Attachment 3 Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 260 KB Posted

Attached to
IWTP CHEMICALS Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-20-Q-0034
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Detroit Arsenal

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to IWTP CHEMICALS, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 003.pdf PDF
Amendment 002.pdf PDF
Amendment 001.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Past_Performance_Questionnaire-1.pdf PDF
Attachment 1. Revised_ Chemical Procurement Specification-Anniston IWTP_3-2-20.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Technical Literature Request.pdf PDF
20-Q-0034.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

This Questionnaire relates to the solicitation requirements for Carbide Inserts located at the

Anniston Army Depot.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – W911KF-20-Q-0015

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile [FAX: 256-235-6353]

Director of Contracting

Anniston Army Depot

7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Lakeeta Beavers, Contract Specialist

Phone: 256-240-3196

E-mail: lakeeta.t.beaverselridge.civ@mail.mil

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

mailto:lakeeta.t.beaverselridge.civ@mail.mil

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.

Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to

Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

C. Technical Processes – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound construction processes and practices, including safety and environmental:

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to specifications:

E. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

F. Quality Control – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound quality processes and practices.

G. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .