Attachment 2 Performance Assessment Questionnaire W911S727RA002.pdf
PDF 278 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911S727RA002
About this file
This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire issued by the U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Leonard Wood in support of Request for Proposal W911S727RA002, dated 14 October 2026. The questionnaire is designed to collect past performance information from references identified by offerors competing for the RFP. The referenced NAICS code is 611519. Responses must be returned to Crystal S. Hytower at crystal.s.hytower.civ@army.mil within 15 days of receipt or by 13 November 2026, whichever occurs first. Questions may be directed to Contracting Officer Alfreda M. Dupont at alfreda.m.dupont2.civ@army.mil.
The questionnaire employs a four-tier rating system: Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence. Respondents evaluate contractor performance across five mandatory criteria: (A) Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship; (B) Effectiveness of Project Management including use and control of subcontractors; (C) Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables; (D) Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (applicable only to cost reimbursement contracts); and (E) Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for Customers' Interest. The questionnaire is divided into three parts: Part I requires offerors to provide contract identification details; Part II requires the reference point of contact to complete performance evaluations with required rationales for each rating; and Part III provides return instructions. Respondents may reference additional relevant past efforts and identify other information sources.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4_Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - W911S727RA002.pdf | ||
| ALS PWS AMO-26-7630_HDCSO Revised 3NOV26.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- CLIN Structure.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF WAR
U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND
FORT LEONARD WOOD
8112 NEBRASKA AVENUE, BLDG 11400
FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO 65473-8944
14 October 2026
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal
(RFP) W911S727RA002
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Armyy Mission Installation Contracting Command , Fort Leonard Wood is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 611519. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to Crystal S. Hytower email at crystal.s.hytower.civ@army.mil no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 13 November 2026, whichever occurs first.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at alfreda.m.dupont2.civ@army.mil .
Sincerely, ALFREDA M. DUPONT
Contracting Officer mailto:alfreda.m.dupont2.civ@army.mil
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name):
Telephone Number:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
| Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter |
| Performance Assessment Questionnaire |
| Rating Definitions: |
| PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) |
| PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) |
| PART III. RETURN INFORMATION |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .