Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Ten (10) 6, 000 lb Tow Tractors
Solicitation number
W911KF-20-Q-0032
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on a solicitation from the Anniston Army Depot. The solicitation seeks ten 6,000 pound tow tractors to be modified and delivered to the depot, along with two owner's manuals for each tractor. Bidders are asked to provide contract and project references for past performance, including descriptions of requirements, performance details, and ratings in categories such as customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, technical requirements conformity, and technical responsiveness. References will also provide an overall assessment of the bidder's past performance. The completed questionnaire is due by the specified response date and is to be treated as source selection sensitive information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W911KF-20-Q-0032.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE –

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile [FAX: 256-235-6353

Director of Contracting

Anniston Army Depot

7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN:

Phone:

E-mail:

Desired Response Date:

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME
OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to

Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to contract specifications:

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

D. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

E. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

Excellent
Good
Adequate
Marginal
Poor
Unknown

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .