B.08.03 W911KB 23-R-0008 Amendment 0002 EIE431A.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: EIE431A F-35 Demolition of Building 1303, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska This solicitation is hereby amended as follow s- A)This amendment provides changes to the solicitation as indicated on the continuation pages of this document

B)PROPOSAL DUE DATE HAS NOT BEEN EXTENDED.

A) Please see the SF30 below for further changes B) YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS AMENDMENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THE STANDARD FORM 1442.

-POC for this amendment is Ron Perry (ronald.perry@usace.army.mil)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-May-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W911KB23R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Apr-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 0 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-May-2023

CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, AK

CEPOA-CT (W911KB)

2204 TALLEY AVENUE

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. The following drawings are substituted for the superseded documents/sections:

NONE

b. The following revised documents/sections are substituted for the superseded documents/sections.

The identifier “AM#02” appears before and after new and/or revised materials, except as noted below.

-Block 13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS: A. has been changed as follows- “Sealed offers in original and 0 copies”

-SECTION 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR

1.13. PROPOSAL FORMAT Has been replaced with the following:

“(d) Number of copies: Volume 1 and Volume 2 must be submitted as two separate documents via PIEE Solicitation Module website as described in paragraph 1.11 unless size prohibits such. “

- SECTION 00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS EVALUATION

CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD ONE STEP - - LOWEST PRICE

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 4.1. VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE

CAPABILITY FACTOR 3 has been changed to from “Vol. 2 “ to “Vol. 1 TAB C”

CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD ONE STEP - - LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY

ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 –“PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION

AND SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE” has been changed to “SUMMARY

MILESTONE SCHEDULE”

-SECTION 00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS EVALUATION

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 –SUMMARY

MILESTONE SCHEDULE Paragraph 5.2.2.1. Proposed Contract Duration has been removed.

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED

SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED

SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE; “5.2.1.2. Schedule Narrative: Submit a schedule narrative describing the offeror’s plan with regard to scheduling construction of the project. The narrative shall describe the offeror’s planned approach to the project to include the construction activities required for completion of the subject project.

Provide a schedule that clearly identifies at least the following required construction activities:

• Preconstruction submittals

• Mobilization

• Demolition

• Abatement

• PCB disposal

• Lead disposal

• Contaminated Soil Disposal

• Utilities work

• Backfill” Has been added.

- SECTION 00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS EVALUATION

CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD ONE STEP - - LOWEST PRICE

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED

SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE; 5.2.1.3. Summary Milestone Schedule: “(a) Show the overall construction phase of the work” has been removed.

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA); 5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED

SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE; 5.2.3 Evaluation Rating System has been changed to the following” The schedule has identified the required construction activities.”

c. The following sections are deleted:

d. The following documents are added:

e. The following revisions are incorporated:

f. Other:

Proj Net Report included.

(End of Summary of Changes)

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS SHALL REMAIN THE SAME.

Section 00 21 00 Page 5

(a) Text: 8 ½” x 11” format, using 10 point or larger font size. Proposal should contain a Title Sheet on the cover for ready identification of the proposal and a full table of contents, separated by Tabs, as prescribed herein. Within each Tab, it is recommended that the proposal information be presented in the same relative format as the submission requirements are listed.

(i) The prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, a signature of the official that can bind the firm and a telephone number and email address shall appear in the lower left corner of the title page of any document/volume to be evaluated.

(ii) Volume number, section, page number and date submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number for the amended page, if necessary). Page numbering shall re-start with each Tab. One (1) page is defined as the front of one (1) sheet; the front and back of one (1) sheet will be counted as two (2) pages. The Government will not evaluate any material exceeding the page limitations stated in the RFP.

(b) Drawing sheets: Use 11” x 17” for half size drawings

(c) Electronic Format: Provide proposal in searchable, read-only format, preferably using .pdf files. All price breakdown information to aide in the price evaluation shall be submitted in Excel format.

(d) Number of copies: Volume 1 and Volume 2 must be submitted as two separate documents via PIEE Solicitation

Module website as described in paragraph 1.11 unless size prohibits such.

The successful contractor shall provide one (1) searchable, read only, electronic (*.pdf) copy of the entire Volumes

1 and 2 and one (1) copy of all CADD files using AutoCAD 2007.

1.14. JOINT VENTURE AND LLC PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration.

If this is an 8(a) or HUBZone joint venture, the offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

When proposing as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a member authorized to bind the LLC shall sign the SF

1442. A copy of the LLC Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and the Operating Agreement shall be submitted with the proposal.

1.15. BUY AMERICAN ACT FOR ADVISORY NOTICE

Your attention is invited to Provision 52.225-10, Notice of Buy American Act Requirement-Construction Materials.

You are advised to inform your potential subcontractors and suppliers of the Buy American Act requirements contained in this solicitation. Subparagraph (b) of the clause provides instructions for pre-award determinations as follows: “Requests for determinations of inapplicability. An offeror requesting a determination regarding the

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

ONE STEP - - LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

(SINGLE AWARD)

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS

AND ELEMENTS

5.0 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

5.1 TAB A – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.2 TAB B – FACTOR 2 – PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

6.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

7.0 VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

7.1 GENERAL

7.2 TAB A – FACTOR 4 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND

CONTRACT LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

7.3 TAB B – BONDING CAPABILITY

7.4 TAB C – SELF-PERFORMED WORK

7.5 TAB D – REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

7.6 TAB E – REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

8.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

8.1 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

8.2 EVALUATION

8.3 EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

ATTACHMENTS

1 – COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE FORM

2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

3 – PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) solicitation for EIE431A F-35 Demolition of

Building 1303, Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable proposal.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. In LPTA selection procedures, interested offerors submit proposals which demonstrate their capability to successfully execute the required construction project resulting from this solicitation. The

Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will award a single contract to the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Offeror. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of those proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for all non-cost factors. Proposals receiving an “Unacceptable” rating in any of the evaluation factors will be excluded from consideration for award.

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. This is a Total Small Business Small Business Set Aside. Firms formally organized as construction contractors, that have associated specifically for this project or any other qualified parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized

Offeror may submit a proposal, provided that the Offeror is considered a small business entity.

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

FACTOR LOCATION DESCRIPTION RATING

FACTOR 1 Vol. 1 TAB A SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE ACCEPTABLE /

UNACCEPTABLE

FACTOR 2 Vol. 1 TAB B SUMMARY MILESTONE

SCHEDULE

ACCEPTABLE /

UNACCEPTABLE

FACTOR 3 Vol. 1 TAB

C

PAST PERFORMANCE

INFORMATION

ACCEPTABLE /

UNACCEPTABLE

4.3. VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

FACTOR LOCATION DESCRIPTION RATING

FACTOR 4 Vol. 2 TAB A PRICE (Standard Form 1442, Proposal

Data Sheet and Contract Line Item

Schedule)

LOWEST PRICE

N/A Vol. 2 TAB B REQUIRED PRE-AWARD

INFORMATION

NOT RATED

5.0 VOLUME 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

5.1. TAB A – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

5.1.1.1. The Government will evaluate the offeror's experience for acceptability on the basis of projects submitted under this RFP. The prime contractor shall demonstrate recent, relevant experience using the

Company Specialized Experience Form (Attachment 1) at the end of the section. Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that meet the identified criteria. Submit projects that are currently well underway (at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this Solicitation. Project examples should be limited to those projects performed by the firm submitting the offer. An offeror may receive credit for relevant experience under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example); if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the project submitted for Specialized Experience is relevant to their anticipated role on this project. The prime contractor shall submit no more than five (5) projects of recent/relevant type.

Some examples of experience the Government considers to be similar include, but are not limited to, the following:

Experience with demolition or renovation projects requiring demolition.

Experience with abatement of hazardous materials.

Experience with construction in cold weather regions similar to Climate Zone 7 or 8, as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States.

Note: Not all projects have to satisfy each experience requirement indicated in the RFP. It is incumbent upon the offeror to demonstrate experience/capability in execution of previous projects of a similar nature.

5.1.1.3 Offerors who submit experience information of a parent, sister or other affiliated company must describe what involvement such company will have on the instant acquisition. The offeror shall provide a one page narrative that clearly and specifically indicates what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance. The Government may not accept the experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company unless the prime contractor clearly provides evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the parent, sister or other affiliated company or provides a Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter including the following:

1. A statement of commitment as to the performance and utilization of the identified entity’s resources on the project.

2. Signatures of both the Offeror and Meaningful Relationship Entity.

5.1.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.1.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent to which experience of the prime contractor meets the acceptability criteria in this solicitation. The evaluation criteria standard has been met when the offeror has demonstrated the necessary experience on at least one (1) of the projects submitted. The experience need not be demonstrated on each project submitted, but all the experience must be demonstrated on the projects submitted. An offeror will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

5.1.2.2. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System

(CCASS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The

Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.1.3. Evaluation Rating System:

The evaluation board will review the proposals and assign a consensus rating based on the following definitions.

ACCEPTABLE – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

• The offeror demonstrates experience with demolition or renovation projects that is equivalent to

5,700 SF of space. Experience can either be self-performed work or managing a subcontractor.

• The offeror demonstrates experience with abatement of hazardous materials approximating 500 tons. Experience can either be self-performed work or managing a subcontractor.

• The offeror demonstrates experience with construction in cold weather regions similar to Climate

Zone 7 or 8, as defined by ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States.

Experience can either be self-performed work or managing a subcontractor.

UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation or and of the bullets above.

5.2. TAB B – FACTOR 2 –SUMMARY MILESTONE SCHEDULE

5.2.1. Submission Requirements:

5.2.1.2. Schedule Narrative: Submit a schedule narrative describing the offeror’s plan with regard to scheduling construction of the project. The narrative shall describe the offeror’s planned approach to the project to include the construction activities required for completion of the subject project.

Provide a schedule that clearly identifies at least the following required construction activities:

Preconstruction submittals

Mobilization

Demolition

Abatement

PCB disposal

Lead disposal

Contaminated Soil Disposal

Utilities work

Backfill

5.2.1.3 Summary Milestone Schedule: Submit a summary level milestone schedule for construction. For schedule purposes only, utilize a Notice to Proceed (NTP) date of 18 August 2023. This date is solely to assist in evaluation of offerors’ proposals and shall not be construed as a contractual NTP date.

(a) Clearly identify any constraints on the schedule (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, military closures, site accessibility, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

(b) The time to complete the project and turn over to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent turnover inspection.

5.2.2. Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.2.2. Schedule Narrative and Summary Milestone Schedule: The Government will evaluate the schedule narrative and summary milestone schedule to assess the offeror’s ability to meet the criteria identified below. The evaluation standard has been met when the contractor’s construction schedule narrative and summary schedule demonstrate that they have met or exceeded the requirements below.

5.2.3 Evaluation Rating System:

The evaluation board will review the proposals and assign a consensus rating based on the following definitions.

ACCEPTABLE – Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The scheduled completion is 365 days or less after issuance of NTP

The schedule has identified the required construction activities.

Schedule shall identify that personnel in Building 1303 will be vacated prior to 15 APR 2024.

UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Schedule is greater than 365 days, or The schedule has identified the required construction activities.

Schedule fails to identify that personnel in Building 1303 will be vacated prior to 15 APR 2024.

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

6.1 Submission Requirements: Past performance information to be provided by outside sources (see paragraph 5.1.1.1). Submit the Past Performance information in a separate volume labeled: “Volume 2 -

Past Performance Information.”

6.1.1 The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. This assessment is based on the offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertain to the products and/or services outlined in the solicitation. The offeror shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current contact information (phone number and email address) on the specific project experience sheets in

Volume 1, TAB A and include the performance rating by the client on the form, if the offeror was rated.

Provide experience forms for only projects submitted under Factor 1. For Federal projects submitted under Specialized Experience (Volume 1, TAB A), the offeror may rely on finalized Construction

Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS) reports. For non-Federal projects, the offeror shall utilize the Past Performance Questionnaire

(PPQ) form at the end of this section (Attachment 2) to fulfill the past performance requirement.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. An offeror will not receive credit under this factor for past performance of key personnel proposed for this project. The Government may also review data from CCASS, CPARS or other agency performance databases for those projects listed in Factor 1. Only final CCASS and CPARS will be used by the government. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.

6.1.2. Evaluation Criteria:

6.1.2.1.

Past performance will initially be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. Recent project will be those that are currently well underway (at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this Solicitation.

Relevant projects would be those that demonstrate experience with demolition or renovation projects that is equivalent to 5,700 SF of space, abatement of hazardous materials approximating 500 tons, and experience with construction in cold weather regions similar to Climate Zone 7 or 8, as defined by

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States.

Second, the past performance evaluation will determine how well the offeror performed on the prior contracts. The past performance evaluation does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 [a][2][iv]). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown (see note above).

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

7.0 VOLUME 2 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

7.1 GENERAL

Submit the Pro Forma information in a separate binder labeled: “Volume 2 - Pro Forma Requirements.”

7.2 Submission Requirements:

7.2.1 Submit the properly filled out and executed SF 1442, along with the CLIN Schedule, containing proposed line item and total pricing, and the proposed contract duration.

7.2.2. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals, the

Government will request a price breakdown of the Contract Line items marked “Price Breakdown

Information,” in Excel format. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three (3) working days after the proposal submission due date. This information may be required for the initial proposal and, if requested, for any revised proposals. This information is not an opportunity for an offeror to revise its non-price or price proposal.

7.3 Evaluation Criteria:

7.3.1 Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. The price evaluators will also check for appearance of unbalanced line item prices. Offerors are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor, equipment, subcontracts, etc., and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract.

8.0 VOLUME 2, TAB B - REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

8.1. Submission Requirements:

8.1.1. Submit this information for the Contracting Officer’s determination of Offeror responsibility:

(a) Joint Venture agreement or Limited Liability company Certificate of Organization, Articles of

Organization and Operating Agreement, if applicable.

(b) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value thereof, and name of the organization under which the work is being performed. Include names and telephone numbers of personnel within each organization who are familiar with the prospective contractor’s performance.

(c) A certified statement listing: (1) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) month period exceeding $1,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract; and (2) each contract awarded within the preceding three (3) year period not already physically completed and exceeding

$5,000,000.00 in value with a brief description of the contract. If the prospective contractor is a joint venture, each joint venture member will be required to submit the above defined certification

(d) Competed Representations and Certifications included by full text in Section 00 45 00. List any changes to SAM (System for Award Management) in 52.204-8 for FAR Clauses and 252.204-7007 for

DFAR clauses. Provide for any certification where vendor indicated in SAM that certification would be provided with specific offer.

(e) One copy of the following information shall be provided:

(1) Proof of Financial Ability (Most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities)

(2) Number of years the firm has been in business

(3) Name, address and telephone number of firm’s bonding company

(4) Information showing offeror’s bondability for this project. Submit a letter from the prime contractor’s bonding company indicating the offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of their proposal price.

(5) Name, address and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references.

8.1.2. Evaluation Criteria:

In addition to the other proposal information, the Contracting Officer shall use this information in making an affirmative responsibility determination for award to the Successful Offeror, in accordance with FAR

Part 9.

9.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

9.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

9.1.1. The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal and any subsequent discussions required, as well as information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The

SSEB will not consider any information incorporated by reference.

9.2. EVALUATION

9.2.1. The SSEB will evaluate the proposals and assign a consensus adjectival rating for each evaluation factor.

9.2.2. The Government intends to award without discussions. A “Competitive Range” is a subjective determination of the most highly rated proposals in the event that discussions with offerors are required or considered to be in the Government’s best interests. In such an event, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range of all the most highly rated proposals.

9.2.3. If discussions are held, the Government may engage in a broad give and take with each offeror in the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 15.306(d). The Government will provide the Offeror an advance agenda for the discussions. During discussions, the Government may ask the Offeror to further explain its proposal and to answer questions about it.

9.2.4. Upon conclusion of discussions, those offerors still considered the most highly rated, will be afforded an opportunity to submit their proposal revisions for final evaluation and selection.

9.3. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

9.3.1. Adjectival Ratings: The following adjectival ratings will be used in the evaluation of three (3) evaluation factors:

9.3.2. Acceptable (A): The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation. For

Factor 3, Past Performance, “Acceptable” is defined as follows: Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

9.3.3. Unacceptable (U): The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. For Factor 3, Past Performance, “Unacceptable” is defined as follows: based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.