coins.
• Coin wallets & exchange services.
• Using blockchain explorers in the field to run discovered coin addresses forward and backward.
• Google Dorking to find a transaction on the blockchain quickly from as little as one data point.
• Transacting with subjects (suspects) or machines to analyze their coin transactions.
• Creating alerts to monitor specific coin address activity.
• Pseudo anonymous vs. anonymous coins.
• Coin hard forks. What are they? What did you miss in a search?
• How to discover crypto resources in your operational area using publicly available resources.
• The evolution of Coin ATMs and why it has never been more important.
• The evolution of Coin ATMs and why it has never been more important.
How to create, receive and spend coin from select paper wallets requiring zero identity.
• How to convert one coin to another using decentralized conversion platforms requiring zero identity.
• Why it is important to still monitor decentralized exchanges that have implemented KYC.
• The best app for sweeping funds from wallet private keys should you discover one in the field.
• Building and improving a cryptocurrency SSE checklist.
• Understanding how Decentralized Exchanges and Non-Fungible Tokens are used in drug trade.
• A brief overview of other non-crypto exchange platforms such as WebMoney and Transferwise.
• Developing and coordinating a cryptocurrency policy within your department, agency or task force.
• Practical Exercises with be used throughout the training to gauge participation and proficiency.
• This course shall include a pre-test and a post-test to assess students’ understanding and to ensure all learning objectives were met.
2. Past Performance Factors:
a. Past Performance Factor A: Recency
Past performance is considered recent if the training occurred within three (3) years prior to the date of the solicitation and includes present past performance. However, references for training conducted more recently may receive more consideration. For example, a reference for training conducted within the last 12 months may receive more consideration than a reference for training conducted 30 months ago.
b. Past Performance Factor B: Relevancy
In establishing what is relevant to this acquisition, consideration will be given to similarity of training, contract duration (one-time training or multiple iterations, single or multiple years), dollar value, and extent of subcontracting/teaming. Relevance will be expressed using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings. (VR- Very Relevant; R- Relevant; SR- Somewhat Relevant;
NR- Not Relevant).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .