Solicitation_W911SG-18-R-0086_Modification.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to:

1. Answ er RFIs

2. Update SOW (Dated 23AUG18)

3. Update Attachments (Updated attachments are highlighted on List of Attachments page)

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W911SG18R0086

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Aug-2018

CODE

MICC- FT BLISS

ISSUING OFFICE

FORT BLISS TX 79916-6812

W911SG 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911SG18R0086

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. POINT OF CONTACT (POC):

CPT Lane Berg, Contract Specialist Tel: 915-568-7749 Email: lane.m.berg.mil@mail.mil

2. COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS: This procurement is a 100% Woman Owned Small Buisness (WOSB) set-aside acquisition.

3. SITE VISIT: The Government has scheduled a one day site visit at WSMR Waste Water Treatment Plant, NM at 1100 MST on 16 August 2018.

a. We will meet at the parking lot of BLDG 102, located at Headquarters Ave and Springfield Street.

The flag pole in front of building 100, Building 102 is just north of Building 100. Please arrive early enough to facilitate going through either access control point (El Paso or Las Cruces/Alamogordo Gate) to receive a vehicle pass. You will need to provide a driver's license, vehicle registration and proof of insurance in order to receive a vehicle security pass, the purpose of the site visit is to provide the contractor insight into the job requirements.

(http://www.wsmr.army.mil/testcenter/Pages/WhereWeAre.aspx)

b. Firms who wish to attend the site visit shall provide the name(s), company name, position title, telephone number, email address and mailing address of all attendees via e-mail to lane.m.berg.mil@mail.mil no later than 10:00 MST on 15 August 2018.

c. The site visit is limited to a maximum of two (2) attendees per company. Contractor representatives should be prepared to furnish identification if requested.

d. Individual or group questions will not be answered during the site visit. Potential offerors may submit written questions in accordance with number 4 (below) of this instructions to offerors section.

e. Potential offerors are not allowed to take pictures at the site visit. If pictures are required, the offeror may ask the designated Government representative to take any pictures requested. Pictures will subsequently be cleared by the WSMR Security Office and then incorporated into the solicitation as an amendment.

Note: Remarks and explanations made by the Government representatives during the course of the site visit, whether orally or in writing, shall not change or qualify any of the terms or conditions of this solicitation. The solicitation can only be changed by a formal written amendment issued by the Contracting Officer (KO).

4. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI): All offeror inquiries or questions shall be submitted in writing electronically to CPT Lane Berg at lane.m.berg.mil@mail.mil no later than 22 August 2018 at 13:00 MST. An amendment will then be issued with all questions and answers. **After the due date no additional RFI’s will be answered**

5. PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Proposals are due no later than 10:00 MST on 10 September 2018. Proposals shall be emailed to lane.m.berg.mil@mail.mil. Proposals SHALL include the following in order to be considered (failure to include all line items shall be cause for rejection of the offer):

a. Cover sheet on company letterhead with your DUNS number, CAGE code, Tax ID, and primary point of contact information;

b. Signed and completed Standard Form 1442 along with any amendments;

c. Letter from bonding company indicating offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their offer;

d. Project Schedule per Evaluation Factors; and

e. Past Performance per Evaluation Factors.

Please note that all correspondence via e-mail shall contain a subject line that reads, “WSMR Repair Headworks W911SG-18-R-0086, Company Name”. If sending attachments via e-mail, ensure only .pdf, .doc or .xls documents are sent. In the body of the email please ensure to list the number of attachments submitted. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to verify all emails along with all attachments are received by the Contract Specialist listed above.

6. BONDNG REQUIREMENTS:

a. Performance and Payment Bonds:

(1) The penal amount of the bonds shall be 100 percent of the awarded price.

(2) The Government may require additional bond protection when a contract price is increased. The increase in protection shall generally equal 100 percent of the increase in contract price. The Government may secure additional protection by directing the contractor to increase the penal amount of the existing bond or obtain an additional bond.

b. Offer Guarantee:

(1) An Offer Guarantee is not required. Instead of submitting an Offer Guarantee, offerors are to submit a letter from their bonding company indicating the offerors ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

2. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM): Offeror must be registered in the database IAW FAR 52.204-7 in order to be awarded a contract and have the applicable NAICS code listed in FAR 52.219-1(c), Small Business Program Representations (Alternate I), Representations.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation using the evaluation method “Lowest Price Technically Acceptable.” This method is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated reasonable price. Offers will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-price factors. Evaluation factors and significant sub factors that establish the requirements of acceptability are set forth below. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors (FAR 15.101-2). The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from price, technical and past performance. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. The Government reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received. If a minor clerical error has occurred, then the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the "clarifications" process.

This solicitation is for a firm, fixed price construction contract. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offer that provides the lowest reasonable price. The Government intends to award a contract to one offeror deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 9.1).

Offerors are required to submit technical proposals addressing the Evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors identified.

The procurement is being conducted utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. Proposal will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked, using the non-price evaluation factors. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. There shall be no trade-offs. Offers evaluated as not Technically Acceptable will not be eligible for award, regardless of price.

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by the solicitation. The Government will rely on such information for the award of the contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in the proposal, including the information provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected.

To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts; Part I –Technical Proposal - Part II - Price Proposal.

The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable.

Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, at time of award, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

This solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors Factor 1: Technical – Evaluation of this factor will be based on the offeror's submission of a project schedule that demonstrates the offeror's understanding of the work requirement including estimated timeframes for ordering supplies and completing construction.

Sub-factor:

a. Experience – Previous experience will be evaluated as “Acceptable or Non-Acceptable”. To be acceptable, offerors must provide information demonstrating they have successfully performed as prime contractor within the last three (3) years* on at least one (1) construction project of equal or greater size and complexity and magnitude within the same or similar scope of work as identified in this solicitation. Past performance information shall be obtained by the Contract Specialist from any other sources available to the Government to include, but not limited to, PPIRS or other databases.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Rating Description

*The three (3) years shall be calculated from the solicitation issue date.

**Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.” Aspects of Past Performance Evaluation: The past performance evaluation results are an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertains to the requirements outlined in the solicitation.

Factor 2: Price – Prices will be evaluated for reasonableness through a comprehensive comparison of each proposal received. Reasonableness will be determined based on prices submitted by the competition, current market conditions, and comparison to the Government estimate. Prices will also be evaluated to determine if they are either excessive or insufficient for the effort to be accomplished, and for any unbalanced areas within the offeror's pricing proposal. A price that is too low or too high may endanger the proposal's opportunity for award of a contract.

Each proposal shall be evaluated to ensure that all information provided in the RFP has been addressed, is accurate and complete.

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Attachments

1. Policy Letter 24 - Work Force Briefing and Training on the Hazards of Un...

2. WSMR Visitor Control Program May 2017

3. DPW037607P - Scope of Work - 23 August 2018 - REPAIR HEADWORKS AT WWTP

4. Attach1-foundation plan (Updated Drawing)

5. Attach2-profile (Updated Drawing)

6. Attach3-splitter box rec dwg (Updated Drawing)

7. Attach4-WWTP

8. RECORD DRAWING No P-212

9. RECORD DRAWING No S-101

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

252.236-7001 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS (AUG 2000)

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(a) The Government will provide to the Contractor, without charge, one set of contract drawings and specifications, except publications incorporated into the technical provisions by reference, in electronic or paper media as chosen by the Contracting Officer.

(b) The Contractor shall--

(1) Check all drawings furnished immediately upon receipt;

(2) Compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying out the work;

(3) Promptly notify the Contracting Officer of any discrepancies;

(4) Be responsible for any errors that might have been avoided by complying with this paragraph (b); and

(5) Reproduce and print contract drawings and specifications as needed.

(c) In general--

(1) Large-scale drawings shall govern small-scale drawings; and

(2) The Contractor shall follow figures marked on drawings in preference to scale measurements.

(d) Omissions from the drawings or specifications or the misdescription of details of work that are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent of the drawings and specifications, or that are customarily performed, shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or misdescribed details of the work. The Contractor shall perform such details as if fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and specifications.

(e) The work shall conform to the specifications and the contract drawings identified on the following index of drawings:

Title File Drawing No.

1. Attach1-foundation plan

2. Attach2-profile

3. Attach3-splitter box rec dwg

4. Attach4-WWTP

5. RECORD DRAWING No P-212

6. RECORD DRAWING No S-101

(End of clause)

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

ANSWERS TO RFIS

RFIs W911SG18R0086 - Repair Headworks at Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) Facility 21290.

1. Request as-built drawing in reference to the scope of work. As-Built needs to contain the measurements for existing headworks system, and to include sheets regarding the existing system to be repaired.

Attachment 1-dated 24 August 2018- has been revised with inside channel dimensions. See Record Drawing, drawing number S-101 for section views of the existing channel; and in conjunction with Attachment 2-profile, calculate areas and quantities for repairs.

2. Require depth of flume.

See Record Drawing, drawing number P-212, detail 3 for reference to dimensions of the existing Parshall Flume, including its depths (crests and throat).

3. Require dimensions of existing splitter box.

See Attachment 3 for dimensions of existing splitter box "C". Scope of work section 11.1.9 was modified to read: The contractor shall repair the concrete splitter box by patching and grouting the existing concrete structure. Calculate a maximum of 50% of its surface area will be patched.

4. Require information concerning the screw auger to be replaced. Existing model number and manufacture would be very helpful. Length and diameter of existing auger.

See Attachment 3 for dimensions of existing splitter box "C". Scope of work section 11.1.9 was modified to read: The contractor shall repair the concrete splitter box by patching and grouting the existing concrete structure. Calculate a maximum of 50% of its surface area will be patched.

5. Please provide dimensions for the Slide Gates to be replaced.

See Attachment 5 for dimensions of the slide gates in the splitter box "C" to be replaced. Section 11.1.10 (1st sentence) of the scope of work was modified to clarify the number of slide gates to be replaced.

6. Where and how to shut down sanitary intake line to head works while doing temporary bypass on system?

The sanitary intake line to the headworks does not shut down. The contractor may install a temporary manhole along the influent line and divert flow upon completion and acceptance of the bypass.

(End of Summary of Changes)