B.08.02 FBO solicitation W9126G-20-Q-0010.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
SB/TB HERBICIDE-PESTICIDE IDIQ
Solicitation number
W9126G20Q0010
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B.08.02 FBO solicitation W9126G-20-Q-0010.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Request for Quotes (RFQ) Solicitation Number: W9126G20Q0015 Solicitation is issued by:

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT WORTH

819 TAYLOR ST, CT OFC RM 2A17

FORT WORTH TX 76102-0300

PROJECT NAME: Sam Rayburn/Town Bluff HERBICIDE/PESTICIDE, PINEY WOODS REGION, JASPER, TX

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes s are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Description of Services: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform herbicide and pesticide treatment services as defined in this Performance Work Statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services. Work shall be performed in the USACE Piney Woods Region, located at various parks within include the counties of Jasper, Sabine, San Augustine, Angelina, Nacogdoches, and Tyler. The Ordering Periods will be one (1) twelve (12) month base period, and four (4) twelve

(12) month option periods.

2. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Department of Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS).

a. The provision at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding any addenda to the provision. Offerors are also required to submit a completed copy of the Request for Quotation and a completed copy of the pricing schedule.

b. Offerors include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Items, with its offer.

c. Clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding any addenda to the clause.

d. Clause at 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders-Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition and a statement regarding which, if any, of the additional FAR clauses cited in the clause are applicable to the acquisition

3. This acquisition is SET ASIDE 100% for Service Disabled Small Business.

4. PSC: S208 Landscaping/Groundskeeping Services

NAICS CODE: 561730 Landscaping Services SIZE STANDARD: $8.0 Million

5. Registration at www.sam.gov is required. Start by going to www.sam.gov, and then click on the SAM HELP tab. Under User Help you will find the full User Guide as well as Quick Start Guides and Helpful Hints that will help you create an account, migrate your roles, perform updates, and search for the information you need

In accordance with FAR 52.204-7(b)(1) An Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation, and shall continue to be registered until time of award, during performance, and through final payment of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchasing agreement resulting from this solicitation.

In accordance with FAR Part 29.3 – State and Local Taxes, and per Title 4 of US Code 104-07, the Government is exempt from paying state and local taxes.

6. Evaluation Information: The Government intends to award a firm fixed price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) resulting from this RFQ to the responsible offeror whose offer represents the best value in terms of technical capability and price IAW 13.106-2(4)(ii). All non-price factors (i.e., technical capability and past performance are approximately equivalent to price. Quotes for this solicitation are due on APR 01, 2020 by 02:00 PM CST. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 30 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

6. Submittals: Offerors must submit representation and certifications in accordance with the provisions at FAR 52.212-3 Offeror Representation and Certifications – Commercial Item (Accessible at https://www.acquisition.gov) or the vendor may verify their Online Representation and Certification Application (ORCA) is updated in SAM. See Vendor information sheet.

Submit the following as separate PDF files in the response to the RFQ

a. Vendor Information Sheet

b. Technical Capability Statement (See Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items)

c. Price Quotation (Bid Schedules) (See Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items)

d. Past Performance NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (See Clause 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Items)

e. Complete and return the provision at 52.204-26

7. Email all quotes to:

Robert.l.norris@usace.army.mil civ-ops.proposals@usace.army.mil

52.237-1 SITE VIST

Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of contract performance, to the extent that the information is reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after contract award.

Prospective offerors/quoters are required to contact the Contract Specialist via email to express their interests by 3:00 PM (CST) two business days prior to attending the site visit.

At a minimum, the email should reference, the Solicitation Number, Project Title, Name(s) of Individual(s) who will attend the site visit, Name of Company Represented, Phone Number of Company being represented. All attendees required sign attendance sheet.

Address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Sam Rayburn Project Office 7696 RR 255 West Jasper, Texas 75951

CT POC: Robert Norris Contact Info: (817)886-1139 Email: robert.l.norris@usace.army.mil

Conference: Tuesday 24 Mar 20 @ 10:00 am CST

OFFEROR INFORMATION:

COMPANY NAME

POC

(Last, First Middle)

ADDRESS

(Number & Street) (City, State and Zip)

PHONE NUMBER MOBILE

(Area code and number) (Area code and number)

EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________________

DUNS NUMBER CAGE CODE NUMBER________

Signature Date

**See clause 52.228-5

INSURANCE

Prior to commencement of work, the Contractor shall furnish the original of his Insurance Certificate directly to the Contracting Officer, Fort Worth District, Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CESWF-CT-S, P.O.

