W911S804D0014JA1107.pdf

MICC JBlM Control No. 2011-1

JUSTIFICATION REVIEW DOCUMENT

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

J&A #1: $10,600,000.00

PROGRAM: Full Food Services, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington

AUTHORITY: 10 U.S.C. 2304(C) (1)

Prepared by:

Typed Name: Thomas Ebenhoh Title: Contract Administrator

Procuring Contracting Officer Typed Name: Angela Chaplinski Title: Contracting Officer

Technical Representative Typed Name: Benedict Tesoro Title: Contracting Officer's Representative

Requirements Representative Typed Name: Linda Harris Title: Food Program Manager

Management Typed Name: Garey R. Heumpbreus Title: Director, Department of Logistics

. Amount: $837,724.90

Date: 3 November 2010

DSN: 347-3488

Date: 3 November 201 0

DSN: 357-3491

Date: 3 November 2010

DSN: 357-5984

Date: 3 November 2010

DSN: 357-1650

Date: 3 November 2010

DSN: 357-7301

thomas.ebenhoh Highlight thomas.ebenhoh Highlight

MICC JBLM Control No, 2011-1

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Reviews: I have reviewed this J&A and find the justification adequate to support other than full and open competition, Local Special Competition Advocate (SCA): Not applicable, local SeA not assigned, Local Legal Counsel:

Typed Name: Algis p, Glamba DSN: 677-1844

Date: 3 November 2010

Director, MICC-Joint Base Lewis-McChord:

Typed Name: Pamela M, Munoz DSN: 347-3507

Signature:

J.' / I r' J 1 'r C)~~" J«' " / lL'~_LI i~'~._, 1/J._/···· or) r il~ ""~"" __ • '" ""_~_~___ "~~'"" "~~ """ """ ", "__ 'MMMM' '\ "",0, _~_ _ """~"""" • """'" """' _ "~""'_"M

Date: 4 November 2010

MICC JBLM Control No. 2011-1

JUSTIFICATION REVIEW DOCUMENT

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

I. CONTRACTING AGENCY:

Mission and Installation Contracting Command, Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Building 2015, MS 19, Box 39500, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, W A..

2. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION:

a. Approval is requested to award a Finn Fixed-Price (FFP) contract extension under other than full and open competition to the following contractor:

Services for the Blind, Dept Of J eanoe Gallo

402 LEGION WAY

Olympia, W A., 98504-0933 Contract number: W911 S8-04-D-00 14

b. The extension is required to provide mission critical food services to troops pending the award of a long tenn, FFP contract by the Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), Ft. Knox, Kentucky, for a base and four (4) one-year option periods. Award of the foliowoOn contract was planned lor the fourth quarter oftlseal year 2010, but has been extended to the first quarter of fiscal year 20 II.

c. This three-month extension, requested from MICC at Fort Knox, Kentucky, is required as a result of MICC required review time for acquisitions of this dollar magnitude (over $5.5 million). There have been several changes in the magnitude and scope of the requirement based on changing mission support at JBLM. As a result of these changes and despite great effort put forth over the last year, it would not be feasible to solicit, evaluate and award a contract prior to the current contract expiration on 30 November 2010. The requested three-month extension is to the existing contract for Full .Food Services (W9I1S8-04-D-OOI4) at JBLM. Washington.

d. Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Operations and Maintenance, Anny (OMA) appropriations will be utilized for delivery orders issued during the period of I December 2010 through 28 February 2011.

3. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES:

a. Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) is one of the largest and most modem military reservations in the United States and is the premier military installation in the Northwest. Part of Forces Command, JBLM is the home of! Corps. JBLM is also home for over 18 Brigades (BDEs), including three of the Anny's Stryker Brigades, as well as a number of other supporting units. It is one of the seven (7) US power projection platfonns and has more than 47, 000 soldiers, airmen and civilian workers. JBLM is the only W cst Coast Primary Force Generating Installation (pFGI) and classified as a mega-installation under Most Optimized Strategically Responsive (MOSR) classification based on highly technical or complex mission of largest most complex industrial installations. The I Corps' primary focus is the Pacific Rim.

As a result, I Corps has a close, ongoing, relationShip with Pacific Command.

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

JBLM-McChord Field is the home of Combat Airlift with two Wings of the C-17 transport fleet that are the Air Mobility Commands premier West Coast strategic lift force and key element of USAF's Nuclear Airlift Force. McChord Field provides airlift capability to JBLM along with airlift and aero medical evacuation in support of Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom and other contingencies around the world.

The Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission in 2005 recommended the transfer of installation support functions of McChord AFB to Fort Lewis and establishment of Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM). The recommendation became law in November 2005. Under JBLM, the U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Lewis, is expanding its mission to absorb similar functions from McChord Field and support of its complimenting mission.

The mission of the Installation Management Command (IMCOM), Directorate of Logistics (DOL) Food Program at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, W A, is to provide complete support to the dining facilities for JBLM. The Full Food Service (FFS) requirement will staff dining facilities in support of the Pacific Command mission. The objectives are: to feed all soldiers in support of the Pacific Command mission; to feed all soldiers and airmen in accordance with (lAW) Army Regulation (AR) 30-22 and Department of the Army Pamphlet (DA PAM) 30-22; to ensure that all food quality standards are met fA W Technical Bulletin Medical (TB MED) 530, and to ensure the cleanliness and sanitary conditions of the dining facilities. The outcomes to be satisfied are performance-based, identified in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS), with evaluation based on the Department of the Army Food Program certified Performance Assurance Plan (PAP). The current contract, in its final one (I) month extension, is performance-based, with acceptable interim performance reviews.

US Army, Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC), JBLM, Washington, is developing a contract for a follow-on requirement. The neW contract for Full Food Services (FFS) will be solicited as a finn-fixed-price requirements contract. The strategy is to conduct a best valueltrade off source selection.

b. The contractor is required to furnish all resources, excluding Government-Furnished Property (GFP), labor, planning, preparation, scheduling, cleaning, management and maintenance to support Fun Food Services for soldiers and qualified civilians in specified dining facilities at JBLM, Washington. Full Food Services include the preparing, storing and requisitioning of food. The contractor shall continue to provide the prescribed services in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in its existing contract requirements. The number of dining facilities that are open varies due to demand, deployments and operational hours. However, soldiers living in barracks and using meal cards have access to hot meals three times a day, seven days a week, as supported by the Full Food Service contract; and their need is most urgent. On an average day, the dining facilities collectively serve approximately 5,000 meals, including unplanned meals served to non-meal card holding soldiers and qualified civilians. The current Full Food Service contract provides meals not only to the Garrison, but also field fceding and Government War on Terrorism (GWOT) lOCO support; plus contingency, operational and mobilization food service support. Holiday meals such as Thanksgiving and Christmas dinners are also served to

MICCJBLM Control No. 2011-1

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

soldiers. The previously mentioned personnel must have reasonable access to food and beverages in order to meet minimal daily nutritional and caloric requirements necessary for basic functioning. Soldiers in training and undergoing daily physical training may have additional caloric and nutritional needs tbat must be met. Full Food Services must be available at selected dining facilities so as to ensure minimal disruption or suspension oftbe personnel's ability to meet mission requirements.

In summation, for reasons based upon health, continuity of mission support, and logistical feasibility, it is essential that qualified personnel be able to receive meals in tbe dining facilities supported by the Full Food Service Contract.

4. AUTHORITY CITED:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) (I), as implemented by FAR 6.302-1, Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Sali.~fY Agency Requirements.

5. REASON FOR AUTHORITY CITED:

Pursuant to FAR 6.302-1 (a) (2) (iii), the incumbent contractor is tbe only logical source for this procurement as will be subsequently discussed. The referenced contractor has provided quality service, performance, and delivery of services at a fair and reasonable price during the course of this contract. The services are deemed to be available only from tbe original source for tbis contract extension because to award to any otber source would result in highly untenable and unacceptable delays in fulfilling the agency's requirements and negatively impact tbe Tnstallation and Management Command.

(a) Background;

(I) A pre-solicitation notice was issued for dining facility and full food service support solicitation DABJ25-03-R-0026 in July 2003. As a result of actions by the Washington State Department of Services for tbe Blind, the solicitation was changed by removing tbe Full Food Service portion of the requirement and placing it under a separate solicitation. The Full Food Service solicitation, W911S8-04R-000I, was issued on 13 November 2003. Due to only one responsible offer being received and excessive pricing the solicitation was canceled by Amendment 0004 on 12 February 2004. On 27 February 2004 solicitation W911 S8-04-R-0006 was issued for full food service. Amendment 000 I issued 3 March 2004 notified potential offerors of tbe applicability of tbe Randolph- Sheppard Act to tbe solicitation. Upon solicitation closing on 31 March 2004 tbere were six responsible offerors, one of which was the Washington State Department of Services for the Blind, which is tbe State licensing agency in tbe state of Washington under the Randolph-Sheppard Act. In accordance with the Randolph-Sheppard Act discussions were opened with tbe Washington State Department of Services for the Blind: On 27 July 2004, tbe Government received a letter confirming that tbe Washington State Department of Services for tbe Blind would enter into a contract as structured in tbe solicitation (Base witb four one-year options). The award was made to tbe Washington State Department of Services for the Blind for an estimated amount of $42,942,416.00 (Base plus all options), which waS considered fair and reasonable and determined to be the best value to tbe Government. Delivery orders issued

MICC JBLM Control No. 2011-1

JUSTIFICATION REVIEW DOCUMENT

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

against the current contract will provide Full Food Services for soldiers and civilian personnel assigned to and working at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, from I March 2010 through

I September 20 I O.

(2) The FFS contract (W911 S8-04-D-0014) is with the State Licensing Agency (SLA) under the Randolph-Sheppard Act (R-SA). It is currently in its last available short-term extension period which will end on 30 November 2010. This contract was solicited as commercial, 100% small business set-aside, competitive, negotiated firm~fixed-price requirements contract using best value/trade-off source selection procedures. Six offers were received to include the SLA.

The contract was awarded for-$8,588,483.33 (EST.)

The Contracting Officer (KO) conducted market research in 2003 and determined that the service was commercial in nature under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 (a) - Commercial Items (3) (ii), "M inor modifications of a type not customarily available in the commercial marketplace made to meet Federal Government Requirements." The modification in this requirement imposes more stringent inspection standards than is common in the commercial market. The current contract was solicited and awarded as a commercial service.

The new acquisition will-be conducted as a commercial, 100% smal1 business set-aside, competitive, negotiated fum-fixed-price-requirements contract using best valucltrade off source selection procedures

i. There are several challenges to this acquisition that drive mission approach. They include, but are not limited to the following:

• The administrative changes being encountered as JBLM implements the Initial

Operational Capacity (IOC) of JBLM with Full Operational Capacity (FOC) on

I October 2010.

• Training, mobilization, and demobilizations that require significant changes to the opening and closing of dining facilities. These changes have caused the contract to grow from an award of $8.5 million to an expanded contract amount of $81 million to date.

• This drastic increase of expended dollars for FFS can be tracked to whether there are sufficient military cooks available to run the facility using only the supplemental Dining Facility (DFA) contract, or if the FFS contract must be used. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) has lead to a shortage of Continental United States (CONUS) military cooks and resulted in a higher than expected use of the FFS coutract.

ii. The RFP had been reviewed locally at MICC-JBLM, by all parties and it was ready to go to MICC for approval. The situation changed dramatical1y when the entire solicitation for the follow on contract was transferred to Fort Knox, KY, in November 2009. This transfer came about as a result of the maximum dollar thresholds that MICC-ffiLM should be doing. In thomas.ebenhoh Highlight

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

addition, due to a significant loss of staff at MICC-JBLM, it was collectively decided that the FFS follow on contract should be solicited at Ft. Knox. After award, the new FFS will be returned to

MICC-JBLM for administration.

iii. Major Milestones for follow on contract:

EVENT DATE

Solicitation Amendment 0006 - Revised RFP issued 17 August 2010

Revised Proposals due 2 September 2010

Evaluation of Revised Proposals 13-17 September 2010

Pre-negotiation Objective Memorandum (POM) completed and 6 October 2010 forwarded for legal/internal review'

Significant Quantities revised per customer e-mail 7 October 2010

Clarification from customer obtained regarding provided 7-15 October 2010 data/contract requirement. Quantities evaluated In regards to scope. To include meeting with legal and MICC- Ft. Knox staff and multiple customer interface.

IGE revised 4 November 2010

Discussion Letters and Amendment 0007 -Revised RFP issued 15 November 2010

Revised Proposals due 30 November 2010

Evaluation of Revised Proposals 1-7 December 2010

POM completed and forwarded for legal/internal review' 16 December 2010

POM Approved 22 December 2010 Negotiations/Discussions completed 10 January 2011

Receive and Evaluate Final Proposals 6 January 2011 Price Negotiation Memorandum (PNM) for legal/internal 13 January 2011 review·

PNM Approved 20 January 2011

Congressional Notification 21 January 2011

Contract Award 26 January 2011

Contractor Phase-in 15-30 February 2011

Start of Full Performance 01 March 2011

·Review Approval retained at MICC Center - Ft. Knox

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

(3) Based on the size and complexity of the follow-on requirement a projected award date of 26 January 2011 was developed using standard acquisition lead time milestones. The 18LM Directorate of Logistics (DOL) has a continuous need for food services. As a result, interim support capability is required to meet. agency mission requirements during the period o[ 1 December 2010 through 28 February 2011.

(b) Alternatives:

Alternatives and their potential impact are explored below. However, based on all available information and the negative potentialities explored in the alternatives below, the best solution still is to do an extension on the existing Full Food Services contract.

(I) Suspending or curtailing, ofFuU Food Service operations. This is not viable or acceptable as access to food and beverage is a health, safety and mission criticality issue and without the meals provided by dining facilities on the Full Food Service contract, a breakdown in soldier functionality, combined with logistical chaos, would ensue. Army core values and mission success rests on the fitness, motivation, well-being, and physical and mental strength of its most valuable asset: the soldiers. The Army cannot meet its mission or maintain the integrity of the troops by leaving troops assigned to barracks on Joint Base Lewis-McChord without food and beverage. This would affect thousands of individual soldiers upon whom a great investment is made and upon whom the people of America rely on for keeping the country safe. The United States Army at 18LM is a critical piece of keeping Americans and American interests protected. This simply cannot be accomplished without proper and fully functioning food services.

(2) Doing an immediate sole-sour~e set-aside to a local business. In theory, there might be other businesses that could imlIlediately perform on this contract, but none of these potential contractors' would be able to provide the specified vital and essential food services in such a short time span, on such short notice, without delays or breaks in service. In reality, MICC.18LM is not aware of any other local contractors who could step in to immediately perform Full Food Services on the JBLM. In addition, FAR, 000, and MICe regulations and governing authority must be followed and would not necessarily allow for this course of action.

(3) Use ofNAF, MWR, and ~ommerclal fa~Uity food outJ\!ts. This option would require meal card-holding soldiers currently living in the barracks on 18LM to solely make use of on-Post NAF and commercial facility outlets in lieu of the meals provided by the dining facilities on the current meal-card program. Soldiers who live off-Post, and civilian personnel, could all simply use the NAP facilities on Post, food outlets in the surrounding community, or bring all meals and beverages from home. Soldiers living in barracks who currently have meal-cards could thusly receive a corresponding increase in pay, or be given meal discount coupons for on and off-Post food service outlets .. This alternative could boost business at on-Post facilities, NAF and commercial food outlets, and food outlets in the surrounding

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

community. However, the lunchtime hours during the workweek already suffer from tratTic congestion, overcrowded facilities, and lack of variety outside of fast food options. The potential lack of nutritional food choices conflicts with AR 30-22, which stipulates that food provided to soldiers be based upon the USDA Food Guide Pyramid and that choices from each food group be made available to the soldier.

Additionally, it would takc time to suspend the meal card system and replace it with increases in pay to meal card holders. Negotiating special food price-discounts with NAF and commercial outlets would also take time and might not be practical as this course of action also has its own regulatory constraints.

Keeping a break in food service to soldiers at bay is the ultimate goal and a break in service lasting even a few days could be too problematic and impact both the mission and health ofthe troops.

(4) Soliciting under Full and Open Competition. This is not practicable for the three-month extension as it would not allow sutTicient time to re-solicit and make an award in time for the current projected start date of the new contract effort, which is 1 March 2011.

(5) Use of catered meals to feed soldiers: AR 30-22, paragraph 3-4, authorizes commercially prepared, catered meals only when food service personnel or equipment are not authorized or available and support cannot be obtained from an active Army unit with food service capability. Requests to purchase catered meals must be approved by the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, for the Department of the Army. To get approval from G-4 prior to 30 November 2010 is highly unlikely and should not be relied upon as a feasible working alternative. In addition, there is a risk that USC Title 10, section 2533a, could be violated through the use of catered meals to feed soldiers. USA Title 10, section 25338, governs the use of DoD funds as applied to food grown outside the United States.

(6) Utilizing Meals Ready to Eat (MREs): In lieu of serving soldiers hot or catered meals they could eat MREs. While MREs are admittedly high in caloric content and nutritious, thus having the potential to sustain a soldier for an extended period of time - this is not the intended purpose of the MRE.

MREs are not designed for Garrison feeding as they are Operational Rations. MREs also lack the fresh fruits and vegetables that are part of the USDA Food Pyramid, thus soldiers would be denied a vital dietary element for an extended period of time. Hence, this is not a viable option.

c. Justification:

(1) Until the new Full Food Service contract is awarded it is essential that food service operations are sustained without disruption so as to support the feeding of troops and qualified personnel. Presently, there is no known source that could immediately begin performance of food service in the dining facilities on JBLM. Hence, to solicit from another source would cause unacceptable disruption to food service operations.

d. Impact: As shown above, there are nO alternatives for this situation that are logistically feasible or allowable by.the Mission and Installation Contracting Command. The incumbent contractor is currently providing daily services that meet the needs of the Government and the new solicitation is being actively developed. As has been previously mentioned, cessation of food service operations would be

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

untenable for meal card holders living in JBLM barracks and there are insufficient food outlets both on and off-Post to support a sudden influx of several thousand extra diners, particularly during weekday Junch hours. There is a critical need to continue the Full Food Services beyond 30 November 2010.

JBLM cannot perfonn its mission without the food services contained within this request. If the rcferenced contract is not awarded as a sole source contract, for the soldiers and qualified personnel of this Post, it will adversely impact the Army's mission, cause chaotic conditions on JBLM, create undue stress to the Post infrastructure, and leave numerous soldiers without sufficient access to food and beverage for the sustainment of their health and meeting of basic nutritional and dietary needs. Thus, the Anny's core values would be compromised and full fledged mission failure could occur. Lack of food and beverage affects both mental and physical well-being to an all encompassing degree. Furthennore, if the general public or news media were to discover that soldiers were no longer being fed it could potentially cause a disruptive backlash and outcry against the Anny, which could adversely impact the perceived strength and reliability of the Anny to perlorm its mission.

6. EFFORTS TO OBTAIN COMPETITION; The requirement is for a commercial service that is well defined and available in the commercial marketplace. A "Notice of Contract Action", as required by FAR 5.201, was synopsized on 27 October 2010 through 3 November 2010. The announcement on FedBizOpps.gov indicated the Government's intent to do the contract extension on a sole source basis for a six-month base period with the incumbent contractor. One response was generated during the 7 -day posting on FedBizOpps.Gov, from Epipeline, requesting dates of the extension period. Market research requires a 209-day solicitation for full and open competition. MICC at Fort Knox assessed the state' of affairs surrounding this contract an!! concluded that a three-month extension was in the best interest of all parties involved. It is anticipated that a new contract will be in place for service to start by 1 March 2011.

7. ACTIONS TO INCREASE COMPETITION: Notice of Contract Action Synopsized (27 October 2010 through 3 November 2010).

8. MARKET RESEARCH: Extensive market research has been conducted for the follow-on requirement and competition is anticipated. The Government synopsized its original intent to extend the current FFP contract on 27 October 2010 with one response received; to clarify period ofperlormance.

9. INTERESTED SOURCES: To date, only one response was received to the Government's Fed.BizOpps Notification, which was to clarify the periodofperlormance.

10. OTHER FACTS.

a. Procurement history; See paragraph 5(a) above.

b. Acquisition data availability. The Government's requirements are defined in the Perlonnance Work Statement. Revisions were required to adjust the current contract requirements to meet projected mission changes as a result of the Anny's restationing and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) affecting JBLM.

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

c. Unusual and compelling urgency. Not applicable.

d. Subcontracting Competition: NOI applicable for this action.

e. Required approvals: Service Contract Approval. The estimated total value of the three-month extension is $837,724.90. Service Contract Approval was been granted by Mr. Thomas G. Knight, Deputy Garrison Commander on 28 October 2010. FYI! funds will be used in issuing individual orders for the extension period.

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

II. Technical Certification. I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the J & A, are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and beJief.

COR, Food Program Management Office:

Typed Name: Benedict D. Tesoro DSN: 357-5984

I~rl·p.r\()·i) ( 'F) i-il"r'Pl)r'(~"I-' 'lj(~'I' _ ...!.......J ,.j _. _. . ) . __ j I __ j ~ _ _.' '. ~ _) I

Date: 4 November 2010

12. Requirements Certification: I certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the J&A, are accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Name: Linda Harris Signature:

, r 'r I '. . r) I) r' ,- I 'r 'r' r . . ~ I - . (I f'.' . r I f' r_r.' [' I . __ :,), _. __ f I r.).!.~, :._J I.J; ).!. .. -~l , Title: Food Program Manager Date: 9 NOV 2010

13. Management Review and Approval: T certify that the supporting data under my cognizance, which are included in the J & A, are accurate and complete. The requirements described herein are valid requirements of JBLM. The technical requirements information contained in the justification represent the minimum needs of the Govermnent. The only way to meet the requirement is by limiting competition as described herein.

Name: Michael J Allen Signature: __________ _ j"',-r fL_i }~-I -r.l/1JC~L-lj -i~\L,JJ 'I. ()GLC " " "' "", " "' ""'"'" " '"" " ,M' '" '"' 'w

Title: Service Delivery Otlicer (Acting DOL) Date: 10 Nov to

MICC JBLM Control No. 2011·1

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

14. Contracting Officer Certification and Determination of Fair and Reasonable Price. I certify that this J&A is accurate and complete to the be~t of my knowledge and belief. I heteby detcnnine that the anticipated cost for this action ($837,724.90) will be fair and reasonable based upon the Govermnent estimate and historical and existing price information. The referenced contractor has been performing Full Food Services for the past five (5) years with etl'iciencies gained in costs, quality, delivery and operational control and has satisfactorily met the terms and conditions undet its Contract Number

W91IS8-04·D·0014.

Name: Angela Chaplinski Signature:

" .. ,. [" ' I - r I"' - -~ -.. .. '," , . - -- -. -,- , j I J i ; ~ , ' I : i r ~_,/ ,- 'I - ~ _ '

, -'_ I . j~ L ilL) ! __ ~, __ ___ r p _ .... __ _ ___ - _ _ _ __ __ __

Title: Contracting Officer Date; _--",IO,,-Nll!!ov~1 Ol-__ --:-___ _

I S. Fair and Reasonable Price Determination. I hereby detennine that the anticipated price of $837,724.90 accurately reflects the requirements for this Firm-Fixed-Price Contract and is fair and reasonable based on the$e factors:

a. Price analysis based upon comparison of the proposed prices with prices· found reasonable uncle!

Contract W911S8-04-D-OOI4 and oomparison of the proposed prices to current prices offered in the commercial marketplace.

b. The reterenced contractors have been petforming Full Food Services for the past five (5) years with efficiencies gained in costs, quality, delivery and operational control.

thomas.ebenhoh Highlight

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Name: Angela Chaplinski Signature:

Title: Contracting Officer Date: 10 Nov 10

JUSTIFICATION REVIEW DOCUMENT

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

FULL FOOD SERVICE, FORT LEWIS, WASHINGTON

APPROVAL

Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve an extension of the existing Full Food Service contract with The Department of Services for the Blind at JBLM, WA, to include a three (3)-month extension period of I.December 2010 through 28 February 2011, on an other than full and open competition basis. The three (3)-month extension is estimated at $837,724.90 dollars. Approval is prOvided pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C.2304 (0) (I), as implemented by FAR 6.302-I(a) (2) (iii), Only One Responsible Source and No Other Supplies or Services Will Satisfy Agency Requirements.

Ms. Toni Gaines

Mission and Installation Contracting Command Special Competition Advocate

L f'/{./W'po.c iJ Date