Attachment_1_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 100 KB Posted

Attached to
IWTP Server Upgrade/Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W911KF-18-Q-0055
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

ATTACHMENT 1 PAST PERFORMANCE

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to IWTP Server Upgrade/Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_2_Q_&_A.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_Q_&_A_Extend.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
18-Q-0055.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Evidence_of_Authority_To_Sign_Offers.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911KF18Q0037

Past Performance Questionnaire This Questionnaire relates to solicitation requirements for the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant Server Upgrade/Support at the Anniston Army Depot.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE – W911KF-18-Q-0037

Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection for Anniston Army Depot.

Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail or send by facsimile [FAX: 256-235-6353]

Director of Contracting Anniston Army Depot 7 Frankford Ave.

Anniston, AL 36201-4199

ATTN: Barbara Gunter, Purchasing Agent Phone: 256-240-3715 E-mail: barbara.b.gunter.civ@mail.mil

Response Date: 4/25/2018, 10:00am (CST)

When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.

Proposed prime contractor

1. OFFEROR NAME OFFEROR ADDRESS

Contractor Name and Address and contract/project information being addressed in this questionnaire

2. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO.:

3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:

4. COMPLETION DATE:

5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options):

6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

7. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS:

8. Point of Contact: Provide the following information for the company and individual completing this questionnaire:

Company/Agency Name and Address:

Name of person completing this questionnaire:

Title:

Role/responsibility for the effort being addressed in the survey:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

Rating Scale:

EXCELLENT: Superior performance. Objectives/requirements essentially always achieved or exceeded, with inconsequential exceptions.

GOOD: Highly satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements achieved with only rare exceptions, and the exceptions had minor consequences.

ADEQUATE: Generally satisfactory performance. Objectives/requirements generally achieved with occasional exceptions, and, in most cases, the exceptions had minor consequences.

MARGINAL: Occasionally unsatisfactory performance of significance.

Objectives/requirements were not fully achieved, with significant consequences in some cases.

POOR: Frequently unsatisfactory performance of significance. Objectives/requirements frequently not achieved, with significant consequences.

UNKNOWN: Unable to rate, not observed, or not a significant aspect of performance.

9. Questionnaire: Please indicate the rating that best reflects your experience with this contractor and provide a short narrative addressing the basis for the ratings assigned. Address compliance with requirements, actual performance, problems encountered and problem resolution. Use additional sheets if necessary. Excellent contract management, attention to Detail and Quality Assurance.

A. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s business-like concern for its customers, including such factors as dependability, flexibility, early problem identification, communication, and responsiveness.

B. Schedule – Assess the contractor’s adherence to delivery commitments; responsiveness to requests for accelerations; and early identification and mitigation of schedule slippages.

C. Technical Processes – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound construction processes and practices, including safety and environmental:

D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s performance in conforming to specifications:

Excellent Good Adequate Marginal Poor Unknown

E. Technical Responsiveness – Assess the contractor’s ability to identify and resolve technical problems effectively and in a timely manner, including correction of faulty work and warranty claims:

F. Quality Control – Assess the contractor’s adherence to sound quality processes and practices.

G. Overall Assessment: Provide your overall assessment.

File details come from the government source that posted it.