DFSC BAA FY17 Amendment 2.pdf

Defense Forensic Science Center (DFSC)

BROAD AGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT FOR

BASIC, APPLIED & ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

W911NF-17-R-0001

Amendment 2

ISSUED BY:

U.S. Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground

Research Triangle Park Division

P. O. BOX 12211

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2211

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW OF THE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

A. Required Overview Content…………………………………………………………...………………………..4

1. Federal Agency Name

2. Funding Opportunity Title

3. Announcement Type

4. Research Opportunity Number

5. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number and Title

6. Response Dates

B. Additional Overview Information………………………………………………………………………………4

II. DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

A. Program Description:

1. RESEARCH AREAS OF INTEREST…………………………………………………………………….6

2. Previous Successful submissions of Research and Development Projects………………………………...6

B. Federal Award Information

1. Procurement Contract

2. Grant

3. Cooperative Agreement

4. Technology Investment Agreement (TIA)

5. Other Transaction for Prototype (OTA)

C. Eligibility Information … …………………………………………………………………………………

1. Eligible Applicants………………...………………………………………………………………...…

2. Cost Sharing or Matching………………………………………………………………………………

3. Duns and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS)……………………………………………..9

4. Other………………………………………………………………………………………………………..9

D. Application and Submission Information:…………………………………………………………………..…..9

1. Address to View Broad Agency Announcement…..…………………………………………………

2. Content and Form of Application Submission

3. Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number and System for Award Management…………………………………………………………………..……………………………..21

4. Submission Dates and Times

5. Intergovernmental Review

6. Funding Restrictions

7. Other Submission

Requirements…………………………………………………………………………………………….22

E. Application Review Information

1. Criteria 2.Review and Selection Process 3.Recipient Qualification

F. Award Administration Information

1. Award Notices

2. Administrative and National Policy Requirement…………………………………………………………….25 A. Required Certifications B. Policy Requirements

3. Reporting

G. Agency Contacts

H. Other Information:………………………………………………………………………………………………..29

1. Meeting Requirements…………………………………………………………………………………….…..29

2. Travel Requirements…………………………………………………………………………………………...29

3. Government Property/Government Furnished Equipment and Facilities…………………………………….29

4. Department of Defense High Performance Computing Program ……………………………………………..29

5. Cost Proposal Samples for Reference …………………………………………………………………………30

6. Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………………………...38

7. Definitions……………………………………………………………………………………………………..40

I. OVERVIEW OF THE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY:

A. Required Overview Content

1. Agency Name:

Defense Forensic Science Center (DFSC)

Issuing Acquisition Office:

U.S. Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground, Research Triangle Park Division

2. Research Opportunity Title:

Defense Forensic Science Center Broad Agency Announcement for Basic, Applied, and Advanced Research (Fiscal Years 2017-2020)

3. Announcement Type:

Initial Announcement

4. Research Opportunity Number:

W911NF-17-R-0001

5. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number and Title:

12.630 – Basic, Applied, and Advanced Research in Science and Engineering

6. Response Dates:

This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) is a continuously open five-year announcement valid throughout the period beginning 5 October 2016 and ending 8 January 2020. Amendments to this BAA will be posted to https://www.fbo.gov (FedBizOpps) and http://www.grants.gov when amendments occur. Interested parties are encouraged to periodically check these websites for updates and amendments.

B. Additional Overview Information

This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), which sets forth research areas of interest to the Defense Forensic Science Center (DFSC), is issued under the provisions of paragraph 6.102(d)(2) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and 10 USC 2358 which provides for the competitive selection of proposals. Proposals submitted in response to this BAA and selected for award are considered to be the result of full and open competition and in full compliance with the provisions of Public Law 98-369, "The Competition in Contracting Act of 1984" and subsequent amendments.

The Department of Defense agencies involved in this program reserve the right to select for award all, some, or none of the proposals submitted in response to this announcement. The participating DoD agencies will provide no funding for direct reimbursement of proposal development costs. Technical and cost proposals (or any other material) submitted in response to this BAA will not be returned. It is the policy of participating DoD agencies to treat all proposals as sensitive, competitive information and to disclose their contents only for the purpose of evaluation.

II. DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDING OPPORTUNITY

A. Program Description

The Defense Forensic Science Center (DFSC) (formerly the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory (USACIL)) provides forensic laboratory services to DoD military criminal investigative organizations (Air Force Office of Special Investigations, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and the Army Criminal Investigation Command) and other DoD customers. It is a full service forensic laboratory, providing state-of-the-art forensic examinations in the following disciplines:

DNA/Serology

Digital Evidence

Drug Chemistry

Firearms and Toolmarks

Forensic Documents

Latent Prints (including footwear and tire track evidence)

Trace Evidence

The DFSC has three primary objectives:

(1) Analyze forensic evidence and provide expert testimony to support worldwide criminal investigation across all military services

(2) Provide expeditionary and reach-back forensic services to U.S. military forces in active theaters of operation

(3) Coordinate and execute research, development, testing and evaluation (RDT&E) projects to advance forensic and biometric capabilities

The Department of Defense Forensic Research and Development Program (“Program”) is administered by the U.S.

Army Research Office and the Defense Forensic Science Center. The Program aims to enhance the capability of forensic science applications for DoD customers both in traditional law enforcement/criminal justice purviews and in expeditionary environments. The Program accomplishes this mission by funding research projects that lead to the production of useful knowledge, materials, devices, systems, or methods that have forensic function.

To be eligible for an award under this announcement, a prospective awardee must meet certain minimum standards pertaining to financial resources and responsibility, ability to comply with the performance schedule, past performance, integrity, experience, technical capabilities, operational controls, and facilities. In accordance with Federal statutes, regulations, and Department of Defense and Army policies, no person on grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin, or disability shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving financial assistance from the Army.

The Program is seeking proposals for funding to support forensic research and its application. The requested proposals should focus on DFSC activities and needs. Forensic research proposals should focus on the creation of new and improved field or laboratory functional capabilities that result in faster, more robust, more informative, less costly, or less labor-intensive recognition, preservation, collection, and/or analysis of forensic evidence. Proposals that will assist the DoD in achieving these goals are solicited, particularly proposals involving the development of equipment that is portable, sustainable, and useful in an expeditionary or field environment. The expeditionary and field environments require systems that are lightweight, portable, inexpensive, fast, and capable of operating in extreme environments of temperature, dust, humidity, etc. The systems must also be capable of secure data communications.

Funding of research and development (R&D) within Program areas of interest will be determined by funding constraints and priorities set during each budget cycle. Due to Government budget uncertainties, no specific dollars have been reserved for awards under this BAA. Those contemplating submission of a proposal are encouraged to submit a white paper and quad chart, summarizing their proposed work. If the proposed R&D warrants further inquiry and funding is available, submission of a full technical and cost proposal will be encouraged. This sequence allows earliest determination of the potential for funding and minimizes the labor and cost associated with submission of full proposals that have minimal probability of being selected for funding. Costs associated with white paper, quad chart, or full proposal submissions in response to this BAA are not considered allowable direct charges to any resulting award. These costs may be allowable expenses to normal bid and proposal indirect costs specified in FAR 31.205-18 for contracts. Offerors submitting proposals are cautioned that only a Government Contracting or Grants Officer may obligate the Government to any agreement involving expenditure of Government funds.

1. RESEARCH AREAS OF INTEREST

Research and development focus areas include, but are not limited to:

1) Digital evidence and computer forensics

2) Signal processing/visual comparison of patterned and impression forensic materials

3) Analytical chemistry (detection of compounds/molecules/elements)

4) Molecular biology

5) Forensic genetics

6) Forensic equipment miniaturization/ruggedization

7) Site exploitation and forensic material recognition

Several topics identified as needing further research and development are specified below, however proposals are not limited to these areas:

Novel analytical chemistry tools, techniques, and methodologies that enhance sensitivity and selectivity over currently existing forensic capabilities

Innovative approaches for source attribution of forensic samples (e.g., drugs, explosives) Novel methods or protocols for extracting information from mixed DNA samples Novel approaches to maximizing the use of next generation sequencing technologies for forensic analyses Novel tools/approaches/techniques for modeling the statistical assessment of a DNA match with limited information and/or emerging marker sets to inform marker/panel selection The development of new analytical protocols for patterned forensic analyses (e.g., firearms, latent prints) that utilize a quantitative rather than qualitative approach Novel methods to pre-process, match, and analyze latent prints with or without human intervention Novel methods to pre-process, match, and analyze pattern evidence with or without human intervention Approaches/tools/techniques for facial recognition which are gender and ethnicity independent Novel approaches/tools/techniques for correlating 2D imagery to 3D imagery Novel approaches to correlate forensic and/or biometric data in order to develop investigative leads or behavior patterns Automated tools and techniques for the creation of ‘best’ composite electronic fingerprint transmission

(EFT) from multiple EFTs The development of an 'all-in-one' crime scene/sensitive site exploitation processing and documenting device with the capability to map and photograph evidence, record audio and video, read and write evidence bar codes, generate and populate evidence forms, with GPS-enabled positioning and mapping

The development of a portable, rugged, and automated DOCEX (Document Exploitation) capability with rapid translation of multiple languages and automated gist translation

The development of a handheld or backpack device that can distinguish buried and surface skeletal remains and teeth from limestone, chalk, or other calcareous substrates

2. Previous Successful Submission of Research and Development Projects

For your reference and consideration in developing proposals, the following list details research and development projects that have been funded by the Defense Forensic Science Center:

Development of a DNA sequence exploitation system for next generation sequencing and analysis of autosomal and Y chromosomal short tandem repeats

Development of a real-time synthetic cannabinoid detection platform Development of a rapid DNA platform to fully process reference samples (e.g., buccal swabs) from sample acquisition through PCR amplification and electropherogram generation in less than 90 minutes Analysis and determination of unknown human body fluids Development of software tools to identify the source of images based on individualizing characteristics of image capture devices by make and model Development of model correlating various sensor technologies to increase detection of clandestine gravesites Development of an ‘all-in-one’ crime scene/sensitive site exploitation processing and documenting device Development of functionalized powders for fumeless latent fingerprint detection Development of methods that provide a more objective and statistical approach to firearms examinations Development of new methods for the detection of gunshot residue which can discriminate the shooter from other individuals Development of a latent fingerprint fusion algorithm to exploit latent fingerprint fragments that otherwise are not of value in identification

B. FEDERAL AWARD INFORMATION

Anticipated awards will be made in the form of procurement contracts, assistance instruments (grants, cooperative agreements, and technology investment agreements (TIAs)), and other transactions for prototypes (OTAs) and are subject to the availability of appropriations. Multi-year projects must have clear goals for each year. Funding for subsequent years will be contingent upon satisfactory performance and availability of funds.

The Army Contracting Command-Aberdeen Proving Ground, Research Triangle Park (ACC-APG-RTP) Division has the authority to award a variety of instruments. The ACC-APG-RTP Division reserves the right to use the type of instrument most appropriate for the effort proposed. Offerors should familiarize themselves with these instrument types and the applicable regulations before submitting a proposal. The following are brief descriptions of the possible award instruments:

1. Procurement Contract: A legal instrument, which consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6303, reflects a relationship between the Federal Government and a State, a local government, or other recipient when the principal purpose of the instrument is to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Federal Government.

Contracts are governed by the following regulations:

a. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

b. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)

c. Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFARS)

2. Grant: A legal instrument, that consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship in which-

a. The principal purpose is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law or the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Department of Defense’s direct benefit or use.

b. Substantial involvement is not expected between the Department of Defense and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the grant.

c. No fee or profit is allowed.

3. Cooperative Agreement: A legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition "grant"), except that substantial involvement is expected between the Department of Defense and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the cooperative agreement. The term does not include "cooperative research and development agreements" as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a. No fee or profit is allowed.

Grants and cooperative agreements for Institution of Higher Education and nonprofit organizations are primarily governed by the following:

a. Federal statutes

b. Federal Regulations

c. 2 CFR part 200, as modified and supplemented by DoD’s interim Implementation found in 2 CFR part 1103

Grants and cooperative agreements for for-profit and nonprofit organizations exempted from Subpart E- cost principles of part 200, are primary governed by the following:

A. Federal Statutes

B. Federal Regulations

C. 32 CFR Part 34 – Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with For-Profit Organizations

Copies of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regulations may be obtained from:

Executive Office of the President Telephone: (202) 395-7332 Publications Service FAX Requests: (202) 395-9068 New Executive Office Building http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/grants 725 17th Street, N.W., Room 2200 Washington, DC 20503

An electronic copy of the DoDGARs may be found at http://www.ecfr.gov (title 32: National Defense, Part 22 – DoD Grant and Agreements – Award and Administration).

4. Technology Investment Agreement (TIA) Assistance Transaction other than a Grant or Cooperative

Agreement (see 32 CFR, Part 37): A legal instrument, consistent with 10 U.S.C. 2371, which may be used when the use of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement is not feasible or appropriate for basic, applied, and advanced research projects. The research covered under a TIA shall not be duplicative of research being conducted under an existing DoD program. To the maximum extent practicable, TIA’s shall provide for a 50/50 cost share between the Government and the Offeror. An Offeror's cost share may take the form of cash, independent research and development (IR&D), foregone intellectual property rights, equipment, or access to unique facilities, as well as others. Due to the extent of cost share, and the fact that an ‘other transaction’ does not qualify as a "funding agreement" as defined at 37 CFR 401.2(a), the intellectual property provisions of a TIA can be negotiated to provide expanded protection to an Offeror's intellectual property. No fee or profit is allowed. Cost sharing and matching is not an evaluation factor used under this BAA. Exceptions to this may exist if the offeror is proposing the use of a TIA or an OTA as an award instrument.

5. Other Transaction for Prototype (OTA): A legal instrument, consistent with 10 U.S.C. 2371 (as authorized by

Public Law 106-398, Section 803), which may be used when the use of a contract, grant, or cooperative agreement is not feasible or appropriate for prototype projects directly relevant to weapons or weapon systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the DoD. The effort covered under an ‘other transaction for prototype’ shall not be duplicative of effort being conducted under an existing DoD program (please refer to the “Other Transactions” OT Guide for Prototype Projects at www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/Docs/otguide.doc). For Cost-Sharing requirements for these types of awards please see “C2.16. COST SHARING” found on page 30 at the web-link directly above.

The following websites may be accessed to obtain an electronic copy of the governing regulations and guidance:

FAR, DFARS, and AFARS: http://farsite.hill.af.mil/

Code of Federal Regulations: http://www.ecfr.gov

C. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION

1. Eligible Applicants:

Proposals are sought from educational institutions, non-profit/not-for-profit organizations, and commercial organizations, domestic or foreign, for research and development (R&D) in those areas specified in Part II Section A of this BAA. Foreign owned, controlled, or influenced organizations are advised that security restrictions may apply that could preclude their participation in these efforts. Educational institutions, non-profit/not-for-profit organizations, and commercial organizations based in countries included on the U.S. State Department List of Countries that Support Terrorism are excluded from participation in these efforts.

Government laboratories, Federal Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs), and U.S. Service Academies are not eligible to participate as prime contractors or recipients. However, they may be able to participate as subcontractors or sub recipients (eligibility will be determined on a case by case basis). If a proposal selected for award includes one or more subawards to a Government laboratory, FFRDC, or U.S.

Service Academy, award funds allocated for Government laboratories, FFRDCs, and/or U.S. Service Academies will be provided via a Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) from DFSC. No award funds will be channeled directly from a prime awardee to a Government laboratory, FFRDC, or U.S. Service Academy subawardee.

2. Cost Sharing or Matching:

There is no required cost sharing, matching, or cost participation to be eligible under this BAA and cost sharing and matching is not an evaluation factor used under this BAA. Exceptions to this may exist if the offeror is proposing the use of a TIA or an OTA as an award instrument. Cost-sharing requirements may be found at 32 CFR 37.215 for TIAs. Cost-sharing requirements for OTAs may be found at Section C2.16 COST SHARING in the August 2002 document entitled “Other Transactions” OT Guide for Prototype Projects referenced in Section B.5 above.

3. Duns and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number and System for Award Management (SAM):

Each applicant (unless the applicant is an individual or Federal agency that is exempt from those requirements under 2 CFR 25.110(b) or (c), or has an exception approved by the agency under 2 CFR 25.110(d)) is required to: (i) Be registered in the SAM prior to submitting its application; (ii) provide a valid DUNS number in its application; and (iii) continue to maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by an agency. An award will not be made to an applicant until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements.

4. OTHER

Foreign owned, controlled, or influenced firms are advised that security restrictions may apply that could preclude their participation in these efforts. Before preparing a proposal, such firms are requested to contact the ARL Security and Counterintelligence Branch (301) 394-2411 concerning their eligibility.

D. APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION INFORMATION

1. Address to View Broad Agency Announcement:

This BAA may be accessed from the following websites:

1) FedBizOpps - https://www.fbo.gov

2) Grants.gov - http://www.grants.gov

3) ARL website - http://www.arl.army.mil/www/default.cfm?Action=6&page=8

Amendments, if any, to this BAA will be posted to these websites when they occur. Interested parties are encouraged to periodically check these website for updates and amendments.

The following information is for those wishing to respond to the BAA:

2. Content and Form of Application Submission:

Section 1 – General Information:

Completeness of Information: Proposals must include all of the information specified in this BAA to prevent delays in evaluation. Be sure to specify the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE Code), the DUNS Number, and the Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) with your submission. Completion of the Representations and Certifications as well as registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) are prerequisites before receiving an award.

Classified Submissions: Classified proposals are not expected. However, in an unusual circumstance where an Offeror believes a proposal has the potential to be classified, contact the ARO Operations Security (OPSEC) Officer, Mr. Anthony J. Johnson, (919) 549-4391, anthony.j.johnson78.civ@mail.mil, prior to the proposal's submission.

Use of Color in Proposals: All proposals received shall be stored as electronic images. Electronic color images require a significantly larger amount of storage space than black- and-white images. As a result, Offerors' use of color in proposals should be minimal and used only when necessary for details. Do not use color if it is not necessary.

Government Property/Government Furnished Equipment and Facilities: Normally, title to equipment or other tangible property purchased with Government funds vests with non-profit institutions of higher education or with non-profit research organizations if vesting will facilitate scientific research performed for the Government.

Commercial organizations are expected to possess the necessary plant facilities and equipment to conduct the proposed research. Deviations may be made on a case-by-case basis. Government equipment, research facilities, and operational military units may be available and may be considered as potential Government-furnished equipment/facilities. Offerors should explain as part of their proposals if any of these Government-furnished resources could be useful to the success of a proposed project.

Post-Employment Conflict of Interest: There are certain post-employment restrictions on former Federal officers and employees, including special Government employees (Section 207 of Title 18, U.S.C.). If a prospective Offeror believes a conflict of interest may exist, the situation should be discussed with the ARO legal counsel, Ms. Peggy Gieseking, (410) 278-6487, peggy.gieseking@us.army.mil, prior to expending time and effort in preparing a proposal.

Statement of Disclosure Preference: Please complete Form 52 or 52A stating your preference for release of Information contained in your proposal. Copies of these forms are available at http://www.arl.army.mil/www/default.cfm?page=218. Additionally, proposals containing data that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes shall include the following statement on their cover page:

The proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed, in whole or in part, for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, an award is made to this Offeror as a result of or in connection with the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting award. This restriction does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in these data if they are obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets .

The Offeror shall also mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:

“Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.”

Section 2 – Application Process Overview:

The application process is in three stages as follows:

Stage 1- Verify the accuracy of your Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) registration at the D&B website http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform before registering with the System for Award Management (SAM) Registration at https://www.sam.gov. Prospective Offerors must be registered in SAM prior to award.

Stage 2 - Prospective Offerors are ebcouraged to submit a white paper and a quad chart prior to the submission of a complete, more detailed proposal. The purpose of this white paper and quad chart is to minimize the labor and cost associated with the production of detailed proposals that have very little chance of being selected for funding. Based on assessment of the white paper and quad chart, feedback will be provided to the proposer(s) to encourage or discourage submission of full proposals.

Stage 3 – Following the review of the white paper and quad chart, offerors may be contacted to submit a full proposal. For all awards, a full proposal must be submitted and reviewed.

Section 3 – White Paper and Quad Chart Preparation:

The white paper and quad chart should focus on describing details of the proposed research, including how it is innovative and how it could substantially increase the scientific state of the art. Army relevance and potential impact should also be described. The white paper and quad chart should present the effort in sufficient detail so as to allow evaluation of the concept's technical merit and potential contributions to the Army mission.

White paper format shall be as follows:

The white paper and quad chart must be combined and submitted as a single PDF file. Only PDF files will be accepted. Original format (e.g., Word, PowerPoint) files should be made available upon request.

Margins: 1 inch; Spacing: Single; Font: Times New Roman 12 Point

Number of Pages: No more than three (3) single-sided pages (excluding the cover page and quad chart);

white papers exceeding the page limit will not be evaluated.

White paper content should follow the template available at http://www.arl.army.mil/www/pages/8/fy13WhitePaperTemp.pdf.

Quad chart format shall be as follows:

The white paper and quad chart must be combined and submitted as a single PDF file. Only PDF files will be accepted. Original format (e.g., Word, PowerPoint) files should be made available upon request.

The quad chart should be a succinct description of the project highlights appropriate for all audiences (both technical and non-technical).

Quad chart content should follow the template available at http://www.arl.army.mil/www/pages/8/fy13QuadChartTemp.ppt.

The preformatted fonts on the quad chart template may be modified so that the required information fits the chart. The chart format itself may not be modified.

TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR WHITE PAPERS/QUAD CHARTS:

1. A detailed discussion of the effort's scientific research objectives, approach, relationship to similar research, and level of effort shall be submitted. Include the nature and extent of the anticipated results, and if known, the manner in which the work will contribute to the accomplishment of the Army's mission and how this would be demonstrated.

2. The cost portion of the white paper shall contain a brief cost estimate revealing all the component parts of the proposal, including research hours, burden, material costs, travel, etc. If applicable, a phased funding approach and its costs by phase should be noted on the quad chart.

RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS ON WHITE PAPERS/QUAD CHARTS:

1. Any proprietary data that the Offeror intends to be used only by the Government for evaluation purposes must be identified. The Offeror must also identify any scientific data contained in the white paper that is to be treated by the Government as limited rights data. In the absence of such identification, the Government will assume to have unlimited rights to all scientific data in the white paper. Records or data bearing a restrictive legend may be included in the white paper. It is the intent of the Army to treat all white papers as privileged information before the award and to disclose their contents only for the purpose of evaluation.

2. The Offerors are cautioned, however, that portions of the white papers may be subject to release under terms of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.

EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF WHITE PAPERS/QUAD CHARTS:

1. Evaluation Process: White papers will be evaluated for scientific/technical merit and the potential to advance future DoD forensics and/or biometrics capabilities. Care must be exercised to ensure that classified, sensitive, and/or critical technologies are not included. If such information is required, appropriate restrictive markings and procedures should be applied.

2. Disposition Process: Offerors will be notified of the evaluation results in writing via e-mail.

Section 4 – White Paper/Quad Chart Submission:

White papers must be submitted electronically in PDF file format to USArmy.Gillem.DFSC.MBX.DFSCOE- RDTE@mail.mil. Hard copy (hand carried, mailed, faxed) submissions will not be accepted. Only PDF files will be accepted (electronic files other than PDF files will not be accepted). You must cite ‘W911NF-17-R- 0001 White Paper-Quad Chart’ in the subject line of the e-mail.

Section 5 – Preparation of Complete Research Proposals:

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS:

This competition seeks applied research deliverables beyond a technical report.

Examples of such deliverables are:

(1) Techniques

(2) Methods

(3) Systems

(4) Device Prototypes/Device Functional Models

(5) Software

(6) Algorithms

(7) Databases

(8) Protocols

(9) Training Materials for Best Practices

If feasible, it is recommended that the Offeror divide the proposed work into discrete phases, with each phase resulting in the delivery of a measurable deliverable. Although it is not guaranteed that subsequent phases, stages, or tasks will be funded, this approach will enable the proposed work to be funded incrementally, depending on, among other things, the quality of the deliverable at the end of each phase, strategic priorities, and the availability of funds. However, applicants should not divide their work if it is not feasible to do so without impairing the technical and programmatic soundness of their approach. Projected periods of performance for awards range from 9 months to 24 months.

Note: Measurable research deliverables will be required at the end of each phase to enable DFSC to assess the progress of the work and assist DFSC in making reasoned determinations as to the suitability of funding the next phase of the work.

Proposal Format and Content: The proposal is the only vehicle available to the Offeror for receiving consideration for award. The proposal must stand on its own merit; only information provided in the proposal can be used in the evaluation process leading to an award. The technical proposal must be accompanied by a fully supported cost proposal as cost and technical considerations are reviewed simultaneously. To ensure all technical proposals receive proper consideration, the Government-recommended proposal format that follows (Volume I Technical Proposal) should be followed as closely as possible. Proposal documents (excluding required forms) must use the following page format:

Page Size – 8 ½ x 11 inches

Margins – 1 inch; Spacing – Single; Font – Times New Roman, 12 Point

Number of Pages – The full proposal may not exceed 30 single-sided pages

The cover letter, table of contents, tables, charts, figures, other illustrations, letters of support, curriculum vitae and appendices count toward the 30-page limit.

The 30-page limit excludes the ARO Form 51, ARO Form 52/52a, SF 424 (R&R) Form (Grants.gov), Research and Related Other Project Information Form (Grants.gov), Attachments Form (Grants.gov), the budget/cost proposal(s), and the supporting budget/cost proposal narrative(s). NOTE: Proposal pages beyond the 30 page limit will not be evaluated or read.

VOLUME I - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

i Cover Letter ii Table of Contents iii List of Illustrations/Tables iv Executive Summary/Project Abstract

1.0 Technical Approach

1.1 Technical Discussion

1.2 Technical Program Summary

1.3 Risk Analysis and Alternatives

1.4 References

2.0 Special Technical Factors

2.1 Capabilities and Relevant Experience

2.2 Previous or Current Relevant Independent Research and Development (IR&D) Work

2.3 Related Government Contracts

2.4 Facilities/Resources/Equipment

3.0 Schedule

3.1 Time Line Chart by Task

3.2 Project Phases, Milestones, and Deliverables

4.0 Program Organization

4.1 Organization Chart(s) with Key personnel

4.2 Management and Technical Team

4.2.1 Prime Contractor Responsibilities

4.2.2 Subcontractor(s) Responsibilities

4.2.3 Consultant(s) Responsibilities

4.3 Resumes of Key Personnel

4.4 Current and Pending Support

5.0 Appendices

i. Cover Page: A cover page is required. Proposals will not be processed without either:

(1) A signed ARO FORM 51 cover page (required for procurement contract proposals submitted by e-mail) (see

Section 6, page 23 – Submission of Complete Research Proposals)

OR

(2) A SF 424 R&R Form (required for grant/cooperative agreement proposals submitted online via Grants.gov

(see Section 6, page 23 – Submission of Complete Research Proposals)

Note: If an Offeror elects to submit a contract proposal via Grants.gov instead of via e-mail, both the ARO FORM 51 and SF 424 R&R Form are required. Proposals for grants or cooperative agreements only require the SF 424 R&R Form.

The cover page should include the BAA number, R&D topic, proposed project title, and any other information that identifies the proposal. The title of the proposed project should be scientifically representative, intelligible to a scientifically literate reader, and suitable for use in the public domain. The cover page should also contain the proprietary data disclosure statement, if applicable (ARO FORM 52 or 52A). Should the project be carried out at a branch campus or other component of the submitting organization, that branch campus or component should be identified in the space provided (Block 11 on the ARO FORM 51 and Block 12 on the SF 424 R&R). The proposed duration for which support is requested should be consistent with the nature and complexity of the proposed activity. The Federal awarding agency reserves the right to make awards with shorter or longer periods of performance. Specification of a desired starting date for the project is important and helpful. However, requested effective dates cannot be guaranteed.

Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 7701, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996[Section 31001(I)(1), Public Law 104-134], Federal agencies shall obtain each awardee’s Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). This number may be the Employer Identification Number (EIN) for a business or non-profit entity or the Social Security Number for an individual. The TIN is being obtained for purposes of collecting and reporting on any delinquent amounts that may arise out of an awardee’s relationship with the Government. Offerors shall provide their organization's Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. The DUNS number is a nine-digit number assigned by Dun and Bradstreet Information Services. Offerors shall provide their assigned Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code. The CAGE code is a 5-character code assigned and maintained by the Defense Logistics Service Center (DLSC) to identify a commercial plant or establishment.

ii. Table of Contents: It is highly recommended that the Offeror follow the Volume I Technical Proposal outline as a table of contents and use it for a final quality-control checklist.

iii. List of Illustrations/Tables: This list is a quick reference of charts, graphs, and other important information.

A separate list of tables is recommended.

iv. Executive Summary/Project Abstract: The summary/abstract should present an organized progression of the work to be accomplished, without the technical details, such that the reader can grasp the core issues of the proposed program. The summary/abstract shall include a concise statement of work and basic approaches to be used in the proposed effort, to include a statement of scientific objectives, methods to be employed, and the significance of the proposed effort to the advancement of knowledge. The abstract should be no longer than one

(1) pages and be in a form suitable for release under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.

The abstract should indicate the effort intended for each twelve (12) month period of research, where applicable.

1.0 Technical Approach: In this section, the Offeror should provide as much technical detail and analysis as is necessary or useful to support the technical approach being proposed. One must clearly identify the core of the intended approach.

1.1 Technical Discussion: The technical discussion should include the following:

A complete discussion stating the current issue, the background and objectives of the proposed work to address this problem, the scientific approaches to be considered, the details of any proof-of-concept work performed previously to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, the relationship to competing or related research, the level of effort to be employed (including the number of samples to be tested as part of the project and the rationale for this number (e.g., statistical significance)), and how data will be analyzed and interpreted. Include the nature and extent of the anticipated results and how they will significantly advance the scientific state-of-the-art. Include how the results will conform to industry standards (e.g., forensic, biometric, and/or data sharing standards). Ensure the proposal identifies any scientific uncertainties and describes specific approaches for the resolution of the uncertainties. If known, include the manner in which the work will contribute to the accomplishment of the Army's mission; letters of support from field experts in academia, industry, or government may be helpful in determining technical merit.

A brief description of your organization.

The names of other Government agencies or other parties receiving the proposal and/or funding the proposed effort (if none, so state); concurrent or later submission of the proposal to other organizations will not prejudice its review by DFSC if we are kept informed of the situation.

A statement regarding possible impact, if any, of the proposed effort on the environment considering as a minimum its effect upon water, atmosphere, natural resources, human resources, and any other values.

The Offeror shall provide a statement regarding the use of Class I and Class II ozone-depleting substances. Ozone-depleting substances mean any substance designated as Class I by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), including but not limited to chlorofluorocarbons, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform and any substance designated as Class II by EPA, including but not limited to hydrochlorofluorocarbons. See 40 C.F.R. Part 82 for detailed information. If Class I or II substances are to be utilized, a list shall be provided as part of the Offeror's proposal. If none, so state.

Requested support (if any) in the following areas: facilities, equipment, and materials.

1.2 Technical Program Summary: This section summarizes the above technical discussion in an orderly progression through the program, emphasizing the strong points of the proposed technical approach.

1.3 Risk Analysis and Alternatives: Every technology has its limitations and shortcomings.

Offeror(s) should demonstrate an understanding of the risk factors associated with the proposed effort as well as potential mitigation plans, as proposal evaluator(s) will formulate a risk assessment during proposal review. Critical technologies should be identified along with their impact on the overall program as well as contingency plans that may still offer improvements to existing approaches, even if less desirable than the proposed solution.

1.4 References/Bibliography: Citations must be complete (including full name of author(s), title, and location in the literature).

2.0 Special Technical Factors: In this section, the Offeror should describe any capabilities it has that are uniquely supportive of the research and development to be pursued. This section should include the following:

2.1 Capabilities and Relevant Experience

2.2 Previous or Current Relevant IR&D Work

2.3 Related Government Contracts

2.4 Facilities/Resources/Equipment

3.0 Schedule: The schedule represents the Offeror's commitment to perform the program tasks in an orderly, timely manner.

3.1 Time Line Chart by Task: Each major task identified in the technical proposal must appear as a separate line on the program schedule.

3.2 Project Phases, Milestones, and Deliverables: Provide a schedule of events and milestones and a detailed description of the results and deliverables that are planned/scheduled for each phase of the work.

Where appropriate, include measurable metrics by which milestones and deliverables can be assessed.

4.0 Program Organization: In this section, the Offeror should present its organization's ability to conduct difficult technical programs. Any pertinent or useful information may be included in this paragraph, but a minimum recommended response should address the following information:

4.1 Organizational Chart(s) with Key Personnel: Include prime contractor and subcontractor organization charts.

4.2 Management and Technical Team: This should specifically identify what tasks will be performed by which party and why each subcontractor/subawardee, if any, was selected to perform its task(s).

4.2.1 Prime Contractor Responsibilities

4.2.2 Subcontractor(s)/Subawardee(s) Responsibilities

4.2.3 Consultant(s) Responsibilities

4.3 Resumes/Curriculum Vitae of Key Personnel: Include the resumes/curriculum vitae of the prime contractor, subcontractor/subawardee, and consultant key personnel to include the names, brief biography, and list of recent publications of the Offeror’s key personnel.

Documentation of previous work or experience in the field of the proposer is especially important. Key personnel information shall include the following:

Primary Principal Investigator (PI): The “Primary” PI provides a single or initial point of communication between the sponsoring agency(ies) and the awardee organization(s) about scientific matters. If not otherwise designated, the first PI listed will serve as the “Primary” PI. This individual can be changed with the concurrence of the agency(ies). The sponsoring agency(ies) do not infer any additional scientific stature to this role among collaborating investigators.

Co-Principal Investigator (s) (Co-PI): When an organization designates more than one PI, it identifies Co-PIs as individuals who share the authority and responsibility for leading and directing the research, intellectually and logistically. The sponsoring agency(ies) do not infer any distinction in scientific stature among multiple PIs.

Relevant experience and employment history including a description of any prior Federal employment within one year preceding the date of proposal submission.

For the personnel categories of postdoctoral associates, other professionals, and students (research assistants), the proposal may include information on exceptional qualifications of these individuals that merit consideration in the evaluation of the proposal.

4.4 Current/Pending Support: All project support from whatever source must be listed. The list must include all projects requiring a portion of the Principal Investigator's and other senior personnel's time, even if they receive no salary support from the project(s). The information should include, at a minimum: (i) the project/proposal title and brief description, (ii) the name and location of the organization or agency presently funding the work or requested to fund such work, (iii) the award amount or annual dollar volume of the effort, (iv) the period of performance, and (v) a breakdown of the time required of the Principal Investigator and/or other senior personnel.

5.0 Appendices: Appendices may include technical reports, published papers, and referenced material. A listing of these reports/papers with short descriptions of the subject matter is usually adequate. Do not provide commercial product advertising brochures.

VOLUME II – COST PROPOSAL

COST PROPOSAL PREPARATION:

1.Cost Reimbursement or Fixed Price Award: Selection of the type of award (cost reimbursement or fixed price) is based upon various factors, such as the type of award instrument selected, the type of research to be performed, the contractor's experience in maintaining cost records, and the ability to detail and allocate proposed costs and performance of the work. Cost type awards are most commonly used because of their suitability in supporting research and development efforts. They permit some flexibility in the redirection of efforts due to recent research experiment results or changes in Army guidance. Fixed-price type awards are used when the research project costs can be estimated accurately, the services to be rendered are reasonably definite, and the amount of property, if any, is fixed. The negotiated price is not subject to any adjustment on the basis of the Offeror’s cost experience in performing the contract. Offerors may propose either cost reimbursable or fixed price arrangements, but the award type may vary in accordance with relevant factors as determined by the ACC (APG) RTP Division.

2.Cost Proposal Content: Cost proposals should represent an Offeror's best response to the solicitation. Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and cost or price data must be fully explained in the proposal. Failure to explain any significant inconsistencies may demonstrate an Offeror's lack of understanding of the nature and scope of the work required. Accordingly, cost proposals must be sufficient to establish the reasonableness, realism, and completeness of the proposed cost/price. Further, any modifications made to the initial proposal must likewise be thoroughly supported in writing regardless of whether such changes are made during negotiations or at the time of a proposal revision. The estimate should be detailed for each task of the proposed work. The cost proposal should be limited to the minimum number of pages necessary to satisfy the specific requirements set forth herein.

Submission of volumes of computer-generated data to support the cost proposal is not necessary or desired.

If computer-generated data is essential to support the cost proposal, it may be submitted as an addendum and must be clearly cross-referenced to the material it supports in the cost proposal.

Each proposal must contain a budget for each year of support requested and a cumulative budget for the full term of requested support. The ARO budget form (ARO FORM 99) may be reproduced as needed. Locally produced versions may be used, but you may not make substitutions in prescribed budget categories nor alter or rearrange the cost categories as they appear on the form.