L_and_M_Technical_Volume_crosswalk.doc

Section L and M Technical Volume Evaluation Crosswalk Attachment #6 The purpose of this Crosswalk is to assist Offerors in their final Technical Proposal preparations to ensure compliance with Sections L and M in the Solicitation. If the Offeror chooses to utilize this Crosswalk then it shall be inserted at the beginning of the Technical Volume of the Proposal after the title page and will not be counted against the page limit requirements. The Offeror shall only indicate where the information is located in their proposal in the final column on this sheet and shall not offer any additional information. This is only being offered as assistance and is not a requirement of the Offerors and will not be counted against an Offeror if one chooses not to utilize this tool.

Section L and M Evaluation Crosswalk Attachment #6

(Para number ONLY)

Element 1: Organizational Chart/Management Approach/ Multi-State Management Plan.

The Offeror Must:

· Describe their overall management approach with regard to the lines of authority and communications between home office, construction teams, subcontractor operations, government project managers, contracting officials, inspectors, and users.

· Discuss their plan to adhere to the requirements of FAR Clause 52.219-4 Limitations of Subcontracting, at least 15% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.

· Provide an organizational chart that clearly illustrates the lines of authority between the home office, project managers, construction teams, and the Government.

· Outline their Multi-State Management Plan to clearly indicate how they will manage multiple contemporaneous projects that are geographically dispersed. The plan shall demonstrate: 1) an understanding of the task order proposal process, construction processes, coordination, monitoring, and control of construction projects; 2) ability to manage multiple projects through adequate and properly qualified staffing to support multiple ongoing, active construction projects in varying degrees of completion at any given time across a disperse geographic area; 3) clearly identify the methods the Offeror will implement to coordinate and schedule work on multiple task order projects, and the ability to procure and provide materials in a timely manner.

Element 1: Organizational Chart/Management For an “acceptable” rating, the contractor’s proposal will be evaluated as follows:

· Demonstrates a clear, logical and effective approach that shall identify communications between home office, construction teams, subcontractor operations, governmental project managers, contracting officials, inspectors and users.

· Adheres to FAR 52.219-4 (subcontractor plan)

· The organizational chart shall clearly delineate the lines of authority between the home office, project managers, construction teams, and the Government.

· The Multi-State Management Plan will be assessed to determine the Offeror’s understanding, capability, and resources to effectively manage multiple geographically dispersed projects to include maintaining adequate and properly qualified staff.

· The proposal shall demonstrate the process and commitment for full participation in the MATOC task order competition process, to include, attending site visits, preparing and negotiating task order proposals, and timely material submittals, while simultaneously completing task orders in varying degrees of completion across geographically dispersed locations

Element 2: Key Personnel.

The Offeror Shall:

· Provide a consolidated list of key personnel with name, position, title, education, experience/qualifications, and description of specific project responsibility for each.

· Key Personnel that shall be presented include: Project Manager(s), Quality Control Manager(s), Safety Manger(s), and Site Superintendent(s).

· Fully describe its Project Manager’s role in the organization and how the Project Manager will ensure successful completion of all construction task orders issued under the resulting contract.

· Also identify all key personnel who will work with the Project Manager and their respective responsibilities on the construction management team.

Element 2: Key Personnel.

The Offeror’s proposed key personnel will be evaluated to:

· Assess the Offeror’s capability to provide personnel with the proper knowledge, skills, and experience to perform the Statement of Work.

· Determine the practicability of the proposed key personnel to fulfill the requirements of the Statement of Work based on the provided narrative

Element 3: Quality Control Program (QCP) and Safety Plan (SP) The Contractor shall:

· Submit a quality control plan and a safety plan for the overall MATOC.

· Provide a comprehensive overview of the QCP proposed for this MATOC.

· Identify the quality control representative(s) position in the company hierarchy and discuss communication interfaces with Government inspectors. The submission shall describe Offeror’s inspection system for covering all services to include, but not limited to, areas to be inspected on either a scheduled or unscheduled basis, how daily inspections will be performed and individuals(s) (by title) who will perform the inspections, procedures for correcting unacceptable services and timeliness of correcting unacceptable services.

· Provide a comprehensive overview of the Safety Plan proposed for this MATOC.

Element 3: Quality Control Program (QCP) and Safety Plan (SP) The QCP will be evaluated as follows:

· To assess the feasibility and appropriateness of the Quality Control Manager’s responsibilities and authority.

· To ensure the Offeror has addressed all aspects of quality control to include the description of the quality control organization, the responsibility for surveillance of work, acceptance, rejection, documentation and resolution of deficiencies and corrective actions

· The proposed quality control processes will also be evaluated to include the inspection and reporting procedures to include interface with Government inspectors.

· The appropriateness of the quality control representative(s) position in the company hierarchy.

The SP will be evaluated as follows:

· To assess the Offeror’s protocols are established to anticipate, recognize, evaluate, and control any hazards involved with the completion of multiple task orders and individual task orders.

Sub-factor 2, Subcontractor Management Plan (Applied to the overall MATOC)

The Contractor Shall:

· Describe the methodology for management of various subcontractors in varying fields of expertise.

· Describe the criteria for selecting and qualifying subcontractor support (any forms or questionnaires used in the selection process shall be included).

· Discuss the company’s commitment to obtaining/reviewing submitted subcontractor payroll records timely.

Sub-factor 2, Subcontractor Management Plan (Applied to the overall MATOC) The Offeror’s plan will be evaluated as follows:

· To assess the proposed methodology for selecting and managing qualified subcontractors amid a geographically dispersed area.

· The plan shall also discuss the Offeror’s commitment to prompt subcontractor payments, obtaining/reviewing submitted subcontractor payroll records, and processes for ensuring adequate subcontractor oversight during task order performance.

Element 1: Project Execution Narrative:

The offeror shall:

· Submit their overall approach for accomplishing the STO from commencement to completion.

· Demonstrate understanding of the work required utilizing the SOW, specifications, and drawings.

Element 1: Project Execution Narrative:

· The Offeror’s narrative will be evaluated for the Offeror’s understanding of the sample task order statement of work, specifications, and drawings.

Element 2: Project Management.

The Offeror shall:

· Submit a Critical Path Method (CPM) schedule that demonstrates that the offeror fully understands the scope of work for the task order, the specifications, and any additional relevant task order documentation (e.g., drawings) to complete the task order successfully.

The CPM schedule must be complete, accurate, realistic, and adherent to the performance period and specifications, thereby demonstrating that the offeror can, in fact, comply with the CPM schedule Element 2: Project Management.

· The Offeror’s proposal will be assessed for feasibility, adherence to the sample task order statement of work and realism of the proposed Critical Path Method schedule.

Element 3: RS Means Price Proposal:

The Offeror shall:

· Submit an RS Means Based proposal. The price shall utilize the applicable line items from the Unit Price Book (RS Means) to the maximum extent possible.

The Sample Task Order proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability only.

Element 3: RS Means Price Proposal:

The Offeror’s RS Means Based proposal will be evaluated for:

· Utilization of the applicable line items from the Unit Price Book (RS Means).

· Technical acceptability

· A complete price proposal which addresses all aspects of the statement of work.