W91278-17-R-0058_AMD_3,_ATTACHMENT_3_APPENDIX_A_EVALUATION_CRITERIA_(REV).pdf
PDF 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91278-17-R-0058
About this file
W91278-17-R-0058, AMD 3, ATTACHMENT 3 APPENDIX A EVALUATION CRITERIA (REV)
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX A
This is a best value acquisition based on Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). The proposal shall consist of responses to three (3) non-price factors related to technical acceptability. The following non-price factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Volume I – Technical Proposal
a. Outboard Engines and Controls – Provide a description of the proposed equipment items to include brand name, make, model#, manufacturer’s brochures/specifications demonstrating the proposed items meet all of the salient physical, functional or performance characteristics provided in the solicitation.
b. Vessel Seats – Provide a description of the proposed replacement seats to include manufacturer’s brochures/specifications demonstrating the proposed item meet all of the salient physical, functional or performance characteristics provided in the solicitation. The weight capacity stated in the solicitation of up to 350lbs is firm.
c. Experience – The Offeror shall submit no more than five (5) projects to demonstrate its company’s experience with dry docking and performing repairs to barges or similar steel hull vessels. All project examples are to have been completed within five
(5) years of the RFQ issue date. Only the experience of the prime contractor will be evaluated. If the Offeror submits more than five (5) projects, only the first five (5) projects shall be evaluated. For each project example, the Offeror shall submit a separate and fully completed Prime Contractor Project Data Sheet (Attachment 1 at the end of this section). If a project example lacks the required information, or if it is vague and ambiguous, then that project example will be rated as “Unacceptable.
In order to be considered awardable, there must be an “Acceptable” rating for the Experience non-price factor. The technical acceptable/unacceptable ratings are described below.
Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings
Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.
The non-price evaluation factors are significantly less important than cost or price.
Award will not be made to any Offeror that receives a rating of “Unacceptable” on any non-price evaluation factor.
Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal represents the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable offer.
The Government reserves the right to reject any and all offers.
| ATTACHMENT 1 |
| Prime Contractor Project Data Sheet |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .