Section_00_22_10 _Attach_2_ _3.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9126G-12-R-0070
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HB4_B10656_Pre-Bid_Sign-in_Sheet.pdf | ||
| Am_0002.pdf | ||
| am_1.pdf | ||
| RFP_No._W9126G-13-R-0089.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W9126G-13-R-0089, Amendment No. 0001
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET - CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 2
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
(To be completed for each project submitted)
CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR PROJECT #_______
Offeror:
Project and Location:
Owner:
Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference:
Telephone:
| Awarded Construction Cost: |
| Final Construction Cost: |
Explain Cost Growth, if any:
Date of Award:
| Original Completion Date: |
| Revised Completion Date: |
Explain Time Growth, if any:
General Scope of Construction and Offeror’s Role:
Work Your Company Self-Performed:
Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out:
Describe extent of relevancy of the project by checking all applicable boxes below and provide any additional narrative to support relevancy assessment (in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the scope of the RFP). Higher relevancy will be assessed based on ability to meet multiple relevancy criteria listed below.
1. Multi-discipline vertical construction of a new facility
1. Repair/renovation, addition, or alteration of an existing facility
1. Design/Build construction
1. Construction value of at least (AM#1) $15 million $6 million (/AM#1)
1. Fully designed and with at least 50% construction progress completed
1. Prime Contractor
Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known :
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET - DESIGN
SECTION 00 22 10 - ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
(To be completed for each project submitted)
DESIGN FIRM OR IN-HOUSE DESIGN PROJECT #_______
Offeror:
Project and Location:
Owner:
Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference:
Telephone:
| Estimated Construction Cost: |
| Actual Construction Cost: |
| Date of Award: |
| Original Design Completion Date: |
| Revised Design Completion Date: |
Explain Time Growth, if any:
General Scope of Construction and Offeror’s Role in Design:
Offeror’s Role in Design (Self-Performed Work):
Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out:
Describe extent of relevancy of the project by checking all applicable boxes below and provide any additional narrative to support relevancy assessment (in terms of scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the scope of the RFP). Higher relevancy will assessed based on ability to meet multiple relevancy criteria listed below.
1. Multi-discipline vertical construction of a new facility
1. Repair/renovation, addition, or alteration of an existing facility
1. Design/Build construction
1. Construction value of at least (AM#1) $15 million $6 million (/AM#1)
1. Fully designed
1. Designer of Record
Your Performance Evaluation by Owner, if known :
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .