QUESTION_for_CCTV_17_SEPT_18.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911SG-18-R-0042
About this file
Question and Answer
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0001_Correcting_Proposal_Due_Date_for_CCTV.pdf | ||
| QUESTIONS_ASKED_AND_ANSWERS.docx | DOCX document | |
| ACCESS_TO_FORT_BLISS.docx | DOCX document | |
| NOTICE_OF_PRE._Proposal_Site_Visit_docx.docx | DOCX document | |
| Buffalo_Soldier_ACP_Images.docx | DOCX document | |
| MSG_Pena_ACP_Images.docx | DOCX document | |
| Cassidy_Gate_Images.docx | DOCX document | |
| W911SG-18-R-0042_Soliciation_for_CCTV.pdf | ||
| Old_Ironsides_ACP_Images.docx | DOCX document | |
| PWS_DES_ACP_Camera_System_QA_reviewed_corrections_12_July_2018.docx | DOCX document | |
| PFC_Minue_ACP_Images.pdf | ||
| CSM_Barreras_ACP_Images.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTION
1) In section 5.1.6 It states that the contractor shall use existing conduit for the installation of the cameras. Is the installer responsible for non-existing pathways necessary to complete this project? Ie conduit, trenching, poles?
ANSWER:
Yes, contractor is responsible for non-existing pathways (i.e. conduit, trenching, poles, etc.) necessary to complete the project.
File details come from the government source that posted it.