PWS_CNNJ_USACE Critcal Repairs Project_MOA Complaince_Combined_20240709 FINAL.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127N24Q0113
About this file
This document is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for a Firm-Fixed-Price contract to provide services related to the Coos Bay North Jetty Critical Repairs Project in Coos County, Oregon. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District is soliciting services to prepare Oregon State Level Documentation of the Coos Bay North Jetty and develop an online entry describing the history and significance of the jetty for publication on the Corps' website.
The contract has an overall period of performance of 330 calendar days from the date of award. Key requirements include conducting background research, developing draft and final Oregon State Level Documentation, drafting and finalizing an online entry, and providing monthly progress reports. The Contractor must comply with Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation, as well as accessibility requirements under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. The PWS provides detailed performance standards, surveillance methods, and procedures for addressing unacceptable performance. The Government will award the contract to the lowest priced, technically capable offeror.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 7N24Q0113 Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Work Statement (PWS)
Coos Bay North Jetty USACE Critical Repairs Project Cultural Resources MOA Compliance
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District
1.0 GENERAL STATEMENT
The US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District (Corps) is making critical repairs to the Coos Bay North Jetty to ensure safe and reliable navigation through the mouth of the Coos River. The Coos Bay North Jetty is in Coos County, Oregon (see Attachment A). The Coos Bay North Jetty has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A (Attachment B). The repairs to the jetty will have an adverse effect to historic properties. The Corps executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in 2021 resolving adverse effects pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and implementing regulations 36 CFR 800.
The Corps is soliciting services to prepare Oregon State Level Documentation of the Coos Bay North Jetty and develop an online entry, to be published on the Corps website, about the history and significance of the Coos Bay North Jetty.
The Contractor shall perform to the standards in the contract and comply with all local, state, and federal regulations during the services performed. This is Firm-Fixed-Priced (FFP) contract with an overall period of performance of 330 calendar days from the date of award.
2.0 DEFINITIONS
Throughout this Performance Work Statement (PWS) terms are defined as follows:
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL): Acceptable Quality Level equals the performance standards listed in Section 6.0. The Contractor must re-perform all unsatisfactory work unless excused by the COR.
Contracting Officer (KO): The Government employee who is authorized to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings.
Contracting Officers Representative (COR): An individual designated in accordance with subsection 201.602-2 of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) and authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer to perform specific technical or administrative functions. The COR is not authorized to make any commitments or changes that will affect price, quality, quantity, delivery, or any other term or condition of the Purchase/Task Order.
Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR): A written record of unsatisfactory performance by the Contractor as observed by the COR.
Performance Requirements Summary (PRS): Identifies critical success factors for the contract. It identifies both the performance objectives for those factors and the performance threshold required for each performance objective. The Government reserves the right to survey all services called for in the contract to determine whether or not the performance objectives and goals were met.
Quality Assurance (QA): The Government procedures to verify that Contractor services performed according to acceptable standards.
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP): A systematic method to evaluate the services the Contractor is required to furnish in accordance with the PWS and PRS.
Quality Control (QC): A method implemented by the Contractor to control the quality of goods and services provided.
Quality Control Inspector (QCI): A Contractor’s employee responsible for monitoring and addressing issues with the quality of goods and services provided.
Quality Control Plan (QCP): A plan developed by the Contractor which includes quality control actions necessary to meet the quality standards set forth by the contract. The plan should be in compliance with the PWS. Once approved by the TL and COR, the plan becomes a part of the QASP.
Technical Lead (TL): The government employee that is the point of contact for technical aspects of this contract.
3.0 THE GOVERNMENT WILL FURNISH
The Government will furnish, at the request of and without cost to the Contractor, the following items for use only in connection with the performance of the work:
3.1 Historic aerials, drawings, plans, and photographs, as available, of the Coos Bay North Jetty.
3.2 USACE archived documents containing previous research for the Coos Bay North Jetty.
If the information is available in an electronic format, then the Government will provide the information in that format via DoD SAFE, email, or compact disc. If the materials are only available in hard copy (paper) format, the Government will provide those materials in that format via mail, courier, or face-to-face handoff.
The Contractor shall return all physical materials (CDs, books, paper maps, etc.) to the COR no later than seven (7) days after the completion of the contract.
