Pre-Proposal_Charts_for_General_Environmental_Service_Dredged_Material_Evaluation.pdf
PDF 541 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9126G-17-R-0031
About this file
Preproposal Conference Slides for RFP W9126G-17-R-0031 31 Jan 2017
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B3_SF30_Amendment_0003_02-15-2017.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_0001.pdf | ||
| B3_RFP_W9126G-17-R-0031_19_Jan_2017.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
Galveston District General Environmental Services for Dredged Material Evaluation
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
W9126G-17-R-0031
General Environmental Services for Dredged
Material Evaluation for the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Galveston District
31 January 2017
Agenda
Introductions Brief Program Overview Solicitation Overview
Galveston District General Environmental Services for Dredged Material Evaluation
Program Overview – Overview of Section C, Performance of Work Statement
Lisa Finn Physical Scientist, USACE Galveston District
CONFERENCE OBJECTIVES
OVERVIEW OF THE SOLICITATION
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Volume 1) PRICE PROPOSAL (Volume 2) EVALUATION FACTORS - Relative Importance of
Evaluation Factors to each other and to Price BASIS OF CONTRACT AWARD – Best Value
Trade Off
Volume 1 – Technical Proposal (Page Limit of 75 Pages, Ref Section L)
Cover Page and Table of Contents Factor 1 Technical Capability, contains 3 Subfactors
1.1 Experience (TAB A)
1.2 Key Personnel Qualifications (TAB B)
1.3 Contract Management (TAB C)
Subfactor 1.1 is significantly more important than Subfactor
1.2. and Subfactor 1.3. Subfactors 1.2 and 1.3 are equal in importance to each other.
Factor 2 Past Performance (TAB D) Factor 1, Technical Capability is significantly more important than Factor 2, Past Performance
Volume 2– Factor 3- Price Proposal Cover/First Page per FAR Clause 52.215-1 (c)(2)
Table of Contents
SF1449 – Sign and submit with offer
SF 30 Amendments - Acknowledge all amendments BID SCHEDULE - Offerors must bid on all line items unless specifically stated in this price schedule. Failure to submit an offer on all items will result in an incomplete offer, and the offer will be rejected.
REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS -
SAM.gov Certifications and/or Solicitation Certifications
JOINT VENTURE Documentation (if Applicable)
JOINT VENTURES
An Association of Persons or concerns with interests in any degree of proportion by way of contract, express or implied, Consorting to engage in and carry out a single specific purpose Business venture for joint profit
For which purpose, they combine their efforts, property, money, skill, or knowledge, but not on a continuing or permanent basis for conducting business generally
Viewed as a business entity in determining power to control its management.
JOINT VENTURES (cont.)
Must be pre-approved by the Small Business Administration (SBA) Prior to Award of Contract
Must be registered in the SAM.gov with a separate DUNS number and CAGE Code
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF THE EVALUATION
FACTORS AND BASIS OF CONTRACT AWARD
All the technical non-price factors when combined are significantly more important than Factor 3, Cost or Price.
The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a))
The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal represents the best value after evaluation in accordance with the factors and subfactors in the solicitation. A best value decision will be made using the Best Value Tradeoff (BVT) procedures.
Contractor Responsibilities Read RFP thoroughly Submit Questions using ProjNet Bidding Inquiry System Do not wait until last minute to ask questions. Cut off period in
Bidding Inquiry System is 10 Feb 2017.
It is the Contractor's responsibility to ensure Past Performance questionnaires are provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. Do not request past performance questionnaires on projects that have completed final CPARS evaluations.
Consider the Relative Importance of the Rating Factors
QUESTIONS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .