PWS_REHS.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) TEMPLATE

Public Health Command, West

Environmental Health & Engineering Division (EHED)

2899 Schofield Road, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6233

FOR

TRAINING INSTRUCTOR SERVICES

of

REGISTERED ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST (REHS) EXAM

PREPARATION

PART 1

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. General: This is a non-personal services contract to provide Registered Environmental Health

Specialist Exam Preparation in order to train 25 Environmental Scientist and Engineering Officer to pass the REHS Exam. The government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the contractor who, in turn, is responsible to the government.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform registered environmental health specialist exam preparation as defined in this performance work statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services. The contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.2 Background: The REHS/RS credential is NEHA’s premier Environmental Health professional credential. It is supported by NEHA’s 86-year history of commitment to the science and application of Environmental Health. Candidates that pass the exam will enjoy various levels of professional reciprocity in almost 40 US States and Uniformed Services.

Environmental Health personnel are first responders and essential Primary Public Health

Personnel. Trained Environmental Health Officers are critical to prevent the introduction and spread of diseases and syndromes that can incapacitate our soldiers and support personnel which, in turn, threatens combat readiness.

Environmental Health Officers identify and evaluate potential health risks from over 200 zoonotic diseases from anthrax to zika, to the air pollution of poisonous clouds of burning oil fields of Iraq, to Bioterrorism, and to the many possible pathogens in drinking water, food, and bodily wastes. These are the personnel that help develop a course of action to control or prevent disease, illness, and injury. In addition, Environmental Health personnel are critical assets in recognizing, preventing, controlling, and mitigating CBRN events. Also, the civilian NEHA

REHS credential is often required for military career advancement (assuming an Environmental

Health MOSQ).

This credentialing exam covers the 15 core competencies of Environmental Health. Zoonotic diseases of humankind are the cornerstone of Environmental Health services. This latest pandemic is a prime example of the range and complexity of expertise required of Environmental

Health personnel.

1.3 Objectives: The NEHA credentialing exam has a reputation of a first-time pass rate of only

≈35%. Multiple attempt pass rates can exceed 60%. Candidates attending the SINEH Preparation

Training for this credentialing exam boast a ≈80% to 84.6% first time pass rate based on the independent testing company’s statistics to the Environmental Health Board of the State of

Illinois Department of Professional Regulation. The Saraniecki Institute for Nutrition &

Environmental Health, Inc. (SINEH), is a nationally recognized training provider of

Environmental Health topics specializing in the NEHA REHS/RS Examination Preparation for over 28 years.

1.4 Scope: To provide 5 days of Training to prepare up to 25 candidates for the NEHA

REHS/RS Exam at USA MEDCoE, JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-FORT SAM HOUSTON in a building and room To Be Determined by the Public Health Command. The Training includes over 30 hours of classroom training (excluding breaks and lunches) and the accompanying 460+ page workbook. SINEH will bulk ship the course workbooks to the training location or designate approximately one month before the scheduled training. Services include printed training materials in workbook form, classroom training over 5 days 0800 to 1630 each day, lunch break

1200 to 1330, all training by Walter Saraniecki via a SINEH laptop to the USA MEDCoE audio/video projector and screen, and course syllabus.

1.5 Period of Performance: The period of performance shall be for one (1) week (5 days) 0800 to 1630 each day with lunch break 1200 to 1330.

1.5.1 Justification for Contract Award:

We recommend awarding a contract to Walter Saraniecki due to their unique ability to provide on-site training and flexibility. This arrangement offers significant cost savings and logistical advantages compared to other contractors in the market.

Market Research Comparison

Our market research indicates that other contractors typically require participants to travel to their location for training, resulting in substantial additional expenses. These costs include:

• Travel arrangements for 25 personnel

• Per diem allowances for each participant

• Hotel accommodations for the duration of the training

• Travel vouchers for transportation and other expenses

In contrast, Walter Saraniecki is willing to come to our installation, eliminating the need for our personnel to travel. This flexibility not only reduces our expenses but also minimizes the disruption to our operations.

Cost Savings

To illustrate the cost savings, we calculated the estimated expenses for sending 25 personnel to an off-site training location. The total cost for travel, accommodations, and per diem allowances would be approximately $64,548. This amount includes:

• Travel arrangements: $10,200

• Per diem allowances: $13,050

• Hotel accommodations: $21,300

• Course Cost: $13,750

• Max per Diem rate: $5,850

• Rental car (mini vans): $398

Total estimated cost: $64,548

By awarding a contract to Walter Saraniecki, we can avoid this significant expense and allocate the funds to other critical areas.

