Final_RFP-28_Sep_2017.pdf

US Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

EIE388

FTQW180105

F-35 R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter

EIELSON AFB, ALASKA

W911KB-17-R-0048

28 September 2017

EIE388 F-35 R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter W911KB-17-R-0048

EIE388

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 – PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS, CONTRACT FORMS AND

CONDITIONS

00 11 00 SF1442

00 11 01 PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

00 22 10 PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

00 22 20 PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES AND

BASIS FOR AWARD

00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 72 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00 73 00.00 29 SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

00 73 46 WAGE DETERMINATION SCHEDULE

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 10 00 STATEMENT OF WORK -- SYNOPSIS

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: EIE388 F-35 R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter, FTQW180105, Eielson AFB, AK

NAICS: 236220 SIZE STANDARD: $36.5M

Competitive Small Business Set-Aside - 2 PHASE BEST VALUE SELECTION IAW FAR PART 36.3

Description of Work: Construct an enclosed 2 vehicle bays w ith 3 vehicle stalls each R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter utilizing conventional design and construction methods to accommodate the mission of the facility. The facility should be compatible w ith applicable DoD, Air Force, and base design standards. Local materials and construction techniques shall be used w here cost effective. The Facility must also be able to w ithstand w ind loads and seismic effects as prescribed in applicable codes and design guides. The facility w ill be designed as permanent construction in accordance w ith the DoD Unif ied Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01, General Building Requirements and UFC 1-200-02, High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements.

JASON WILLIAMS 907-753-2676

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

28-Sep-2017

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

F-35 R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________661 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______60 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, ALASKA

CEPOA-CT-CW (W911KB)

PO BOX 6898

JBER AK 99506-0898

W911KB

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour) Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

EIE388

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W911KB-17-R-0048 255

local time 30 October 2017 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

F-35A R-11 FUEL TRUCK SHELTER

EIELSON AFB, ALASKA

BASE ITEMS

Item No.

Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

0001 Design F-35A R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter, Complete 1 Job $_________ $_________

0002 Construct F-35A R-11 Fuel Truck Shelter within the building 5-foot line, Complete.

1 Job $_________ $_________

0003 Construct site work and utilities beyond the Building 5-foot line, Complete.

1 Job $_________ $_________

0004 Stockpile and Sample 1,000 Cubic Yards of Potentially Contaminated Soil Including Construction of Holding Cells, Complete.*

1,000 CY $_________ $_________

0005 Dispose of 1,000 Cubic Yards of PFOS/PFOA Contaminated Soil, Complete.**

1,000 CY $_________ $_________

0006 Dispose of 20 Cubic Yards of POL Contaminated Soil, Complete.** 20 CY $_________ $_________

0007 Dispose of 300 Cubic Yards of Pesticide Contaminated Soil, Complete. **

300 CY $_________ $_________

Total of Base Items 0001 thru 0007 $_________

OPTION ITEMS

Item No.

Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount

0008 Dispose of 1,000 Cubic Yards of PFOS/PFOA Contaminated Soil, Complete.**

1,000 CY $_________ $_________

0009 Dispose of 1,500 Cubic Yards of PFOS/PFOA Contaminated Soil, Complete.**

1,500 CY $_________ $_________

0010 Dispose of 1,500 Cubic Yards of PFOS/PFOA Contaminated Soil, Complete.**

1,500 CY $_________ $_________

0011 Dispose of 1,500 Cubic Yards of PFOS/PFOA Contaminated Soil, Complete.**

1,500 CY $_________ $_________

0012 Dispose of 10 Cubic Yards of POL Contaminated Soil, Complete.** 10 CY $_________ $_________

0013 Dispose of 100 Cubic Yards of Pesticide Contaminated Soil, 100 CY $_________ $_________

Complete. ** 0014 Asbestos Abatement at connection with existing utilidor, Complete.*** 20 LF $_________ $_________

0015 Unsatisfactory Material Excavation and Backfill, Complete. **** 100 CY $_________ $_________

Total of Optional Items 0008 thru 0015 $_________

TOTALS

Total of Base and Optional Items 0001 thru 0015 $_________

Proposed Contract Duration: ____________________

Contract line items 0004 through 0015 are estimated quantities.

* Work on CLIN 0004 shall be the cost for work identified in Specs 02 61 13 “Excavation and Handling of Contaminated Material” and Section 01 57 20.01 29 “Environmental Protection” that is additional to the requirements of the normal project excavation and the field screening identified in Section 31 09 20.00 29 “Field Screen Testing of Soils for POL Contamination”. It does not include costs for disposal of soils determined to be contaminated, which shall be included in CLINs 0005 and 0006 and 0007. For CLIN 0004, the Contractor shall keep a record of the amount of soil being stockpiled and sampled, as required by results of the field screening. If the amount of contaminated soil being stockpiled and sampled is above 115% or below 85% of the estimated quantity, the equitable adjustment will be in accordance with FAR CLAUSE 52.211-18, VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY. CLIN 0004 does not include stockpiling, or sampling of soil within those areas identified in Appendix A/sheet C-301 as requiring 100% stockpiling and sampling. Those costs are to be included in CLINs 0002 and 0003 as applicable.

** For CLINs 0005 - 0013, the Contractor shall keep a record of the amount of contaminated soil being disposed of.

This is the soil determined to be contaminated through the testing of soil from those areas identified in Appendix A/sheet C-301 as requiring 100% stockpiling and sampling and the testing of soil required by CLIN 0004 to be stockpiled and sampled. Soil determined to be clean shall be disposed of as shown on the drawings. If the amount of contaminated soil disposed of is above 115% or below 85% of the estimated quantity, the equitable adjustment will be in accordance with FAR CLAUSE 52.211-18, VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY. For CLINs 0008 – 0013, these CLINs can be awarded at any time during the Construction Contract period.

*** Work on CLIN 0014 shall be the cost for work identified in Specs Section 01 57 20.01 29 “Environmental Protection”. For CLIN 0014, the Contractor shall keep a record of the amount of asbestos containing material removed and disposed of. If the amount of asbestos containing material removed and disposed of is above 115% or below 85% of the estimated quantity, the equitable adjustment will be in accordance with FAR CLAUSE 52.211-18, VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY. For CLIN 0014, this option can be awarded at any time during the Construction Contract period.

**** Work on CLIN 0015 shall be the cost for work identified in Specs 01 10 00. The Contractor shall survey the extent of excavation and keep a record of the unsatisfactory material removed and disposed of. This CLIN can be awarded up to 10 times. Each exercise of CLIN 0010 is subject to FAR CLAUSE 52.211-18, VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY. For CLIN 0015, this option can be awarded at any time during the Construction Contract Period.

EVALUATION OF OFFERS.

1. AWARD: Award will be made in accordance with Section 00 22 20 – PHASE 2 DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION

PROCEDURES AND BASIS FOR AWARD.

2. INCOMPLETE OFFERS: Failure to submit an offer on all items in the schedule constitutes an incomplete offer.

Incomplete offers may be rejected. Lump sum or unit prices must be shown for each item within the schedule.

3. EXTENSIONS: All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

4. SPECIAL CONDITION: If a modification to an offer based on unit prices is submitted which provides for a lump sum adjustment to the total estimated cost, the application of the lump sum adjustment to each unit price in the proposal schedule must be stated. If it is not stated, the offeror agrees that the lump sum adjustment shall be applied on a pro rata basis to every unit price in the proposal schedule.

-- END OF PROPOSAL SCHEDULE --

Section 00 21 00 W911KB-17-R-0048

Section 00 21 00 Page 1

SECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.2 CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION

1.3 BOND AMOUNT REQUIRED

1.4 PRE-AWARD SURVEYS

1.5 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR

1.6 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

1.7 COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

1.8 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.9 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

1.10 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

1.11 SITE VISIT/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

1.12 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.13 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

1.14 PROPOSAL FORMAT

1.15 JOINT VENTURE AND LLC PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.16 BUY AMERICAN ACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

1.17 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

Section 00 21 00 Page 2

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Pacific Ocean Division (POD), Alaska District (POA) has been authorized to construct an enclosed R-11 Fuel Truck shelter on Eielson AFB, Alaska located in the South Loop area utilizing conventional design and construction methods to accommodate the mission of the facility. There will be two vehicle bays with three vehicle stalls each. The facility should be compatible with applicable DoD, Air Force, and base design standards. In addition, local materials and construction techniques shall be used where cost effective. The Facility must also be able to withstand wind loads and seismic effects as prescribed in applicable codes and design guides. The facility will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01, General Building Requirements and UFC 1-200-02, High

Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements. This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-010-01.

1.2. CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION

The construction costs will be subject to the funds available for this project. The construction cost limitation for contract award is $8,500,000 Million. Offerors are notified that they are under no obligation to approach this limitation however the Government may not be able make an award if the cost limitation set for this project is exceeded.

1.3. BOND AMOUNT REQUIRED

Offeror Guarantee: The requirements for an Offer Guarantee as required in FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee

(Sep 1996) are hereby waived. However, the offeror must submit a letter from their bonding company indicating the offeror’s ability to obtain performance and payment bonds in the amount of the proposal price.

1.4. PRE-AWARD SURVEYS

The Government reserves the right to conduct a pre-award survey of any firm under consideration to confirm any part of the information furnished by the Offeror, or to require other evidence of managerial, financial, technical, and other capabilities, the positive establishment of which is determined by the Government to be necessary for the successful performance of the contract.

1.5. PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR

Your attention is invited to Section 00 72 00, FAR 52.219-14 entitled “Limitations on Subcontracting.” Submit with the proposal, a description of the work that the contractor intends to perform with his own organization (e.g.

earthwork, paving, brickwork, roofing, etc.), the percentage of the total work and the estimated cost thereof.

1.6. GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

Section 00 21 00 Page 3

The Offeror(s) must ensure that ALL mail sent to the Alaska District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, either pre-contract or post-contract award, has a return mailing address on the outside of the envelope, package, box, etc. ANY MAIL addressed to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, including but not limited to bids, modifications to bids, proposals, revised proposals, bonds, correspondence, etc., will be REJECTED by the US Army Corps of

Engineers mail room facility located at PO Box 6898, Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER), Alaska 99506-

6898 if it does not contain a return mailing address. There will be no exceptions.

1.7. COPIES OF SOLICITATION DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

Copies of the solicitation and amendments are available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities website at: http://www.fbo.gov/ via Quick Search

(Solicitation No. W911KB-17-R-0048).

It shall be the contractor’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments. The offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this solicitation. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this solicitation.

A list of interested vendors (potential offerors and subcontractors) is available on the federal business opportunities web site (registration required) is available at: http://www.fbo.gov/ via Quick Search (Solicitation No. W911KB-

17-R-0048).

1.8. OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via the Bidder Inquiry system as indicated below. All questions and/or comments should be submitted no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the proposal due date. Bidder Inquiry Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet. To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on the next screen is correct and click on continue. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry. A complete listing of all inquiries and responses will be issued by amendment after the inquiry period closes. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W911KB-17-R-0048

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 5AS8FT-APZDZC

The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquires 7 calendar days prior to proposal submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.projnet.org/projnet

Section 00 21 00 Page 4 prior to submission of a new inquiry. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone

(Chicago). The telephone number for the Call Center is 800-428-HELP.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

1.9. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

See Standard Form 1442, block 10 for the small business size standard/NAICS code.

1.10. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.11. SITE VISIT/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

A pre-proposal conference/site visit is yet to be determined. Offerors interested in a pre-proposal conference or site visit should submit a request in writing. Send requests to:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District

ATTN: CEPOA-CT (Jason A. Williams)

P.O. Box 6898

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska 99506-0898

Fax: 907-753-2676

Email: Jason.Williams@usace.army.mil

1.12. ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.13. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

Offerors must mail or deliver proposals to be received no later than the date and time stated on the standard form

(SF) 1442 or subsequent solicitation amendment. Questions concerning proposal receipt can be directed to the

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer listed in the solicitation. Offerors are advised to plan accordingly. No arrangements will be made by the government to assist in proposal delivery. Day-pass procedures will not be used for proposal delivery purposes nor are there proposal pick-up services. No escort services will be provided. It is incumbent on the offeror to plan for unanticipated delays in delivery of proposals. Due to heightened security at

Government installations, visitors to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) must use the Boniface Gate or Fort

Richardson Gate (Visitor Centers). All vehicle occupants are required to wear seatbelts and hand-held cell phone usage by vehicle operators while driving on base/post is prohibited. Violators will lose their Base/Post driving mailto:Jason.Williams@usace.army.mil

Section 00 21 00 Page 5 privileges for these offenses. For offerors who will have their proposals hand-delivered, or use personal delivery services such as DHL, UPS or FedEx, the delivery must be by person, courier or personal delivery service with active base access. Proposals will be received no later than the date and time stated on the SF1442 or subsequent solicitation amendment at:

Mailing Address:

ATTN: CEPOA-CT (Williams, Rm 30)

PO Box 6898

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson AFB, Alaska 99506-0898

Physical Address:

ATTN: CEPOA-CT (Jason A. Williams)

2204 3rd Street, Room 30

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska 99506

The proposal will be accepted in Room 30 during Alaska District Corps of Engineer business hours (7:30 AM to

2:00PM) Monday through Friday, excluding holidays, but not later than the date and time stated on the SF1442 or subsequent solicitation amendment. The proposer is advised that the Alaska District Corps of Engineers building has limited access. Only the main door (in front under the Corps of Engineers red flag facing Talley Avenue) and the atrium doors (the tan addition to the main building located on Third Street/Fairchild Avenue) are open to individuals without a building pass. Room 30 is located in the basement of Building 2204; turn right if using the center stairs or elevator. There is a date/time stamp located at the front desk in Room 30 and is the official clock used for proposal receipt. The Packaging that contains the Proposals shall be marked:

”Proposals for Solicitation Number: W911KB-17-R-0048, DO NOT OPEN”

1.14. PROPOSAL FORMAT

(a) Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format, using 10 point or larger font size, in bound volumes, using 3-ring binders. Each bound volume will contain a Title Sheet on the cover for ready identification of the proposal and a full table of contents, separated by Tabs, as prescribed herein. Within each Tab, it is recommended that the proposal information be presented in the same relative format as the submission requirements are listed.

(i) The prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, a signature of the official that can bind the firm and a telephone number and email address shall appear in the lower left corner of the title page of any document/volume to be evaluated.

(ii) Volume number, section, page number and date submitted shall appear in the bottom right corner of each page (along with the revision number for the amended page, if necessary).

Section 00 21 00 Page 6

(b) Drawing sheets: Use 11” x 17” for half size drawings.

(c) Electronic Format: Provide CD in searchable, read-only format, preferably using .pdf files. All price breakdown information to aide in the price evaluation shall be submitted in Excel format.

(d) Number of copies: For Volume 1, submit one original and three (3) copies of drawings and printed matter

(Bound Volumes), as well as one (1) CD. For Volume 2 submit the original and one copy and one separate CD.

Any Pro Forma information for Joint Ventures, or LLC as outlined in Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.15 shall be included in Volume 2 along with evidence of bondability.

(e) The successful contractor shall provide one (1) searchable, read only electronic (*.pdf) copy of the entire

Volumes 1 and 2 and one (1) copy of all CADD files using AutoCAD 2007.

1.15. JOINT VENTURE AND LLC PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration.

If this is an 8(a) or HUBZone joint venture, the offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

When proposing as a Limited Liability Company (LLC), a member authorized to bind the LLC shall sign the SF

1442. A copy of the LLC Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and the Operating Agreement shall be submitted with the proposal.

1.16. BUY AMERICAN ACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

Your attention is invited to Clause 52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Act Requirement-Construction Materials under Trade Agreements. You are advised to inform your potential subcontractors and suppliers of the Buy

American Act requirements contained in this solicitation. Subparagraph (b) of the clause provides instructions for pre-award determinations as follows: “Requests for determinations of inapplicability. An offeror requesting a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American Act should submit the request to the Contracting

Officer in time to allow a determination before submission of offers. The offeror shall include the information and applicable supporting data required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of the clause at FAR 52.225-11 in the request. If an offeror has not requested a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American Act before submitting its offer, or has not received a response to a previous request, the offeror shall include the information and supporting data in the offer.” In accordance with FAR Part 25 Foreign Acquisition, subpart 25.205, entitled Post

Award determinations, subparagraph (a), if a contractor requests a determination regarding the inapplicability of the

Buy American Act after contract award, the contractor must explain why it could not request the determination before contract award or why the need for such determination otherwise was not reasonably foreseeable.

Section 00 22 10 W911KB-17-R-0048

Section 00 22 10 Page 1

SECTION 00 22 10

PHASE 1 OF 2 PHASE DESIGN-BUILD SELECTION PROCEDURES

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATONS FACTORS

4.0 TAB A – STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROOSAL DATA SHEET

5.0 TAB B - FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

7.0 TAB D – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION

8.0 TAB E – FACTOR 4 – TECHNICAL APPROACH

9.0 PHASE 1 OVERALL RATING

10.0 PHASE 1 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

10.1 SOURCE SELECTIONEVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

10.2 EVALUATOIN

10.3 DEFINITIONS

10.4 EVALUATION AND RATING SYSTEM

10.5 PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATING AND PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESTMENT

PHASE ONE – SECTION 00 22 10 ATTACHMENTS

1 – PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

2 – COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE – CONSTRUCION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

3 – COMAPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE – DESIGN FIRM OR IN – HOUSE DESIGN CAPABILITY

4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

5 – KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Section 00 22 10 Page 2

1.1 In Phase 1 of the 2 phase design-build selection procedure, interested firms or joint venture entities (referred to as “offerors”) submit certain specified performance capability proposals, demonstrating their capability to successfully execute the design-build construction contract resulting from this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and intends to select not more than three (3) of the most highly qualified Phase 1 offerors to submit Phase 2 proposals. The intent of the solicitation, however, is to obtain the best value proposal, therefore the Government reserves the right to select additional offerors (not more than five (5)) to participate in Phase 2 if it is determined to be in its best interest.

1.2 In Phase 2, the short-listed offerors will submit proposals in accordance with Section 00 22 20.

1.3 The short-listed Offerors will be announced by special notice or synopsis to the Federal Business

Opportunities website (https://www.fbo.gov).

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized

Offeror may submit a proposal. To qualify for Phase 2, the Offeror or Offeror’s subcontractor has to have or will have to have professional architects and engineers, registered in the appropriate technical disciplines in compliance with the requirements specified in Contract Clause, “Requirements for

Registration of Designers” and All designs must be under the direct supervision of appropriately licensed professionals for each discipline involved.

2.2 Submit the Phase 1 proposal in a tabbed, three-ring binder. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits indicated in the sections below. PHASE 1 DOES NOT

INVOLVE PRICING SUBMISSION.

3.0 PHASE 1 PROPOSAL AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

Tab A SF 1442 and Proposal Data Sheet N/A

Tab B Factor 1 Specialized Experience Most Important

Tab C Factor 2 Past Performance

(Confidence

Equal to Factor 1, slightly more important than Factor 3 https://www.fbo.gov/

Section 00 22 10 Page 3

Tab D Factor 3 Organization Less important than

Factor 2, more important than

Factor 4

Tab E Factor 4 Technical Approach Less important than Factor 3

4.0 TAB A – STANDARD FORM 1442 AND PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

4.1 Submit the SF 1442, completed and signed by a person authorized by the Offeror. Include the completed proposal data sheet (See Attachment 1, provided at the end of this Section). Also include joint venture agreement or LLC Certificate of Organization, Articles of Organization and the Operating

Agreement, if applicable (see Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.15).

5.0 TAB B – FACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZD EXPERIENCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The prime contractor and designer of record design firms for civil, architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical design shall each demonstrate recent, relevant experience on similar projects, using the Company

Specialized Experience – Construction (Attachment 2), and the Company Specialized Experience – Design Firm or In-House Design Capability form (Attachment 3) at the end of this Section (no more than 2 pages per project).

