Performance_Assesment_Questionnaire._Attachment_3_Amendment_1.pdf

PDF 212 KB Posted

Attached to
Cyberspace Training Services
Solicitation number
W911S018R0020
Issued by

About this file

This document is a performance assessment questionnaire for a federal solicitation for cyberspace training services. The U.S. Army Contracting Command is conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on solicitation W911S018R0020 for cyberspace training services from the Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis. Offerors are required to provide information on relevant past performance, which will be assessed through performance assessment questionnaires sent to references. References must return completed questionnaires by 29 March 2019. The questionnaire includes rating definitions and sections for offeror identification, performance evaluation, and return information. Respondents are asked to evaluate offeror performance on compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction and provide commentary.

Amendment to attachment 3 Performance Assessment Questionnaire. The amended time frame will be 15 days after receipt of request or 29 March 2019, whichever occurs first.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

MICC – Fort Eustis [Joint Base Langley-Eustis]

705 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD, SUITE 126

FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA 23604

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF

CCMI-CEU-EU 14 March 2019

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W911S018R0020

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 611430 – Professional and Management Development Training.

You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return via email to the Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) Fort Eustis, 705 Washington Blvd, Fort Eustis, VA 23604, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 29 March 2019, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Antonio Smith (Contract Specialist) at Antonio.o.smith2.civ@mail.mil and Linda D Whitlock (Contracting Officer) at linda.d.whitlock.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at linda.d.whitlock.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist Antonio.o.smith2.civ@mail.mil.

Sincerely, LINDA D. WHITLOCK

Contracting Officer mailto:Antonio.o.smith2.civ@mail.mil mailto:Antonio.o.smith2.civ@mail.mil mailto:linda.d.whitlock.civ@mail.mil mailto:linda.d.whitlock.civ@mail.mil mailto:linda.d.whitlock.civ@mail.mil mailto:Antonio.o.smith2.civ@mail.mil

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division: Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: Total Contract Value:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Comments:

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs .

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name):

Telephone Number:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Rating Definitions:
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .