W9127820R0046 AM01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

W9127820R0046-0001 18 NOV 2020 MBF20022

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY(If other than item 6)

CODE

Corps of Engineers 109 St. Joseph St.

Mobile, AL 36602

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

W9127820R0046

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

5 NOV 2020

10A. MODIFICATION OF

CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible) The subject solicitation for: TWO-PHASE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ZONE 8 SECURITY FORCES MOBILITY STORAGE, TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

Is modified in the following: REFER TO THE ENCLOSED SPECIFICATION REVISIONS FOR AMENDMENT NO. 0001.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document reference in item 9A or 10A, as Heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICE (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of contracting officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

TWO-PHASE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF ZONE 8 SECURITY W9127820R0046

FORCES MOBILITY STORAGE, TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA MBF20022

SF 30 Page 2 Amendment No. 0001

PART I-REVISIONS MADE BY ADDED AND/OR REPLACEMENT PARAGRAPHS/PAGES/SECTIONS

The items listed below are to be replaced by the corresponding added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections. Added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections are indicated by a note in bottom right hand corner of each paragraph or page. Added sections are hereby made a part of the contract and are to be inserted in the specification in the proper numerical/alphabetical sequence.

Within the specifications, deletions from the specifications are indicated by strikethrough, e.g.: deletions are marked with strikethrough and additions to the specifications including revisions/substitutions are indicated in bold, italic and underlined, e.g.: additions are indicated thus.

Corresponding Added or Revised Paragraph SECTION Page, and/or Section

00 11 00 Revised Paragraphs 4.3, 5.3 and 5.4

00 12 00 Revised Paragraph 1.3

01 00 01 Revised Paragraph 7

Encl as stated:

Revised pages of the specifications as indicated in Part I.

00 11 00 Revised by Amendment No. W9127820R0046-0001

4.3 Volume II – Tab B C, Factor 2 – Overall Management Approach.

4.3.1 In Factor 2, the Offeror must submit an overall management approach narrative to explain their company’s ability to execute the contract. The response to Factor 2 shall be limited to twenty (20) pages. Address each of the following items in the narrative:

(a) Describe the home office organizational structure, allocation of responsibilities, and show the lines of authority to support the execution of this design-build contract. At a minimum, discuss key management positions and departments, project team composition for both design and construction, to include subcontractors, etc. Include an organizational chart and ensure the information fully supports the narrative.

(b) List the type(s) of work the Offeror intends to self-perform other than construction management services.

(c) Describe the Offeror’s business method for selecting subcontractors and for managing subcontract acquisition, execution and administration, including the technical approach to correcting deficient work performed by subcontractors.

5.3 Evaluation of Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor. Factor 1 will be rated using relevancy ratings and a confidence rating applied as described below.

(1) An Offeror’s “Relevant Company Effort” information will be evaluated to determine if the construction and design projects submitted are “recent”, and “relevant”. For this solicitation, the Government will give more consideration for: design-build construction project on military installations; for dollar value similar to those anticipated under this solicitation; projects where the Offeror performed as the prime contractor, as opposed to a subcontractor.

Additionally, more consideration will be given to a project portfolio that reflects successful performance of a diversity of construction and repair type projects similar to those described by this solicitation.

This project is for the design and construction of a 3,000 10,000 square-foot Mobility Storage Facility for Security Forces Squadron to store their deployment and readiness equipment. The facility includes reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel frame with masonry walls, and standing seam metal roof. The project includes all utilities, site improvements, pavements, detection/protection features, security enhancements and other supporting work necessary to make a complete and usable facility.

Privatized utility connections to a point of demarcation will be provided for electrical; Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative (GCEC), water; GCEC, and gas;

Peoples Gas Systems (PGS).

(Note: The remainder of Paragraph 5.3 is unchanged by this amendment.)

5.4 Evaluation of Factor 2 – Overall Management Approach. The SSEB will evaluate the management approach narrative to assess the Offeror’s overall organizational structure, self-performance, and management of subcontractors to ensure it reflects an understanding of the requirements of the solicitation. The overall management approach will be assessed for understanding, logic, and reasonableness. The Government will give more consideration for narratives that demonstrate the integration of design aspects for the duration of the project. The SSEB will determine the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies, if any, in the approach presented, and then assign an overall combined technical/risk ratings as listed below.

Combined Technical/Risk Rating and Definitions OUTSTANDING Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

GOOD Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

MARGINAL Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

UNACCEPTABLE

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

The technical risk rating reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum technical requirements. The technical risk rating definitions in support of the above referenced table are as follows:

a) Low – Low risk means the proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

b) Moderate – Moderate risk means the proposal contains a significant weakness of combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

c) High – High risk means the proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.

Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

d) Unacceptable – Unacceptable risk means the proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

(Note: The remainder of the section is unchanged by this amendment.)

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

00 12 00

00 12 00

1.3 This project is for the design and construction of a 3,000 10,000 square-foot Mobility Storage Facility for Security Forces Squadron to store their deployment and readiness equipment. The facility includes reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel frame with masonry walls, and standing seam metal roof. The project includes all utilities, site improvements, pavements, detection/protection features, security enhancements and other supporting work necessary to make a complete and usable facility.

Privatized utility connections to a point of demarcation will be provided for electrical; Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative (GCEC), water; GCEC, and gas;

Peoples Gas Systems (PGS). Specific and detailed scope information of the project is as indicated in this solicitation.

01 00 01

01 00 01

7. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

Project consists of design and construction of a 3000 SF = 279 SM 10,000 SF Mobility Storage Facility for Security Forces Squadron to store their deployment and readiness equipment. The facility includes reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel frame with masonry walls, and standing seam metal roof. The project includes all utilities, site improvements, pavements, detection/protection features, security enhancements and other supporting work necessary to make a complete and usable facility. Privatized utility connections to a point of demarcation will be provided for electrical; Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative (GCEC), water; GCEC, and gas; Peoples Gas Systems (PGS).

NOTE: The above general outline of features of the work does not in any way limit the responsibility of the Contractor to perform all work and furnish all plant, labor, equipment and materials required by the specifications and the drawings referred to therein. The cost of this work is estimated to be between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.00.

End of Paragraph