Offerors may identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements. If the offeror is a Newly formed joint venture without any previous experience as the joint venture, each firm of the joint venture shall provide information demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects that are currently well underway (designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or completed and turned over no longer than ten (10) years preceding the date of this Solicitation. An offeror may receive credit for relevant experience under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project. Offerors who submit experience information of a parent, sister or other affiliated company must describe what involvement such company will have on the instant acquisition. The offeror shall provide a one page narrative that clearly and specifically indicates what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company – its workforce, management, facilities, or other resources – will be provided or relied upon for contract performance.

The Government may discount the experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company unless the prime contractor clearly provides evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the parent, sister or other affiliated company or provides a Meaningful

Relationship Commitment Letter including the following:

1. A statement of commitment as to the performance and utilization of the identified entity’s resources on the

Section 00 22 10 Page 4 project.

2. Signatures of both the Offeror and Meaningful Relationship Entity.

The offeror shall select the design firm(s). Design firms may list projects of prime contractors they have worked for, or projects directly contracted with Government, private or commercial customers. If projects were design-build, so identify them. Submit no more than five (5) projects for the prime contractor for the below facility type or equivalent or similar commercial or institutional type facility. Submit no more than six (6) projects total for the design firms and consultant, if applicable, and no more than five projects for any individual design firm/consultant. Submit relevant projects for the below facility type or similar commercial or institutional type:

• Aircraft Refueling vehicle enclosed heated parking

• R-11 Refueler enclosed heated parking

5.1.1 Provide a one page consolidated list of submitted projects for prime contractor and design firms to include a matrix that identifies the Specialized Experience projects and the firms that worked on each (teaming). If needed, the Specialized Experience matrix may be submitted on one 11” x 17” sheet.

5.1.2 Provide a supplemental narrative, not to exceed two pages, to address any of the following that are applicable. The information shall be limited to projects that are well underway or that have been completed and turned over no longer than five years preceding the date of this solicitation.

a. If submitting relevant experience under a previous business relationship, clearly describe the offeror’s role on the submitted project.

b. Identify specific projects and address how the team members worked together to achieve safety, quality, and schedule compliance goals.

c. Describe team members’ experience with Sustainable Design and Development, if not included on the project experience forms.

d. Describe design-build experience on other type projects. Identify specific projects.

e. Describe experience completing projects on and/or ahead of the construction contract scheduled completion date.

Section 00 22 10 Page 5

5.2. EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the prime contractor and design firms in design, construction or design-build, with regard to their role on this project. If the design will be accomplished in-house, rather than by subcontract, then the design element of Specialized Experience will still be evaluated, realizing that the work is being done in-house. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. In assessing relevancy of Specialized

Experience, the relevancy ratings included under the Past Performance evaluation factor will be utilized.

5.2.2. The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in both design and construction, for the facility type (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this contract, as described in Section 00 22 10. Recent experience includes projects well underway (at least 50% construction progress completed) or those completed and turned over within ten (10) years preceding the date of this solicitation for design or construction experience. Partners of Joint Venture offerors shall each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

5.2.3. The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System, CPARS and any other

DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

5.2.4. To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror and its proposed design firm(s) shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. Experience under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant.

5.2.5. The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and experience with local conditions. Some

Section 00 22 10 Page 6 examples of relevancy to this project may include:

(1) Size, type of work and complexity.

(2) Location of work and similarity to the climate of Climate Zone 8 as defined by

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 climate zone map for the United States.

(3) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience).

(4) Experience working with multiple contractors on one site. (On the project experience sheet, identify the other independent contractors that worked concurrently on the project site and provide a point of contact for each firm)

(5) Experience completing project(s) that included a short, fast and/or compressed schedule, on or ahead of contract required schedule completion date.

5.2.6. Previous design-build (D-B) experience is not necessary for an acceptable rating. The Government may consider previous D-B experience a strength, even if the experience is on different type projects than this project. Similarly, the Government may consider previous recent teaming experience among the team members as value added, even if on different type design and/or construction projects than this project. The more relevant the experience, the more credit will be given.

5.2.7. The firm(s) preparing the design must demonstrate qualifications and experience in Sustainable

Design and Development based on project experience. Additional consideration will be given if both the constructor and the design firm(s) demonstrate qualifications and experience in Sustainable Design and

Development.

6.0 TAB C – FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE (CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT)

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective. The offeror shall provide customer reference name(s), company affiliation and current contact information (phone number and email address) on the specific project experience sheets submitted

Section 00 22 10 Page 7 for TAB B and include the performance rating by the owner on the form, if the offeror was rated. For Federal projects submitted under Specialized Experience (Tab B), the offeror may rely on finalized CCASS, ACASS or

CPARS reports, otherwise the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project. Previously completed PPQ’s may be submitted, however, ensure current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. The completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal and may be duplicated for submission on future solicitations. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first 2 pages of the PPQ (Attachment 4), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Jason A.

Williams, via email at jason.williams@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

6.1.1 Projects cited shall be currently well underway (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) or construction completed and turned over within ten (10) years preceding the date of this solicitation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last ten (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

6.1.2 In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance

Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.3 Experience of a parent, sister or other affiliated company will not be considered if the offeror fails or demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister of other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister or other affiliated company. An offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous mailto:jason.williams@usace.army.mil

Section 00 22 10 Page 8 business arrangement (joint venture for example) if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the submitted project is relevant to their role on this project.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1 The Government will first assess and rate the relevancy of recent projects accomplished by the offeror to the scope of this contract for overall application to the performance confidence assessment ratings described hereinafter.

The projects will include those submitted under the Specialized Experience Factor as well as from other sources described above. This rating is not a separate proposal rating but is only used in developing overall past performance confidence assessment rating assigned to the Past Performance Factor. The past performance relevancy ratings are described below:

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

6.2.2. The Government will next consider how well the offeror performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. With respect to relevancy, past performance on projects with more relevance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment rating than past performance on projects of lesser relevance. An offeror will not receive credit for past performance of a parent, sister or other affiliated company if the offeror fails to demonstrate what resources of the parent, sister or other affiliated company will be provided or relied upon or fails to demonstrate the existence of a contractual or meaningful relationship with the parent, sister or other affiliated company. An offeror may receive credit for relevant past performance under a previous business arrangement (joint venture for example); if the offeror demonstrates that their role on the project submitted is relevant to their role on this project. Owners/references may

Section 00 22 10 Page 9 be asked to comment on items such as quality of design or construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for design or construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government places a higher value on projects which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to resolve problems successfully. The rating for this factor will be expressed as a degree of confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully accomplish the contract requirements. The rating system used for the performance confidence assessment is described at the end of this section.

6.2.3 Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. Past performance under a previous business arrangement will not be considered relevant if the offeror’s role on the project is not considered relevant. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, past performance will be rated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The performance confidence assessment will be considered “Unknown Confidence (Neutral).”

7.0 TAB D – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATION

7.1. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

7.1.1. Provide a project-specific narrative that describes the offeror’s organization and the items below.

Limit the information to three (3) pages or less and individually address each paragraph below. The page limit does not include resumes submitted for key personnel or the Organizational Chart.

7.1.2. Organization: Describe the prime contractor and design firms proposed to participate in this project, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. Include an organizational chart (not included in the three (3) page count above) with position title and job location for the following key personnel:

project manager responsible for design and construction, onsite manager (if applicable), general superintendent, design manager responsible for managing designers of record, LEED AP, Registered Communications

Distribution Designer (RCDD), Commissioning authority and the designers of record for architecture, interior

Section 00 22 10 Page 10 design, structural, civil, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical and mechanical. Describe the proposed management structure for the design-build team, describing how the design and construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team.

7.1.3. Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience:

(a) Provide a brief resume (not included in the three (3) page count limit above) using the Key Personnel

Resume form (Attachment 5) at the end of this section for project manager responsible for design and construction, general superintendent, design manager and the designers of record for civil, architectural, structural, geotechnical, fire protection, electrical and mechanical. The Designers of Record shall be licensed in the State of Alaska or shall have at least 5 years of design experience in Climate Zone 8 as defined by

ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 169 Climate zone map for the United States. The Geotechnical Engineer may be a licensed Civil Engineer with a minimum of…