FTUAS_Industry_Day_Charts.pdf

PM UAS: Revolutionizing our Nation’s Warfighting Capabilities

Group 2/3 Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Demonstration

17 July 2018

KBR/Wyle

Huntsville Operations

Agenda

Time Topic/Presentation Presenter

Tues 0730-0830 Registration Ms. Kay Masley & Ms. Rosalind Payne, UAS Security Office

0830-0845 Welcome and Ground Rules

Mr. Kelsey Haynes, FTUAS Product Lead, TUAS Product Office

0845-0900 Opening Remarks LTC David Griffin, Product Manger, TUAS Product Office

0900-0930 Requirements Overview COL Ramsey Bentley , TRADOC Capability Manager, Future Vertical Lift

0930-1000 Contract Overview Mr. Jeremy Deorsey, Contracting Specialist, ACC NATICK

1000-1015 Break KBR/Wyle

1015-1100 Product Presentation Mr. Kelsey Haynes

1100-1145 Questions and Answers Dr. Carlos Correia, Deputy Product Manager, TUAS and Mr.

Haynes

1145-1200 Closing Comments Dr. Correia 1200-1300 Lunch On Your Own 1300-UTC One-on-One Sessions Various

Wed 0900- UTC One-on-One Sessions Various Thurs 0900-UTC One-on-One Sessions Various

Mr. Kelsey Haynes

FTUAS Product Lead

TUAS Product Office

Ground Rules

• There is no guarantee that any contract will result from today

• Unclassified Information Only

• Proprietary Information will be Protected

• All potential offerors will be provided the same information as all other potential offerors

Ground Rules for One on One Sessions

• Government will primarily be “in receive mode”

• All potential offerors will be provided the same information as all other potential offerors

• Government will take down any questions and respond back through FBO announcement

• Vendors will have 45 minutes to present material to Government team ─ Please be ready at or before your time slot

(visitor check-in, computer, handouts, etc.)

─ HDMI or RGB connection available in conference room, please have computer ready for presentation

Introductions

• TRADOC Capability Manager, Future Vertical Lift

─ COL Ramsey Bentley, TCM-FVL, 334-255-1491, erskine.r.bentley.mil@mail.mil

• Product Manager, Tactical UAS

─ LTC David Griffin, SFAE-AV-UAS, 256-313-5359, david.e.griffin14.mil@mail.mil

• FTUAS Product Lead

─ Mr. Kelsey R. Haynes, SFAE-AV-UAS, 256.955.0128, kelsey.r.haynes.civ@mail.mil

• Army Contracting Command, Natick Contract Division, Contract Specialist:

─ Jeremy A. Deorsey, ACC-APG-NCD, 508.233.619, Jeremy.a.deorsey.civ@mail.mil

LTC David Griffin

Product Manager

FTUAS PM Comments

COL Ramsey Bentley

TRADOC Capabilities Manager, Future Vertical Lift

ARMY AVIATION

DECISIVE IN LAND WARFARE

Maintaining Trust with Soldiers on the Ground

9UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO//PRE-DECISIONAL

Task: Accelerate FTUAS Technologies for Joint Forcible Entry (JFE) Operations

• Alpha Echelon forces require an Air Drop Capable, Rapid Deployable, Runway Independent Multi- Domain Reconnaissance, Surveillance, and Target Acquisition (RSTA) UAS capability.

• Initial airborne assault forces must operate expeditionary (small footprints) in austere environments.

• Maximize the effectiveness of Alpha Echelon artillery while reducing tactical risk in the deployment of ground reconnaissance and observers.

Purpose: Address Detect and Assess Challenges in JFE Operations

• Alpha Echelon forces possess M777 to 60mm mortar indirect fires capability to decide and deliver.

• During 24-96 hour window the only organic detect and assess capability is ground based.

• Current fleet of UAS is not available until the arrival of air lands (Bravo Echelon).

Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System (FTUAS) Scene Setter

Alpha Echelon (M777–28km to 60mm mortars-3.5km)

P-Hour Bravo Echelon Bravo Echelon Bravo Echelon

P+24 P+48 P+72 P+96

Potential 96 hour UAS Gap between the initial airborne assault (Alpha Echelon) and air lands (Bravo Echelon) with current tactical UAS fleet

Joint Forcible Entry: Seize and hold lodgments against armed opposition.

ARMY AVIATION

DECISIVE IN LAND WARFARE

Maintaining Trust with Soldiers on the Ground

10UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO//PRE-DECISIONAL

Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System (FTUAS) OV-1

UAS C2 & FMV

UAS FMV

Mobile Assault Command Post

Assault Command Post

Austere Environment

Point takeoff and landing

Small footprint

Expeditionary

Rapidly Deployable

Continuous RSTA

OBJ A

OBJ A

OSRVT FMV

Mr. Jeremy Deorsey

Contract Specialist

Army Contracting Command – Natick Contracting Division

Contract Information

• Firm Fixed Price, Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (MAIDIQ) Contract using Commercial Procedures (FAR Part 12) for Supplies with Associated Services

• Best Value Award utilizing 3 evaluation areas

• Technical Performance

• Paper submission to establish competitive range

• Fly-Off demonstration within competitive range to establish awardees

• Price

• Program Management

• Period of Performance 3 years

• CLIN Structure:

• CLIN 0001 – Systems Purchase (Firm Fixed Price)

• CLIN 0002 – System Components (Firm Fixed Price)

• CLIN 0003 – Replacement and Spare Parts (Firm Fixed Price)

• CLIN 0004 – Field Service Representatives (FSR) Support (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• CLIN 0005 – Contractor Logistical Support (CLS) (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• CLIN 0006 – New Equipment Training (NET) (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• CLIN 0007 – Contract Data Requirement List (CDRL)

• CLINs 0008 – 0010 RESERVED for Travel, ODCs, and CMR

Technical Performance Factor Evaluation

• Utilize both proposals and fly-off demonstration for overall determination

• Will evaluate data sought in recent RFI

• Matrix to be provided in final RFP

• Includes both desired and required capabilities

• Requirements

• Equipment and crew for continuous operations for 96 hours fits on one C-130

• Equipment fits within cube space of one 16 foot pallet or two 463L pallets

• Minimum of 3 hour individual vehicle endurance

• Minimum Full Motion Video transmission range of 10 km

• Detect and Classify vehicle-sized targets day and night at operational altitude of air vehicle

• Capable of takeoffs and landings in 20 knot winds

• Validation (at Fly-off Demonstration)

• Single system endurance

• Distribution of Sensor Data/Target Recognition

• OSRVT compatibility

• Altitude (if system position data not available)

• Data Link Range

• Aural Detection

Price Factor Evaluation

• CLIN 0001 – Systems Purchase (Firm Fixed Price)

• Estimated 2 complete systems per award: $___________

• CLIN 0002 – System Components (Firm Fixed Price)

• Undefined Quantity: $___________

• CLIN 0003 – Replacement and Spare Parts (Firm Fixed Price)

• Undefined Quantity: $___________

• CLIN 0004 – Field Service Representatives (FSR) Support (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• Offeror Submission IOT support 85% system availability: $___________

• CLIN 0005 – Contractor Logistical Support (CLS) (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• Offeror Submission IOT meet 85% system availability: $___________

• CLIN 0006 – New Equipment Training (NET) (Cost Plus Fixed Fee)

• Offeror Submission IOT meet 2-6 events: $___________

• CLIN 0007 – Contract Data Requirement List (CDRL) Not Separately Priced

• CLIN 0008 – RESERVED (Travel, ODCs, CMR) As Needed

• CLIN 0009 – RESERVED (Travel, ODCs, CMR) As Needed

• CLIN 0010 – RESERVED (Travel, ODCs, CMR) As Needed

Total Contract Value $___________

Program Management Factor Evaluation

• Review of management processes to assess ability to complete tasks within PWS for duration of Period of Performance

• Evaluate Capability Standards

• Previous CPARS scores, if available

• System Delivery Schedule

• Technical Readiness Levels of Key Technologies (8 or above)

• Manufacturing Readiness Levels/Production Capacity (8 or above)

• Previous production efforts

• Quality Control Processes

• Configuration Management/Control Processes

• Resident Workforce to meet requirements

Mr. Kelsey Haynes

FTUAS Product Lead

FTUAS Background and Scope

• Objective is to use the “Buy-Try-Decide” methodology to inform requirements development for a future UAS program of record

• Army is looking at Expeditionary, Runway Independent Group 2/3 UAS to fulfill approved Operational Needs Statements ─ Key attributes focus on rapid deployability, point take off and landing, and transportability ─ Procure up to 6 systems (3 vendors, up to 2 systems each) ─ Provide systems to FORSCOM BCTs to conduct unit and CTC exercises over a short time period ─ Demonstration of system hardware conducted by TRADOC TCM FVL and supporting organizations

• Utilize ACC-Natick as contracting center to award 3 Commercial (FAR Part

12) Contracts

• This is a Procurement (APA) funded effort – We CANNOT develop new capabilities

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Issue Draft RFP Draft RFP

Industry Day Industry Day RFP Reviews

Issue RFP RFP Industry Proposal Preparation

Proposals Received Proposals Received Source Selection Phase One SS Phase 1

Fly Off Fly Off Commences Source Selection Phase Two

Contract Reviews Contract Awards Contract Awards

September October November DecemberShadow BCT Replacment Demo Competitive Multiple Award Contracts

June July

Reviews

Reviews

August

Proposal Preparation

SS Phase 2

Tentative FTUAS Schedule

Time Now

Notional Demonstration Schedule

M 1

IOC

Fielding

Decision Point Action

1st unit of CTC (1 of 6) Unit feedback of UAS Operational trial to TCM UAS/Decision to continue

Decision of record All unit feedback provided / conduct analysis to continue 2

CTC Cycle Duration (6-18 Months) FORSCOM Units will evaluate systems operations during CTC Rotations

M 2 M 3 M 8M 7M 6M 5M 4 M 12M 10M 9 M 11

Review of First CTC event1

NET

Home Station Training

CTC

Rotations

M 13 M 14 M 17M 16M 15 M 19M 18 M 20 M 21 M 22 M 23 M 24

Coordinating with DAMO-AV and FORSCOM on potential units for CTC rotations

Start Date Driven by System Availability

IDIQ Minimums and Maximums

• Minimum Guarantee: $500

• IDIQ Ceiling: Estimated at $99.5M

• New Equipment Training (NET)

• At CONUS-based Army unit location

• Max class size: 30 (based on current unit size)

• Duration: System Dependent

• Minimum number of training sessions: 2

• Maximum number of training sessions: 6

• Field Support Representative(s):

• Minimum Duration: 6 months after delivery of systems

• Maximum Duration: 2 years after delivery of systems

• Contractor Logistics Support:

• Minimum Duration: 6 months after delivery of systems

• Maximum Duration: 2 years after delivery of systems

Evaluation Approach

• Two phase evaluation:

─ Phase 1: Evaluate of proposals to determine offerors within competitive range

─ Phase 2: Conduct a fly-off demonstration of systems within the competitive range

• Companies within competitive range will be offered an invitation to attend fly-off demonstration at Dugway Proving Grounds, UT ─ Intent is to validate system performance data to feed technical performance factor of source selection ─ Vendors will provide all systems and support equipment ─ Government to provide range facilities and support, “test cards”, and schedule

• Award Contracts to vendors (2 complete systems, attrition vehicles, initial spares, FSR, CLS, and New Equipment Training for minimum of 2 units)

Questions and Answers

Dr. Carlos Correia

Deputy Product Manager

Closing Comments