D.01.16_W9127N18R0052P00007Final.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to fix a calulation error in the interport differential in Section M: Basis For Aw ard, Location Adjustment.

POC David Dvorak, david.l.dvorak@usace.army.mil, 503-808-4633

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9127N18R0052

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Jun-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Aug-2018

CODE

USACE PORTLAND DISTRICT

333 SW 1ST AVE

PORTLAND OR 97204-3440

W9127N 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127N18R0052

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

Every prospective offeror wanting to be considered for the award of the job order under this RFP must hold a MSRA for overhaul of the YAQUINA with USACE, Portland District. If a prospective offeror wants to submit a proposal for this job order and has not entered into a MSRA for overhaul of the YAQUINA with Portland District, that prospective offeror shall follow the instructions in Sections L and M to be considered for the award of the job order under this RFP.

The job order contemplated by this RFP will be awarded on the basis of the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process using technical (non-price) and price factors specific to the tasks in the job order.

The LPTA source selection process shall be used in accordance with FAR Part 15.101-2. There are three (3) non-price evaluation factors consisting of Factor 1 – Preliminary Production Schedule, Factor 2 – Site Visit Attendance, and Factor 3 – Past Performance; price shall be evaluated separately. To receive consideration for award of the job order under this RFP, a rating of no less than ‘Acceptable’ must be achieved for all non-price evaluation factors.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with Offerors, except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a); therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

For evaluation purposes, the Government will calculate the overall price of each proposal by adding the total price proposed for CLIN 0001 (Category A) Price Schedule, the total price proposed for the Anticipated Items (Category B) Pricing Schedule, and the location adjustment described below. Additional details are explained below under Factor 4 – Price.

FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each proposal:

VOLUME I: Technical Proposal

Factor 1 – Preliminary Production Schedule;

Factor 2 – Site Visit Attendance;

Factor 3 – Past Performance; and

VOLUME II: Price

Factor 4 – Price.

EVALUATION APPROACH

FACTOR 1 – PRELIMINARY PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

To receive a rating of “Acceptable” under Factor 1 – Preliminary Production Schedule, an Offeror shall submit a schedule that includes all Preliminary Production Schedule Items identified in Section C – Technical Provisions and shows their completion within the period of performance (POP) of the job order. A proposal that fails to include all required items or fails to identify their performance and completion within the POP specified in the RFP, shall receive a rating of “Unacceptable” under Factor 1 – Preliminary Production Schedule.

FACTOR 1

PRELIMINARY PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the RFP.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the RFP.

FACTOR 2 – SITE VISIT ATTENDANCE

A mandatory site visit is required for this RFP. There are no submission requirements for this factor. The Contracting Officer and/or Contract Specialist will be present at each organized site visit and will have a sign in sheet for all attendees to fill out as record of attendance. As long as the Offeror is represented, signs the attendance sheet, and is present throughout one of the organized site visits, the Offeror will received a rating of ‘Acceptable’ under this factor. If an Offeror is not represented, does not sign the attendance sheet, or is not present throughout one of the organized site visits, the offeror will be assigned an ‘Unacceptable’ rating for this factor.

FACTOR 2

SITE VISIT ATTENDANCE

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the RFP.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the RFP.

FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE

The Government will pull past performance evaluations on projects for the last 24 months, which are similar in size and scope to the requirements of this RFP. This information will be used to evaluate past performance for this Job Order. The Government reserves the right to pull past performance information from all available sources to include, but are not limited to: past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), Wide Area Workflow (WAWF), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. No further submissions are required.

Past Performance will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis as follows:

FACTOR 3

PAST PERFORMANCE

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)).

