3-23-2020 Consolidated Questions and Answers Cyber Battle Lab.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 41 KB Posted Mar 31, 2020

Attached to: CYBER BATTLE LAB EXPERIMENTATION SUPPORT
Solicitation number: W91249-20-R-0002
Issued by: Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 30, 2023

This solicitation requests proposals to provide non-personal services supporting experimentation at the Army's Cyber Battle Lab. The contractor shall provide all necessary management, supervision, personnel, equipment and supplies. Key requirements include providing 65 personnel across various specialties such as systems administration, cybersecurity, modeling and simulation support. Proposals are due by the specified closing date. The Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis will award a single IDIQ contract for a five year period of performance.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
W91249-20-R-0002-03 Amendment Cyber Battle Lab.pdf	PDF	Apr 8, 2020
04-07-2020 Cyber Battle Lab Solicitation Amendment 03 Questions and Answ....pdf	PDF	Apr 8, 2020
W91249-20-R-0002-0002.pdf	PDF	Mar 31, 2020
Attachment 5 Pricing Sheet_Amendment 01.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 31, 2020
W91249-20-R-0002-0001.pdf	PDF	Mar 31, 2020
W91249-20-R-0002 Cyber Battle Lab Solicitation 2-20-2020.docx	DOCX document	Feb 20, 2020
Attachment 5 Pricing Sheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 20, 2020
Attachment 1_ DD 254 (003).pdf	PDF	Feb 20, 2020
Attachment 2_DD254 SCI Addendum.docx	DOCX document	Feb 20, 2020

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Sheet1

Item #	Consolidated Questions/Answers W91249-20-R-00002 Cyber Battle Lab
	Paragraph, Section and Page	Question	Government Response/Comment
1	PWS, Part 5 Specific Tasks Monthly Progress Reports (CDRL A001), 2nd Sentence	Government states the "document will be delivered within 15 working days of each month." Question: I assume the Government expects the report by the 15th which will report on the previous month?	Yes, CDRL A001 will be due by the 15th of each month, and will report previous month information.
2	PWS, Part 5 M&S Support, Section 5.4.1 2nd Paragraph - Models/Interfaces/Tools, 1st sentence	Government states that the "contractor is responsible for safeguarding and warehousing of all models, interfaces (custom code) and tools required….." Question: Will the Government be providing the warehouse and if so what product, model, etc. ?	Yes, the Government will be providing warehousing. Providing product or model in a rapidly changing enviroment is not practical.
3	PWS, Part 5 Section 5.5.1 BLCSE Helpdesk, 2nd Sentence	Government states " All calls shall be answered within 4 rings from the helpdesk monitoring phone." Question: Is this requirement expected 24 hours per day 7 days a week?	No, the requirement of answering calls is not expected 24 hours per day 7 days a week. The lab operates during normal working hours five days a week. See PWS 1.6.4 for the hours of operation.
4	PWS, Part 5 Section 5.5.1 BLCSE Helpdesk, 5th Sentence	The Government states "The contractor must accurately and efficiently report network utilization and network outages to the Government Lead or CESC manager within 15 minutes of contractor discovery of the outage." Question: Can the Government indicate how we are to communicate the outage?	PWS section 5.5.1 BLCSE Helpdesk. The contractor shall communicate an outage by email, phone call, or in person.
5	PWS, Part 5 Section 5.5.1 BLCSE Helpdesk, 6th Sentence	Government states " The contractor shall get Government Lead approval prior to performing any changes impacting network or system maintenance…." Question: Does the Government have an expectation regarding how long the approval process should take?	In reference to PWS 5.5.1 BLCSE Helpdesk. The approval process could take minutes or a couple of hours depending on how it will affect the network/system. However, approval process should not take more than 2 hours at the most.
6	PWS, Section 5.8.4 Incident Response #1	Government states "Immediately notify the Government IAM and Branch Chief of any: ……… " Question: Is the Government expectation to be notified immediately upon the discovery of a problem or once we assess what the issue is and the impact?	In reference to PWS 5.8.4 incident response. Yes, the Government expectation is to be notified immediately upon the discovery of a problem, while the contractor still assessing the problem.
7	PWS, 1.6.14	Data Rights states the following:

The Government has unlimited rights to all documents/material produced under this contract. All documents and materials, to include the source codes of any software, produced under this contract shall be Government owned and are the property of the Government with all rights and privileges of ownership/copyright belonging exclusively to the Government. These documents and materials may not be used or sold by the contractor without written permission from the Contracting Officer. All materials supplied to the Government shall be the sole property of the Government and may not be used for any other purpose. This right does not abrogate any other Government rights. Question: Is the Government Requesting Data Rights beyond those granted under the FAR/DFAR such as 252.227-7014 Rights in Noncommercial Computer Software and Noncommercial Computer Software Documentation FEB 2014 252.227-7015 Technical Data--Commercial Items FEB 2014?

	No, in PWS 1.6.14 the Government is not requesting Data Rights beyond those granted under the FAR/DFAR such as 252.227-7014 Rights in Noncommercial Computer Software and Noncommercial Computer Software Documentation FEB 2014 252.227-7015 Technical Data--Commercial Items FEB 2014.
	8	General	As this procurement is a set-aside for small business, will the Government allow teaming with similarly situated small business companies to combine to meet the 50% of total labor dollars requirement.	Yes, the Government will allow teaming with similarly situated small business companies IAW 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting (DEVIATION 2019-O0003).
	9	Attachment 7	According ‘Attachment 7, Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet’ (top of page 122 of 162), “The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation.” Question: What is considered a major subcontractor/s?	Attachment 7 is updated to remove the verbiage major.
	10	General	‘Cost Control’ (page 160 of 162) sub-paragraph (2) reads “A relevancy determination of the offeror’s (including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s)) past performance will be made.”Question: What is considered a critical subcontractor/s?	Addendum 52.212-2 has been updated to remove critical verbiage.
	11	Attachment 7	According to the section ‘Specific Relevant Contracts Format’ (first paragraph page 153 of 162) “Sheets in accordance with Attachment 7. The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation.”Question: Is the Prime required to have Past Performance or can Past Performance come from only the subcontractor?	In reference to attachment 7 all past performance submitted will be evaluated collectively and in accordance with the solicitation.
	12	Section M	Based on the language in ‘Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award’ (page 155 of 162) “…The Government will select the best overall offer(s), based upon an integrated assessment of Technical Experience, Management Capability, Past Performance, and Price Factors. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror (or offerors) who is (are) deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged by an overall assessment of the evaluation factors to represent the most advantageous to the Government”The language in ‘Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award’ (page 155 of 162) above contradicts with section 1.6.6 ‘Type of Contract’: The Government intends to award one (1) Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract that will permit Firm Fixed Price orders. The period of performance will be approximately sixty months (five years) from the effective date of the award. Question: Is it the Government’s intent to make a single award or multiple awards.
	In reference to section M, the Government intends to award one (1) Single Award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract that will permit Firm Fixed Price orders
	13	General	The Government is requesting ‘Cross Reference Matrices’ in Volume II (page 148 of 162) and Volume III (page 150 of 162). Question: Can offerors cross reference to sections within the same volume and/or to other volumes?	Offeror can cross reference within the same volume.
	14	PWS Task 5.8	PWS Task 5.8 ‘Cyber Security/Information Assurance (IA) Support’ (page 48 of 162) is not aligned with any of the Factor 1 – Technical Experience Subfactors in Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award, Factors & Subfactors (page 157 of 162). Question: How does the Government plan to evaluate PWS Task 5.8 ‘Cyber Security/Information Assurance (IA) Support’?	Tthe Government plan to evaluate PWS Task 5.8 ‘Cyber Security/Information Assurance (IA) Support through monthly surveillance scheduled check list and discrepancies will be address with the PM/contractor.
	15	Attachment 5	Attachment 5, Column G seems to have a formula error. The formula multiplies rate times hours times CMEs. This effectively doubles the total. Please clarify.	Attachment 5 has been updated.
	16	PWS 1.6.7	Reference RFP Section 1.6.7, ‘Security Requirements, Phase In’ (page. 13). Question: If a position requires a TS/SCI and our employee has only a secret clearance, will the contractor be allowed to bill for the TS/SCI position until the employee has obtained TS/SCI eligibility, assuming the FSO initiated the TS/SCI within 30 days of employment?	Yes, in reference to PWS 1.6.7, the contractor will be allowed to bill for the TS/SCI position until the employee has obtained TS/SCI eligibility, assuming the FSO initiated the TS/SCI within 30 days of employment.
	17	PWS 1.6.15	If No OCI exists, please clarify what type of plan the Government wants the offeror to provide. Additionally - in which volume does the Government desire this information to be put?	If no OCI plan exist please see the second sentence in PWS para 1.6.15 for guidance. If offeror has OCI plan submit in Volume I.
	18	FAR 52.222-46	Please clarify how the Government would like the compensation plan to be presented. It is not clear where is should go as the reference made on page 154 appears to be in connection with the spreadsheet. Is it the Government's intention for it to be included as part of the price volume narrative?	Yes, the compensation plan IAW FAR 52.222-46 is part of the price volume narrative.
	19	Technical Exhibit 1	Please clarify the "daily rate" included in the disincentive. Please clarify the use and calculation of this disincentive metric. How is it calculated and at what level of performance threshold is it activiated?	In reference to Technical Exhibit 1, the daily rate is for the task not performed or deliverables not met.
	20	Attachment 6 and 7 and Section L	There is a requirement to provide information for subcontractors who are deemed as "major subcontractors." Please define that threshold.	Attachments 6, 7, and Section L (Addendum to FAR 52.212-1) the word "major" has been removed.
	21	Technical Exhibit 3	Are the total direct productive person hours (DPPH) provided in Technical Exhibit 3 meant to be the minimum hours?	Exhibit 3 is the Government Estimated Workload.
	22	Attachment 5 Pricing Sheet - Option Years 1-4	The Junior RF Engineer (Tactical Radios) LE LCAT changed to Junior Principal Engineer (Tactical Radios) LE in Option Years 1-4. Can the Government clarify if the labor category should be the same each year.	Attachment 5 pricing sheet is updated to reflect Junior RF Engineer (Tactical Radios).
	23	Attachment 5 Pricing Sheet	The Total column in Attachment 5 multipies CME, Ceiling Rate and Hours. This causes a mathematical error. Will the government provide a corrected Attachment 5, where the total is the product of the Ceiling Rate multiplied by Hours or is offeror allowed to make changes to Attachment 5?	Attachment 5 pricing sheet is corrected to remove the error.
	24	RFP Page 73 - 52.222-42 Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires	JR RF Systems Engineer (Tactical Radios) is not reflected in this section. Please provide equivalent rate for federal hire.	52.222-42 Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires is updated to reflect JR RF Systems Engineer (Tactical Radios).
	25	PWS 1.6.8.17	The PWS in section 1.6.8.17 lays out the requirements for the Principal Engineer LE. The staffing charts in the solicitation state that there are historically 4 Principal Engineers (such as pricing table, etc) in the LE branch. However, PWS section 1.6.8.17 includes descriptions for 5 Principal Engineers for the LE branch (Principal Engineer Live Experimentation (LE) requirements: ISSO LE, Senior Network / Data Engineer LE, Network / Data Engineer LE, System Administrator LE & NetOps Engineers LE). Can you clarify the discrepancy?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.17, the ISSO LE is an additional duty to the other 4 full-time engineers described in the PWS.
	26	Sec. L, paragraph C.2.(c)	On page 146 of 162, paragraph (c) states, "In addition to submitting hard copies of the proposals, digital copies shall be provided in MS Word, PP and/or Excel."
On the same page, Table 2 states to submit 1 MS Excel and 1 PDF for Volume V.Should Volume V - Price be submitted in MS Word or PDF?	In reference to Sec. L, paragraph C.2.(c). Price is to be submitted IAW Table 2. Price will be submitted as 1 MS Excel and 1 PDF.
	27	Section L, pages 146, 151
Section M, page 158	Section L, p. 151, states: "Resumes for key personnel are excluded from the 50 page limit for Volume III."

Section M, p. 158, states: "Resumes for key personnel are excluded from the 25 page limit for Volume III."

Table 2 in Section L, p. 146 also indicates a 50-page limit for Volume III. Please confirm the page limit for Volume III. In reference to Section L, pages 146, 151 Section M (Addendum to FAR 52.212-2), page 158. The page limit for Volume III is 50 pages.

28 PWS 1.6.4 Hours of Operation (Page 12. Para 1.6.4) Question: Can the Government expound upon the experiment surge support time? Can the Government provide a history of how much time has been required during the past contract?

In reference to PWS 1.6.4 the experiment surge support time. The specific number of each year will be clearly defined in each task order based on the support required for that PoP.
29	PWS 1.6.8.1	Question: Can the Government expound upon the Project Management Professional training and PMP certification preferred statement? Is the Government stating that if an individual has received PMP training then that is satisfactory?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.1, yes the Government is stating that if an individual has received PMP training it is satisfactory, but PMP certification preferred.
30	PWS 1.6.8.2	Question: Has the Government moved from JPAS to using DISS?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.2, the Government is in the process of making the transition from JPAS to using DISS.
31	PWS 1.6.8.3	Question: The Government makes the statement “have a minimum of three years’ experience or equivalent in the field of Army logistics operations and worked directly in the career field during three (3) of the preceding five (5) years; have experience with the Cyber Center of Excellence Command Supply Discipline Program providing 100% inventory control to all items identified on the installation property book; and equipment maintenance processes and procedures.” Specifically, the requirement to have experience with the Cyber Center of Excellence Command Supply Discipline program is unnecessarily restrictive and competition limiting. This is a unit level program and only someone having worked within the organization would have this experience. Recommend that it be restated that the individual be familiar with AR 710-2, Supply Policy and AR 735-5, Property Accountability Policies as these are the official documents upon which a program is created.	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.3, "The requirement to have experience with the Cyber Center of Excellence Command Supply Discipline program" will not be restated.
32	PWS 1.6.8.6	The Government states that the individual must have advanced IT Administrator skills in Collaboration and Chat services. What applications does the Government currently utilize in support of this contract?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.6, openfire XMPP is the applications the Government currently utilize in support of this contract.
33	PWS 1.6.8.17; 1.6.8.23; and 1.6.8.24	The Government makes multiple references to “Windows Server 2012.” Does the Government anticipate upgrading to 2016 or 2019 during the life of this contract?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.17; 1.6.8.23; and 1.6.8.24 “Windows Server 2012.Yes, the Government anticipate upgrading to 2016 or 2019 during the life of this contract.
34	PWS 5.2.3	The Government mentions TRADOC Pamphlet 71-20. Can you confirm that this document still exists? It is not listed as a TRADOC document any longer.	Should read TRADOC Pamphlet 71-20-3. PWS 5.2.3 is updated.
35	PWS Para 5.2.7	Question: The Government states “The contractor will work closely with TRADOC Capability Manager Tactical Radio (TCM-TR) and TRADOC Capability Manager Networks and Services (TCM-NS).” It would be very helpful if the Government were to provide an organizational relationship chart that defines the relationships with the TCM’s in a subsequent amendment to show how this contract and the services it provides works within the TRADOC environment. This would help to resolve organizational responsibilities, taskings, and direction in the accomplishment of tasks.?	PWS Para 5.2.7 covers a very broad area to include commercial, tactic and enterprise networks. This is a holistic requirement, providing an organizational chart that could change at any time will defeat the purpose of the last three lines of this para.
36	PWS 5.4.2	Question: The Government states “All traffic will be developed based on IERs. IERs will be obtained from valid and authorized sources such as AIMKE. Can the Government state what “AIMKE” is referring to in this contract? It is not listed in the acronym list.	In reference to PWS 5.4.2, “AIMKE”is referring to Architecture Integration Management database. AIMKE is updated in the acronym list.
37	PWS 5.4.4	Question: The Government states “The contractor is also responsible for obtaining any Certificates of Net worthiness (CON) or Authority to Operate (ATO) for any model, interface or tool required to support the CBL M&S environments.” This statement is clearly a Government performed function. A contractor can assist in providing documentation for a CON or ATO but it is the Government’s responsibility for the actual submission. Recommend this paragraph be amended.	In reference to PWS 5.4.4, CON is replaced with RMF. The verbiage is changed in PW 5.4.4 to contractor can assist in providing documentation.
38	PWS 5.4.5	Question: The Government states “The contractor shall ensure that each prospective required model, interface, or tool capability has a “gold standard” test plan in which to evaluate with.” Will the Government explain what constitutes the term “gold standard”?	In reference to PWS 5.4.5, the Government constitutes the term “gold standard to the highest quality, best, most reliable, or most prestigious.
39	PWS 5.6.2, item #6	Question: Can the Government explain what training, duties and or responsibilities that the contractor has regarding this area?	In reference to PWS 5.6.2, item #6, the Government replaced Cryptograhic with COMSEC.
40	PWS 5.8.3, item #5	Question: I believe the DoD Instruction 8500.02 has been replaced with DoDI 8500.01, March 14, 2014.	In reference to PWS 5.8.3, item #5, DoD Instruction 8500.02 is replaced with DoDI 8500.01 in PWS 5.8.3 ITEM # 5.
41	(Page 90. Table, 5.6	Maintain RHN-E Network Daily Operations (Page 90. Table, 5.6)The Government states that to achieve exceptional that the RHN-E has to be available at least 15 days prior to the scheduled event. This does not correspond to a realistic metric for this task as of the day of the event if the RHN is not available it results in mission failure. Having a time-based metric for RHN availability is only applicable for execution. Recommend that the Government relook at performance threshold to pertain to mission planning submissions (i.e. SAR, GAR, etc.) and requests that are submitted on time and processed.	In reference to Maintain RHN-E Network Daily Operations (Page 90. Table, 5.6), the Government is referring to Network availability. All other administrative requirements should have already been processed.
42	Volume IV – Past Performance	Volume IV – Past Performance (Page 152. Para L.C.3.d.1) Question: Please confirm that this volume is independently due (15) days after RFP issuance date, which would be March 6, 2020.	Volume IV is due with all other volumes at the close of the Solicitation.
43	General	HelpdeskQuestion: What tools does the helpdesk use in the execution of their mission? Remedy, etc.?	Tools not defined to avoid restricting applicants experiences.
44	PWS 1.2	1.2 Background: Is “Information Operations” to be understood as defined in FM 3-13 Information Operations?	In reference to PWS 1.2, yes, Information Operations is to be understood as defined in FM 3-13 Information Operations.
45	PWS 1.6.1	Quality Control states, “The initial QCP shall be delivered with the contractor’s proposal.” This is not clearly stated in Section L, para C3(c) pertaining to preparation of Volume III – Management Capability, nor is it addressed in the subsequent evaluation criteria.	In reference to PWS 1.6.1, the initial QCP shall be delivered with the contractor’s proposal. QCP will be submitted as a standalone document.
46	PWS 1.6.4	Hours of Operation states, “During experiment surge support time, contractors supporting the BLCSE, M&S or LE branches may work on an early or late shift to support distributed sites located in different time zones.” What is the normal duration of a “surge” and how many occur in a typical calendar year? The para further states, “Contractors supporting the RHN-E shall work a rotating shift only during experiment surge support time.” Do these contractors normally work Day shift when not on “surge”? Are there hours outside of a typical work day required when not in a “surge” period?	In reference to PWS 1.6.4 surge support time, the exact number and duration of surge support time will be identified at the task order level, because the number varies.
47	PWS 1.6.7	Security Requirements, para PHASE IN states, “Contract personnel will not be authorized access to SCI until they receive a final TOP SECRET clearance.” Are any allowances made for individuals granted an interim TS//SCI clearance?	In reference to PWS 1.6.7, no, allowances will be made for individuals granted an interim TS//SCI clearance.
48	PWS 1.6.7.3	states, “NOTE: A NATO Awareness brief and acknowledgement is required for all personnel prior to access to the SIPRNET.” Is the Government responsible for providing the NATO Awareness brief or the contractor FSO?	In reference to PWS 1.6.7.3, contract FSO is require to provide the NATO Awareness brief.
49	PWS 1.6.7.14	ID Badges states, “The contractor shall provide each contractor employee an identification (ID) badge on contract start date or on employment start date.” The Government usually provides a facility-specific ID badge which allows individuals access to the facility. Contractors may or may not issue company ID badges for contractor facilities in addition to Government issued ID badges. Should this read, “The Government shall issue each contractor employee an ID badge…”	Refer to the Performance Work Statement 1.6.7.14 on ID badges.
50	PWS 1.6.8	Staffing and Personnel Qualifications states, “The Government anticipates the requirements within this PWS will require sixty-five (65) contractor personnel…” How many of the recommended personnel are on the current contract and were the same qualification requirements in place at the time the current contract was awarded?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8 staffing and personnel qualification. The Government will not provide the requested on the incumbent workforce. See technical exhibit 3 for the estimated workload data.
51	PWS 1.6.8	Staffing and Personnel Qualifications states, “Contractors will be given six months to obtain required certificate of training and certification, if the requirements change during the period of performance.” Did any qualification requirements change over the course of the current contract? Are there any changes to qualification requirements in the solicitation that would impact any of the incumbent workforce transitioning to the new contract?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8 required certificate of training. Some qualification might have changed during each Task Order. The certification timeline will also be applied to incumbent workforce if they do not hold certification.
52	PWS 1.6.8.1	Program Manager and subsequent paragraphs under 1.6.8 contain the acronym “CE.” This acronym is not on the acronym list and assumed to be “Continuing Education.”	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.1, CE is added on the acronym list.
53	PWS 1.6.8.3	Logistic Engineer Associate requirements states under Experience, “…have experience with the Cyber Center of Excellence Command Supply Discipline Program…” What is the other service or commercial equivalent?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.3 Logistic Engineer Associate requirements. Hiring within the CCOE will help reduce training and any delays in job performance. Other branches of the DOD could qualify for this requirement if there are limited candidate in the CCOE.
54	PWS 1.6.8.5	Network / Data Engineer BLCSE CESC requirements states, “day 1: at least one CME in the BLCSE must have certification in CCNP R&S; all other CME must have CCNA.” Does the incumbent workforce meet or exceed this qualification/professional certification requirement? Is the requirement the same on the current contract?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.5 Network / Data Engineer BLCSE CESC requirements. The Government will not provide the requested on the incumbent workforce qualification/professional certification requirement.The requirements is relatively the same on the current contract.
55	PWS 1.6.8.6	Senior System Administrator BLCSE CESC requirements states, “day 1: all CMEs must have Microsoft Certified Solutions Associate (MCSA) Server; at least one CME in the BLCSE must have

certification in Microsoft Certified Solutions Expert (MCSE) Core Infrastructure; at least one CME must have certification in Microsoft (MS) server virtualization (e.g. MS Exam 74-413); and at least

one CME in the BLCSE must have certification in NetApp Certified Data Administrator (CDA).” Does the incumbent workforce meet or exceed this qualification/professional certification requirement? Is the requirement the same on the current contract?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.6 Senior System Administrator BLCSE CESC requirements. The Government will not provide the requested on the incumbent workforce qualification/professional certification requirement. The requirements is relatively the same on the current contract.
	56	PWS 1.6.8.7	Security Analyst Engineer (CS-SP Security Analyst (CS-AN)) BLCSE requirements states, “within 6 months: CISA or GSNA or CySA+ or cyber/information/network security advanced degrees
approved by the IAM/COR (additional training, certifications, and/or years of relevant technical experience may be substituted for a degree); and complete training for HBSS 201 & 501 approved by the IAM/COR.” What other cyber/information/network security advanced degrees are approved by the IAM/COR? What additional training, certifications, and/or number of years of relevant technical experience may be substituted for a degree? What training for HBSS 201 and 501 are approved by the IAM/COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.7Security Analyst Engineer (CS-SP Security Analyst (CS-AN)) BLCSE requirements. The qualifications and certs are listed in the description with no substitutions Security Analyst Engineer (CS-SP Security Analyst (CS-AN)) BLCSE. The advanced degree option is offered to provide the contractor flexibility in demonstrating qualification via post-secondary education instead of industry certification. Degrees are considered for approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, one recently approved degree was a masters in cybersecurity from an accredited university. Number of years of experience 4 years to substituted for a degree. The HBSS 201 and 501 approved training evolves over time as new options become available and previous ones get discontinued. As such, CBL provides flexibility in allowing the contractor to propose training options for consideration approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, recently approved options came from the Cyber.mil site.

57 PWS 1.6.8.8 Host Based Security System (HBSS) Administrator (CS-SP Infrastructure Support (CS-IS)) requirements states, within 6 months: MCSA Server; and complete training for HBSS 201 & 501 approved by the IAM/COR.” What training for HBSS 201 and 501 are approved by the IAM/COR? In reference to PWS 1.6.8.8 Host Based Security System (HBSS) Administrator (CS-SP Infrastructure Support (CS-IS)) requirements. The qualifications and certs are listed in the description with no substitutions for the Host Based Security System (HBSS) Administrator (CS-SP Infrastructure Support (CS-IS). The HBSS 201 and 501 approved training evolves over time as new options become available and previous ones get discontinued. As such, CBL provides flexibility in allowing the contractor to propose training options for consideration approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, recently approved options came from the Cyber.mil site.

58 PWS 1.6.8.9 Security Auditor (CS-SP Auditor (CS-AU)) BLCSE requirements states, “within 6 months: CISA or GSNA or cyber/information/network security advanced degrees approved by the IAM/COR; and HBSS 301 training approved by the IAM/COR.” What other cyber/information/network security advanced degrees are approved by the IAM/COR? What training for HBSS 501 are approved by the IAM/COR? In reference to PWS 1.6.8.9, the qualifications and certs are listed in the description with no substitutions for Security Auditor (CS-SP Auditor (CS-AU). The advanced degree option is offered to provide the contractor flexibility in demonstrating qualification via post-secondary education instead of industry certification. Degrees are considered for approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, one recently approved degree was a masters in cybersecurity from an accredited university. The HBSS 501 approved training evolves over time as new options become available and previous ones get discontinued. As such, CBL provides flexibility in allowing the contractor to propose training options for consideration approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, recently approved options came from the Cyber.mil site.

59 PWS 1.6.8.10 Information System Security Officer (ISSO) BLCSE requirements states, “within 6 months: must complete training HBSS 101 or HBSS 201 approved by the IAM/COR.” What training for HBSS 101 or 201 are approved by the IAM/COR? In reference to PWS 1.6.8.10 Information System Security Officer (ISSO) BLCSE requirements. The qualifications and certs are listed in the description with no substitutions. The HBSS 101 and 201 approved training evolves over time as new options become available and previous ones get discontinued. As such, CBL provides flexibility in allowing the contractor to propose training options for consideration approval by the IAM/COR on a case by case basis. For example, recently approved options came from the Cyber.mil site.

