W9127821R0012-0001 SF-30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1. Please acknow ledge this amendment in block 14 of the SF33.

2. Correct Solicitation Number from W912782R0012 to W9127821R0012 in Section L (PARAGRAPH 1.3).

3. All other parts of the solicitation reamin unchanged

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 10-Mar-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9127821R0012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Feb-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Mar-2021

CODE

ENDIST MOBILE CONTRACTING DIVISION

109 ST JOSEPH ST

MOBILE AL 36602

W91278 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127821R0012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

1.0 Introduction. This is a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, competitive, Unrestricted, Best Value - Tradeoff, source selection solicitation. In this source selection, the Government intends to make one (1) award of a Firm Fixed Price contract resulting from this solicitation. The term of this contract will be for one base year and three 1-year options. Each competing Prime Contractor, hereinafter referred to as the “Offeror”, shall submit a proposal that includes the required submission information found in this Section L, to demonstrate the Offeror’s capabilities to perform the work described in this Request for Proposal (RFP) at a fair and reasonable price. By submission of a proposal, the Offeror accedes to all the terms of this RFP. RFP Section M outlines the proposal evaluation process and the basis for award. Below is project specific, proposal submittal instructions to the Offeror based on requirements important to this solicitation. The Offeror must follow the instructions and incorporate the requirements into their proposal.

1.1 Who May Submit. Any responsible business organized as a prime contractor that is eligible for Honduran security clearances shall be allowed to make an offer for this work.

1.2 Project Description. In general, this project is described in RFP Section C, Statement of Work.

Reference all of Section C, and other Sections and Appendices for the entire scope of effort required.

1.3 Request for Information. Any questions about this solicitation, including technical questions about Technical Provisions (TP’s), shall be submitted via the Bidder Inquiry Portal in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org/projnet. Questions should be submitted no later than April 2, 2021, 2:00 p.m. Central Time to allow time for a response, and an amendment to the solicitation, if necessary. On this date and time, the portal will be closed. For technical questions, no other means of communication (e-mail, fax or telephone) will be accepted. Oral exchanges between offerors and the Government prior to award of the contract will not be binding.

In addition to the information available to the Offerors on the Bidder Inquiry Portal, any information concerning this solicitation will be furnished to all Offerors as an amendment to the solicitation if the information is necessary to the submittal of offers.

To submit and review inquiries, an Offeror needs to be a current registered user of the ProjNet system. To register, go to https://www.projnet.org/projnet, click the “BID” tab, select “Bidder Inquiry”, select agency “USACE”, enter the “Bidder Inquiry Key” for the solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, and then click login. Complete all required information and then click “Create User”. Verify that information on the next screen is correct and click “Continue”.

From this page you can view all bidder inquiries for this solicitation or submit an inquiry. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via e-mail, and the Mobile District’s technical team will post a response to the ProjNet system after it has been processed.

SOLICITATION NUMBER is: W912782R0012 W9127821R0012

BIDDER INQUIRY KEY is: QHDTFI-XEUVPB

Note: Any inquiry submitted and answered within this system, will be accessible to view by all interested Offerors on this solicitation.

If there are any conflicts between the solicitation and the responses provided in the ProjNet system, the solicitation governs. Changes to the solicitation will be made by amendment.

1.4 Pre-Proposal Conference.

a. A Virtual Site Visit and Pre-proposal Conference will be conducted by Teleconference March 17, 2021.

The purpose of the conference is to familiarize the offerors with the site, statement of work, address offeror questions concerning the work, and familiarize the offerors with the best value process. Teleconference phone access: 1-844-800-2712 US Toll Free, Int Toll 1-669-234-1177, Access Code 1997205190.

b. Attendance at the pre-proposal conference is strongly recommended. All interested Offerors are urged and expected to attend the scheduled site visit and to inspect the site(s) where work will be performed.

(Reference FAR 52.237-1 Site Visit)

c. The number of attendees for the pre-proposal conference is limited to three (3) from each firm. The

Offeror is to provide the names of individuals that will be attending on company letterhead to ivan.oliveri@usace.army.mil and cesar.m.sabillon@usace.army.mil by March 10, 2021 as follows: Name, title, color passport or alternate official identification document photocopy and phone number of each individual. The Soto Cano Field Office, Corps of Engineers phone number is 011-504-2234-4634, extensions 4433 or 5079.

d. Information obtained during the site survey, but not included in the scope of work, is not contractually binding.

1.5 Proposal Submission Address and Deadline: Submit the electronic proposal package to the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers via DoD SAFE (https://safe.apps.mil/) as indicated on the Standard Form 33 (SF33) in this solicitation. Emailed submissions of proposals are not permitted and will not be accepted under any circumstances. DoD SAFE provides a time stamped notification to the Government when a file is uploaded. The Government must receive your proposal no later than the time and date specified on the SF33. DoD SAFE requires a unique “Request for Drop-Off” code in order to upload proposal files. Offerors must contact the Point of Contact listed on the SF33 to obtain unique “Request for Drop-Off” code. All amendments to the solicitation shall be acknowledged by signing on each amendment and by completing the SF33. Offerors shall confirm proposal receipt by calling the Point of Contact listed on the SF33.

1.6 Proposal Format Requirements. Submit the proposals in two separate volumes, labeled with quantities as follows:

Submit one (1) electronic copy of the entire proposal (“Volume I and II”) in Portable Document File (PDF) format. Label the pdf “Volumes I and II”.

Submit one (1) electronic copy of Volume I in Portable Document File (PDF) format. Label the pdf “Volume I”.

Hard copies are not required to be submitted and will not be accepted or evaluated. However, when formatting the PDF files the page size should be 8-1/2” x 11” for all pages except schedules and organizational charts, as applicable, which should be 11” x 17” (counts as one sheet toward page limitation).

1.6.1 To evaluate proposals effectively and equitably, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) must receive information, in the order described below, that clearly describes an Offeror's capabilities to successfully execute the project as required by this RFP. It is therefore an Offeror’s responsibility to submit proposal information that is fully responsive to the submission requirements of this section. Offerors are responsible for organizing material sequentially under tabs and numbered pages as set out below to facilitate evaluation. Materials that are not properly organized may easily be overlooked during evaluations, possibly affecting an Offeror’s rating. Offers should be concise, addressing only the information outlined in this section.

2.0 Specific Proposal Submission Requirements. The submission criteria are listed in the chart below in the order of relative importance.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND ORDER OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

Volume I Description Order of Relative Importance

Factor 1 Technical Approach and Methodology

1st in relative importance

Factor 2 Personnel and Management Plan 2nd in relative importance/less important than Factor 1

Factor 3 Past Performance of the Prime Contractor

3rd in relative importance/less important than Factors 1 and 2

Volume II Price (including Administrative Requirements)

Not rated.

2.1 Submit required information in Volume I under the tabs indicated above chart and number all pages. Do not provide any price information in Volume I. The maximum page limitation to include charts, tables, etc. is limited to 150 pages. Any information past this number will not be reviewed.

2.2 VOLUME I– Factor 1, Technical Approach and Methodology. There are six (6) aspects which will be used for evaluation of this factor to determine the offeror's ability to achieve the requirements stated in the Scope of Work. All aspects are equally weighted and only one rating will be determined for this Factor. Broad general statements that merely mimic, repeat, paraphrase, or promise general performance are not sufficient.

2.2.1 Provide manufacturer, make & model number of generators, catalog cuts for major equipment items to be supplied, and concept drawings for how the generators will be located within the site include dimensions and distances to clearly show the generators can be accommodated within the area. Indicate if the generators will be new or refurbished, provide manufacturer’s ratings, fuel consumption estimates, overload/redundancy specifications, if the generator is not new indicate the date of the last major overhaul, indicate the major overhaul intervals for all generators, how many overhauls can be completed, and similar items of concern should be included to support all claims of performance for each generator. New units will be preferred and evaluated higher.

2.2.2 Discuss your plan to coordinate and install required equipment to include phasing out the old equipment and installation of the new equipment.

2.2.3 Provide a schedule that details the removal of the old equipment and installation of the new equipment to show how all requirements will be met on schedule.

2.2.4 Discuss your plan to operate and maintain the power generation facility on a day-to-day basis.

2.2.5 Discuss your plan to transition from prime to standby power to include timeframe, staffing, and roles and responsibilities.

2.2.6 Provide a checklist with the services to be provided and at what intervals for maintaining the PV Farm.

2.3 VOLUME I – Factor 2, Personnel and Management Plan. There are five (5) aspects which will be used for evaluation of this factor to determine the offeror's ability to achieve the requirements stated in the Scope of Work. All aspects are equally weighted and only one rating will be determined for this Factor.

2.3.1 Provide resumes for key personnel, including the Project Manager, Superintendent, and the electrical personnel who will be applied to the operation and maintenance effort (Option Years – Energy Services) of the contract. Also discuss program management controls and levels of authority.

2.3.2 Provide a simple organizational chart, to illustrate the management approach. The Offeror may use foldout(s) not to exceed 11” x 17”. Clearly show which management positions are located at the home office and which management positions will be located on-site. Clearly show the lines of authorities discussed in paragraph 2.3.1. If the

Offeror is a Joint Venture, discuss the Joint Venture’s executive team’s role and how it intends to manage this contract.

2.3.3 Identify any proposed subcontractors and the extent of the effort to be subcontracted. Provide statements from the subcontractors indicating ability to provide effort or services in time required.

2.3.4 Provide a draft Safety Plan in accordance with EM-385-1-1, latest version.

2.3.5 Provide a draft Quality Control Plan clearly to include but not limited to discussing levels of authority, inspection, control, and corrective measures.

2.4 VOLUME I – Factor 1, Past Performance of the Prime Contractor. The contractor noted on the SF 33 is considered the Prime Contractor and Offeror. The Offeror is to provide its past performance information regarding recent and relevant efforts and the quality of those efforts to demonstrate its accomplishments and capabilities to successfully perform and accomplish the effort required by this RFP. Past performance information includes the following: (a) Relevant Company Effort and (b) Quality of Past Performance.

Where the word "project” and/or “effort(s)" appears in RFP Sections L and M, it is understood to mean a single contract. Examples of project effort submitted by Offeror may be projects performed for a State or Federal Government agency or for a commercial or private sector customer. If the Offeror is submitting projects or efforts performed under a “task order type contract”, each task order shall be considered a separate project. In other words, do not combine tasks order projects and present them as one project.

Where the word “recent” appears it is understood to a project for which (1) the contract is 100% complete within six (6) years of the RFP issue date; (2) the contract has a base period of one year or less with additional option periods available, and the base period is 100% complete by the RFP issue date and an option period has been exercised; or (3) the contract has a period of performance in excess of one year or includes a base period in excess of one year, and the contract or base period is at least 50% complete as of the RFP issue date.

“Relevant” past performance information is one indicator of an Offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully. Where the word “relevant” appears it is understood to mean a single project that is similar and logically connected to the context of this solicitation in terms of scope (dollar value, size, project type), and magnitude of effort and complexities as the work described in this solicitation.

2.4.1 (a) RELEVANT COMPANY EFFORT. The Offeror is to submit no more than five (5) examples of its most “recent” and “relevant” project efforts performed as a prime contractor to demonstrate its company’s accomplishments on contracts similar to the effort required in this solicitation. Particularly as it relates to similar prime power generation projects and level of experience in similar physical and political environments, particularly as it relates to delivery, installation, operation and long term maintenance of power generation plants in remote areas of the world, particularly in countries in Central and South America. If the Offeror submits more than five projects, only the first five projects shall be evaluated. For each “recent” and “relevant” project example, the Offeror shall submit a separate and fully completed Prime Contractor Project Data Sheet (Attachment 1 at the end of this section).

(b) QUALITY OF PAST PERFORMANCE. The Offeror shall submit evidence of the quality of its past performance for all projects submitted paragraph 2.4.1(a) by providing a completed and signed contractor Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2 at the end of this section).

PPQ’s received after the proposal receipt date will not be considered timely and will not be included in the Offeror’s proposal.

2.4.1.1 Joint Venture Submission Requirements. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) in the name of the Joint Venture. The Offeror, that is the JV, must provide no more than five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV’s ability to perform the work required in this solicitation as required by Paragraph 2.2.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b).

2.4.1.2 If the Offeror, that is the JV, cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV to meet the requirement, the Offeror must provide “recent”, “relevant” projects that it has performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by any JV member in their individual capacities. In this instance, the total number of projects submitted shall be no more than five (5), regardless of the combination of JV projects and JV member projects.

2.4.1.3 If the Offeror, that is the JV, has no “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV, then members of the JV must provide a combined total of no more than five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by either member of the JV that reflects the JV member’s ability to perform the work required in this solicitation as required by Paragraph 2.4.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b).

2.4.2 Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the past performance record of cited projects or other recent projects not submitted by reviewing information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), or other Government appraisal systems or to interview owner or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to address.

2.4.3 All Business Entities: To satisfy Paragraph 2.4.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b), only information pertaining to the corporate entity listed on the SF 33 will be considered in the evaluation. The individual experience of key personnel will not be considered. Information documented in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and PPIRS related to a parent company, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, predecessor companies, and other related entities will be considered for responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104-6, but will not be considered in the evaluation.

2.5 VOLUME II PRICE and ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS. In Volume II, the Offeror is to submit the following:

(1) Signed and dated Standard Form (SF) 33 and Section B, acknowledging any and all amendments by completion of Block 14 of the SF33;

(2) Proposal Data Sheet (See Attachment 3 at the end of this section);

(3) Section K (Representation and Certifications contained at FAR Clause 52.219-1 in Section K or a copy from the offeror’s SAM registration;

(4) Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable): If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, a copy of the fully executed

Joint Venture Agreement must be provided. When bidding as a Joint Venture, each member of the Joint Venture must complete the Representations and Certifications unless the Joint Venture Agreement designates one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the Joint Venture.

Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may render the bid non-responsive. For 8(a) Joint Ventures, the Offeror shall also submit evidence that it has notified and discussed the proposed Joint Venture with its SBA Servicing office.

(5) Banking Institution (Requested for pre-award verification: Name, Address, Point of Contact, and Phone

Number)

(6) Notice of Exceptions. Offeror shall identify any exceptions, deviations or waivers from the solicitation in the Notice of Exceptions Form (See Attachment 4 at the end of this section).

ATTACHMENT 1

Prime Contractor Project Data Sheet

The Offeror shall provide the following information to show examples of the prime contractor’s company’s recent, relevant, specialized experience in similar type work. Use separate sheets for each project example.

1. Company Name:

2. Name of Project:

3. Location of Project:

4. Owner (i.e. customer work was completed for):

5. Cost for this single contract:

6. Narrative Description of General Scope of Project/Contract as it relates to this solicitation (use additional pages as necessary):

7. Your Role (Prime, Subcontractor, Joint Venture, etc.) and type work Your Company Self-Performed other than management:

8. Contract type:

(Firm Fixed Price, Cost Plus Award Fee, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Hybrid, etc.)

9. Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted Out:

10. Dates Project: Began Completed (Month/Year) (Month/Year)

11. Were You Terminated? _____ If yes, attach an explanation. Were you assessed Liquidated Damages? _____ If yes, attach an explanation. Provide comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the owner or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions (use additional pages as necessary):

12. Name and contact information (telephone/email/etc.) of Owner’s point of contact:

(ATTACHMENT 2)

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Part 1 of 3

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS

DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO

SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE

SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC

INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

(ATTACHMENT 2 con’t) Part 2 of 3

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(NA) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

(ATTACHMENT 2 con’t)

Part 3 of 3

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U NA

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U NA

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U NA

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U NA

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U NA

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U NA

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U NA

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U NA

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U NA

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U NA

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U NA

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U NA

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U NA

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U NA

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U NA

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U NA

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U NA

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U NA

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U NA

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U NA

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U NA

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U NA

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U NA

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U NA

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U NA

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U NA

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

(ATTACHMENT 3)

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

In addition to the completed and signed SF 33, submit the Proposal Data Sheet and include in Volume II Administrative Requirements.

1. Name of Solicitation:

2. Offering Firm’s Name As Appears on the SF 33:

Offering Firm’s DUNS number as it appears on the SF 33:

Offering Firm’s CAGE code as it appears on the SF 33:

3. Mailing Address:

4. Telephone Number

5. Fax Number:

6. E-mail Address to use for all correspondence

7. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. Far 52.215-11. The Offeror represents that the following person(s) are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposal (RFP).

List name(s), title, and telephone numbers of authorized negotiator(s).

Name of Person(s) Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator’s Address:

Negotiator’s Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

ATTACHMENT 4

NOTICE OF EXCEPTIONS

Any exceptions, deviations or waivers from the solicitation shall be specifically identified below.

If none, state so. Any exception, deviation or waiver not specifically identified below, regardless of whether it is included in the proposal, shall be deemed invalid. May supplement with additional pages if necessary.

(End of Summary of Changes)