Therefore the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

FACTOR 4 – PRICE

Offeror’s price for tasks shall represent the best price in response to the RFP. For evaluation purposes, the Government will calculate the overall evaluated price of proposals by adding the total price proposed for CLIN 0001 (Category A) Price Schedule, the total price proposed for the Anticipated Items (Category B) Pricing Schedule, and the location adjustment described below. This overall price will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 15.404, Proposal Analysis, to determine the lowest-price, technically-acceptable proposal. Unit prices shall be evaluated to determine fairness, reasonableness and if unbalanced pricing exists. Per FAR 15.404-1(g), unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated. If cost or price analysis techniques indicate that a proposal is unbalanced, the Contracting Officer shall consider the risks to the Government associated with the unbalanced pricing. NOTE:

A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer, determines that the unbalanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

LOCATION ADJUSTMENT

The Dredge YAQUINA's current FY18 operating schedule directs dredging in the Columbia River near Portland/Vancouver prior to entry into and upon departure from the shipyard. The Columbia River is the largest, most dynamic navigation channel and dredging is required throughout the year to maintain adequate depth. The YAQUINA will be the only dredge available in February 2019. The YAQUINA will be required to dredge the Columbia River immediately before and after the shipyard availability. Portland is the homeport for the vessel and the home duty station for crews per union agreement. Therefore, Portland will be used as the reference point for round-trip travel for the purpose of comparing proposals. Due to the unknown location of the overhaul and the cost impact associated with the logistical concerns identified below, a location adjustment will be added to every proposal to obtain a total evaluated price. The rate will be calculated based on the offeror’s location where services will be rendered:

1. If the offeror’s location where services will be rendered is within 300 nautical miles of Portland, OR:

Location adjustments will not be required.

2. If the offeror’s location where services will be rendered is beyond 300 nautical miles of Portland, OR. The location adjustment will contain the following multiple factors.

a. Dredge Vessel Transportation: For the purpose of comparing proposals only, the Government’s cost to transport dredge from the homeport, to and from the offeror’s facilities. Costs include roundtrip travel.

i. FY19 YAQUINA cost is $2.36 per Gallon.

Consumption 3000 Gallons Per Day 3000 glns x $2.36 = $7,080 per day

11.5 nautical mile/hour = 276 nautical miles/day Cost per nautical mile = $7,080/276 = $25.65/nautical mile Total Cost = distance between excess of 300 NM from YAQUINA homeport and offeror's facilities x

2 x $25.65 (cost per Nautical Mile).

b. Crew members: For the purpose of comparing proposals only, the Government’s cost for forty-four (44)

Government employee crew members from Portland to the offeror’s facilities. Costs include roundtrip travel but not per diem (assume liveaboard ship). Crew change every 2 weeks = 5 trips x 44 crew members = 220 individual air-fare; 5 trips x 2 vans per trip = 10 van trips.

c. Non-Crew member: For the purpose of comparing proposals only, the Government’s cost for on-site non-crew personnel and tools/equipment from Portland to the offeror’s facilities. Costs include roundtrip travel and daily per diem.

Periodic meetings for two (2) management personnel (2 days every 2 weeks) = 2 x 2 x 6 trips = 24 days per diem. One contract specialist and one COR on site (75 days, travel every 2 weeks) = 2 x 75 = 150 days per diem. Four (4) port engineers (75 days, travel every 2 weeks) = 4 x 75 = 300 days per diem. Three (3) moorings shop personnel including supervisor (75 days, travel every 2 weeks) = 3 x 75 = 225 days per diem. Total per diem = 24 + 150 + 300 + 225 = 669 699 days. Total trips = 75/14 (roundup to whole) = 6; 6 trips x 10 personnel = 60 individual air-fare; 6 trips x 7 cars per trip = 42 car trips. Total transportation of tools and equipment = one roundtrip freight fee = ~$2.50 per mile (on road). For shipyards not accessable by road from Portland OR, a $10,000.00 freight fee will be added in replacement of $2.50 per mile.

d. The rates will be pulled from published standard DOD rates, such as GSA airfare rates and location per diem charts. Nautical mileage will be pulled from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s publication entitled ‘Distance between United States Ports – 2012 (12th Edition).’

e. References:

http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/104877 http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100715 http://www.transtats.bts.gov/Distance.asp?pn=0 http://www.defensetravel.dod.mil/Docs/DomesticCeilingRates.pdf https://www.google.com/maps/@

NWP Logistics Office (GSA minivan daily rate) U.S. Department of Commerce’s publication entitled “Distance between United States Ports. – 2012 (12th Edition).”

(End of Summary of Changes)