Conclusion

Based on our market research and analysis, we believe that awarding a contract to Walter

Saraniecki is the most cost-effective and efficient option for our training needs. Their willingness to provide on-site training and flexibility makes them an attractive partner, and we are confident that they will deliver high-quality training to our personnel. We estimate that this arrangement will save us approximately $64,548, which can be used to support other important initiatives.

1.6 General Information

1.6.1 Quality Control : Quality control is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor is responsible for the delivery of quality services/supplies to the government (see FAR 52.246-1, Contractor Inspection Requirements).

The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain an effective quality control system that includes a written quality control plan (QCP). The QCP shall implement standardized procedure/methodology for monitoring and documenting contract performance to ensure all contract requirements are met. The contractors’ QCP must contain a systematic approach to monitor operations to ensure acceptable services/products are provided to the government. The QCP, as a minimum, shall address continuous process improvement; procedures for scheduling, conducting and documentation of inspection; discrepancy identification and correction;

corrective action procedures to include procedures for addressing government discovered non-conformances; procedures for root cause analysis to identify the root cause and root cause corrective action to prevent re-occurrence of discrepancies; procedures for trend analysis; and procedures for collecting and addressing customer feedback/complaints. The contractor shall upon request provide to the government its quality control documentation. After acceptance of the quality control plan the contractor shall receive the contracting officer’s acceptance in writing of any proposed change to its QC system.

1.6.2 Quality Assurance: The government shall evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan. This plan is a government only document primarily focused on what the government must do to assure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the requirements of the contract.

1.6.3 Federal Government Holidays:

New Year’s Day 1st day of January

Martin Luther King Jr. Day 3rd Monday of January

Presidents Day 3rd Monday of February

Memorial Day Last Monday of May

Juneteenth Day 19th day of June

Independence Day 4th day of July

Labor Day 1st Monday of September

Columbus Day 2nd Monday of October

Veterans Day 11th day of November

Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday of November

Christmas Day 25th day of December

1.6.4 Hours of Operation: The contractor is responsible for conducting business, between the hours of 0800 to 1630 Monday through Friday except federal holidays or when the government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar government directed facility closings. For other than firm fixed price contracts, the contractor will not be reimbursed when the government facility is closed for the above reasons. The contractor must at all times maintain an adequate workforce for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within this PWS when the government facility is not closed for the above reasons. When hiring personnel, the contractor shall keep in mind that the stability and continuity of the workforce are essential.

1.6.5 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at facility with audiovisual aids access.

1.6.6 Type of Contract: The government will award a (Type of contract to be determined by the contracting office and resource adviser (RA)).

1.6.7 Security Requirements: Contractor personnel (to include subcontractors) performing work under this contract must have a [Insert the level of security required, if applicable] at time of the proposal submission, and must maintain the level of security required for the life of the contract. The security requirements are in accordance with the attached DD Form 254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification (The unit security monitor is responsible for initiating this form).

1.6.7.1 Physical Security: The contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all government equipment, information and property provided for contractor use. At the close of each work period, government facilities, equipment, and materials shall be secured.

1.6.7.2 Key Control The contractor shall establish and implement methods of making sure all keys/key cards issued to the contractor by the government are not lost or misplaced and are not used by unauthorized persons. NOTE: All references to keys include key cards. No keys issued to the contractor by the government shall be duplicated. The contractor shall develop procedures covering key control that shall be included in the Quality Control Plan. Such procedures shall include turn-in of any issued keys by personnel who no longer require access to locked areas. The contractor shall immediately report any occurrences of lost or duplicate keys/key cards to the contracting officer.

1.6.7.2.1. In the event keys, other than master keys, are lost or duplicated, the contractor shall, upon direction of the contracting officer, re-key or replace the affected lock or locks; however, the government, at its option, may replace the affected lock or locks or perform re-keying. When the replacement of locks or re-keying is performed by the government, the total cost of re-keying or the replacement of the lock or locks shall be deducted from the monthly payment due the contractor. In the event a master key is lost or duplicated, all locks and keys for that system shall be replaced by the government and the total cost deducted from the monthly payment due the contractor.

1.6.7.2.2. The contractor shall prohibit the use of government issued keys/key cards by any persons other than the contractor’s employees. The contractor shall prohibit the opening of locked areas by contractor employees to permit entrance of persons other than contractor employees engaged in the performance of assigned work in those areas, or personnel authorized entrance by the contracting officer.

1.6.7.3 Lock Combinations. The contractor shall establish and implement methods of ensuring that all lock combinations are not revealed to unauthorized persons. The contractor shall ensure that lock combinations are changed when personnel having access to the combinations no longer have a need to know such combinations. These procedures shall be included in the Contractor’s Quality

Control Plan.

1.6.8 Personal Identity Verification (PIV).

1.6.9 Visit Notification.

1.6.10 Special Qualifications: Walter P. Saraniecki credentialing: Illinois Licensed

Environmental Health Practitioner (LEHP), Illinois Licensed Dietitian and Nutritionist (LDN) and NEHA credentialed Registered Environmental Health Specialist/ Registered Sanitarian

(REHS/RS). Independent Contracted Certified Instructor for the Center for Domestic

Preparedness(CDP), Department of Homeland Security, FEMA for Food Safety, Potable Water, Vectors of Diseases, & Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste, Responder Safety, and Re-occupancy of

Homes & Businesses. He has taught both the Environmental Health Training for Emergency

Response Awareness Level course and the new Operations Level Course at CDP. IRCA FSMS

22000 Auditor/Lead Auditor Certificate, Training Certificate OSHA 40 hour Hazardous Waste

Certificate, EPA Section 608 & 609 Ozone Depleting Freon Technician, Certified Swimming

Pool Operator, Certified Pool & Spa Inspector, International HACCP Alliance and SQF HACCP

Certified, Chicago Certified Food Service Sanitation Manager, Illinois Food Service Sanitation

Manager, Illinois HACCP Train the Trainer, Illinois Food Allergen Certified, NEHA Registered

Food Safety Trainer, Illinois Dept of Agriculture Mosquito Larvicide Applicator, and U.S. Dept of Homeland Security FEMA Certificates: IS-5.a; IS-100.a; IS-200.a; IS-700.a; IS-800.b.

Furthermore, Walter serves as the Chairman of the Illinois Board of Environmental Health

Practitioners at the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation in Springfield, IL.

Walter holds an MS in Human Nutrition with a minor in Public Health Education from the

University of Tennessee in Knoxville and holds a BS in Food and Nutrition Science from

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

He also holds a diploma in Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning from Doolin Technical

College, Dallas, Texas.

Walter is the author of the "REHS Examination Review Course Workbook".

He also is the instructor for the REHS/RS Examination Review Class.

In addition to his Public Health efforts, Walter is the President of Saranecki Bros Catering, Inc, an 80 year old family business that includes six Banquet facilities, Off-Premise Catering, and commercial property leasing.

1.6.11 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: The contractor shall agree to attend any post award conference convened by the contracting activity or contract administration office in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5, Post Award Orientation. The contracting officer, COR, and other government personnel, as appropriate, will meet periodically, quarterly as a minimum, with the contractor to review the contractor's performance.

At these meetings the contracting officer will apprise the contractor of how the government views the contractor's performance and the contractor will apprise the government of problems, if any, being experienced. Appropriate action shall be taken to resolve outstanding issues. These meetings shall be at no additional cost to the government.

1.6.12 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): The COR will be identified by separate letter. The COR monitors all technical aspects of the contract and assists in contract administration. The COR is authorized to perform the following functions: assure that the contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract; perform inspections necessary in connection with contract performance; maintain written and oral communications with the contractor concerning technical aspects of the contract; issue written interpretations of technical requirements, including government drawings, designs, and specifications; monitor contractor's performance and notify both the contracting officer and contractor of any deficiencies;

coordinate availability of government furnished property; and provide site entry of contractor personnel. A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost or price, estimates or changes in delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

1.6.13 Key Personnel: The follow personnel are considered key personnel by the government:

Environmental Scientist military or which title is to perform any environmental/food assessment for Force Health Protection. The contractor shall provide a contract manager who shall be responsible for the performance of the work. The name of this person and an alternate who shall act for the contractor when the manager is absent shall be designated in writing to the contracting officer. The contract manager or alternate shall have full authority to act for the contractor on all contract matters relating to daily operation of this contract. The contract manager or alternate shall be available between 8:00 a.m. to 4:30p.m., Monday through Friday except federal holidays or when the government facility is closed for administrative reasons. Qualifications for all key personnel are listed below:

1.6.14 Identification of Contractor Employees: The contractor (to include subcontractors) shall provide each employee an identification (ID) badge, which includes at a minimum, the company name, employee name and a color photo of the employee. ID badges for key personnel shall also indicate their job title. ID badges shall be worn at all times during which the employee is performing work under this contract. Each contractor (to include subcontractors) employees shall wear the ID badge in a conspicuous place on the front of exterior clothing and above the waist except when safety or health reasons prohibit. The contractor (to include subcontractors) shall be responsible for collection of ID badges upon completion of the contract or termination of employee. A listing of issued identification cards shall be furnished to the contracting officer prior to the contract performance date and updated as needed to reflect contractor and subcontractor personnel changes. All contract personnel attending meetings, answering government telephones, and working in other situations where their contractor status is not obvious to third parties are required to identify themselves as such to avoid creating an impression in the minds of members of the public that they are government officials. They must also ensure that all documents or reports produced by contractors are suitably marked as contractor products or that contractor participation is appropriately disclosed.

1.6.15 Anti-Terrorism and Operations Security Requirements:

1.6.16. Supervision of Contractor Employees: The government will not exercise any supervision or control over contractor or subcontractor employees while performing work under the contract. Such employees shall be accountable solely to the contractor, not the government.

The contractor, in turn, shall be accountable to the government for contractor or subcontractor employees.

1.6.17 Contractor Travel: [Insert any travel requirements.]. : The contractor will be required to travel CONUS and within the National Capital Region (NCR) during the performance of this contract to attend meetings, conferences, and training. The contractor may be required to travel to off-site training locations and to ship training aids to these locations in support of this PWS.

Required language should travel be needed: The contractor will be authorized travel expenses consistent with the substantive provisions of the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) and the limitation of funds specified in this contract. All travel requires government approval/authorization and notification to the COR. For proposal purposes, a Not to Exceed amount for travel can be established or you can include in your Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) and the workload summary, a projected listing of travel locations to include frequency and number of persons required to travel so the offerors can provide pricing.

1.6.18 Other Direct Costs (If applicable): [Insert what the other direct costs requirements will

be. These costs must be preapproved by the contracting officer] For example: This category includes travel (outlined in 1.6.14), reproduction, and shipping expenses associated with training activities and visits to contractor facilities. It could also entail the renting of suitable training venues.

1.6.19 Data Rights (If applicable): The government has unlimited rights to all documents/material produced under this contract. All documents and materials, to include the source codes of any software, produced under this contract shall be government owned and are the property of the government with all rights and privileges of ownership/copyright belonging exclusively to the government. These documents and materials may not be used or sold by the contractor without written permission from the contracting officer. All materials supplied to the government shall be the sole property of the government and may not be used for any other purpose. This right does not abrogate any other government rights.

1.6.20 Organizational Conflict of Interest:

a. Purpose. The primary purpose of this clause is to aid in ensuring that:

(1) The Contractor does not obtain an unfair competitive advantage by establishing the ground rules for a future competition;

(2) The Contractor's objectivity and judgment are not biased because of its present or future interests

(financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) which relate to work performed under this contract;

and

(3) The Contractor does not obtain an unfair competitive advantage by virtue of its access to non-public or proprietary information belonging to others.

b. Definitions.

(1) The term “Contractor” herein used means: (a) the organization (hereinafter referred to as "it" or "its") entering into this agreement with the Government; (b) all business organizations with which it may merge, join or affiliate now or in the future and in any manner whatsoever, or which hold or may obtain, by purchase or otherwise, direct or indirect control of it; (c) its parent organization if any and any of its present or future subsidiaries, associates, affiliates, or holding companies, and; (d) any organization or enterprise over which it has direct or indirect control now or in the future.

(2) The term "proprietary information" for purposes of this clause means any information considered so valuable by its owners that it is held secret by them and their licensees. Information furnished voluntarily by the owner without limitations on its use, or which is available without restrictions from other sources, is not considered proprietary.

c. Organizational Conflicts of Interest Examples. The following examples illustrate situations in which organizational conflicts of interest may arise. These examples are not all inclusive.

(1) Biased Ground Rules. This type of conflict may arise in situations where a company sets the ground rules for a future competition. For example, when a Contractor develops requirements then competes to provide products or services to satisfy those requirements, thus obtaining a competitive advantage.

(2) Impaired Objectivity. This type of conflict may exist where a Contractor’s obligations under a contract require objectivity, but another role of the Contractor casts doubt on its ability to be truly objective. An example of this type of conflict is where a Contractor’s work under one contract entails evaluating itself, its affiliates, or its competitors under a separate contract.

(3) Unequal Access to Information. This type of conflict may arise when a Contractor has access to nonpublic or proprietary information as part of its performance under a contract that gives it an unfair advantage in a competition for a later contract.

d. General Constraints. The provisions of FAR Subpart 9.5, Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of

Interest, concerning organizational conflicts of interest govern this contract. Potential conflicts may exist in accordance with FAR 9.505-1, Providing Systems Engineering and Technical Direction, through

9.505-

4, Obtaining Access to Proprietary Information. In this regard, the Contractor is responsible for identifying any actual or potential organizational conflicts of interest to the Contracting Officer that arise as the result of performance under this contract. To avoid or mitigate a potential conflict related to performance under this contract, the Contracting Officer will impose appropriate constraints such as the constraints discussed below. Since it is impossible to foresee all of the circumstances that might give rise to organizational conflicts of interest, the constraints discussed below are not all inclusive and the

Contracting Officer may impose constraints other than, or in addition to, the constraints listed below.

(1) The Contractor agrees that if it provides, under a contract or task order or delivery order, systems engineering and technical guidance for systems and programs, but does not have overall contractual responsibility, it will not be allowed to be awarded a contract or task or delivery order to supply the system or any of its major components or be a Subcontractor or consultant to a supplier of the system or any of its major components

(2) The Contractor agrees that if it prepares complete specifications for non-developmental items or assists in the preparation of work statements for a system or services under a contract or task order or delivery order, it shall not be allowed to furnish these items, either as a prime Contractor, a Subcontractor or as a consultant.

(3) The Contractor agrees that it shall neither evaluate nor advise the Government with regard to its own products or activities. The Contractor shall objectively evaluate or advise the Government concerning products or activities of any prospective competitors.

(4) The Contractor agrees that if it gains access to proprietary information of other companies, it shall exercise diligent effort to protect such proprietary information from unauthorized use or disclosure. In addition, the Contractor agrees to protect the proprietary information of other organizations disclosed to the Contractor during performance of this contract with the same caution that a reasonably prudent

Contractor would use to safeguard highly valuable property. The Contractor also agrees that if it gains access to the proprietary information of other companies it shall enter into written agreements with the other companies to protect their information from unauthorized use or disclosure for as long as it remains proprietary and to refrain from using the information for any purpose other than that for which it was furnished. The Contractor shall provide copies of such agreements to the Contracting Officer.

(5) If the Contractor, in the performance of this contract, obtains access to plans, policies, reports, studies, financial plans, data or other information of any nature which has not been released or otherwise made available to the public, the Contractor agrees that without prior written approval of the Contracting

Officer, it shall not: (a) use such information for any private purpose unless the information has been released or otherwise made available to the public, or (b) release such information unless release is otherwise authorized under the contract or such information has previously been released or otherwise made available to the public by the Government.

e. Non-Disclosure Agreements. The Contractor shall obtain from each employee who has access to proprietary information under this contract, a written agreement which shall in substance provide that such employee shall not, during his/her employment by the Contractor or thereafter, disclose to others or use for their benefit, proprietary information received in connection with the work under this contract.

The Contractor shall educate its employees regarding the restrictions so that they shall not use or disclose proprietary information or data generated or acquired in the performance of this contract except as provided herein.

f. Training. The Contractor shall effectively educate its employees, through formal training, company policy, information directives and procedures, in an awareness of the legal issues so that each employee shall know and understand the bsolute necessity of safeguarding information from anyone other than the

Contractor's employees who have a need to know, and the U.S. Government.

g. Subcontracts. The Contractor agrees that it shall include the provisions in paragraphs d., e., and f.

above and this paragraph in consulting agreements, teaming agreements, and subcontracts of all tiers which involve access to information or the performance of services described in paragraph d. above. The use of this clause in such agreements shall be read by substituting the word "consultant" or

"Subcontractor" for the word "Contractor" whenever the latter appears.

h. Additional Constraints. If this contract provides for the issuance of task or delivery orders, such orders may impose additional requirements and restrictions relating to this clause to include the requirement for the Contractor and its Subcontractors and employees to furnish the Government with written non-disclosure agreements or statements of no conflict of interest. With regard to any proposal submitted by the Contractor in response to a Request for Task or Delivery Order Proposal, by submitting its proposal the Contractor represents that it has disclosed to the Contracting Officer, prior to the issuance of the task or delivery order, all facts relevant to the existence or potential existence of organizational conflict of interest.

i. Conflicts Involving Future Procurements. The award of this contract, task or delivery orders issued under this contract, Government taskings, or acquiescence in the Contractor’s performance of services hereunder shall not constitute or be interpreted as a determination that the Contractor is eligible to participate in future procurements, developmental efforts, implementation efforts, or related activities.

Only the Contracting Officers for such efforts, applying the rules, principles, and procedures have the authority to determine whether a conflict exists in connection with such procurements.

j. Representations and Disclosures.

(1) The Contractor represents that it has disclosed to the Contracting Officer, prior to award of this contract, all facts relevant to the existence or potential existence of organizational conflict of interest.

(2) The Contractor represents that if it discovers an organizational conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest after award of this contract, a prompt and full disclosure shall be made in writing to the

Contracting Officer. This disclosure shall include a description of the action the Contractor has taken or proposes to take in order to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

k. Remedies and Waiver.

(1) For breach of any of the above restrictions or for non-disclosure or misrepresentation of any relevant facts required to be disclosed concerning this contract, the Government may terminate this contract for default, disqualify the Contractor for subsequent related contractual efforts, and pursue such other remedies as may be permitted by law or this contract. If, however, in compliance with this clause, the

Contractor discovers and promptly reports an organizational conflict of interest (or the potential thereof) subsequent to contract award, the Contracting Officer may terminate this Contract or any task or delivery order issued under this Contract for convenience if such termination is deemed to be in the best interest of the Government.

(2) The parties recognize that this clause has potential effects which will survive the performance of this contract and that it is impossible to foresee each circumstance to which it might be applied in the future.

Accordingly, the Contractor may at any time seek a waiver from the cognizant Contracting Officer by submitting a full written description of the requested waiver and the reasons.

1.6.21 COMBAT TRAFFICKING IN PERSON.

IAW FAR 52-222-50. Contractor Requirements.

The Contractor shall –

(1) Notify its employees of

(i) The U.S. Government's zero tolerance policy.

(ii) Actions that will be taken against employees for violations of this policy.

(2) Take appropriate action.

Part II, Trafficking in Persons (TIP)

1. The Contractor has a procedure for notifying employees of TIP and proof of such notification on file via:

i. Training records or

ii. Employee signature

2. Has documented actions on file citing appropriate action to TIP violations.

3. Record of documented violations to date (if any).

4. The Contractor has a procedure for notifying the Contracting Officer if information is received or actions related to TIP are observed.

1.6.22. IAW FAR 39.2, (Applicable to IT services only): HQIIS shall be compliant with Section

508, an amendment to the United States Workforce Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Contractor shall ensure all HQIIS applications are accessible to people with disabilities and that current and future requirements to maintain compliance with Section 508 are met.

1.6.23 PHASE IN /PHASE OUT PERIOD (If applicable): To minimize any decreases in productivity and to prevent possible negative impacts on additional services, the contractor shall have personnel on board, during the [Insert the time period, i.e., sixty (60) day, thirty (30) day, etc.] phase in/ phase out periods. During the phase in period, the contractor shall become familiar with performance requirements in order to commence full performance of services on the contract start date.

PART 2

DEFINITIONS & ACRONYMS

(This section includes all appropriate terms and phrases for this PWS. The definition must be clear and concise, not ambiguous. Carefully consider each definition because they will be binding for the duration of this contract, unless modified. In addition, include a complete listing of all acronyms and words or phrases they represent.)

2. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS:

2.1. DEFINITIONS: [List any terms used within the PWS that require further definition. At a minimum, insert the definitions provided below].

2.1.1. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR. The official government representative delegated authority by the contracting officer to administer a contract. This individual is normally a member of the appropriate contracting/procurement career field and advises on all technical contractual matters.

2.1.2. CONTRACTOR. A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or services to the government. The term used in this contract refers to the prime.

2.1.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER. A person with authority to enter into, administer, and/or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government.

Note: The only individual who can legally bind the government.

2.1.4. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). An employee of the U.S.

government appointed by the contracting officer to administer the contract. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations. This individual has authority to provide technical direction to the contractor as long as that direction is within the scope of the contract, does not constitute a change, and has no funding implications. This individual does not have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.

2.1.5. DEFECTIVE SERVICE. A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the performance work statement.

2.1.6. DELIVERABLE. Anything that can be physically delivered, but may include non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.

2.1.7. GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP) OR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

(GP). Property in the possession of, or directly acquired by, the government and subsequently made available to the contractor.

2.1.8. KEY PERSONNEL. Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the key personnel listed in the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.

2.1.9. PHYSICAL SECURITY. Actions that prevent the loss or damage of government property.

2.1.10. QUALITY ASSURANCE. The government procedures to verify that services being performed by the contractor are acceptable in accordance with established standards and requirements of this contract.

2.1.11. QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST. An official government representative concerned with matters pertaining to the contract administration process and quality assurance/quality control. Acts as technical advisor to the contracting officer in these areas.

2.1.12. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP). An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.

2.1.13. QUALITY CONTROL. All necessary measures taken by the contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.

2.1.14. SUBCONTRACTOR. One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor. The government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.

2.1.15. WORK DAY. The number of hours per day the contractor provides services in accordance with the contract.

2.1.16. WORK WEEK. Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays unless specified otherwise.

2.2. ACRONYMS: [List all acronyms used in the PWS and what they represent. At a minimum, insert the acronyms provided below].

ACOR Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative

AFARS Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

AR Army Regulation

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CMR Contract Manpower Reporting

CONUS Continental United States (excludes Alaska and Hawaii)

COR Contracting Officer Representative

COTS Commercial-Off-the-Shelf

DA Department of the Army

DD250 Department of Defense Form 250 (Receiving Report)

DD254 Department of Defense Contract Security Requirement List

DFARS Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement

DMDC Defense Manpower Data Center

DOD Department of Defense

FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation

HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996

KO Contracting Officer

OCI Organizational Conflict of Interest

OCONUS Outside Continental United States (includes Alaska and Hawaii)

ODC Other Direct Costs

PIPO Phase In/Phase Out

POC Point of Contact

PRS Performance Requirements Summary

PWS Performance Work Statement

QA Quality Assurance

QAP Quality Assurance Program

QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

QC Quality Control

QCP Quality Control Program

TE Technical Exhibit

PART 3

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES

3. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES:

3.1. Services: Not applicable

3.2 Facilities: Generally, work will be performed on the Government installation and the

Government will provide adequate physical workspace and office equipment, and supplies, to support the required services.

3.3 Utilities. The government will provide all utilities for the facility. The Contractor shall instruct employees in utilities conservation practices. The contractor (to include subcontractors) shall instruct employees in utilities conservation practices. The contractor shall be responsible for operating under conditions that preclude the waste of utilities, which include turning off the water faucets or valves after using the required amount to accomplish cleaning vehicles and equipment.

3.4 Equipment The government will provide all office equipment and supplies to perform the work on the government installation to include internet access and projector with audio for audiovisual aid.

3.5 Materials: Not applicable, the instructor will provide material aids.

PART 4

CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES

4. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

4.1 General The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.2 Secret Facility Clearance: Not Required. Work will be performed at Government facilities.

4.3. Materials The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

4.4. Equipment The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

PART 5

SPECIFIC TASKS

5. Specific Tasks:

5.1. Basic Services. The contractor shall provide services to prepare all participants with sufficient Environmental Health scientific and governmental regulatory knowledge to pass the

NEHA REHS exam on the first attempt. All students are advised to study an additional 3 hours for every one hour of class time before attempting the exam.

5.1.1 Performance Objectives: Within one week of reviewing course materials, a pre- and post-course knowledge assessment will be included in the handbook for each of the 15 topics.By the end of the course, all students will complete a course evaluation. The instructor aims to achieve an overall satisfaction rating of at least 80% on this survey.

5.2. Task Heading. This credentialing exam covers the 15 core competencies of Environmental

Health. Zoonotic diseases of humankind are the cornerstone of Environmental Health services.

One week training for the REHS certification and participants would neeThis latest pandemic is a prime example of the range and complexity of expertise required of Environmental Health personnel. Includes multiple check on learning attached in the booklets.

5.2.1 Wastewater

Proper management of wastewater is crucial for protecting public health, particularly in densely populated areas like military bases. Wastewater can harbor pathogens, chemicals, and other contaminants that can spread diseases and harm humans. Effective wastewater treatment and disposal help prevent:

a) Waterborne diseases: Such as cholera, typhoid, and dysentery.

b) Environmental pollution: Contaminating soil, air, and water sources.

c) Infections and illnesses: Caused by bacteria, viruses, and parasites.

Prioritizing wastewater management, forces can safeguard the health and well-being of their personnel, preventing outbreaks and maintaining operational readiness.

5.2.2 Swimming Pool and Recreational Waters

Proper maintenance and management of swimming pools and recreational waters are vital for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. Contaminated water can harbor pathogens, chemicals, and other microorganisms that can cause:

a) Waterborne illnesses: Such as gastroenteritis, skin infections, and respiratory issues.

b) Infections and outbreaks: Caused by bacteria, viruses, and parasites like Cryptosporidium and Giardia.

c) Diseases and conditions: Like conjunctivitis, otitis externa, and dermatitis.

Ensuring swimming pools and recreational waters are properly disinfected, tested, and maintained, forces can prevent waterborne diseases, reduce the risk of illness and infection, and maintain the health and readiness of their personnel.

5.2.3 Vector, Pest and Weeds

Effective management of vectors, pests, and weeds is crucial for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. These unwanted organisms can spread diseases, cause discomfort, and compromise operational readiness. Proper control measures help prevent:

a) Vector-borne diseases: Such as malaria, dengue fever, and Zika virus, transmitted by mosquitoes and other insects.

b) Pest-related illnesses: Like leptospirosis, hantavirus, and rat-bite fever, caused by rodents and other pests.

c) Allergic reactions and skin irritations: Caused by weeds, insects, and other allergens.

Controlling vectors, pests, and weeds, forces can reduce the risk of disease transmission, prevent discomfort and illness, and maintain the health, morale, and operational effectiveness of their personnel.

5.2.4 Disaster, Bioterrorism and Environmental Health Planning

a) Disaster Importance in Force Health Protection:

Proactive planning and preparedness for disasters are critical for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. Disasters can cause widespread destruction, displacement, and chaos, leading to:

1. Injuries and fatalities: From trauma, falls, and other accidents.

2. Waterborne and foodborne illnesses: From contaminated water and food sources.

3. Mental health issues: Like anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder

(PTSD).

Having a disaster response plans in place, forces can mitigate the health impacts of disasters, ensure timely medical response, and maintain the health and well-being of their personnel.

b) Bioterrorism Importance in Force Health Protection:

Preparedness and response to bioterrorism threats are essential for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. Bioterrorism agents can cause:

1. Mass casualties and fatalities: From intentional release of biological agents.

2. Widespread illness and disease: From exposure to anthrax, smallpox, and other bioterrorism agents.

3. Panic and social disruption: From fear and uncertainty surrounding bioterrorism threats.

Having bioterrorism response plans in place, forces can detect and respond to threats, prevent the spread of disease, and maintain the health and security of their personnel.

c) Environmental Health Planning Importance in Force Health Protection:

Proactive environmental health planning is vital for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. Environmental hazards can cause:

1. Waterborne and airborne diseases: From contaminated water and air sources.

2. Injuries and illnesses: From exposure to hazardous materials, noise, and other environmental stressors.

3. Long-term health effects: From exposure to toxic substances, like lead and asbestos.

Identifying and mitigating environmental health hazards, forces can prevent illnesses and injuries, maintain the health and well-being of their personnel, and ensure operational readiness

5.2.5 Solid, Hazardous and Medical Waste

Proper management of solid, hazardous, and medical wastes is crucial for protecting public health, particularly in military settings. Improper waste disposal can lead to:

1. Environmental pollution: Contaminating soil, air, and water sources, and harming ecosystems.

2. Infections and diseases: From exposure to pathogens, toxins, and other hazardous substances.

3. Injuries and accidents: From sharp objects, toxic chemicals, and other hazardous materials.

Ensuring safe and proper disposal of solid, hazardous, and medical wastes, forces can:

1. Prevent the spread of diseases and infections

2. Protect the environment and conserve natural resources

3. Maintain the health and well-being of personnel and surrounding communities

4. Prevent accidents and injuries from hazardous materials

Effective waste management is essential for maintaining operational readiness, protecting public health, and preserving the environment.

5.2.6 OSHA, Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Communication and Toxic Substances

OSHA Importnace in Force Health Protection:

Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations is vital for protecting the health and well-being of military personnel. OSHA standards help prevent:

1. Workplace injuries and illnesses: From hazards like falls, electrical shock, and chemical exposure.

2. Occupational diseases: Like asbestos-related illnesses, hearing loss, and respiratory problems.

3. Fatalities and long-term disabilities: From serious accidents and exposures.

Following OSHA guidelines, forces can ensure a safe working environment, reduce the risk of accidents and illnesses, and maintain operational readiness.

Hazardous Materials Importance in Force Health Protection:

Proper handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials are critical for protecting public health and the environment. Hazardous materials can cause:

1. Toxic exposures: From chemicals, fuels, and other hazardous substances.

2. Environmental contamination: From spills, leaks, and improper disposal.

3. Explosions and fires: From incompatible or improperly stored materials.

Managing hazardous materials safely, forces can prevent accidents, protect the environment, and maintain the health and well-being of personnel.

Hazardous Communication Importance in Force Health Protection:

Effective hazardous communication is essential for protecting the health and safety of military personnel. Clear communication about hazards helps prevent:

1. Accidents and exposures: From unknown or unmarked hazards.

2. Injuries and illnesses: From inadequate training or warning.

3. Environmental contamination: From improper handling or disposal of hazardous materials.

Providing clear and concise information about hazards, forces can ensure personnel are aware of potential dangers and take necessary precautions to stay safe.

Toxic Substances Importance in Force Health Protection:

Protection from toxic substances is crucial for maintaining the health and well-being of military personnel. Toxic substances can cause:

1. Acute and chronic illnesses: From exposure to chemicals, heavy metals, and other toxins.

2. Cancer…