4.0 THE CONTRACTOR WILL FURNISH
The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to perform required services under this contract and comply with all local, state, and federal regulations through the duration of this contract. The Contractor shall furnish all “standard-to-the-industry” equipment, materials, and supplies necessary to perform the work, including, but not limited to:
4.1 All vehicles necessary for any travel to facilities or other locations for research of the project.
4.2 All GIS, GPS, computer hardware, software, and office supplies required for recording, mapping, drafting and delivery of assigned task products.
4.3 Access to Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) - Oregon Archaeological Records
Remote Access (OARRA) and Oregon Historic Sites Database.
5.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS
The Contractor shall conduct background research of the Coos Bay North Jetty, develop an online entry describing the history and significance of the jetty, and complete Oregon State Level Documentation for the jetty. As described in Section 4.0, the Contractor will provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to complete research, documentation, and development.
5.1 Professional Standards. The Contractor shall have an in-house Principal Investigator (PI) and
Project Manager (PM) that meets the Secretary of Interior’s “Standards and Guidelines for Professional Qualifications,” for History, Architectural History, and/or Historic Architecture found at 36 CFR Part 61, https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_9.htm. The Contractor shall provide resumes of the PI, PM, and technical staff (ex. historian or historic architect) to demonstrate their capabilities to successfully complete all phases of identified work.
The Contractor shall follow the Secretary of the Interior’s “Standards and Guidelines for Professional Qualifications,” found at 36 CFR Part 61, https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_9.htm in determining qualifications for the PI, PM, and technical staff positions.
If key personnel change during the period of performance, a vitae for all new supervisor and technical staff must be submitted to the COR for Corps review.
https://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_9.htm
5.2 Workflow Management. The Contractor shall provide product management and coordination for work tasks during production of the report. The Contractor shall assign a PM to act as a primary point of contact (POC). The PM shall be responsible for the coordination of work developed under this Contract.
The Contractor shall be responsible for the professional and technical competence of the personnel it assigns to perform work under this contract and will select individuals who will be able to perform the obligations under the contract. Changes to personnel assigned to this contract shall not occur without prior notification to the COR, in writing (email correspondence is acceptable). Replacement of personnel shall be carried out as quickly as possible and in a manner that will not adversely affect the performance obligations under the contract.
5.3 Reporting Standards. The report shall be free from defects in factual statements, logic, grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. The Contractor shall correct such errors at no cost to the Government. In-text citations must be provided for the sources of facts upon which opinions or analyses presented are based. The Contractor will follow the Society for American Archaeological style guide.
5.4 Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. The Contractor shall follow all Secretary of the Interior Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation. Online versions of the Secretary of Interior’s standards and guidelines is located at the following website address https://www.nps.gov/subjects/historicpreservation/upload/standards-guidelines-archeology-historic-preservation.pdf
5.5 Photos and Images. The Contractor will provide the Corps with an index and digital copy of any photos, graphics, and images gathered or created to meet the requirements of this contract. The images will be saved in .tiff format with a resolution of at least 300 dpi. The Contractor will follow the National Park Service (NPS) National Register Guidelines:
a. How to Improve the Quality of Photographs for National Register Nominations.
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB23-Complete.pdf
b. National Register Photo Policy Factsheet updated 5/15/2013.
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/Photo_Policy_update_2013_05_15 _508.pdf
5.6 GPS/GIS Data. The Contractor will provide GIS spatial data for all survey areas and sites recorded, including photographic point locations. The Contractor shall differentially correct GPS files and then prepare projected ESRI geodatabase feature classes with tabular information and FGDC metadata as a deliverable. The deliverable shall include one geodatabase containing all deliverable feature classes. The deliverable shall include one feature class for each type of feature. Each feature class in the GIS deliverable shall have metadata. The required metadata format is ESRI ArcCatalog Metadata using the FGDC standard: North American Profile (NAP) of ISO 19115 2003. Any GIS data will be collected using North American Datum (NAD) 83 and projected with UTM Zone 10 N.
5.7 Metadata. Any data, database(s), and/or geospatial data produced through this purchase order must be documented through the preparation of standard metadata (data about data) descriptions.
The Contractor shall ensure that the metadata delivered is compliant with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19115:2003, North American Profile (NAP). The Standard is available for purchase at: http://www.webstore.ansi.org.
5.8 Task 1: Work Plan. Within 7 calendar days of contract award, the Contractor shall develop and submit to the COR and TL a Work Plan that includes, but is not limited to, the following:
a. Matrix of all Contractor and subcontractor personnel working on this project, their roles and responsibilities, including all review personnel.
b. Project objectives and a plan on how to meet those objectives.
c. Information on project organization.
d. Project schedule based on completion date requirements. The schedule shall include all work items, milestones, durations, predecessors, source materials and study requirements, data delivery dates, completion dates, deliverables, review processes, and all coordination activities.
e. Quality Control Plan (QCP): The QCP is a management plan for producing a quality product or service, on schedule, and within budget. The Contractor shall submit QCP(s) to the COR addressing each task above for approval prior to beginning any work. QCPs shall outline QC and QA procedures that shall ensure the stated accuracy specifications are met. The QCP shall be in accordance with USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12, "Quality Management."
USACE Engineering Regulation 1110-1-12 can be viewed at the following website:
http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Regulations.aspx
5.9 Task 2: Kick-Off Meeting. Within 14 calendar days of contract award, the Contractor shall arrange a mutual date and time for a kick-off meeting with the COR and TL prior to the start of work. The purpose of the kick-off meeting will be to clarify tasks and methods, review the work plan schedule, and to identify and minimize issues or problems that might arise over the course of the contract. Kick-off meeting will be virtual.
5.10 Task 3: Research and Research Update. The Contractor shall conduct background research to inform the Oregon State Level Documentation of the Coos Bay North Jetty and online article.
Recommended sources for information include:
a. OR SHPO: Reports, site records, and region Historic Sites Database;
b. Historic properties and cultural resources reports;
c. Site and survey records;
d. Historic photos, historic aerial photos, historic maps, oral histories, historic contexts, and any available information at local or university libraries, local historical societies, county offices, the Coos History Museum, and the Corps;
e. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and General Land Office (GLO) maps;
f. Corps government furnished materials;
g. Field visit to Coos Bay North Jetty.
Within 60 calendar days of the contract award, the Contractor will provide the TL and COR with a written update of research conducted, including:
a. Locations where research was conducted;
b. Summary of materials reviewed;
c. Summary of photos, plans, etc. gathered;
d. Summary of fieldwork, if conducted.
5.11 Task 4: Draft Oregon State Level Documentation. The Contractor will complete Oregon State
Level Documentation (OSLD), according to Oregon SHPO standards (Attachment C), for the Coos Bay North Jetty. The Contractor will submit for review a draft of the Oregon State Level Documentation for the Coos Bay North Jetty to the COR and TL. The draft deliverable shall be submitted within 120 calendar days after contract award. The Corps will review draft documentation and provide comments 60 calendar days after receipt of the draft deliverables.
In addition to the Oregon SHPO standards for OSLD, the document will include:
a. The title page will specify if the document is a draft or final and include the Corps contract number and a statement indicating: “Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers”.
b. All pages, photographs, tables, etc. shall be consecutively numbered throughout the document, and where applicable, shall have titles and appropriate explanatory notes.
c. The document shall include photographs to visually document significant areas, events, and features within the study area.
d. The documentation shall be free from defects in factual statements, logic, grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling. In-text citations must be provided for the sources of facts upon which opinions or analyses presented are based.
http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Regulations.aspx
5.12 Task 5: Draft Online Entry. The Contractor will develop an online entry for publication on the
Corps’ public website describing the history of the Coos Bay North Jetty, Coos County, Oregon.
The online entry will include text and images describing the history and significance of the Coos Bay North Jetty, including its planning, design, construction, previous rehabilitation, and operation. The draft entry will be minimum 1,000 words with publicly digestible content. In addition to government furnished materials, the Contractor shall conduct research at local, state, and tribal offices, local and national museums, historical societies, and archive repositories (Task 3). The Contractor must not include specific locational information from government furnished materials including the site forms and survey reports in the entry. Site locations are controlled information and must not be shared with the public for the protection and preservation of this historic resource.
A draft entry will be submitted by the Contractor within 210 calendar days of contract award to the COR and TL for review. The government shall provide comments within 60 calendar days after receipt of the draft deliverables. The government will coordinate review with the Oregon SHPO, and Operations Security (OPSEC) and the Public Affairs Office (PAO) at the Corps.
5.13 Task 6: Final Oregon State Level Documentation. The Contractor shall address all comments and outstanding issues from the review of the draft documentation and submit final Oregon State Level Documentation for the Coos Bay North Jetty within 300 calendar days of contract award to the COR and TL. The final documentation must be compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794d, which requires that Federal agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use information and communications technology (ICT) that is accessible to people with disabilities and to give employees and members of the public with disabilities access to information comparable to the access available to others. The Contractor will submit final documentation in MS Word and PDF formats.
5.14 Task 7: Final Online Entry. The Contractor shall address all comments and outstanding issues from the review of the draft entry. Upon acceptance of the final draft, the Contractor shall submit a finalized entry for publication on the Corps’ public website to the COR and TL The final entry must be compliant with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794d, which requires that Federal agencies develop, procure, maintain, or use information and communications technology (ICT) that is accessible to people with disabilities and to give employees and members of the public with disabilities access to information comparable to the access available to others. The final deliverable text shall be in MS Word format and include all digital materials and photos needed for publication on the Corp’s public website. The final deliverable shall be submitted by the Contractor within 330 calendar days of contract award.
5.15 Task 8: Monthly Progress Reports. The Contractor shall prepare a monthly progress report identifying the following information by task:
a. Status of services performed since the previous reporting period.
b. Discussion of issues or concerns.
c. Confirmation that services performed to date are within scope.
d. Confirmation that services performed to date are within negotiated budget.
The Contractor shall submit monthly progress reports via email to the COR and TL by the 10th of each month.
5.16 Schedule: The period of performance for this contract is 330 calendar days from the award of the contract.
Task Deliverable Description Due Date Delivery Method
5.8 Work Plan A proposal outlining how the Contractor
proposes to conduct all aspects of the work within the PWS.
Award + 7 Calendar Days
5.9 Kick-Off Meeting
Kick-off meeting with COR and TL. Award + 14
Calendar Days
In-Person or Webex
5.10 Research and
Research Update
Written update to the COR and TL of research conducted to contribute to draft and final deliverables.
Award + 60 Calendar Days
5.11 Draft Oregon State
Level Documentation
Draft OSLD following Oregon SHPO standards as described in Task 5.4. Draft report will be in MS Word Format. Government provide comment within 60 days. Submit to COR and
TL.
Award + Calendar Days
E-mail or DoD Safe if too large for E-mail
5.12 Draft Online Entry Draft an online entry describing the history and significance of the Coos Bay North Jetty for a public audience. Draft entry shall be in MS Word Format. Government provide comment within 60 days.
Award + Calendar Days
E-mail or DoD Safe if too large for E-mail
5.13 Final Oregon State
Level Documentation
Submit one (1) electronic copy of the final report in MS Word and PDF formats to COR and TL. Ensure 508 Compliance.
Award 300 +Calendar Days
Mail or DoD Safe if too large for E-mail
5.14 Final Online Entry Submit one (1) electronic copy of the final online entry for publication on the Corps’ public website in MS Word Format to the COR and TL. Ensure 508 Compliance.
Award + Calendar Days
E-mail or DoD Safe if too large for E-mail
5.15
Monthly Progress Report
Contractor shall submit monthly progress reports to provide an update to the COR and TL on the progress of the contract.
10th of every month
6.0 SCHEDULE AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
To ensure that the Government receives the services for which it contracted, the Government will only pay for services received. The Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) determines if the Contractor meets the performance standards of the contract, as well as provides guidelines for how and when surveillance will be performed. It ensures timeliness, effectiveness, and that the Contractor is delivering the results specified in the contract. The Government contract quality assurance will be performed per the PRS surveillance schedule.
6.1 Performance Requirements Summary Table. Below are the criteria against which the performance will be evaluated. Work shall be considered not to have been performed when any one of the conditions as shown below exists in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
The Government shall evaluate the Contractor periodically during performance of this contract to ensure compliance with the proposed and accepted performance goals, regulations, and guidance. The Government shall perform this evaluation according to the QASP. Failure to adequately complete any service or submittal to at least a satisfactory level of quality or timeliness may result in repeat of work, a poor performance evaluation, or both.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Required Services (Tasks)
Performance Standards
Acceptable Quality Levels Surveillance Validated
Complaints
Provide Work Plan (Task 1)
Contractor shall provide a work plan within 14 days of task order award, as described in Section 5.8.
Contractor shall provide a work plan on time.
Government Review
One per contract
Kick-Off Meeting (Task 2)
Contractor to attend kick-off meeting with COR and TL as described in Section 5.9.
Contractor attendance at the meeting.
Direct Observation
One per contract
Research and Research Update (Task 3)
Contractor will submit update of research conducted as described in Section 5.10.
Contractor shall conduct adequate research and submit research update on time.
Government Review
One per contract
Draft Oregon State Level Documentation (Task 4)
Contractor will submit draft Oregon State Level Documentation as described in in Section 5.11.
Draft submitted on time and mostly complete.
Draft contains all appropriate sections and is 90% free of errors (typos, grammar, etc.).
Government Review
One per contract
Draft Online Entry (Task 5)
Contractor will develop an online entry describing the history and significance of the Coos Bay North Jetty for a public audience as described in Section 5.12.
Draft submitted on time and mostly complete.
Draft contains all appropriate sections and is 90% free of errors (typos, grammar, etc.).
Government Review
Final Oregon State Level Documentation (Task 6)
Contractor submits final Oregon State Level Documentation as described in Section 5.13.
Contractor addresses comments and submits final documentation on time. Contains all appropriate sections and is free of errors (printing, typos, grammar, etc.).
Government Review
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Required Services (Tasks)
Performance Standards
Acceptable Quality Levels Surveillance Validated
Complaints
Final Online Entry (Task 7)
Contractor submits final online entry as described in Section 5.14
Contractor addresses comments and submits final online entry on time. Contains all appropriate sections and is free of errors (printing, typos, grammar, etc.).
Government Review
One per contract
Monthly Progress Reports (Task 8)
Contractor shall submit monthly progress reports as listed in Section 5.15 by the 10th of every month
Contractor submits progress reports on time.
Government Review
One per contract
Monthly Invoices (Section 7.7)
Contractor shall submit accurate invoices as listed in Section 7.7 by the 10th of every month
Contractor submits accurate invoices on time.
Government Review
6.2 Surveillance. 100% inspection by the COR will serve as the surveillance methods. If the COR discovers deficiencies and/or receives complaints, the COR will alert them to the Contractor for correction.
6.3 Quality Control. The Contractor, not the Government, is responsible for quality control actions necessary to meet the quality standards set forth by the contract. The Contractor shall develop and submit a Quality Control Plan (QCP) for Government approval within ten (10) calendar days after award. Once accepted, the QCP will be incorporated into the QASP. The QASP is not a contractual instrument and may be changed at the COR’s discretion. The Contractor shall use the QASP to guide and document the implementation of the required management and quality control actions to achieve the specified results. The Government reserves the right under the Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (FAR 52.212-4) to inspect and test the services called for by the Task Order, to the extent practicable at all times and places during the term of the Task Order. The Government will reject non-conforming services.
6.4 Unacceptable Performance. Draft products and final deliverables will be evaluated by the following criteria:
a. Written expression. The extent to which the writer is capable of expressing their thoughts in writing in a logical manner and sequence using appropriate grammar, punctuation and sentence structure.
b. Writing and Editing. Exhibits clear style and structure (readable, concise, cohesive);
demonstrates accurate language usage (grammar, punctuation, spelling); the work is free from errors or omissions.
c. Substance and Content. Exhibits clear understanding of the assignment; demonstrates accurate, thorough, relevant, and coherent content and ideas; ideas are appropriately covered and knowledge of author exhibited.
d. Audience Awareness. Writing and tone are adapted to audience and purpose;
communicates ideas clearly and effectively.
e. Document Design. Demonstrates cohesion by graphic and visual means (headings, white space) in documents; includes appropriate number and kind of aesthetic visual aids (tables, images, etc.).
f. Textural Attribution. Demonstrates the ability to differentiate between sources and one’s own text; cites text in a uniform manner.
Draft products and final deliverables that are found to be generally unacceptable based on one or more of the criteria will be returned to the Contractor without complete review. The Contractor will be required to revise the document at their own expense within the schedule listed in Section 5.16. When performance is determined unacceptable, as defined in the Performance Requirements Summary, the COR will inform the Contractor that performance is unacceptable and provide written documentation by use of the Form DD 2772, Contract Discrepancy Report. By initialing and dating the form, the Contractor is only acknowledging notification of unacceptable performance. Disputes in surveillance should be referred to the Contracting Officer.
The COR will notify the Contracting Officer of unacceptable performance. If any of the services do not conform to contract requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to perform the services again in conformity with contract requirements, at no increase in contract amount.
When the defect(s) in services cannot be corrected by re-performance, the Government may:
a. Require the Contractor to take necessary action to ensure future performance conforms to contract requirements.
b. Reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed.
c. If the Contractor fails to promptly re-perform the services, or to take the necessary action to ensure future performance in conformity with contract requirements, the Government may:
i. By contract or otherwise, perform the services and charge to the Contractor any cost incurred by the Government that is directly related to the performance of such service;
ii. Issue Cure Notice;
iii. Terminate the contract for Government convenience; and / or
iv. Terminate the contract for Cause.
6.5 Correction of Non-Performance of Work. Contractor shall employ an adequate quantity of
6.6
6.7
6.8 personnel to ensure that any services found to be not in compliance and therefore not acceptable, shall be made acceptable by the performance or re-performance of the work, where such re-performance is possible, during the first business day after non-compliance has been observed by or reported to and verified by the COR.
Correction of Unsatisfactory Work. The COR maintains the right to reject any work that is found to be in error, incomplete, illegible, or in any way not conforming to the specifications outlined in the contract in accordance with FAR Clause 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS- COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES subpart (a) INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE. The Contractor shall be liable for all costs in connection with correcting such errors.
Damages Caused by the Contractor. Contractor shall be held accountable and liable to the Government for any damages to Government facilities, fixtures, furnishings, equipment, or grounds caused by the Contractors or their employees.
Interference with Government Operations. Contractor and their employees shall perform all work in such a way as to not interfere with regularly scheduled Government operational activities.
7.0 COORDINATION REQUIREMENTS
Coordination of these activities is critical to the successful completion of the contract. The Contractor shall make every effort to resolve critical issues in a timely manner before they become problems.
Communication by telephone and email is strongly encouraged. The Contractor shall provide written records of all significant conversations and email them to the COR within two working days of the call.
7.1 Security
a. Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures. All Contractor and all associated sub-contractor employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility, and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (to be provided by a Government representative). The Contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks to meet installation/facility access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services, or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DoD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any installation or facility change, the Government may require changes in Contractor security matters or processes.
b. Pre-Screen Candidates using E-Verity Program. The Contractor must pre-screen Candidates using E-Verify Program (http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify) website to meet the established employment eligibility requirements. The Contractor must ensure that the Candidate has two valid forms of Government issued identification prior to enrollment to ensure the correct information is entered into the E-Verify system. An initial list of verified/eligible Candidates must be provided to the COR no later than three (3) business days after contract award.
7.2 Safety Regulations and Guidelines. The Contractor shall comply with EM 385-1-1 (Safety and
Health Requirements), including interim changes, in effect on the date of solicitation. EM 385- 1-1 and its changes are available at https://www.mvr.usace.army.mil/About/Offices/Safety-and- Occupational-Health/. EM 385-1-1 states, “Contractors shall comply with the latest version of EM 385-1-1 (including interim changes) that are in effect on the date of solicitation.”
7.3 Travel. The Contractor shall be responsible to provide transportation necessary for Contractor employees to perform all tasks outlined in this Performance Work Statement.
7.4 Codes and Standards. Work under this purchase order shall comply with the latest codes, standards, and regulations applicable to the work requested including USACE Engineering Regulations and Manuals, and Industry.
7.5 Contract Changes. Changes in scope, time, or deliverables can only be authorized by the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer immediately if they have received direction to perform work outside the scope of the contract. Changes in scope will be negotiated and a written modification issued, before proceeding with the work.
7.6 Additional Services. The Contractor shall not perform any services under this purchase order that are considered by the Contractor to be a change in work or services required by this agreement without the written approval of the Contracting Officer.
7.7 Payments. In accordance with the payment clause of the contract, any monthly invoices are due by the 10th day of the month. Payment will be made in the amount of 100 percent of the value of services shown on the monthly invoice. Submit the original invoice to the COR, TL, and Invoicing POC. Please ensure the firm’s address shown on the invoice matches the address shown in SAM (http://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/). In addition, please ensure the invoice has a period of performance (e.g., 02 JAN 17 to 06 JUN 17). Please ensure that the period of performance does not fall after the date the invoice is signed. All invoices shall be signed by the Project Manager. Any errors in invoice preparation will be cause for rejection. Assistance with the preparation of your invoice may be obtained from the Invoicing POC, Ms. DeeAndra Smith, 503-808-4743, DeeAndra.J.Smith@usace.army.mil
No more than 80% of the contract total may be invoiced before Task 6 (Section 5.13) is submitted.
http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify http://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/
7.8 Points of Contact.
Assignment Personnel Phone Number E-Mail Contracting Officer Representative (COR)
Katherine Pollock 503-808-3830 Katherine.H.Pollock@usace.army.mil
Technical Lead Christine O’Neill- Mullen
503-808-4286 Christine.C.Oneill- Mullen@usace.army.mil
Invoicing POC DeeAndra Smith 503-808-4743 DeeAndra.J.Smith@usace.army.mil
7.9 Invoice Submittals. The Contractor shall prepare invoice(s) in accordance with FAR clause 52.212- 4(g) and submit them electronically via email to the COR, TL, Invoicing POC, and the USACE Finance Center: CEFC-G2invoices@usace.army.mil.
Email a PDF copy to Katherine.H.Pollock@usace.army.mil, Christine.C.Oneill- Mullen@usace.army.mil, and deeandra.j.smith@usace.army.mil.
For invoice receipt verification or for a vendor’s Payment problem, the vendor may contact the USACE Finance Center at 901-873-9077.
7.10 Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act or the McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA).
Every employer performing work covered by the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act or the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA) is required to post a notice of the compensation required (included, for service contracts, any applicable wage determination) in a prominent and accessible location at the worksite where it may be seen by the employees performing on the contract. A copy of the poster is available in two versions at the following DOL website:
http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/sca.htm. The rest of the content is subjective to each locations needs.
7.11 Final Invoice. The Contractor shall mark the last invoice as “Final.”
7.12 Release of Information. Reports and information generated under this contract become the property of the Government and distribution by the Contractor to any source, at any time, without the written consent of the Contracting Officer is prohibited.
7.13 Use of Information. All generated elements of the draft and final report (pursuant to Tasks 6 and 7) shall be provided to the Government.
7.14 Veterans Employment Emphasis for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracts. USACE contractors and sub-contractors at all tiers are encouraged to promote the training and employment of U.S.
veterans while performing under a USACE contract. While no set-aside, evaluation preference, or incentive applies to the solicitation or performance under the resultant contract, USACE Contractors are encouraged to seek out highly qualified veterans to perform services under this contract. The following resources are available to assist USACE Contractors in their outreach efforts:
a. Federal Veteran employment information at http://www.fedshirevets.gov/index.aspx
b. Department of Labor Veterans Employment Assistance at http://www.dol.gov/vets/
c. Department of Veterans Affairs-VOW to Hire Heroes Act at http://benefits.va.gov/vow
d. Army Wounded Warrior Program at http://wtc.army.mil/modules/employers/index.html
e. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation – Hiring Our Heroes: http://www.hiringourheroes.org/
f. Guide to Hiring Veterans:
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/white_house_business_council_- _guide_to_hiring_veterans_0.pdf
7.15 Work Scheduling. The Contractor is not required to perform services on the following recognized
Federal holidays: New Year's Day, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., Washington’s Birthday, Memorial Day, Juneteenth National Independence Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus mailto:CEFC-G2invoices@usace.army.mil mailto:Katherine.H.Pollock@usace.army.mil mailto:Christine.C.Oneill-Mullen@usace.army.mil mailto:Christine.C.Oneill-Mullen@usace.army.mil http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/posters/sca.htm http://www.fedshirevets.gov/index.aspx http://www.dol.gov/vets/ http://benefits.va.gov/vow http://wtc.army.mil/modules/employers/index.html http://www.hiringourheroes.org/ http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/white_house_business_council_-_guide_to_hiring_veterans_0.pdf http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/white_house_business_council_-_guide_to_hiring_veterans_0.pdf
Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.
8.0 FORMS
Contractor Discrepancy Form: http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd2772.pdf http://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd2772.pdf
Attachment A
Foredune Road
ReRoute Road
Alternative Staging Area 2
Material Off-Loading Facility
Alternative Staging Area 1
North Jetty Staging Area
North Jetty
Overland Delivery Staging Area
0 0.85 1.70.425 Kilometers
0 0.8 1.6 Miles
1:40,000
US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District January 2021 ¢
APE
APECoos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Attachment A - Map of Area of Potential Effect (APE) T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charelston and Empire Quad Map created by Katherine H Pollock
Attachment B
Alternative Staging Area 2
Material Off-Loading Facility
Alternative Staging Area 1
Log Spiral Bay
North Jetty Staging Area
North Jetty
Overland Delivery Staging Area
35CS312
35CS277
35CS337
35CS27
0 0.5 10.25 Kilometers
1:40,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District March 2019
Sites
APE
North_Jetty_APE
Coos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Enclosure 1: Topographic Map of Area of Potential Effect (Map 1 of 3) T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charleston and Empire Quad Map created by Katherine H Pollock
Text
0 0.5 10.25 Miles
Alternative Staging Area 2
Material Off-Loading Facility
Alternative Staging Area 1
Log Spiral Bay
North Jetty Staging Area
North Jetty
35CS312
35CS277
35CS337
35CS27
0 0.3 0.60.15 Kilometers
1:24,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District March 2019
Sites
APE
North_Jetty_APE
Coos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Enclosure 1: Topographic Map of Area of Potential Effect (Map 2 of 3) T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charleston and Empire Quad Map created by Katherine H Pollock
Text
0 0.3 0.60.15
Alternative Staging Area 2
Overland Delivery Staging Area
35CS312
35CS277
0 0.3 0.60.15 Kilometers
1:24,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District March 2019
Sites
APE
North_Jetty_APE
Coos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Enclosure 1: Topographic Map of Area of Potential Effect (Map 3 of 3) T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charleston and Empire Quad Map created by Katherine H Pollock
Text
0 0.3 0.60.15
0 0.85 1.70.425 Kilometers
0 0.8 1.6 Miles
1:40,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District March 2019 ¢ Road Widening
Sites
APE
North_Jetty_APE
Coos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Enclosure 2: APE, Sites, and Road Widening T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charleston and Empire Quad
0 0.85 1.70.425 Kilometers
0 0.8 1.6 Miles
1:40,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District March 2019 ¢ Condition_B
Condition_C
Coos Bay North Jetty Rehabilitation Enclosure 3: 35CS239 Road Condition T25S, R13W, Sect 12, 13, 23, 24, 26, 35 Coos County, Oregon Charleston and Empire Quad
Attachment C
Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Revised January 29,2014
Oregon SHPO Documentation Standards Mitigation for Adverse Effects under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act or ORS 358.653
In cases where an action by a local, state or federal agency will adversely affect a listed or potentially-eligible National Register property, documentation may be required as part of the mitigation for the undertaking. Documentation is not necessarily adequate in all cases. Agencies should contact the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) before planning or completing any mitigation measures, including documentation.
State Level Documentation
The following items are required for all state level documentation.
1. Architectural description of the building - Description should be surface-by-surface, covering the entire exterior of the building, noting all important character-defining elements, fenestration types and patterns.
Include descriptions of key interior areas, if accessible. Include discussion of all observed alterations, and provide dates for them. Descriptions should be not less than 500 words and use appropriate architectural terms.
2. Building history - History of not less than 500 words discussing at least when the building was constructed and by whom, the building or structure’s use over time, and any important persons or events associated with the resource. Be as accurate as possible. If the documentation is being conducted for mitigation purposes, give extra detail to those elements being impacted. Contact the Oregon SHPO for research suggestions.
3. Bibliography - Include a bibliography of all resources used in the preparation of the document, including sources for appended archival materials described in item 8.
4. Map - Digital image of the appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map with the location of the property marked. A portion of the entire map may be printed for free from a website such as topoquest.com and marked by hand.
5. Scale site plan – Include subject building or structure and adjacent buildings and structures on the same tax lot. Drawing may be done by hand as long as it reasonably to scale. Include the name of the person completing the map, date the map was completed, map scale, and north arrow on the map. The name and/or use of each building, structure, object, and adjacent streets on the map should be labeled.
6. Scale Floor plans - Include each floor of the subject building or structure. Drawing may be done by hand as long as it reasonable to scale. Include the name of the person completing the map, date the map was completed, map scale, and north arrow on the map. The name and/or use or each space should be labeled.
7. Photographs – Include photos of the building or structure interior and exterior. Photos may be taken as 35mm black-and-white 4x6 images or as color digital images. Digital and print images and prints must meet all aspects of the Oregon SHPO Digital Photo Checklist available at the SHPO website:
http://www.oregonheritage.org/OPRD/HCD/NATREG/nrhp_documents.shtml .
8. Archival materials - If available, include original architectural drawings or maps, brochures, photos, newspaper clippings, or other archival items of interest relating to the history of the building or structure.
Provide three complete hard-copy sets of documentation including printed photos, and one CD containing a digital copy of the complete submission to the Oregon SHPO. A fourth full set may be required in cases where there is a local repository that is interested in receiving the materials.
Historic American Building Survey (HABS) and Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Documentation
In cases where HABS / HAER documentation is required, the provided materials must meet all standards set by the National Heritage Documentation Programs Office, including archiving at the Library of Congress. The level of documentation is negotiated on a case-by-case basis between the agency managing the project and the Oregon SHPO. Documentation standards may be found at: http://www.nps.gov/hdp/.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .