Solicitation_Amendment_0002_W911N2-19-Q-0003-0001.pdf

ALLEN G. MILLER JR.

LETTERKENNY CONTRACTING OFFICE

1 OVERCASH AVENUE CCAM-ALK

717-267-8714

CHAMBERSBURG PA 17201-4150

W25G1Q825600L2

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to change FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation from Low est Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) to Tradeoff utilizing best value and to extend the closing date. See summary of changes. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jan-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W911N219Q0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Nov-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Jan-2019

CODE

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT

LETTERKENNY CONTRACTING OFFICE - ACC

1 OVERCASH AVENUE, ATTN: CCAM-ALK, BLDG 2S

CHAMBERSBURG PA 17201-4150

W911N2 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE W911N2

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W911N219Q0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 15-Jan-2019 04:00 PM to 23-Jan-2019 04:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

SOLICITATION NOTES

1. System for Award Management (SAM): In accordance with FAR 4.1102, Offerors shall be registered in the SAM database in order to be eligible for contract award. No award will be made to an Offeror not registered.

Registration can be accomplished at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. Registration in this database shall remain active. There has been a recent SAM requirement for submission of notarized letters for all new vendor registrants, and for renewals of existing registrations. Please check your SAM registration and if the registration is due for renewal in the next few months, it is important to start that process immediately. For additional information on notarized letters, visit: https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/organization/federal-acquisition-service/office-of-systems-management/integrated-award-environment-iae/sam-update.

2. Annual Representations and Certifications: In accordance with FAR 4.1201, Offerors shall complete electronic annual representations and certifications within SAM as part of required registration. Registration in this database shall remain active and can be accessed at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.

3. Questions: Questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer, in writing, at least 10 calendar days prior to the closing date. Questions submitted after this time will be answered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer for this action is Michelle L. Fike, email:

michelle.l.fike.civ@mail.mil and the Contract Specialist for this action is Allen G. Miller, email:

allen.g.miller6.civ@mail.mil.

4. Award without Discussions: The Government intends to award without discussions, offerors should submit their best prices in their initial offer. If FAR Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items, is included, Offerors must submit all information requested therein in order for the Government to determine technical acceptability.

5. Amendments: The Offeror shall submit to the Contracting Officer signed copies of all amendments issued to this solicitation. Failure to comply may cause your proposal to be rejected.

6. Payment: Payment for this action will be made by Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) through the Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS) utilizing Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF). See 252.232-7006 for more information.

7. Period for Acceptance of Offers: The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

8. FOB Destination: Unless otherwise stated in the solicitation, Offerors shall provide FOB Destination prices.

9. Equal Part: When submitting an equal part, please provide all the literature, drawings that proves that it is equivalent.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by eithe party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, BASIS OF AWARD:

A. General Information:

1. The basis of award will utilize Best Value Trade Off criteria procedures. This is a competitive Best Value Trade Off requirement. The Government intends to award a single contract. The Government’s most important factor for this Best Value requirement is technical compliance with the salient characteristics of the purchase description as described in this solicitation . If the government technical evaluator determines that an offeror’s product exceeds the technical specifications described in the purchase description for this solicitation, the Government is willing to pay a higher price (not to exceed 5%) for the technically superior product. The 5% margin shall be determined by evaluating cost of the lowest price technically acceptable offer and adding 5% to the cost of the lowest price technically acceptable offer. If the price of the technically superior product is within 5% of the cost of the lowest price technically acceptable offer award shall be made to the technically superior product. If the contractor’s proposal once reviewed is technically equal with another contractor’s proposal, price will become the determining factor for award. Contractors must have an acceptable past performance.

2. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, and technical requirements.

3. The Government intends to make award without discussions, unless the Contracting Officer determines that discussions are necessary. Offerors should provide their most favorable prices in their initial offers.

B. Non-Price Evaluation Factor:

1. Factor 1 – Technical:

(a) Subfactor 1 Technical compliance with the salient characteristics as described in this this solicitation: The offeror shall provide all detailed information possible for the Government POC to evaluate their proposal against the requirement in the purchase description.

(b) Subfactor 2 Past Performance: The offeror shall provide three (3) references for the Government POC to evaluate. The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products outlined in the solicitation requirements.

Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation require will be consider relevant. Contract Performance occurred within the past three years from the date proposals are due is consider recent.

Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the rating in Table below.

Past performance will be initially evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s present / past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired.

The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant shall be unique to each Best Value Trade Off source selection. Therefore, the solicitation shall establish the criteria for recency and relevancy in relation to the specific requirement being procured. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract performance history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the requirements of the contract that is contemplated to be awarded as a result of the evaluation of proposals in the current procurement.

Second, the past performance evaluation will determine how well the offeror performed on the prior contracts.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

Past Performance Table for Acceptable /Unacceptable Rating Method

Acceptable - Based on the offeror’s relevant and recent performance record of at least three (3) references, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Alternatively offeror’s performance record is unknown and therefore neutral.

Unacceptable - Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

C. Price Evaluation Factor: Offerors shall complete the with pricing for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN).

D. Proposals will be evaluated initially independently of the price to determine the Offerors’ ability to meet the Government’s requirement set forth in the solicitation. The Government may make a final rating determination based on the proposal as submitted without requesting any further information. For all proposals determined to be Technically Acceptable, the offer providing the lowest price will receive the contract award.

1. Offerors’ technical proposals will receive an overall rating based on the following:

(a) Technically Acceptable: Offeror meets all requirements or technical specifications or has submitted all documentation requested in any technical evaluation criteria and all documentation meets the standard set forth in the solicitation.

(b) Technically Unacceptable: Offerer fails to meet all requirements or technical specifications or has failed to comply in submitting requested documentation in any technical evaluation criteria or the submitted documentation fails to meet the standard set forth in the solicitation.

(End of Addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)