AM0001 FTG247 W911KB26RA011.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

PROJECT TITLLE/LOCATION: FTG247-Replace UPS at IDT1, Fort Greely, Alaska The purpose of this amendment is to provide changes to the solicitation as indicated on the Summary of Changes page.

PROPOSAL DUE DATE HAS NOT BEEN EXTENDED and is due 31 October 2025 by 2:00PM AKDT. Proposals shall be submitted in accordance with Section 00 21 00, Para 1.12, Proposal Submittal.

You are required to acknowledge receipt of this amendment on the reverse side of the Standard Form 1442.

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALASKA

CEPOA-CT-SP

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB26RA011

1 6

10/03/2025

10/01/2025

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections. The identifier “AM0001” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.

SECTION 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

− Revised Clause 52.236-27 to reflect correct site visit date and time

SECTION 00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA

AND BASIS OF AWARD AWARD ONE STEP - - BEST VALUE

− Revised paragraph 5.2.1.2 to include “where badging and security escorts are required” − Revised paragraph 6.1.2 to delete “identify how shield will be removed and facility will be protected during down time” − Revised paragraph 6.1.2 to add the definition for “impact to the warfighter” − Revised paragraph 7.1.4 to delete “automatic transfer switches” − Revised paragraphs 7.1.4 to add “Uninterruptable Power Systems”

NOTE: Revisions within the following documents do not contain the above referenced identifiers:

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

AM0001…52.236-27 Site Visit (Construction). (Alternate I) (Feb 1995) Alternate I (Feb 1995)

Alternate I (Feb 1995). If an organized site visit will be conducted, substitute a paragraph substantially the same as the following for paragraph (b) of the basic provision:

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for-

10 April 2025 at 10:00 am Alaska Time[Insert date and time] 16 October 2025 at 10:00 Alaska Time

(c) Participants will meet at-

Participants will meet at the Ft Greely Community Activity Center (CAC) at 1000.

Participants will board a bus that will then proceed to the Entry Control Facility (ECF). Cell phones, cameras, transmitting key fobs, and laptops are not allowed onto the MDC. The Government will have a camera available and will take pictures as requested on-site.

Participants will need to be escorted by security attendants or Government personnel unless they already have unescorted access to the MDC. The site visit will likely go through lunchtime, participants are encouraged to bring lunch or snacks. Offerors interested in participating in the site visit shall fill out the FTG Personnel Base Access Request Form (Attachment D of Specification 01 19 30.03 29 Special Items) and send to the contacts as shown on the form by 03 April 2025.____[Insert location] 09 October 2025. …AM0001

Section 00 22 11 W911KB26RA011

FTG247

Section 00 22 11 Page 8 and relevant record of performance in supplying construction services that meet the contract’s requirements. The evaluation method that the Government will use with respect to Factor 1 – Past Performance is detailed below.

5.2.1 There are three (3) aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

5.2.1.1 The first aspect is to evaluate the recency of the offeror’s past performance. For this solicitation, recent projects are those completed or substantially completed** (as defined above) within six (6) years of the date that proposals are due.

5.2.1.2 The second aspect is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the work required by this solicitation. The projects will include those submitted as well as from other sources described above. This relevancy rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. There are four (4) levels of relevancy as shown in the Table below.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOTE: Magnitude is defined as projects with a construction cost between $1M to $5M. In determining the relevancy of each submitted project, the Government will consider the following in scope features, complexity, and magnitude:

• Work in secure areas where badging and security escorts are required…AM0001

• Similar electrical experience as described in this solicitation.

• Similar complex control systems as described in this solicitation.

• Scheduling around mission critical facilities or similar as described in this solicitation, taking into account proper planning, sequencing and scheduling to coordinate service outages.

AM0001...

Section 00 22 11 Page 11

6.1.1 Provide a project-specific narrative that describes the offeror’s intended technical approach to executing this construction contract per the detailed requirements herein. Clearly but concisely describe the technical approach to project management and execution. Limit the information to three (3) pages or less and individually address the paragraphs below.

6.1.2 Technical Approach for Construction: Describe the technical approach to construction of the requirements in this RFP. Include construction considerations for the following: heavy electrical inside mission critical facilities, identify seismic requirements, identifying scheduling impacts to the warfighter, ensure protection of facilities, ensure minimal interruptions, identify how shield will be removed and facility will be protected during down time, identify how hemp shield will be tested, and operating in a cold climate environment. Any event that removes one or more GBIs from an available status is considered an “impact to the warfighter”. This includes, but is not limited to, construction activities that:

disconnect a SIV and/or Silo from power, disable communications to a SIV and/or Silo, degrade certain environmental conditions in the SIV and/or Silo, or otherwise render a GBI in a non-operating state.

Events that could meet the definition of “Impacting” are reviewed through the WAM process and require a submission 8-weeks prior to the activity, per standard specifications for USACE contracts. …AM0001

6.1.3 Relate the project scope features to the construction process considering the impact of long-lead item procurement, work sequencing, work by others, resource management, and working in and around secure areas.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1 The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the Offeror’s technical approach. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of construction and the capability to execute the project.

6.2.2 Technical Approach: The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and demonstrates a good understanding of the project scope features, as described in paragraph 6.1.2. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces risk of not achieving the required delivery date for the project. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach and understanding of construction within secured areas with proximity to active warfighter assets. Additional consideration will be given for narratives that clearly depict a plan to accomplish the technical requirements while demonstrating an exceptional understanding of the project scope and the conditions under which the construction with proximity to a missile field.

7 VOLUME 1 - TAB C – FACTOR 3 – SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE

7.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

7.1.1 Narrative - The Execution Concept Narrative should expand the approach submitted under TAB B – Factor 2 – Technical Approach and support the Offeror’s Summary Schedule. Limit narrative to no more than three (3) pages. Proposed contract duration shall not exceed the maximum contract duration specified in FAR 52.211-10. The presented concept must correlate to the schedule logic and other technical submittals throughout this RFP. The concept should explain the chosen approach by the offeror, the rationale, and specific measures taken to mitigate

Section 00 22 11 Page 12 schedule and cost risk. The narrative should be of a detail needed to demonstrate an understanding of the interfaces, joint occupancy features of work, and other requirements of the project scope. The narrative should specifically address the proposed contract duration. Describe how construction phasing will be executed to meet the requirements in the RFP.

7.1.2 Summary Schedule - Submit a summary level schedule for construction. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be clearly labeled as Tab C. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10: Project Schedule. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days after Notice to Proceed (NTP), by which milestones are to be achieved. For proposal purposes, utilize an NTP date of 15 January 2026. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offeror’s proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date. Offeror shall use a Critical Path Method (CPM) and the schedule shall be graphically represented. The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration.

7.1.3 An electronic version of the project schedule shall be submitted PDF format. The schedule shall demonstrate a reasonable and realistic sequence of activities (logic ties) which represent all the work (planning, construction, testing and turnover of base and options) and reflects the proposed contract duration. The schedule shall be at a reasonable level of detail and include submission and reviews, government actions, and long lead time item procurement. Also address construction related activities, including mobilization and activities to accommodate winter construction. The schedule should be easily correlated with the accompanying narrative. Cost loading of the schedule is not desired or allowed.

7.1.4 The schedule submittal should include as a minimum:

(a) Overall to show construction phasing to show, electrical, controls, testing and commissioning of the new automatic transfer switches Uninterruptable Power Systems in the facility. …AM0001

(b) Show any utility outages or interruptions, as required to do the work.

(c) Show turnover of the facilities. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the requirements and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspections.

(d) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, scheduled airfield exercises, coordination with airfield manager inside the “Construction Site”, approval for