Attachment_3_-_Quality_Surveillance_Plan.pdf

QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

Plastic Blast Media

Contract Number:

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1. Purpose. The role of the Government in quality assurance is to ensure contract standards are achieved. The purpose of the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is to identify the methods and procedures the Government will use to evaluate contractor actions while performing the requirements in the Statement of Work (SOW). It is designed to provide an effective surveillance method by monitoring contractor performance required by the Statement of Work (SOW).

1.1.1.The QASP provides a systematic method to evaluate the services the contractor is required to perform as specified in the Statement of Work (SOW) and the Contract.

1.1.2.The QASP has been developed by the requiring activity. It is designed to provide direction to personnel performing contract surveillance activities. Personnel surveying the contract terms and conditions and Statement of Work (SOW) requirements will periodically review the QASP throughout the life of the contract.

2.0. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

2.1. Contracting Officer Representative. The Contracting Officer Representative (COR) is responsible for quality assurance guidance and to ensure that contract quality requirements, provisions, standards, and thresholds are defined, practical, enforceable, necessary, and verifiable.

2.1.1. The COR evaluates and documents contractor performance in accordance with the QASP and

Statement of Work (SOW).

2.1.2. The COR shall notify the Contracting Officer of any significant performance deficiencies using a Contractor Discrepancy Report with supporting documentation.

2.1.3.The COR will upload copies of ALL surveillance documentation to the VCE COR Tool, unless otherwise directed by the contracting officer.

2.1.4.The COR will submit a monthly report to the contracting officer concerning performance of services rendered under this contract.

2.1.5. The COR recommends improvements to the QASP and Statement of Work (SOW) throughout the life of the contract.

2.2. Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer is responsible for safeguarding the interests of the

United States Government in contractual relationships. Only the Contracting Officer is authorized to bind the Government and then, only to the extent of the authority delegated to them through the issuance of a warrant.

2.2.1. The Contracting Officer delegates authority for inspection and/or acceptance in accordance with the terms of the contract.

2.2.2. The Contracting Officer informs the contractor of the names, duties, and limitations of authority for all quality assurance personnel assigned to the contract.

3.0. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

3.1. Scope of Work. The scope of this contract is to deliver plastic blast media, type II: UREA, MIL-P-85891A as outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW)

4.0. QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

4.1. Quality Control Program. The contractor, not the Government, is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract.

5.0 SURVEILLANCE. The COR will perform monthly surveillance based on the quality and effectiveness of the services provided and contractor’s data deliverables.

5.1 Unacceptable Performance. If the number of complaints/defects exceeds the performance threshold for any objective, the COR will determine the possible cause of this unacceptable performance.

Government-caused complaints/defects will not be counted against the contractor. The same applies to any other requirement of the contract when Government-caused complaints/defects are the cause of unacceptable contractor performance. If the contractor’s performance is judged unacceptable for any requirement by the COR, the COR will inform the contracting officer for resolution. Significant performance deficiencies must be submitted to the Contracting Officer using a Contractor Discrepancy

Report and include supporting documentation.

7.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS)

7.1 Overview. This PRS identifies the services required by the Statement of Work (SOW) over which the Government will exercise surveillance.

7.2 Performance Evaluation. Performance of a service will be evaluated to determine whether or not it meets the performance threshold. The contractor shall provide the Government a written response as to why the performance threshold was not met, how performance will be returned to acceptable levels, and how recurrence of the cause will be prevented in the future. When documentation does not meet performance thresholds, revising and resubmitting the documentation at no cost to the Government is the preferred method for correcting unacceptable performance.

7.3 Performance Objectives, Indicators, Thresholds, and Surveillance Methods. The services required by the contractor are summarized into performance objectives and indicators, along with the minimum standards that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

7.4 Human Trafficking. COR will report any Human Trafficking activity to the proper authority.

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS)

Performance

Objective

Performance Indicator Performance

Threshold

Method of

Surveillance

PRS # 1. Scope

Reports

Plastic blast delivered in accordance with the

Statement of Work

(SOW) sections 1.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and the delivery order

100% accuracy 100% inspection of deliverables

The evaluation ratings are as follows:

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task contain some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

8.0 APPROVAL

Signature:

Printed Name: Cannon, Christina J

Electronic Signature:

Title: Supply Systems Analyst Date: 14JUN2019

Contracting Officer Representative (COR)