	60	PWS 1.6.8.11	Network / Data Engineer RHN-E requirements states, “within 6 months: at least 2 CME must have certification and provide verification of Cisco Certified Network Professional (CCNP) security or CCNP R&S; all other Network / Data Engineers in the RHN-E shall provide verification of either (1) CCNP R&S certification; or (2) certificate of completion in CCNP TSHOOT training approved by the IAM/COR; Network / Data RHN-E engineers that also perform System Administration Assistant duties must complete Windows 10 training approved by the IAM or COR.” Does the incumbent workforce meet or exceed this qualification/professional certification requirement? Is the requirement the same on the current contract? How many Network / Data RHN-E perform System Administration Assistant duties? What Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.11 Network / Data Engineer RHN-E requirements. The Government will not provide the requested on the incumbent workforce qualification/professional certification requirement and many Network / Data RHN-E perform System Administration Assistant duties. This is a new requirement. The industry standard windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR.
	61	PWS 1.6.8.12	SATCOM Engineer Associate RHN-E requirements states, “within 6 months: none, unless performing System Administration Assistant duties, then must complete Windows 10 training approved by the IAM or COR.” How many SATCOM Engineer Associate RHN-E personnel perform System Administration Assistant duties? What Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.12 SATCOM Engineer Associate RHN-E requirements. One (1) of the four SATCOM Engineer Associate RHN-E personnel perform System Administration Assistant duties. Industry standard Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR.
	62	PWS 1.6.8.13	Senior System Administrator RHN-E requirements states, “within 6 months: (1) either VMWare certification VCPS-DCV; or Udemy training certification VMware ESX and VSphere Admin Tutorial; or ITU training certification VMware vSphere VCP 5.5; (2) HBSS 201 training approved by
the CBL IAM or COR; (3) HBSS 301 training approved by the CBL IAM or COR; and (4) ACAS training approved by the CBL IAM or COR.” What HBSS 201, HBSS 301, and ACAS training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.13 Senior System Administrator RHN-E requirements. Industry standard HBSS 201, HBSS 301, and ACAS training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR.
	63	PWS 1.6.8.14	Senior Principal Systems Engineer RHN-E requirements states, “within 6 months: none,unless performing System Administration Assistant duties, then must complete Windows 10 training approved by the IAM/COR.” How many Senior Principal Systems Engineer RHN-E personnel perform System Administration Assistant duties? What Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.14 Senior Principal Systems Engineer RHN-E requirements. One Senior Principal Systems Engineer RHN-E personnel perform System Administration Assistant duties. Industry standard Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR.
	64	PWS 1.6.8.15	Information System Security Officer (ISSO) RHN-E requirements states, “within 6 months: must complete training HBSS 101 or HBSS 201 approved by the IAM/COR.” What HBSS 101 or HBSS 201 training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.15 Information System Security Officer (ISSO) RHN-E requirements. Industry standard HBSS 101 or HBSS 201 training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR.
	65	PWS 1.6.8.17	Principal Engineer Live Experimentation (LE) - System Administrator LE requirements state, “within 6 months: obtain the following 1. Windows = 1 of 2: [pass MS Exam 70‐411 "Administering Windows Server 2012"; or Windows training approved by the CBL IAM/COR] AND 2. VMWare = 1 of
4: [VMWare cert, "VCP6-DCV"; or Udemy training cert, "VMware ESXi and vSphere Admin Tutorial"; ITU training cert, "VMware vSphere VCP 5.5"; or VMWare training approved by CBL IAM/COR].” What Windows training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR? What other VMWare training is approved by the CBL IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.17, industry standard windows and VMWare training and is approved by the CBL IAM or COR.
	66	PWS 1.6.8.18	Senior RF Engineer LE requirements states, “day 1: provide proof of military/commercial RF/spectrum training/certification approved by CBL IAM/COR.” What are examples of training/certifications approved by the CBL IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.18, industry standard training/certifications are approved by the CBL IAM or COR.
	67	PWS 1.6.8.21	EW Analyst requirements states, “day 1: EW Certifications (Military or Commercial)…”What EW certifications are desired?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.21EW Analyst requirements. Industry standard EW certifications are desired.
	68	PWS 1.6.8.22	M&S Senior Analyst requirements states, “day 1: bachelor’s degree with a minimum of 30 semester hours in a combination of mathematics, statistics, and computer science with at least 4 years’ experience directly supervising and managing information technology projects.” How are the degree requirements to be verified? How many years of equivalent work experience in M&S would
be acceptable in lieu of degree requirements?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.22 The offeror's HR or recruiting team is responsible to will verify degree requirements. 4 years years of equivalent work experience in M&S would

be acceptable in lieu of degree requirements.

	69	PWS 1.6.8.23	Senior Computer Programmer/Software Engineer M&S requirements states, “within 6 months: (1) for Windows: pass MS Exam 70‐411 "Administering Windows Server 2012"; or complete Windows training approved by the IAM/COR; and (2) for Linux: Linux+CE certification; or Linux training approved by the IAM/COR.” What Windows and Linux training is approved by the IA or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.23,Senior Computer Programmer/Software Engineer M&S requirements. The industry standard for windows and Linux training is approved by the IA or COR.
	70	PWS 1.6.8.24	Database Programmer M&S requirements states, “day 1: verification of training in MCSA SQL Server approved by the IAM/COR.” and “within 6 months: (1) MCSA SQL Server; (2) for Windows: MS Exam 70‐411 "Administering Windows Server 2012"; or Windows training approved by the IAM/COR; and (3) for Linux: Linux+CE certification, or Linux training approved by the IAM/COR.” What MCSA SQL Server training is approved by the IAM or COR? What Windows and Linux training is approved by the IA or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.24 Database Programmer M&S requirements. Industry standard MCSA SQL Server training is approved by the IAM or COR. Industry standard windows and Linux training is approved by the IA or COR.
	71	PWS 1.6.8.26	Information Technology / Information System Security Officer (ISSO) M&S requirements states, “within 6 months: (1) for Windows: MS Exam 70‐411 "Administering Windows Server 2012"; or Windows training approved by the IAM/COR; (2) for Linux: Linux+CE certification, or Linux training approved by the IAM/COR; and (3) must complete RMF training approved by the IAM/COR.”What Windows, Linux, and RMF training are approved by the IA or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.26 Information Technology / Information System Security Officer (ISSO) M&S requirements. The industry standard Windows, Linux, and RMF training are approved by the IA or COR.
	72	PWS 1.6.8.27	Information Assurance Network Officer (IANO) states, “within 6 months: must complete Windows 10 training approved by the IAM/COR.” What Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR?	In reference to PWS 1.6.8.27 Information Assurance Network Officer (IANO). Industry standard Windows 10 training is approved by the IAM or COR.
	73	PWS 5.2.6	International Trade in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Is there an initial and/or annual training requirement? If so, who is responsible for providing and documenting the training?	In reference to PWS 5.2.6 International Trade in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR). There is no an initial and/or annual training requirement for the International Trade in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR).
	74	PWS 5.2.7	“Network analysts will develop capabilities that will deliver tactical, operational, and strategic advantages.” Should read, “…will facilitate development of capabilities to deliver…” Is “capabilities” in this context referring to equipment, as well as non-material solutions such as tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP)?	In reference to PWS 5.2.7 Network analysts. The language will remain the same, and yes capability in this context is referring to equipment, as well as non-material solutions such as tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP).
	75	PWS 5.2.8	Cyber Warfare (CW) Analysis. “CW analysts will develop CNO capabilities that will deliver tactical, operational, and strategic advantages.” Should read, “…will facilitate development of capabilities to deliver…” Is “capabilities” in this context referring to hardware/software tools, as well as non-material solutions such as tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP)?	In reference to PWS 5.2.8 Cyber Warfare (CW) Analysis. The language will remain the same, and yes capabilities in this context is referring to hardware/software tools, as well as non-material solutions such as tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP).
	76	PWS 5.4.1	Cyberspace, EW, and Network Model Development and Maintenance. (CDRL A007).“Cyberspace and EW (EW) effects will continue to be developed and integrated into the CBL simulation environment.” What other models are being integrated from other domains such as land, air, sea, and Space?	In reference to PWS 5.4.1 Cyberspace, EW, and Network Model Development and Maintenance. Experimentation requirements vary, intent is to meet the AFC Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) requirements.
	77	CDRL A003	The contractor shall develop, maintain, and provide technically oriented written documentation on how these capabilities are integrated into the CBL M&S environments and/or efforts. The contractor shall develop, maintain, and provide technically oriented written documentation with operational and system architectures related to the overall construct of the CBL M&S environments and/or efforts.” Does the CBL already have a technical model library in place? If so, does the contractor manage it?	In reference to CDRL A003. Yes the CBL already have a technical model library in place and yes the contractor manage it.
	78	CDRL A003	“The contractor will coordinate with COR approved commercial vendors and other Government organizations for the procurement and maintenance of emulation tools, models and simulations deemed necessary for the CBL mission.” What commercial vendors are on the approved list?	In reference to CDRL A003. The procurement and maintenance of emulation tools, models and simulations deemed necessary for the CBL mission are vetted through CHESS.
	79	PWS 5.4.4	Model Documentation. “The contractor is also responsible for obtaining any Certificates of Net worthiness (CON) or Authority to Operate (ATO) for any model, interface or tool required to support the CBL M&S environments.” Obtaining a CON or an ATO is a Government function. The contractor should assist the IAM in preparing documentation required to obtain approval for a CON or ATO.	In reference to PWS 5.4.4 Model Documentation. Yes, contractor will assist the IAM in preparing documentation required to obtain approval for a CON or ATO.
	80	CDRL A005	The Government requires a maximum of 30 days to review deliverables. The contractor shall structure work so that each deliverable has at least one (1) immediate review, by the designated Government official before final delivery and acceptance.” Should this read “initial” review? How far out is the immediate initial/intermediate/in-progress review or is it included in the 30-day window?	In reference to CDRL A005, "immediate review" is correct and should not change to "initial" review.The immediate initial/intermediate/in-progress review is included in the 30 day window.
	81	PWS 5.6.3	RHN-E Baseband Architectures. “The contractor shall develop baseband routing architectures and baseband architectures for other than routing networks within 45 days of event start.” Is there a process to make changes within the 45-day window?	In reference to PWS 5.6.3 RHN-E Baseband Architectures.Yes, there is an Internal process that makes changes within the 45-day window that varies depending on the experiment.
	82	PWS 5.6.5	RHN-E Satellite Engineering. Acronym “MRT” not broken out or on list of acronyms.	In reference to PWS 5.6.5 Master reference terminal. MRT is added to the acronyms list.
	83	PWS 5.6.6	RHN-E Network Implementation. Acronym “NCW” not broken out or on list of acronyms.	In reference to PWS 5.6.6 NCW is Network centric waveform. NCW is added to the acronyms list.
	84	PWS 5.7	VISITOR ACCESS CONTROL. Do these contractors work for the CBL Security Manager?	In reference to PWS 5.7. Yes, contractors work for the CBL Security Manager.
	85	PWS 5.8	CYBER SECURITY / INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) SUPPORT. CYBER SECURITY / IA DOCUMENTATION (CDRL A012). 2. IA/IS Master Plans aligned to the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Critical Security Controls (CSCs) for all CBL information systems to ensure internal and external security standards are documented and enforced: “Basic CSC IA/IS master plan elements are due within 30 days of contract award. Foundational CSC IA/IS master plan elements due within 60 days of contract award. Organizational CSC IA/IS master plan elements are due within 90 days of contract award.” What specific elements are required and distinguish the difference between Basic, Foundational, and Organizational CSC IA/IS master plans?	In reference to PWS 5.8. Basic, Foundational, and Organizational CSC IA/IS master plans levels are different. Each level has different certification requirement which will correspond to each contract personnel qualification.
	86	PWS 5.8	CYBER SECURITY / INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) SUPPORT. CYBER SECURITY / IA DOCUMENTATION (CDRL A012). Items 8, 9, and 10 contain the phrase “due within 30 days of IAM instruction.” Does this mean within products are to be delivered within 30 days of IAM tasking or after release of DoD 8140, which will replace DoD 8570?	In reference to PWS 5.8. CDRL A012 will be delivered within 30 days of the tasking.
	87	PWS 5.8.1	Coordination & Planning. 3. Provide subject matter expertise participation in configuration control boards for the respective systems. How often are configuration control boards convened and who runs them?	In reference to PWS 5.8.1 Coordination & Planning. Configuration control boards are convened as required by the Government and Contractors. The boards are run by the Government.
	88	PWS 5.8.2	Systems Compliance. 6. “… Manual checks will be performed for systems that cannot be checked with an automated tool.” How many systems must be checked manually (i.e., approximate number or percentage) and what is the normal resource (time, manpower, etc.) investment required?	In reference to PWS 5.8.2 Systems Compliance most all system checks are automated.
	89	PWS PART 6	APPLICABLE PUBLICATIONS (CURRENT EDITIONS). FM 3-13. Inform and Influence Activities. 25 January 2013 was superseded by FM 3-13. Information Operations. 6 December 2016.	In reference to PWS PART 6. PWS part 6 is updated with FM 3-13. Information Operations. 6 December 2016.
	90	52.222-46	EVALUATION OF COMPENSATION FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (FEB 1993). (c) The Government is concerned with the quality and stability of the work force to be employed on this contract. How many open/vacant contractor positions at present? What has been the rate of employee turnover over the life of the current contract?	In reference to 52.222-46. There are 5 open/vacant contractor positions at present. The rate of employee turnover over the life of the current contract is 7 per year
	91	PWS Technical Exhibit 1 (PRS)	Technical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS). Network Daily Operations. No more than 5 customer complaints. Is there any consideration for the same complaint coming from multiple locations (e.g., system-wide issue)? Is the complexity of the complaint or time required to resolve the issue taken into account?	In reference to PWS Technical Exhibit 1 (PRS),Network Daily Operations. Yes, considerations are made for the same complaint coming from multiple locations.
	92	PWS Technical Exhibit 1 (PRS)	Technical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS). 5.6 Maintain RHN-E Network Daily Operations. Is there any consideration for the same complaint coming from multiple locations (e.g., system-wide issue)? Is the complexity of the complaint or time required to resolve the issue taken
into account?	In reference toTechnical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS). 5.6 Maintain RHN-E Network Daily Operations. Yes, considerations are made for the same complaint coming from multiple locations.
	93	PWS Technical Exhibit 1 (PRS)	Technical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS). 5.8 Cyber Security Support. At least 95% of Cyber Security Support is complete. How is this percentage assessed?	In reference to Technical Exhibit 1 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS). 5.8 Cyber Security Support. Cyber Security Support percentage is assessed using a monthly surveillance checklist.
	94	PWS Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule	Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule. Trip Reports CDRL A002. Frequency is 5 days after trip ends. Is this calendar days or workdays?	In reference to Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule. The frequency is in workdays not calendar days.
	95	PWS Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule	Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule. Models/Interfaces/Tools CDRL A003 and Model Input Data/Traffic CDRL A007. 1 original and 1 copy are to be submitted quarterly to the Government Lead. Is there any need for the copy or is a copy to be submitted to the COR?	In reference to Technical Exhibit 2 Deliverables Schedule. Models/Interfaces/Tools CDRL A003 and Model Input Data/Traffic CDRL A007 Yes, there is a need for the copy.
	96	CDRL A005	SPECIALIZED TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION REPORTS (CDRL A005). The contractor shall structure work so that each deliverable has at least one (1) immediate review, by the designated Government official before final delivery and acceptance. Should this read “initial” review? How far out is the immediate initial/intermediate/in-progress review or is it included in the 30-day window?	In reference to CDRL A005. No, it is read "immediate review" and not "initial" review. The immediate initial/intermediate/in-progress review is included in the 30 day window.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Mar 31, 2020.