Box 17300, Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300 and one copy directly to the Lake and Project Office. The Contractor shall maintain, during the entire period of his performance under this contract, the following minimum insurance requirements:

Submit a copy of Insurance Certificate directly to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sam Rayburn Project Office 7696 RR 255 West Jasper, Texas 75951

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Town Bluff Project Office 5171 FM 92 South Woodville, Texas 75979

Or email to: robert.l.norris@usace.army.mil Phone: (817) 886-1139 Fax: (817)886-6508

(a) Comprehensive general liability insurance for bodily injury in the minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence. No property damage liability is required.

(b) Comprehensive automobile liability insurance covering the operation of all automobiles used in connection with the performance of the contract in the minimum limits of $200,000 per person and $100,000 per accident for bodily injury and $20,000 per accident for property damage.

(c) Workmen's Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance in the minimum amount of $100,000.00 or in compliance with applicable State statutes.

(d) An endorsement to the effect that any cancellation or any material change adversely affecting the Government's interest shall not be effective until 30 days after the insurer or the Contractor gives written notice to the Contracting Officer.

NOTE:

(1) It is recommended that the contractor furnish a copy of the foregoing requirements to his insurance company in order to assure that an Insurance Certificate is issued meeting the minimum requirements shown. The Insurance Certificate shall also show the contract number to which it applies as well as a brief description and location of the work.

ATTACHMENT 1

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNS Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of Project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND

SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNARIE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATION. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER,

QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE

OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

AFTER COMPLETION, PLEASE EMAIL TO: CIV-OPS.Proposals@usace.army.mil Ensure the former employer references the solicitation number in the email subject line.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATIONOF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive or negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to meet quality standards for technical performance E VG S M U

N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and /or labor force?

E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirement and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U

N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agree price(s)?

b) Contractor Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports.

Budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) In the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

YES NO

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

YES

NO

f) Have there been any indication that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

YES NO

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To What extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements, regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U

N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

YES NO

d) In Summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (Please attach additional pages in necessary):

Below is a checklist to assist you to ensure all the proper documents are returned for consideration on this solicitation. Only those items checked below as “required” must be returned

Required Contractor Item

Complete Bid Schedule(s), Sign SF 1449, Sign Amendments (if applicable) and return

CHECK YOUR QUOTES FOR MATHEMATICAL ERRORS

DO NOT ROUND UP OR DOWN

ANNOTATE UNIT AND TOTAL COSTS TO THE HUNDRETH POSITION

Complete vendor information sheet or provide a document with similar information

The provisions at 52.212-1, 52.212-3 Alt I, 52.212-5 and apply to this acquisition.

Confirm vendor’s 52.212-3 Alt I is updated in SAM on the vendor information sheet.

You must have an active SAM registration prior to award

Submit past performance and technical approach and understanding Documentation IAW Instructions to Offerors.

Ensure former employer returns the form and references the solicitation number and Company Name in the email subject line.

Scan all documents into a single.pdf file. PDF only authorized format

EMAIL your proposal to: antwain.r.burks@usace.army.mil

Subject line of email must include the solicitation number and Company Name.

**Please see clause 52.228-5 Insurance and Insurance MFR for insurance requirements.

Vendor Information Sheet

IN THE EVENT OF AWARD, ISSUE CONTRACT TO:

COMPANY NAME

POC

(Last, First Middle)

ADDRESS

(Number & Street) (City, State and Zip)

PHONE NUMBER MOBILE

(Area code and number) (Area code and number)

EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________________

DUNS NUMBER CAGE CODE NUMBER________

SSN/TIN NUMBER or firm’s Tax ID Number (TIN) ______________________________

Vendor’s Online Representation and Certification Application (ORCA) is updated in SAM Yes No

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNS Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of Project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy)

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNARIE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNARIE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATION.

CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

AFTER COMPLETION, PLEASE EMAIL TO: antwain.r.burks@usace.army.mil Ensure the former employer references the solicitation number in the email subject line.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATIONOF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be either positive or negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and /or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirement and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agree price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports.

Budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) In the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

YES NO

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

YES NO

f) Have there been any indication that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

YES NO

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To What extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements, regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

YES NO

d) In Summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

AFTER COMPLETION, PLEASE EMAIL TO: antwain.r.burks@usace.army.mil Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (Please attach additional pages in necessary)

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

FORT WORTH DISTRICT

SAM RAYBURN/TOWN BLUFF PROJECTS

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

HERBICIDE AND PESTICIDE IDIQ

1. GENERAL: This is a non-personal services contract to provide herbicide and pesticide treatment services. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform herbicide and pesticide treatment services as defined in this Performance Work Statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services. The contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.2 Scope: Application of herbicide and pesticide treatment services. Services include the work under this contract will be performed at Sam Rayburn and Town Bluff Projects which will include the counties of Jasper, Sabine, San Augustine, Angelina, Nacogdoches, and Tyler. The contractor shall accomplish application of herbicide and pesticide treatment. The work will consist of furnishing all labor, materials and equipment necessary to perform specified herbicide and pesticide services. The areas covered for required services include all government property at the described locations. Work shall include, but is not limited to herbicide treatment for control of brush, weeds, and grasses located on rip-rap portion of dam, embankment toe drainage ditch, road shoulders on top of dam, along fences, impact areas around camp sites, various asphalt surfaces with encroaching vegetation, beach areas, and boat launch areas. In addition, grasses and weeds may be sprayed on a per acre basis in open park and mowing areas for the control of winter broadleaf weeds and growth suppression of grasses. The Government shall provide all herbicide and surfactant for each application, as well as tank mixture instructions. Insecticides for fire ant treatment and crazy ant treatment will be provided by the contractor. Insecticides shall be approved by Government POC before application of insecticides. Dye indicators shall be included with all herbicide applications at a 0.25% ratio unless otherwise specified by project specific POC. Dye indicators shall be provided by contractor. All herbicide and insecticide applications will be at selected project areas, in accordance with project managers’ instructions and/or maps. All chemical shall be applied in strict accordance with manufacture’s product labeling. If lake water is used for dilution in tank mixture, batched herbicides must be applied within 30 minutes of mixing with water.

1.3 Period of Performance: The Contractor shall commence all work as specified and complete work within thirty (30) days of the start of application. All work must be completed within thirty (30) days of TO date.

Exceptions may be given for adverse weather conditions, flooding, and facility use by visitors, or Federal Holidays. The contractor shall not work on holidays unless approved in writing by the COR. This action will have a base year from 01 APR 2020 to 31 MAR 2021, an Option Year 1 from 01 APR 2021 to 31 MAR 2022, an Option Year 2 from 01 APR 2022 to 31 MAR 2023, an Option Year 3 from 01 APR 2023 to 31 MAR 2024, an Option Year 4 from 01 APR 2024 to 31 MAR 2025.

1.3.1 Frequency of Service – The frequency of services required under this contract are variable and dependent upon the needs of the project.

1.3.2. Task Order (TO) – Services to be furnished under this contract shall be ordered by TO. These orders shall be issued by the Ordering Officer. All TOs are subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. In the event of conflict between a TO and this contract, the contract shall control. A TO is considered "issued" when the Government provides the task order to the Contractor.

1.4 General Information – A Contracting Officer Representative (COR) may be assigned to this action. If a COR is not assigned to this action, a Government Quality Assurance Representative (GQAR) will be assigned and will perform the duties listed for COR.

1.4.1 Quality Control: The contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The contractor’s quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract. The Prime KTR is responsible for insuring that all work performed under this contract, including that performed by subcontractors, is in accordance with the specifications. To accomplish this, the Prime KTR will appoint in writing, subject to the approval of the COR/GCAR, one (1) QC Inspector.

Requirements for QC will be set forth in Part 1.4.1, “Quality Assurance”. After acceptance of the quality control plan the contractor shall receive the Contracting Officer’s acceptance in writing of any proposed change to his QC system.

1.4.1.1 Quality Assurance: The Government shall evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. This plan is primarily focused on what the Government must do to ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. It defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, and the minimum acceptable defect rate(s).

1.4.1.2. Contractor Quality Control – The KTR is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate QC system to satisfactorily inspect and ensure that all work performed by the KTR’s organization in each separate service is in full compliance with this contract and the instructions, provisions, specifications and maps herein. The KTR shall designate, in writing, a QC Inspector, whose main duty shall be to verify contract conformance of all work performed, to include reviewing each work leader’s daily activity report to ensure that it is legible, understandable, and complete, and to notify the COR/GQAR of anything requiring his immediate attention. The COR/GQAR may request additional QC personnel at any time he determines that the KTR’s work is in danger of nonconformance, at no additional cost to the Government. A QC Report shall be submitted for the COR/GQAR’s information at the end of each work week, (Sunday through Saturday).

1.4.1.3. Equipment and Supplies Inspection – The COR/GQAR may inspect required equipment and supplies at any time when in use on Government property. Any individual, crew or equipment found deficient shall be removed from service immediately until faulty conditions have been corrected and passed inspection by the COR/GQAR. No such removal will reduce the KTR’s obligation to perform all work required within the time scheduled under this contract. This requirement shall not be made the basis of any claim for compensation or damages against the United States or any of its officers or agents.

1.4.1.4. Performance Evaluation Meetings – The KTR, his superintendent, QC inspector, or all, shall meet with the COR/GQAR, or his representative, periodically as determined necessary by the COR/GQAR, in order to discuss performance. However, a meeting shall be held not later than one normal workday after a Contract Deficiency Report (CDR) is issued. Mutual effort will be made to resolve any and all problems identified.

1.4.1.5. Inspection - All work must be inspected and accepted by the COR/GQAR before payment for the work can be made. The Government QAR will inspect the work in each area as it is completed to ensure all requirements of the contract have been satisfied. The Contractor QCR will be responsible to ensure all work is completed prior to inspection by the Government. Inspections will be made by the COR/GQAR or his representative after work is completed. Inspections may take up to two weeks after the completion of an application to evaluate application effectiveness.

Any work that is rejected by the COR/GQAR shall be re-performed by the contractor at the contractor's expense including herbicide and surfactant costs. Rejection of work may be due to improper application methods by the contractor. This includes but is not limited to application of herbicides within 30 minutes of a rain event. Inspections will be conducted by using the 100 % sampling method; however, the Government has the right to change or modify inspection methods at its discretion.

1.4.1.6. Deductions - The COR/GQAR may require that all work which fails to provide the desired results be repeated at the KTR’s expense, or may reduce the contract price to equal the reduced value of the service. The KTR will ensure that these defects do not recur. If the KTR fails to rework the rejected areas or the defects are recurring, the Government may:

a. Reduce the contract price to equal the reduced value of the service.

b. Perform the required services, by contract or otherwise, and deduct any costs incurred by the Government that is directly related to the performance of such services from the KTRs invoice.

c. Terminate the contract for default. See 52.212-4

1.4.1.7 Payment - Work performed under this contract shall be paid for at a per unit price. This price shall be full compensation for furnishing all labor, tools, materials, equipment, transportation and incidentals necessary to complete all work as specified in herein. No payment shall be made until the work is completed, inspected by the QAR, properly invoiced to the appropriate project office, and approved by the COR/GQAR. The proper invoice shall include the KTR’s name, address, contract number, line item numbers, quantities, line item price, and total price.

1.4.2 Government Holidays: NO WORK WILL BE ALLOWED ON HOLIDAYS New Year’s Day Labor Day Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday Columbus Day President’s Day Veteran’s Day Memorial Day Thanksgiving Day Independence Day Christmas Day

1.4.3 Hours of Operation:– Normal working hours for the Contractor shall be between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday, except as specifically approved in advance by the COR/GQAR.

Major Federal Holidays during the recreation season (1 April – 30 Sept) shall be observed by the Contractor and no work on site will be permitted except in extreme cases and after specific approval by the COR/GQAR. The COR/GQAR will have the right to direct the schedule of any work that is to be performed.

1.4.4 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at Sam Rayburn and Town Bluff Projects which will include the counties of Jasper, Sabine, San Augustine, Angelina, Nacogdoches, and Tyler.

1.4.5 Type of Contract: The government will award an IDIQ service contract.

1.4.6 Security Requirements: Contractor personnel performing work under this contract must be able to work with in the United States at time of the proposal submission, and must maintain the level of security required for the life of the contract.

1.4.6.1 Physical Security: The contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all Government equipment, information and property provided for contractor use. At the close of each work period, government facilities, equipment, and materials shall be secured.

1.4.6.2 Key Control. The Contractor shall establish and implement methods of making sure all keys/key cards issued to the Contractor by the Government are not lost or misplaced and are not used by unauthorized persons. NOTE: All references to keys include key cards. No keys issued to the Contractor by the Government shall be duplicated. The Contractor shall develop procedures covering key control that shall be included in the Quality Control Plan. Such procedures shall include turn-in of any issued keys by personnel who no longer require access to locked areas. The Contractor shall immediately report any occurrences of lost or duplicate keys/key cards to the Contracting Officer.

1.4.6.2.1. The Contractor shall prohibit the use of Government issued keys/key cards by any persons other than the Contractor’s employees. The Contractor shall prohibit the opening of locked areas by Contractor employees to permit entrance of persons other than Contractor employees engaged in the performance of assigned work in those areas, or personnel authorized entrance by the Contracting Officer.

1.4.6.2.2 Lock Combinations. The Contractor shall establish and implement methods of ensuring that all lock combinations are not revealed to unauthorized persons. The Contractor shall ensure that lock combinations are changed when personnel having access to the combinations no longer have a need to know such combinations. These procedures shall be included in the Contractor’s Quality Control Plan.

1.4.6.3 All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, controlled access areas, or require network access, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. Upon request, the contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel.

AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website:

http://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html; or it can be provided by the RA ATO in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum.

1.4.6.4 All contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative). The contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks to meet installation/facility access requirements to be accomplished by installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services or Security Office. Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements (FAR clause 52.204-9, Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel) as directed by DOD, HQDA and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any installation or facility change, the Government may require changes in contractor security matters or processes.

1.4.6.5 Contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with adjudication standards and procedures using the National Crime Information Center Interstate Identification Index (NCIC-III) and Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) (Army Directive 2014-05 / AR 190- 13), applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative, as NCIC and TSDB are available), or, at OCONUS locations, in accordance with status of forces agreements and other theater regulations.

1.4.6.6 The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training (provided by the RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after the completion of the training.

1.4.6.7 The Contractor must pre-screen Candidates using the E-verify Program (http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify) website to meet the established employment eligibility requirements. The Vendor must ensure that the Candidate has two valid forms of Government issued identification prior to enrollment to ensure the correct information is entered into the E-verify system. An initial list of verified/eligible Candidates must be provided to the COR no later than 3 business days after the initial contract award." *When contracts are with individuals, the individuals will be required to complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, with the designated Government representative. This Form will be provided to the Contracting Officer and shall become part of the official contract file.

1.4.7 Special Qualifications: LICENSE REQUIREMENTS- Contractor shall be certified by the State of Texas in the handling and application of herbicides and pesticides and shall conform to all rules and regulations as contained in the latest revision of the Texas Herbicide Law and Regulations and/or the Texas Pesticide Control Law and Regulations for the application of herbicides and pesticides on lands and water located within the State of Texas, inclusive of Federal projects lands and waters. Copies of certification/license will accompany the bid and a copy will be furnished to the Sam Rayburn Project Office. Failure to submit certification/license shall be cause to reject the bid.

1.4.8 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: The Contractor agrees to attend any post award conference convened by the contracting activity or contract administration office in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5. The Contracting Officer, Contracting Officers Representative (COR), and other Government personnel, as appropriate, may meet periodically with the contractor to review the contractor's performance. At these meetings the Contracting Officer will apprise the contractor of how the Government views the contractor's performance and the contractor will apprise the Government of problems, if any, being experienced. Appropriate action shall be taken to resolve outstanding issues.

These meetings shall be at no additional cost to the Government.

1.4.9 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The (COR) will be identified by separate letter if applicable. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract: perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance:

maintain written and oral communications with the contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract:

issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, specifications: monitor contractor's performance and notifies both the Contracting Officer and contractor of any deficiencies; coordinate availability of government furnished property, and provide site entry of contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the contract task order.

1.4.10 Contractor Key Personnel: The following personnel are considered key personnel by the Government: a minimum of one (1) foreman/superintendent, one (1) QC Inspector. The contractor shall provide a contract manager who shall be responsible for the performance of the work. The name of this person and an alternate who shall act for the contractor when the manager is absent shall be designated in writing to the Contracting Officer. The contract manager or alternate shall have full authority to act for the contractor on all contract matters relating to daily operation of this contract.

1.4.11 Identification of Contractor Employees:

“Identification of Contractor Employees in the Federal Workplace (Aug 2008):

(a) The contractor shall provide each of its employees who will be involved in the performance of the contract, on a Government facility, with an identification (ID) badge. The ID badge shall clearly display the contractor’s name and the employee’s name and color photograph. The Contracting Officer or his/her designee shall approve the ID badge before the commencement of contract performance. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that all contractor personnel wear the ID badge at all times when performing work under this contract at a Government facility.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .