W9127818R0001 - Phase 1 Solicitation.PDF
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127818R0001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9127818R0001-0001 Amendment_Modification.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PHASE ONE
THIS SOLICITATION IS ADVERTISED ON AN UNRESTRICTED BASIS
SOLICITATION NO: W9127818R0001
SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
TWO-PHASE
SOUTH REGION UNRESTRICTED
MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT
(MATOC)
MOBILE DISTRICT AOR
INCLUDES SAMPLE PROJECT:
[TO BE IDENTIFIED IN PHASE TWO]
“GOOD ENGINEERING RESULTS IN A BETTER ENVIRONMENT”
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, MOBILE
109 St. Joseph St Mobile, Alabama 36602
BUILDING STRONG®
Note: THERE ARE NO SAMPLE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS IN THIS PHASE. One solicitation will be issued covering both phases. Proposals will be evaluated in Phase One to determine which Offerors will submit proposals for Phase Two, and an amendment will be issued to those selected Offerors. Selection of Offerors for involvement in Phase Two will be based on requirements stated in Section 00 11 00. Detailed project design requirements will then be added by amendment to the solicitation at the start of the Phase Two stage of the Request For Proposals.
Two-Phase South Region Unrestricted MATOC W9127818R0001 Mobile District AOR
CHECKLIST FOR PREPARATION OF OFFERS (PHASE ONE)
Before sending your offer to us, review it for the following documents--without these, your offer could be rejected.
If you have questions, confusion, or doubts, submit questions via the Bidder Inquiry Portal in ProjNet as described in Section 01 00 01 Paragraph REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION.
This checklist is designed for your convenience to assist you in completing your offer. Its completion does not guarantee that your offer will be acceptable. A complete and acceptable offer is solely the responsibility of the Contractor.
1. Your attention is directed to the following clause:
Section 00 45 00, FARS Clause 52.204-7, “System for Award Management”. LACK OF
REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL RENDER OFFEROR INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.
Information on how to register and the time it takes is detailed in the clause.
2. Standard Form 1442 Titled “SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD”
a. Is it signed in Block 20B? Yes (Y)___Not Applicable(NA) ___
b. Have you verified with the Project Office that you have received all Amendments? Have you acknowledged all Amendments using block 19? Y__ NA__
c. Is the complete, correct address of the company printed in Block 14? Y__ NA__
(ALSO INCLUDE YOUR TIN, DUNS, AND CAGE NUMBERS IN THIS BLOCK)
d. Are the correct phone numbers, and fax numbers including country codes, included in Block 15? Y__
NA__
e. If the mailing address of the company is different from the address in Block 14, is the mailing address written in Block 16? Y__ NA__
f. If you are a Partnership or Joint Venture, have all partners or joint ventures signed in Block 20; or has authority properly been delegated pursuant to the provisions of the solicitation clause entitled JOINT VENTURE
BID REQUIREMENTS? Y__ NA__
g. . If you are a Joint Venture have you submitted your Joint Venture Agreement and taken the other actions necessary to comply with the “Joint Venture Bid Requirement” Clause? Y__ NA__ h.. Is the time you are allowing for acceptance of the offer, the same or longer than the time set out in block 13?. Y__ NA__
3. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of the Offeror
Are all of the clauses in this section completed and signed in the appropriate places and returned attached to the offer? Y__ NA__
4. Organizational Conflict of Interest
If there are any Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) issues that may arise for the prime and any team members/ subcontractors in performance of the contract, provide an explanation of those issues and a plan to avoid, neutralize, or mitigate potential conflicts. If no OCI issues are applicable, so state.
5. Technical Documents that Pertain to Evaluation Factors, Award will be based on the specific factors set out in the Section 00 11 00, “PHASE ONE - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA.”
a. Have you responded to all the evaluation factors (if required by the solicitation)? Y__ NA__
b. Is a summary of the experience and special qualifications of your Administration staff included (if required by the solicitation)? Y__ NA__
c. Is a quality control plan included (if required by the solicitation)? Y__ NA__
d. Are time tables and schedules included (if required by the solicitation)? Y__ NA__
e. Is a current audit of your company’s financial status included or a certificate attached to a past audit stating the financial status has not changed since the time of the past audit (if required by the solicitation)? Y__
NA__
f. Is a list of the contracts you are currently working on attached (if required by the solicitation)? Y__
NA__
g. Have you included a list of the names and phone numbers of references for whom you have done past contracts (if required by the solicitation)? Y__ NA__
All your documents must be in English
TABLE OF CONTENTS – PAGE 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHECKLIST FOR PREPARATION OF OFFERS (PHASE ONE)
BIDDING REQUIREMENTS
Contract Clauses
STANDARD FORM 1442 - SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD
STANDARD FORM 24 - BID BOND
STANDARD FORM 28 - AFFIDAVIT OF INDIVIDUAL SURETY
STANDARD FORM LLL - DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
00 11 00 PHASE ONE - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
00 12 00 PHASE TWO - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION
CRITERIA, SELECTION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF AWARD
00 21 16 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS
00 70 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES
CESAM FORM 1151, PROMPT PAYMENT CERTIFICATION AND SUPPORTING DATA
FOR CONTRACTOR PROGRESS PAYMENT INVOICE
SPECIFICATIONS
DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
01 00 01 GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
01 00 02 STATEMENT OF WORK/DESCRIPTION
01 00 04 OUTLINE OF THE TASK ORDER PROCESS OF A MATOC
01 10 12 DESIGN AFTER AWARD
01 45 00.15 10 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM)
END OF TABLE OF CONTENTS
This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.
SOLICITATION, OFFER
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
1. SOLICITATION NO.
W9127818R0001
2. TYPE OF
SOLICITATION
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
3. DATE ISSUED
24 JAN 2020
PAGES OF PAGES
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.
6. PROJECT NO.
7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, MOBILE
CONTRACTING DIVISION (CESAM-CT)
109 SAINT JOSEPH STREET
MOBILE, AL 36628-0001
SAME AS BLOCK 7
IF HAND CARRIED, CONTACT CT SPECIALIST
IDENTIFIED IN BLOCK 9
9. FOR INFORMATION
EMAIL : Kenneth Harlan
Kathleen Achord
A. NAME
Kenneth.P.Harlan@usace.army.mil Kathleen.A.Achord@usace.army.mil
B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
SOLICITATION
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):
Two-Phase South Region Unrestricted MATOC, Mobile District AOR The guaranteed minimum quantity of work which will be required under this contract and which will be initiated by one or more task orders, will not be less than $1,000.00 for the five (5) year term of the contract.
* See Section 01 00 00, Paragraph “COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK”. (TO BE PROVIDED IN PHASE 2) **Block 13A. : Refer to Section 00 11 00 for the number of copies to submit with the Phase 1 offer. Refer to Section 00 12 00 for the number of copies to submit with the Phase 2 offer
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within _8____ calendar days and complete it within __*__ calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed.
This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _ __ .)
12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
YES NO
12B. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
A. Sealed offers in original and ___**___ copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _1400_ (hour) local time 26 FEB 2020 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.
B. An offer guarantee is, is not required for the Seed Project in the Phase 2 proposal only.
C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
D. Offers providing less than __120__ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date Phase 2 offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101
STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)
Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)
CODE FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within _________ calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)
AMENDMENT NO.
DATE
20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER
(Type or print)
20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )
26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.
30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED
TO SIGN (Type or print)
31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
30B. SIGNATURE
30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY
31C. AWARD
DATE
STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)
BID BOND
(See instructions on reverse)
OMB Control Number: 9000-0045 Expiration Date: 7/31/2019
PRINCIPAL (Legal name and business address) TYPE OF ORGANIZATION ("X" one)
STATE OF INCORPORATION
SURETY(IES) (Name and business address)
PERCENT
OF BID
PRICE
PENAL SUM OF BOND
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
MILLION(S) THOUSAND(S) HUNDRED(S) CENTS
BID IDENTIFICATION
BID DATE INVITATION NUMBER
PRINCIPAL
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
1.
1. 2.
2.
3.
3.
(Seal) (Seal) (Seal) Corporate Seal
INDIVIDUAL SURETY(IES)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME(S)
(Typed)
1.
1.
2.
2.
(Seal) (Seal)
CORPORATE SURETY(IES)
SU
R
ET
Y
A
NAME &
ADDRESS
STATE OF INCORPORATION LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
1.
1.
2.
2. Corporate Seal
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
Previous edition is NOT usable
STANDARD FORM 24 (REV. 8/2016)
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.228(a)
FOR (Construction, Supplies or Services)
OBLIGATION:
We, the Principal and Surety(ies) are firmly bound to the United States of America (hereinafter called the Government) in the above penal sum. For payment of the penal sum, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally. However, where the Sureties are corporations acting as co-sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in such sum "jointly and severally" as well as "severally" only for the purpose of allowing a joint action or actions against any or all of us. For all other purposes, each Surety binds itself, jointly and severally with the Principal, for the payment of the sum shown opposite the name of the Surety. If no limit of liability is indicated, the limit of liability is the full amount of the penal sum.
CONDITIONS:
The Principal has submitted the bid identified above.
THEREFORE:
The above obligation is void if the Principal - (a) upon acceptance by the Government of the bid identified above, within the period specified therein for acceptance (sixty (60) days if no period is specified), executes the further contractual documents and gives the bond(s) required by the terms of the bid as accepted within the time specified (ten (10) days if no period is specified) after receipt of the forms by the principal; or (b) in the event of failure to execute such further contractual documents and give such bonds, pays the Government for any cost of procuring the work which exceeds the amount of the bid.
Each Surety executing this instrument agrees that its obligation is not impaired by any extension(s) of the time for acceptance of the bid that the Principal may grant to the Government.
Notice to the surety(ies) of extension(s) is waived. However, waiver of the notice applies only to extensions aggregating not more than sixty (60) calendar days in addition to the period originally allowed for acceptance of the bid.
WITNESS:
The Principal and Surety(ies) executed this bid bond and affixed their seals on the above date.
DATE BOND EXECUTED (Must not be later than bid opening date)
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement - This information collection meets the requirements of 44 USC § 3507, as amended by section 2 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. You do not need to answer these questions unless we display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 9000-0045. We estimate that it will take 25 minutes to read the instructions, gather the facts, and answer the questions. Send only comments relating to our time estimate, including suggestions for reducing this burden, or any other aspects of this collection of information to: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (M1V1CB), 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405.
JOINT VENTURE
OTHER (Specify)
PARTNERSHIPINDIVIDUAL
CORPORATION
INSTRUCTIONS
1. This form is authorized for use when a bid guaranty is required. Any deviation from this form will require the written approval of the Administrator of General Services.
2. Insert the full legal name and business address of the Principal in the space designated "Principal" on the face of the form. An authorized person shall sign the bond. Any person signing in a representative capacity (e.g., an attorney-in-fact) must furnish evidence of authority if that representative is not a member of the firm, partnership, or joint venture, or an officer of the corporation involved.
3. The bond may express penal sum as a percentage of the bid price. In these cases, the bond may state a maximum dollar limitation (e.g., 20% of the bid price but the amount not to exceed dollars).
4. (a) Corporations executing the bond as sureties must appear on the Department of the Treasury's list of approved sureties and must act within the limitations listed therein. The value put into the LIABILITY LIMIT block is the penal sum (i.e., the face value) of the bond, unless a co-surety arrangement is proposed.
(b) When multiple corporate sureties are involved, their names and addresses shall appear in the spaces (Surety A, Surety B, etc.) headed "CORPORATE SURETY(IES)." In the space designated "SURETY(IES)" on the face of the form, insert only the letter identifier corresponding to each of the sureties. Moreover, when co-surety arrangements exist, the parties may allocate their respective limitations of liability under the bond, provided that the sum total of their liability equals 100% of the bond penal sum.
(c) When individual sureties are involved, a completed Affidavit of Individual Surety (Standard Form 28) for each individual surety, shall accompany the bond.
The Government may require the surety to furnish additional substantiating information concerning its financial capability.
5. Corporations executing the bond shall affix their corporate seals. Individuals shall execute the bond opposite the word "Corporate Seal"; and shall affix an adhesive seal if executed in Maine, New Hampshire, or any other jurisdiction requiring adhesive seals.
6. Type the name and title of each person signing this bond in the space provided.
7. In its application to negotiated contracts, the terms "bid" and "bidder" shall include "proposal" and "offeror."
SU
R
ET
Y
B
NAME &
ADDRESS
STATE OF INCORPORATION LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
1.
1.
2.
2. Corporate Seal
Corporate Seal
LIABILITY LIMIT ($)STATE OF INCORPORATION
2.
2.
1.
1.NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME &
ADDRESS
SU
R
ET
Y
C
Corporate Seal
LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
2.
2.
STATE OF INCORPORATION
1.
1.
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME &
ADDRESS
SU
R
ET
Y
D
Corporate Seal
LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
2.
2.
STATE OF INCORPORATION
1.
1.
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME &
ADDRESS
SU
R
ET
Y
E
Corporate Seal
LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
2.
2.
STATE OF INCORPORATION
1.
1.
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME &
ADDRESS
SU
R
ET
Y
F
Corporate Seal
LIABILITY LIMIT ($)
2.
2.
STATE OF INCORPORATION
1.
1.
NAME(S) &
TITLE(S)
(Typed)
SIGNATURE(S)
NAME &
ADDRESS
SU
R
ET
Y
G
STANDARD FORM 24 (REV. 8/2016) BACK
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
(See reverse for public burden disclosure.)
1. Type of Federal Action:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
contract grant cooperative agreement loan loan guarantee loan insurance
2. Status of Federal Action:
a.
b.
c.
bid/offer/application initial award post-award
3. Report Type:
a.
b.
initial filing material change
For Material Change Only:
year quarter date of last report
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:
Congressional District, if known:
Prime Subawardee Tier , if known:
5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:
Congressional District, if known:
6. Federal Department/Agency:
7. Federal Program Name/Description:
CFDA Number, if applicable:
8. Federal Action Number, if known:
9. Award Amount, if known:
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity (if individual, last name, first name, MI):
b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a) (last name, first name, MI):
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary)
11. Amount of Payment (check all that apply):
$ actual planned
12. Form of Payment (check all that apply):
a.
b.
cash in-kind; specify: nature value
13. Type of Payment (check all that apply):
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
retainer one-time fee commission contingent fee deferred other; specify:
14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be Performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or Member(s) contacted, for Payment indicated in Item 11:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A, if necessary)
15. Continuation Sheet(s) SF-LLL-A attached: Yes No
Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C section 1352. This disclosure of lobbyig activities is a materia representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 . This information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
Telephone No.: Date:
Federal Use Only: Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL
Approved by OM 0348-0046
16.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C.
section 1352. The filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet for additional information if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information.
Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of a covered Federal action.
Identify the status of the covered Federal action.
Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.
Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier.
Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants.
If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks “Subawardee”, then enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.
Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.
Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.
Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number; Invitation for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g., “RFP-DE-90-001.”
For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.
(a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.
(b) Enter the full names of the individuals(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10 (a).
Enter Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).
Enter the amount of compensation paid or reasonably expected to be paid by the reporting entity (item 4) to the lobbying entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Check all boxes that apply. If this is a material change report, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be made.
Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If payment is made through an in-kind contribution, specify the nature and value of the in-kind payment.
Check the appropriate box(es). Check all boxes that apply. If other, specify nature.
Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that the lobbyist has performed, or will be expected to perform, and the date(s) of any services rendered. Include all preparatory and related activity, not just time spent in
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503.
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
CONTINUATION SHEET
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL-A
Approved by OM 0348-0046
Reporting Entity: Page of
*U.S. G.P.O. 1990-260-708:00012
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 1
SECTION 00 11 00
PHASE ONE - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
1.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS.
1.1 This is a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 15 and 36, competitive, design-build, construction solicitation for an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) to provide design, repair, and construction support for real property, facilities and/or their systems and components for military construction primarily in the south region of Mobile District. It is the intent of the Government to establish one (1) IDIQ MATOC pool of contractors that will compete for firm fixed-price task orders. The Offerors selected for the MATOC pool will be required to furnish all plant, labor supervision, tools, materials equipment, design and other items necessary to perform general renovation, repair, and new construction requirements. The MATOC will be used primarily in the south region of the Mobile District Area of Responsibility (AOR), but may be used anywhere in the Mobile District AOR.
1.2 The term of this contract is for five (5) years from date of contract award. The total contract capacity for the entire pool is $245 million over the life of the contracts. The guaranteed minimum payment is $1,000 per contract. Firm Fixed-Price task orders will be issued against the contracts.
1.3 In Phase One, price is not a submission requirement. Non-priced proposals will be evaluated in Phase One to determine which Offerors will submit proposals for Phase Two. Non-priced Phase One information will consider past performance information of the prime contractor, overall management approach, and a quality control approach. Based on the results of Phase One, the Government intends to select a target of five (5) of the most highly rated Offertors to participate in the Phase Two competition. However, the Government reserves the right to reject any and/all offers.
1.4 In Phase Two, Offerors will compete to determine which Offerors will be awarded an IDIQ contract and participate in the MATOC pool. For Phase Two, Offerors must submit non-priced information and will also be required to provide rates for key disciplines, overhead and other unit costs, and pricing for the sample project. The Government is not obligated to award an IDIQ contract to all Offerors competing in Phase Two. The Government reserves the right to reject any and/all offers in Phase Two.
2.0 WHO MAY SUBMIT.
2.1 In Phase One, any responsible, interested party may submit a proposal.
For Phase-Two, only the Offerors that are selected in Phase-One to participate in Phase-Two will be allowed to submit a proposal.
2.2 Any design firm that participated in preparation of this solicitation, whether as a Government contractor or as a subcontractor to a Government contractor, is not eligible to participate in this solicitation as a prime contractor or subcontractor due to a conflict of interest. The Government considers such firms to have an unfair competitive advantage, and therefore will not consider such firms.
3.0 PHASE ONE - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 2
3.1 Submit the proposal package to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at the address shown in Block 8 of Standard Form 1442 (SF 1442). If mailing the proposal, address the package to the contract specialist listed in block 9 of the SF 1442. If hand delivering the proposal, contact the contract specialist listed in block 9 of the SF 1442 via telephone upon delivering the proposal.
The Government must receive your proposal no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Any and all amendments to the solicitation shall be acknowledged by completion of Block 19 of the SF 1442.
3.2 Submit your proposal as follows:
Submit two (2) electronic copies of the entire proposal (“Volume I and II”) in Portable Document File (PDF) format on compact disks (CDs).
Place the CDs in an envelope clearly marked on the outside “Volumes I and II”.
Submit two (2) electronic copies of Volume II in Portable Document File (PDF) format on compact disk (CDs). Place the CDs in an envelope clearly mark on the outside “Volume II”.
Hard copies of Volumes I and II are not required to be submitted, and will not be accepted or evaluated. However, when formatting the PDF files the page size should be 8-1/2” x 11” for all pages except schedules and organizational charts, as applicable, which should be 11” x 17”.
3.3 To effectively and equitably evaluate proposals, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) must receive information, in the order described below, that clearly describes an Offeror's capabilities to successfully execute design and construction in support of this MATOC. It is therefore an Offeror’s responsibility to submit proposal information that is fully responsive to the submission requirements of this section. Offerors are responsible for organizing material sequentially under tabs and numbered pages as set out below to facilitate evaluation. Materials that are not properly organized may easily be overlooked during evaluations, possibly affecting an Offeror’s rating. Offers should be concise, addressing only the information outlined in this section.
4.0 PHASE ONE – EVALUATION CRITERIA.
4.1 There are two volumes required for Phase One. Volume I includes certain administrative requirements that are not rated. Volume II has three rated non-priced factors: Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor, Overall Management Approach, and Quality Control Approach.
PHASE ONE - EVALUATION FACTORS AND ORDER OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE
Volume Factor - Description Relative Importance
Volume I Administrative Requirements Not Rated
Volume II
- Tab A
Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor
1st in relative importance; more important than Factor 2
Volume II
– Tab B
Factor 2 – Overall Management Approach
2nd in relative importance; less important than Factor 1
Volume II
– Tab C
Factor 3 – Quality Control Approach
3rd in relative importance; less important than Factor 2
4.1.1 Volume I, Administrative Requirements. The information submitted under this tab is not rated but checked for compliance.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 3
(a) Submit a Standard Form (SF) 1442, completed and signed by an authorized representative of the Offeror. Also include a completed and signed Proposal Data Sheet (See Attachment 1).
(b) Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a JV. Include a fully executed Joint Venture Agreement.
(c) Submit an Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure:
The Offeror shall provide a disclosure statement with its proposal that concisely describes all the relevant facts concerning any past or present OCIs relating to this solicitation. If applicable, in the same statement, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Officer will make a decision on whether or not to terminate the contract. If no conflicts of interest exist, the Offeror shall provide a statement stating no Conflicts of Interest exist.
(d) All other documentation as identified in the Contract Clauses specifications sections within this solicitation.
4.2 Volume II - Tab A, Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor. The Past Performance of the Prime Contractor (Offeror) consists of (a) Relevant Company Effort and (b) Quality of Past Performance. The Government will review recent, relevant company efforts and quality information provided by the owners of those efforts to assess the Offeror’s past experience and probability of successfully performing the work described in this solicitation. For this factor, a recent, relevant project is a construction project:
(a) Performed under a contract or task order, as those terms are defined in FAR 2.101, for the Federal Government, or similar contractual agreements for State or Local Governments, or the commercial or private sector. (Multiple projects under a single contract or task order are considered one project. However, do not combine multiple projects under separate contracts or task orders to create a single project.);
(b) That is “recent”; one that has been completed within six (6) years of the solicitation issue date, or one where the construction is at least 50% complete (measured by performance period days) as of the solicitation issue date. (Offerors are responsible for providing start and completion dates for each completed project, or the start and scheduled completion dates for projects currently under construction.);
(c) That is “relevant”; one that is similar in scope (type, size, complexity and dollar value) to the project types described in this solicitation. In terms of dollar value, a relevant project is one ranging from $18M to $50M; however, projects outside of this dollar range may be considered when similar in scope and complexity. For a project to be assessed any degree of “relevancy” it must reflect performance of design, repair, and construction requirements as described by this solicitation.
4.2.1 (a) Relevant Company Effort: The Offeror shall provide no more than ten
(10) examples of recent, relevant construction projects performed as the prime construction contractor that demonstrate the company’s ability to
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 4
perform work similar in scope and magnitude to that required by this solicitation. For each project, the Offeror shall furnish the information specified below. Attachment 2, at the end of this section, may be used to present the information. The construction effort shown does not have to be a task order under an IDIQ contract, but where it is, clearly indicate so. If more than ten projects are submitted for evaluation, only the first ten (10) projects presented will be evaluated.
(1) Company Name
(2) Name of Project
(3) Location of Project
(4) Project Owner
(5) General Scope of Project
(6) Your Role and Construction Type Work Your Company Self-Performed on site other than Construction Management Services
(7) Construction Cost of the single project
(8) Extent and Type of Work Subcontracted Out
(9) Construction Period - Start and Completion/Scheduled Completion Dates (Provide Month/Year)
(10) Termination or Liquidated Damages Information; Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(b) Quality of Past Performance.
(1) The Offeror shall submit evidence of the quality of their past performance for each project. For Federal Government projects, the Offeror shall provide a completed contractor performance evaluation, whether interim or final, found in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (www.cpars.gov/). If a proper evaluation does not exist in CPARS, because it has not been completed or the project is a non-Federal Government project, the Offeror shall provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).
(See Attachment 3). If, at time of evaluation, a final contractor performance evaluation exists in CPARS, and yet the Offeror submits a PPQ, only the evaluation in CPARS will be considered.
(2) Past performance surveys/assessment/evaluation forms other than CPARS or PPQs are unacceptable and will not be considered or evaluated.
(3) Completed PPQs that were submitted in response to previous solicitations may be used in this source selection. However, Offerors shall not incorporate such PPQs by reference. The Offeror must resubmit PPQs for each submitted project within their proposal as evidence of quality of past performance. This does not, however, preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the Past Performance evaluation.
While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing current, detailed and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.
(4) If the CPARS or PPQs for each submitted project within the proposal indicate that the Offeror was required to take corrective action for any substandard performance or experienced other performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc., the Offeror should explain the circumstances and the corrective actions taken within their proposal.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 5
(5) If an Offeror’s client/customer will only provide completed PPQs directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, Offerors must ensure the client/customer submits the PPQ by the proposal due date using the following electronic mailing address: cesam.plansroom@sam.usace.army.mil. The solicitation number shall be included on the PPQ form. PPQs received after the proposal due date will be considered untimely and will not be considered during the evaluation.
4.2.2 Joint Venture Submission Requirements.
4.2.2.1 Like other Offerors, a JV Offeror shall provide no more than ten (10) examples of recent, relevant projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV’s ability to perform the work required in this solicitation.
4.2.2.2 If the JV Offeror does not have ten (10) projects performed as a JV, the Offeror may supplement those projects it performed as a JV with recent, relevant projects performed by the members of the JV in their individual capacities. In such instance, the total number of projects submitted by the JV shall be no more than ten (10).
4.2.2.3 If the JV Offeror has not previously performed as a JV, each member of the JV may submit recent, relevant projects performed in their individual capacities. The total number of projects submitted by the JV shall be no more than ten (10).
4.2.3 All Business Entities: To satisfy Paragraph 4.2.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b), only information pertaining to the corporate entity listed on the SF 1442 will be considered in the evaluation. Information related to a parent company, affiliates, divisions, subsidiaries, other related entities, subcontractors, or the individual experience of key personnel will not be considered.
4.2.4 Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the information on projects submitted for evaluation, and to review CPARS, or other Government project appraisal systems, for information on other projects performed by the Offeror whether submitted as part of a proposal or not. The Government also reserves the right to contact project clients/customer, or other references. For any adverse performance information found for which the Offeror has not had an opportunity to address, the Offeror will be afforded an opportunity to explain.
4.3 Volume II - Tab B, Factor 2 – Overall Management Approach.
4.3.1 In Factor 2, the Offeror must submit an overall management approach narrative to explain their company’s ability to execute the contract. The response to Factor 2 shall be limited to fifteen (15) pages. Address each of the following items in the narrative:
(a) Describe the home office organizational structure, allocation of responsibilities, and show the lines of authority to support the execution of this design-build contract. At a minimum, discuss key management positions and departments, project team composition for both design and construction, to include subcontractors, etc. Include an organizational chart and ensure the information fully supports the narrative.
(b) List the type(s) of work the Offeror intends to self-perform to meet contract requirements other than construction management services.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 6
(c) Describe the Offeror’s business method for selecting subcontractors and for managing subcontract acquisition, execution and administration, including the technical approach to correcting deficient work performed by subcontractors.
(d) Provide a description of the Offeror’s plan to ensure a safe environment for every job site. The discussion shall include the contractor’s plan for safe performance of the project requirements that would be required for a typical construction or repair project on a military installation.
4.4 Volume II - Tab C, Factor 3 – Quality Control Approach.
4.4.1 In Factor 3, the Offeror must submit an quality control approach narrative to explain their company’s quality control approach during execution of new construction and repair work in accordance with this solicitation, specifically Sections 01 00 02 and 01 00 04. The response to Factor 3 shall be limited to fifteen (15) pages. Address each of the following items in the narrative:
(a) Describe the quality control approach that will be used, addressing all steps involved as described in Section 01 00 04.
(b) Describe the Offeror’s quality control requirements to achieve design and construction excellence and describe any tools the Offeror utilizes on every project to achieve design and construction excellence.
(c) Describe the Offeror’s process for managing a subcontractor’s quality control program as it relates to the overall project quality control program.
5.0 PHASE ONE - EVALUATION PROCESS.
5.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) composed of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers personnel, Using Activity representative, and, as necessary, technical advisors will conduct the evaluation. The number and identities of Offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other Offerors. The SSEB will evaluate proposals, using the factors and evaluation criteria described in this section.
5.2 The evaluation process for Phase One consists of two parts: Proposal Compliance Review, and Non-Price Factor Evaluation.
5.2.1 Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial check by Contracting Division to ensure that all required forms are complete, and in compliance with all administrative and submission criteria.
5.2.2 Non-Price Factor Evaluation. In accordance with the solicitation, each member of the SSEB will conduct an independent review of the proposals. The review will be an in-depth, systematic evaluation of the proposal against the submission criteria and evaluation factors. After these reviews, the SSEB, by consensus, will provide a rating for each evaluation factor supported by a justifying narrative. The Offeror’s ratings are confidential, and will remain in the Contracting Officer’s files. Upon completion of the evaluations, the results will be provided to the Contracting Officer in the form of a Proposal Analysis Report with a recommendation of the offerors who are most qualified to proceed to Phase Two.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 7
5.3 Evaluation of Factor 1 – Past Performance Information of the Prime Contractor. Factor 1 will be rated with relevancy ratings and a confidence rating applied as described below.
(1) An Offeror’s “Relevant Company Effort” information will be evaluated to determine if the construction or repair projects submitted are “recent”, and “relevant”. For this solicitation, the Government will give more consideration for design, repair and construction of real property, facilities, and/or the systems and components in support of a military construction program; for the primary location within the Mobile District AOR; for dollar value similar to those anticipated under this solicitation;
and for projects where the Offeror performed as the prime contractor, as opposed to a subcontractor. Additionally, more consideration will be given to a project portfolio that reflects successful performance of a diversity of construction and repair type projects similar to those described by this solicitation.
(2) The Government will then assess how well an Offeror performed on their projects. The Government will, as necessary, confirm quality of past performance data provided by the Offeror and, at its discretion, obtain additional past performance information, if available, from other sources.
When the relevant performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective action taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and evaluate their effectiveness.
(3) Upon completion of its evaluation of each project, the SSEB, by consensus, will assign each project one of the following ratings:
Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Very Relevant - Present/Past effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude, effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Relevant - Present/Past effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant - Present/Past effort involved some scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant - Present/Past effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
No overall relevancy rating is assigned to an Offeror’s portfolio of projects. Rather, after checking compliance and assigning each project a relevancy rating, the SSEB will then determine an overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating takes into consideration the degree of relevancy of each project, and the quality ratings of those projects.
(4) If the Offeror is submitting as a Joint Venture (JV), the SSEB will utilize the information submitted to conduct the relevancy and performance confidence assessment ratings of the JV, as previously indicated. Based on the information submitted by the JV Offeror, the SSEB will evaluate and assess:
(i) The JV’s “Past Performance Information”, and/or
(ii) Each JV partners’ “Past Performance Information”
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 8
(5) The overall Performance Confidence Assessment Rating reflects the degree of probability that the Offeror will be able to meet the solicitation’s requirements. Upon completion of the evaluation, one of the following ratings will be assigned:
Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings
Description
Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonable assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.
Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
(6) Offerors with little or no relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably for Factor 1. However, such a proposal will be rated neutral confidence, and thus may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government when compared to the proposals of other Offerors with recent/relevant past performance. An Offeror with a deficiency as defined by FAR 15.0001 will not be short-listed for participation in Phase-Two.
5.4 Evaluation of Factor 2 – Overall Management Approach. The SSEB will evaluate the management approach narrative to assess the Offeror’s overall organizational structure, self-performance, management of subcontractors, and safety plan to ensure it reflects an understanding of the requirements of the solicitation. The SSEB will determine the strengths, weaknesses and deficiencies, if any, in the approach presented, and then assign an overall combined technical/risk ratings as listed below.
Ratings Combined Technical/Risk Rating Definitions OUTSTANDING Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
GOOD Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
SECTION 00 11 00 – PAGE 9
ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
MARGINAL Proposal has not…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .