W9127Q24R0023 EVALUATION CRITERIA.pdf

Evaluation Criteria A Source Selection Evaluation Board and Source Selection Evaluation Criteria are required. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(1)- (3), price, past performance, and technical evaluation factors and sub-factors will be used as the source selection evaluation criteria. Trade-Offs will be used as the basis for award. In accordance with FAR Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation— Commercial Items, Technical and Past Performance, when combined, will be approximately equal to price for this acquisition. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will assess the technical sub-factors utilizing a Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method. All technical sub-factors and past performance sub-factors are listed below.

1. Technical Factors:

• How to process the scene

• Conduct a thorough death/murder investigation

• Techniques to use to identify and track down the suspect who supplied the Fentanyl and effect an arrest.

• Techniques to use to proactively target and go after Fentanyl Traffickers.

• Techniques to utilize during the investigations.

• Put together a solid case for prosecution in State or Federal court.

• This course shall include a pre-test and a post-test to assess students’ understanding and to ensure all learning objectives were met.

The instructor(s) must be subject matter experts on narcotics investigation techniques as demonstrated by training other government training institutions on this topic. Instructor(s) must have extensive experience in training law enforcement officers at all levels to include federal, state, and local agencies.

The contractor and their instructor(s) will have a background in and be currently engaged in training law enforcement officers in law enforcement investigative techniques and best practices.

Instructor(s) with extensive narcotics enforcement experience with the significant experience with investigating opioid overdose deaths are highly sought.

2. Past Performance Factors:

a. Past Performance Factor A: Recency

Past performance is considered recent if the training occurred within three (3) years prior to the date of the solicitation and includes present past performance. However, references for training conducted more recently may receive more consideration. For example, a reference for training conducted within the last 12 months may receive more consideration than a reference for training conducted 30 months ago.

b. Past Performance Factor B: Relevancy

In establishing what is relevant to this acquisition, consideration will be given to similarity of training, contract duration (one-time training or multiple iterations, single or multiple years), dollar value, and extent of subcontracting/teaming. Relevance will be expressed using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings. (VR- Very Relevant; R- Relevant; SR- Somewhat Relevant;

NR- Not Relevant).