RR_ Lake Security Fence _Amendment 01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

PAGE OF PAGES

1 33

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

U0001

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Aug-2021

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE W9126G 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT WORTH

819 TAYLOR ST, CT OFC RM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

See Item 6

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACT OR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

W9126G21R0088

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-Jul-2021

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT /ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. T HIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENT S OF SOLICIT ATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one ofthe following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegramor letter, provided each telegramor letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNT ING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACT S/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT /ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. T HE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT /ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINIST RATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORT H IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUT HORIT Y OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. T HIS SUPPLEMENT AL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUT HORIT Y OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORT ANT : Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPT ION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to schedule a new site visit, A site visit w ill be held on Thursday 12-Aug-2021 at 9:00 am.

Site Visit Location 100 P W 4137, Pilot Point, TX 76258. POC Robert Jordan, (940) 395-5680 The POC for this amendment is Shayla Lucas shayla.j.lucas@usace.army.mil All other terms and conditions w ill remain the same.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONT RACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

15B. CONT RACT OR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNIT ED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

30-105-04 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION SF30 - CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTION TO OFFEROR'S

SECTION 00 22 00

Proposal Preparation

LOW PRICED TECHNICALLY

ACCEPTABLE(LPTA)

Evaluation Criteria

Ray Roberts Lake Security Fence Repair

<AMD01> 09-Aug-2021 </AMD01>

PART I – GENERAL INFORMATION

• INQUIRIES

OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail to:

Contract Specialist – Primary POC

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,Fort Worth District ATTN: SWFCT-C- (Shayla Lucas) Phone: (817) 886-1188 Email: shayla.j.lucas@usace.army.mil

Bidder Inquiry Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via:

Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

*** Please Note: Offerors shall only submit one question per inquiry. Inquiries containing multiple questions may be rejected.

e. Be Specific to your RFI. Page, Chapter/Paragraph. Include the solicitation number, project title and location of project with your questions.

From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation RFP/Number is:W9126G21R0088

The Bidder Inquiry Keys is: WKPD4M- 2KIP37

If you are not registered a set of fields will appear. Complete all the fields. Once completed, you will be taken to the inquiry page for the solicitation. From here you can view all inquiries or add an inquiry.

In order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. If the System is not closed in a timely manner, an inquiry posted within (7) Seven calendar days of the receipt of proposals will still be regarded as untimely and will not be afforded a substantive response.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry. The bidder call center operates weekdays from 8am to 5pm U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

Oral explanation or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offeror will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive acquisition, there are no public bid openings, and no information will be given out as to the number offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made to the successful and unsuccessful offerors.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

(a) In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically. All submissions should be in Adobe PDF format. The Price Proposal and Technical Proposal shall be submitted as two “individual” files at minimum. Both the Technical and Price Proposals may be submitted at the same time.

(b) NOTE: Offerors not submitting a proposal is requested to send a formal letter informing the Contract Specialist to: Robert.M.Duran@usace.army.mil

(c) PROPROSAL DUE DATE: 25- AUGUST-2021, 4:00 PM CENTRAL TIME.

LATE PROPOSAL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Title the file(s) in the following format in two documents:

W9126G21R0088_COMPANY NAME _PRICE

W9126G21R0088_COMPANY NAME _TCHL

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION ‘IMPORTANT’

Submit the Proposals electronically via the DoD SAFE website at:

https://safe.apps.mil/.

In order for an outside user (the contractor) to submit a proposal for the solicitation, they must receive a drop-off request from an inside user (the government) two (2) working days before the proposal due date. When the inside user generates a drop-off request for you, you will receive an email with a link to submit your drop-off.

Optionally, the Government may provide you with a request code. In that case, click the Drop-off button on the SAFE home page and enter the Request code.

OFFERORS: Coordinate with Contracting Specialist and/or the Contracting Officer two (2) working days before the proposal due date. Submit the request through . The Contracting Officer for this project is: Mr. Robert M. Duran. Email address is robert.m.duran@usace.army.mil. The Contract Specialist for this project is: Ms. Shayla Lucas. Email address is: shayla.j.lucas@usace.army.mil.

Include the solicitation number in your Email Subject Line: W9126G21R0088, Ray Roberts Lake Security Fence Repair .

(1) OFFERS BY TELEGRAPH. Offers received by telegraph, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

(2) FACSIMILE OFFERS. Facsimile offers, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

(3) E MAIL OFFERS. Offers received by e mail, modifications thereto, or cancellations of offers will or will not be accepted.

1. PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE / SITE VISIT

SITE VISIT LOCATION:

1. An organized site visit has been scheduled for— <AMD01> Tuesday, 28 July 2021 at 4pm Thursday, 12-Aug- 2021 at 9am </AMD01>

2. Participants will meet at— Ray Roberts Lake Outlet, 100 P W 4137, Pilot Point, TX 76258

3. The POC for this action Robert Jordan , (940) 395-5680

IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) Remarks and explanations addressed during the conference shall not qualify or alter the terms and conditions of the solicitation. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

PART II – PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

• Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal electronically. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes/files.

• Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

• No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

• All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

• Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus deemed ineligible for award.

Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to determining those contractors within the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisitions.

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Certification of Cost or Pricing Data with their offer.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

1. Submit only the electronic-documents. Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages should be numbered.

2. PDF pages should be formatted to print on 8 ½ by 11 inch paper size, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission.

Spreadsheets must fit to (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers of the solicitation, project title and company.

3. Hard copies will not be submitted.

4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215- 1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

5. In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

6. For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page. Font size Arial 10-12 pitch. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

7. Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision.

Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED”, and shall show the date of revision.

8. : Within three (3) days of contract award, the awardee shall submit a conformed Technical Offer and preconstruction submittals as an electronic readable format. Acrobat Adobe or PDF.

(1) SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

• Submit the price proposal as one separate PDF file titled:

W9126G21R0088_COMPANY NAME_PRICE

• Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages in PDF format.

There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation. Technical pages are limited to: See (f)(3). Electronic documents must meet page sizes in case documents require printed.

• Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

1 The Proposal Cover Sheet

2 Signed Offer letter/1442 and SF 30 Acknowledgement of Amendments

3 Section 00 11 00, Pricing Schedule

Section 00 45 00, Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors or statement that offeror has electronic

5 JV Agreement or Articles of Organization for LLC (if applicable)

6 Bid Guarantee / Bid Bond

• Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

TAB 2: Signed offer letter, duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

TAB 3: Section 00 11 00, Pricing Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors.

See Section 00 11 00 with attached notes, for further instructions.

TAB 4: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the System for Award Management (SAM.GOV) website or respond with the completed representations / certifications found in the solicitation. The offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. Additionally, the offeror must also complete and return the “Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors” included in the

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

i. Solicitation Number

ii. The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, VIN, CAGE code, and DUNS number of the Offeror (and electronic address if available).

iii. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item

iv. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation solicitation. If the offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete both the SAM Representations and Certifications. MUST BE ACTIVE IN SAM.GOV

TAB 5: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV Agreement. If a JV Agreement has not yet been finalized / approved, indicate its status. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties. If the Offeror is a Limited Liability Company, include a copy of the Articles of Organization.

TAB 6: Provide a fully executed Bid Guarantee as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1(c), Bid Guarantee.

(2) SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

• Technical Proposal. Submit an electronic document of the Technical Proposal.

• Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The technical proposal shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

TAB # CONTENTS OF THE

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Tab 1 Factor 1: Experience

<AMD01>

Tab 1 2

<AMD01>

Factor 2: Technical Understanding of SOW

Tab 3 Factor 3: Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ)

• Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 1 Experience: Limited to two (2) pages per project (maximum of five (5) forms) sent electronically

Factor 2 Technical Understanding of SOW: Limited to two pages

• Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following provides a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each Tab.

• Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following provides a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each Tab.

TAB 1: FACTOR 1, EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including subcontractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation. If using subcontractors as team members in demonstrating experience describe the role they will play in the project and the percentage of work, they will be performing.

Same/similar experience is defined as: Midway Park Water distribution sites:

1 through 33. 2" water line Approx. 4,320 LF. Tie into existing 2" main located near entrance of park. Install a new valve box and 2" valve after water meter. Run approximately 620 LF of HDPE 2" water line with two Tee connections (See DIV01 Scope of Work and Specification for details).

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms in response to this factor. If Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) and specialized experience cannot be provided as a JV, each partner can submit no more than five (5) projects combined. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be considered recent with at least 50% complete for current on-going projects and 100% complete projects must have been completed within the last five (5) years.

If any of the information requested on the “Experience Information” form is not provided, then the contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as

“UNACCEPTABLE.”

EXPERIENCE (FACTOR 1) WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON THE

FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The Government will review the project experience of the offeror, including subcontractors, on projects provided in response to the Experience Factor. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

(1) At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be similar scope to horizontal construction value of at least $100,000.00 for each project

(2) At least one project submitted must be a similar construction contract with a value of at least $250,000.00.

(3) All projects submitted under Factor 1 must be at least 50% complete for current on-going projects and 100% complete projects must have been completed within the last three (3) years.

(4) All “Experience Information” forms submitted under Factor 1 must be completely filled out.

A combination of projects meeting the 2 experience requirements outlined above (criteria 1 - 2), all projects meeting the completion requirement (criteria 3), and completed “Experience Information” forms for all projects submitted (criteria 4) will result in an “ACCEPTABLE” rating.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

1. TAB 2: FACTOR 2, Technical Understanding of SOW: The Offeror shall provide a narrative that demonstrates the Offeror has a clear understanding of the requirements of the contract and the contract duration. The narrative shall include discussion of that the following items that could potentially jeopardize the successful completion of all contract work, to include procurement of long lead items, working in occupied facilities, construction phasing/sequencing work items.

The Offeror shall describe the plans for managing these items to successfully complete the contract. Any deviation from the solicitation requirements will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

Technical Understanding of SOW (FACTOR 2) WILL BE EVALUATED

BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA:

The Government will review the documentation provided in response to Factor 2.

Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards for a narrative to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

The Technical Understanding of the SOW shall described above shall demonstrate all of the following:

a. Task oriented process with all required Government review periods and approval periods of required submittals, construction submittals, long-lead procurement items, proposed phasing of work, and contract closeout submittal items.

b. The Period of Performance indicates the overall duration for the project, in calendar days (not to exceed the duration in SECTION 01 00 00, RFP Letter;

The narrative shall include discussion of each the following items and demonstrate how each item will be managed to successfully complete this project:

3. Procurement of long lead items

4. Working in the proximity surrounding occupied facilities

5. Proposed construction phasing/sequencing of work

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards for the schedule and for the narrative under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

PART III – EVALUATION OF OFFEROR PROPOSALS

5. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the FAR, no contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

6. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICED, TECHNICALLY

ACCEPTABLE PROCESS

An evaluation for acceptability will be performance on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the acceptability standards for non-cost factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

7. BASIS OF AWARD

Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of technically acceptable proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs will not be permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

8. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

• Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

• The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a, CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

9. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions.

Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or be asked to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government.

10. PROPOSAL EXPENSE AND PRE-AWARD COSTS

The Request for Proposal does not commit the Government to pay any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of the initial and/or any subsequent proposals.

11. EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the criteria identified in the individual attachments for the Factors.

12. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

• Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

• Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered unacceptable. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included in the proposal may result in the offer being found deficient.

• The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of an “UNACCEPTABLE” determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that Offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal.

TECHNICAL TAB 1

EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Company:

Address:

2. Contract /Task Order(TO) /Purchase Order (PO) Number:

3. Contract/TO/PO Dollar Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: Active Complete

Completion Date (w/ extensions):

Percentage Complete:

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client – provide: Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

TAB 2: FACTOR 2, Technical Understanding of SOW: See Section 2i above.

Prepare Technical Understanding of SOW narrative on letterhead.

Include contact information and printed name and signature.

Provide a brief statement who has signature authority for the company.

TECHNICAL TAB 3

PPQS NEED NOT BE SUBMITTED FROM A GOVERNMENT PROJECT. CIVILIAN PROJECTS AREACCEPTABLE.

SUBMITTED PROJECT PPQS SHOULD BE OF SIMILAR SIZE AND SCOPE.

OFFEROR INFORMATION:

COMPANY NAME

POC

(Last, First Middle/ TITLE)

ADDRESS

(Number & Street) (City, State and Zip)

PHONE NUMBER MOBILE

(Area code and number) (Area code and number)

EMAIL ADDRESS

DUNS NUMBER CAGE CODE NUMBER

VIN:

Authorized Signature Date

TECHNICAL TAB 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNS Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of Project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work:

High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE

AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE

COMPLETED QUESTIONNARIE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATION. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAYBE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY ANDALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECTYOUR

EVALUATIONOF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

OFFEROR TO PROVIDE TO CLIENT

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element orsub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U)

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive or negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met,please address below)

E VG S M U

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, business like, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and /or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirement and/or priority, including planning, execution, and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agree price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports. Budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) In the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explaining Remarks section.

NO

YES

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indication that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

W9126G21R0088

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To What extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements, regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

NU

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

U

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

d) In Summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (Please attach additional pages in necessary):

END OF

TAB 3

NOTE: CLIENT: PPQ can be returned to Offeror to submit with proposal package or send to shayla.j.lucas@usace.army.mil. Provide as PDF.

Provide all TAB 3 pages.

Send to include: Subject: W9126G21R0088, PPQ for (Offeror’s Company Name) Must be received no later than 23-August-2021 4 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)

(End of Summary of Changes)