Amendment_0002_Solicitation_19-B-0004_Repair_Drainage_Failures_at_Areas_A,_C_and_E_FH_18_Jul_19.pdf

W9115119B0004

0011339646 AD015803P/AD015823P

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

a.) The purpose of this amendment is to respond to the Questions provided by Industry, attach revised specifications and revised draw ings to this solicitation. If you have issues w ith the draw ings on FBO please contact me via email and I w il send them via ARMDEC.

b.) The Public Bid Opening date has been changed from 24 July 2019 2:00PM CST to 2 August 2019 2:00 PM CST. The physical location of the Public Bid Opening has not changed.

c.) The FAR clause 52.232.16 -PROGRESS PAYMENTS (APR 2012) does not apply to construction contracts os it is being removed from this solicitation.

d.) See summary of changes for details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 18-Jul-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9115119B0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Apr-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

18-Jul-2019

CODE

MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING

MISSION CONTRACTING OFFICE (MCO)

36000 DARNALL LOOP, ROOM 1300B

FORT HOOD TX 76544-5095

W91151 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 24-Jul-2019 02:00 PM to 02-Aug-2019 02:00 PM.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Technical Exhibit A -

NFH Drainage Area A Drawings

52 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit B Technical Exhibit B- NFH Drainage Area C Drawings

30 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit C Technical Exhibit C - NFH Drainage Area E Drawings

38 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit D Technical Exhibit D - NFH Drainage Specs

211 26-APR-2019

Exhibit E Technical Exhibit E - DPW Specifications

3173 27-APR-2019

Attachment 1 Attachment 1-Appendix A

139 02-JUL-2018

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Technical Exhibit A -

NFH Drainage Area A Drawings

52 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit B Technical Exhibit B- NFH Drainage Area C Drawings

30 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit C Technical Exhibit C - NFH Drainage Area E Drawings

38 23-MAY-2019

Exhibit D Technical Exhibit D - NFH Drainage Specs

211 26-APR-2019

Exhibit E Technical Exhibit E - DPW Specifications

3173 27-APR-2019

Exhibit F TE F- Area A Rev Drawings

54 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit G TE G- Area A Revised Specs

260 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit H TE H- Area C Rev Drawings

31 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit I TE I - Area C Revised Specs

260 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit J TE J- Area E Rev Drawings

40 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit K TE K- Area E Revised Specs

260 16-JUL-2019

Attachment 1 Attachment 1-Appendix A

139 02-JUL-2018

The following have been added by full text:

QUESTIONS FROM INDUSTRY

Questions from Industry Requests for Information (RFIs)

W91151-19-B-0004 Correct Drainage Failures Areas A, C and E

North Fort Hood 17 July 2019

1. For any water, sewer, gas, and electric work performed. Who will be responsible for the lines? The contractors and their subs, or, American Water and Dominion for their respective utilities? Contractor shall contact American Water and Dominion to receive pricing to relocate utilities. American Water and Dominion are responsible for their respective utilities.

2. May we receive a copy of today’s pre-construction meeting’s sign in sheet? The sign in sheet will be posted to FBO with amendment two.

3. Does the government intend to provide a submittal register? A sample format of the Submittal Register is located in Appendix A of the solicitation. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to complete the submittal register (in accordance with the specifications; Exhibits D and E) and submit it to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for review and/or approval after award.

4. Note 4 on sheet G102requires the contractor to “bid on utility conflicts as shown on the plan set”. Note 7 on G012 requires the contractor to lower all waterlines to meet the minimum cover. These notes imply the contractor is responsible for relocating all utilities shown as conflicts on the contract drawings. The information shown on the contract documents does not provide adequate information to allow the contractor to bid these conflicts. Refer to sheet CU 104 in area A. This sheet identifies utility conflicts with the proposed work.

These conflicts include two 6” water lines, a gas line and a sanitary sewer line. The profile of the new work shown on sheet CU104 does not show any of these utilities. We cannot determine what type of material was used to construct these lines, how much they will need to be lowered or how much of the sanitary sewer line must be relocated in order for the system to operate properly. How does a contractor bid the utility conflicts based on the lack of specific information on each of the conflicts? Contractor shall obtain pricing from respective utility companies for remediation of each utility conflict identified on the plans. Contractor shall include the utilities price to correct conflicting utilities in the GC’s bid.

5. PP CU101 Scale not agreeing on Plan view Versus the Profile view, which on is to be utilized? SCALE

CORRECTED SEE REVISED DRAWINGS

6. PP CU 104 Scale not agreeing on Plan view Versus Profile view, which one is to be utilized? SCALE

CORRECTED SEE REVISED DRAWINGS

7. PP CU104 There is a note for the gravity sewer conflict, what plan is for the re-routing of the sewer OR is it a force main sewer line? CU-104 AREA A - Assume WW line is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

8. PP CU106 Park Ave crossing is not agreeing with the Plan view Versus Profile view? SCALE CORRECTED

SEE REVISED DRAWINGS

9. PP CU108 Does the AWL need to be removed? CU-108 AREA A -Assume AWL line is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

10. PP CU108 Does the WL at +/- Sta 8+90 and Sta 7+80 conflict with the new construction? CU-108 AREA A - Assume WL line is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

11. PP CU108 Scale not agreeing on Plan view Versus Profile view, which one is to be utilized? SCALE

CORRECTED SEE REVISED DRAWINGS

12. PP CU108 Are the two waterline crossings at +/- Sta 12+20 in conflict for the 48” RCP? CU-108 AREA A - Assume the two WL lines at +/- Sta 12+20 are in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

13. PP CU 109 Does the AWL at +/- Sta 4+05 and Sta 3+10 conflict and need to be removed? CU-109 AREA A - Assume the two AWL lines at +/- Sta 4+05 and Sta 3+10 are in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

14. PP CU109 Scale not agreeing on Plan view Versus Profile view, which one is to be utilized? SCALE

CORRECTED SEE REVISED DRAWINGS

15. PP CU109 Do we know the size of the WL in conflict that is running parallel to HQ Ave? CU-109 AREA A - Size of water line is unknown. Contact AW for this information.

16. PP CU101 the existing waterline at +/- Sta 23+70 is in conflict on the profile but is said to remain in the plan view, which is correct? CU-101 AREA C - Assume WL at +/- Sta 23+70 are in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

17. PP CU101 the AWL at +/- Sta 19+50 does it need to be removed? CU-101 AREA C - Assume 4” WL at +/- Sta 19+50 is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

18. PP CU102 the waterline parallel on the north side of the run, is it in conflict with the construction of the channel. CU-101 AREA E - Assume WL as labeled are in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

19. PP CU103 the 10” WL at Sta 10+60 does not appear to have enough cover to remain, does it need to be lowered? CU-103 AREA C - Assume WL as labeled is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

20. PP CU105 the 10” WL at Sta 10+95 does not appear to have enough cover to remain, does it need to be lowered? CU-105 AREA C - Assume WL as labeled is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

21. PP CU105 the 2” AWL at +/- Sta 13+20 does it need to be removed? CU-105 AREA C - Assume WL as labeled is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

22. PP CU106 the 8” WL at +/- Sta 18+40 has a conflicting note, it does need to be lowered, correct? CU-106 AREA C - Assume WL is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

23. PP CU107 the 10” WL at Sta 10+85 does not appear to have enough cover to remain, does it need to be lowered? CU-107 AREA C - Assume WL is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

24. PP CU108 the 8” AWL needs to be removed at +/- Sta 18+15? CU-108 AREA C - Assume AWL at +/- Sta 18+15 is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

25. PP CU101 the waterline at Sta 1000+30, is it a conflict? CU-101 AREA A - Assume WL at +/- Sta 1000+30 is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

26. PP CU102A the waterline at Sta 1002+20 is it a conflict? CU-102A AREA E - Assume WL at +/- Sta 1002+20 is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

27. PP CU102A is all of the 8” WL running parallel to the channel in conflict to the new construction? CU-102A AREA E - Assume WL is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

28. PP CU102B the sewer conflict that is called out, if this is a gravity sewer line, what is the proposed remedy OR is this a force main? CU-102B AREA E - Assume WW is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

29. PP CU104 the 24” RCP at Central detail (Sta 5000+90 to Sta 5000+00) is the waterline running parallel to this in conflict? CU-104B AREA E - Assume WW is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

30. PP CU108 is there a conflict with the waterline at the proposed 9 x 2 RCB at +/- Sta 1002+50 area? CU-108B AREA E - Assume WW is in conflict. Request pricing from AW to correct the assumed conflict.

31. Does the government have any proposed lay down/staging/stockpile areas that will be available? Coordinate with COR laydown/staging/stockpile areas TBD after award.

32. On our current project, we encountered numerous existing utilities that could not be marked by the Government.

In addition, we have heard that the areas on this project are known to have numerous aged existing utilities that can’t be located. Should we anticipate an unusually high number of unmarkable utilities on this project? See General Note #1 sheet G-101and Utilities Note #1 sheet G-102.

33. In areas where the existing pavements are decrepit, will the contractor be responsible for repairing any more pavement than that affected by the work? Pavement repair is limited to areas affected by work.

34. Area A, Page CU-103. Will the existing light poles be in the work area and in conflict with the grading plan?

Contractor shall locate the existing light poles, determine if light poles conflict. Request pricing from Dominion to relocate/replace any light poles that cannot be protected due to grading.

35. Area A, Page CU-108. The existing fence appears to be in the work area but not shown on plans. Will the fence conflict with grading plan located North of Headquarters Avenue? SEE REVISED PLANS

36. Area C. Will the contractor be responsible for removing debris piles along southern side of 25th Street? No the contractor is not responsible for removing of debris piles along the southern side of 25th St.

37. Area E, PG CU-101. Profile and plan view contradict each other with what size/number of RCP to be installed across Central Ave. Please clarify. SEE REVISED PLANS

38. Area E, PG CU-101. Profile and plan view contradict each other with what size/number of RCP is to be installed across N 17th Street. Please clarify. SEE REVISED PLANS

39. All of the plans sheets, except the standard details, found in the file named "Amendment_0001 Technical_Exhibit_C_-_NFH_Drainage_Area_E_Drawings", downloaded from FBO.GOV, have a note on the lower right side of the sheets that says "Not For Construction, This document is released for the purpose of interim review under the authority of Rajesh Tolikonda, P.E., Texas No. 130945 on 01/09/2019. It is not to be used for construction, bidding or permit purposes. Kenall Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-5366.

Please confirm these plans are to be used for bidding purposes. . SEE REVISED PLANS

40. Sheet CU-102A shows the proposed 3'X2' RCB beginning with a 10'X6' junction box. Confirm the details on sheet X-307 are correct for the junction box. Confirm, whether or not, a grated inlet is to be incorporated. ? .

SEE REVISED PLANS

41. Sheet CU-102A, from approximately 2000+00 to Sta 2003+50, there are several exterior improvements that are not called out or otherwise addressed on the plans. Does the Government plan on another contract to address these existing improvements? SEE REVISED PLANS

42. Sheet CU-102A shows the Proposed 3'X2' RCB ending into a 10'X8' junction box and 2-3'X2' RCB exiting near Station 2006+27.50. . SEE REVISED PLANS

43. Sheet CG-101 shows an Inlet Protection Barrier to be install from Station 2006+00 to about 2006+85 assumed per Detail 3 on CG-103. This may conflict with existing utilities. . SEE REVISED PLANS

44. Sheet CU-102B shows the RCB outfall near Station 2009+27.92 to be underground. Sheet CG-101 calls for 40 CY of concrete rip rap near this RCB outfall. It is not clear how the RCB outfall and the concrete rip rap are configured. . SEE REVISED PLANS

45. Sheet CU-103 Indicates there is an existing culvert through all or a portion of this profile. What is the length, pipe size, pipe material type, number of barrels, backfill type of the existing culvert? SEE REVISED PLANS.

46. Sheet CU-105 shows a drainage channel to be excavated from Station 7000+56.83 to 7002+26.82; and from Station 7002+50.82 to 7004+21.84. There is no cross section configuration of this drainage channel given. SEE

REVISED PLANS

47. Sheet CU-105 shows a 24" pipe crossing N 13 1/2 St just south of Headquarters Ave. There is no profile view of this pipe run given. Sheet CS-100 indicates this pipe run should be shown in detail on CU-105. SEE

REVISED PLANS

48. Sheet CU-106shows a drainage channel to be excavated from Station 9006+96.32 to 9006+28.58; and from Station 9006+15.79 to 9005+00. There is no cross section configuration of this drainage channel given. ? . SEE

REVISED PLANS

49. Sheet CU-107 the plan view and profile view information does not match. . SEE REVISED PLANS

50. Sheet CU-108 shows drainage channel from Station 11000+24.07 to 11002+29.17; Station 11002+64.52 to

11004+20.11; and Station 11004+36.76 to 11004+94.60. There is no cross section configuration shown. SEE

REVISED PLANS

51. Sheet CU-108 shows four crossings with no notes as to the expectation of what type of surfacing is required.

SEE REVISED PLANS

52. Sheet CU-100 through CU-108 shows removal of existing drainage conduits at various locations. NOTED

53. Sheet CU-109 has note to relocate a backstop and two foul poles. It does not show where they are to be relocated to. Provide information as to the relocation points. SEE REVISED PLANS

54. Sheet CU-100 shows to install 42 lf of 3'X2' RCB. Sheet CU-109 calls for the same drain conduit to be a 5'X2' RCB. Coordinate the plans to show the required RCB size. SEE REVISED PLANS

55. Sheet CU-101 has notes calling for the relocation of existing power poles. Where are the poles to be relocated to? Provide information as to the relocation points. SEE REVISED PLANS

56. Does the rock rip rap require a bedding material layer beneath it? It does not appear to be required by Detail 3 on C-201. Both the Project Specification and the reference TXDOT specification have a paragraph discussing bedding. TXDOT Item 432 2.3.4 says "If required, provide bedding stone..." Provide additional information.

SEE REVISED PLANS

57. Sheet CG-101 appears to have an incorrect scale for the plan view. The plan view shows a 20 scale, we believe it should be a 40 scale. SEE REVISED PLANS

58. Sheet CU-101 appears to have an incorrect scale for the plan view. The plan view shows a 20 scale, we believe it should be a 40 scale. SEE REVISED PLANS

59. Sheet CU-101 indicates a drain conduit crossing under the East Range Road. Plan geometry suggest the proposed drain conduit does not cross under the current East Range Road, but rather a frontage road parallel to the East Range Road. SEE REVISED PLANS

60. Sheet CG & CU-101 appears to have an incorrect scale for the plan view. The plan view shows a 20 scale, we believe it should be a 40 scale. SEE REVISED PLANS

61. Sheet CU-102 shows a horizontal 20 scale in the profile view. We believe this should be a 40 scale. SEE

REVISED PLANS

62. Sheet CU-102 shows a drainage channel to be excavated from Station 0+71.50 to 2+90.00. There is no cross section configuration of this drainage channel g7i. vSehne.et CU-108 appears to have an incorrect scale for the plan view. The plan view shows an 80 scale, we believe it should be a 120 scale. SEE REVISED PLANS

63. Sheet CU-108 has a note in the profile view that says PARK AVE CROSSING (TYP). We believe this note should say HEADQUARTERS AVE CROSSING. SEE REVISED PLANS

64. Sheet CU-109 has notes that says Relocate Street Lights and Power Poles. Along 27th west of Headquarters Rd, plan notes say to relocate Street Lights and Power poles. How many lights are there, and how many power poles are there? What are the power poles supporting? How tall are the power pole? Where are they to be relocated to? CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST PRICING FROM DOMINION TO RELOCATE POWER POLES

SEE NOTE 2 SHEET CU-109 AREA A FINAL PLANS DATED 6/24/2019.

65. On Google Earth, there appears to be an existing CL Fence running along 27th Street on the South and East side, between Headquarters Avenue and Central Avenue. Does this CL Fence need to be removed? If so, does it need to be reinstalled? Does there need to be gates at the new driveways? SEE REVISED PLANS

66. Plans sheet CS 107 has a call out that says “Proposed Fence.” However, the call out arrow line points to nothing. Plans sheets X-312 and X-313 show Area A Fence Details. Is there new fence required on this project?

SEE REVISED PLANS

67. Solicitation Section 00700 has FAR 52.232-5-Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts MAY 2014 is a clause incorporated by reference and FAR 52.232-16-PROGRESS PAYMENTS (APR 2012) is incorporated by full text. Section 00700 also has FAR 52.252-2-CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) where it says "This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address (es):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil . This payment clause will addressed in amendment two to the solicitation.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Any bids received in response to this solicitation SHALL carry a 120 day acceptance period before prices need to be verified, extended or re-negotiated.

1. Submission of Bids The priced bid shall be supported by a draft progress schedule that demonstrates the offeror's understanding of the work requirements, phasing of work between buildings, and estimated time frames for ordering and installing equipment. Bidders are required to provide a CD copy of their bid documents with their IFB submission.

2. Public Bid Openings Please refer to Block 13A of the 1442. Anyone wishing to attend the bid opening MUST notify the Contracting Officer (jermain.m.compton.civ@mail.mil) and Contract Specialist (bentura.fernandez.civ@mail.mil) by email no later than 31 July 2019 at 2:00 P.M CST with a firm commitment to attend.

MAILING ADDRESS

ATTN: Bentura Fernandez (Contracting Section) Mission and Installation Contracting Command-Fort Hood 36000 Darnall Loop, Room 1300B Fort Hood, Texas 76544-5095

PUBLIC BID OPENING

Shoemaker Center Bldg 36000 Darnall Loop, Room 1463 Fort Hood, TX 76544-5095

2 August 2019 at 2:00 P.M. CST

3. Pre-requisites for Speciality Trade Licensure and Certification None

In responding to this solicitation for bids, the bidder shall provide copies of certifications/training identified above and below as a part of the bid. Failure to provide this documentation will render the bid non- responsive and no further consideration will be given to that bidder for award of this contract. No substitution of the individual possessing the required pre-qualifications will be authorized without the written approval of the Contracting Officer, and no time will be allowed for the contractor to acquire the required training/certification after the contract is awarded.

4. Work Experience The prime contractor shall demonstrate that it possesses general construction contract management by providing at least three examples of relevant work experience within the last 5 years in an awarded contract similar to the requirements stated in this solicitation. Documentation shall be submitted with the bid and include the contract number, the date of contract award, the customer's name and contact information, the awarded dollar value, the value of the contract at completion, a description of all work elements included in the contract, the number and type of specialty trades needed to complete the contract, the period of time allocated for completion of the work and actual time required to complete the work (include reasons for time extensions). Federal work experience is preferred; however, the Government will accept work experience from both State and institutional and commercial contracts as well. No residential work experience will be considered appropriate for this purpose. Failure to provide this documentation will render the bid/offer non-responsive and no further consideration will be given to that bidder for award of this contract.

5. Pre-Bid and Pre-Construction Conferences The Contracting Officer will conduct a pre-bid/pre-proposal conference in conjunction with the site visit. All potential bidders/offerors attending the site visit are highly encouraged to attend the pre-bid/pre-proposal conference. Information on the scheduled Site Visit is located in FAR 52.236-3 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION)

(FEB 1995) of this solicitation. Space limitations dictate that no more than two representatives from each company attend. The Contracting Officer will review solicitation submittal requirements, and other administrative matters critical for successful and timely performance of the work.

The Contractor shall attend a Government coordinated preconstruction conference within 10 calendar days of contract award. As a minimum, the conference shall be attended by the contractor’s appointed project manager, the superintendent, the QCM, and administrative personnel responsible for preparation of contract documents, certified payroll records and invoices. The contractor shall deliver letter appointments of its key personnel that include each individual’s duties, roles and responsibilities.

6. Subcontractor List Offerors shall submit a list of proposed subcontractors as an attachment to their bid. If offeror does not intend on utilizing subcontractors (self-perform), offeror shall state so in their bid. Failure to provide this listing or statement will render the quote nonresponsive and eliminate the offer from further consideration for award.

52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

0001- The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate FAR 52.236-27 Alt I Site Visit (Construction), into this solicitation by full text. The Site Visit date is changed from 20 June 2019 to 2 July 2019 9:00 AM CST. The Bid Opening date is also changed from 16 July 2019 to 24 July 2019 2:00 PM CST. See summary of changes for detailed information.

0002- The purpose of this amendment is to add the Questions from Industry, revised specifications and revised draw ings to this solicitation. If you have issues with the drawings on FBO please contact me via email and I wil send them via ARMDEC. The Public Bid Opening date has been changed from 24 July 2019 2:00PM CST to 2 August 2019 2:00 PM CST. The physical location of the Public Bid Opening has not changed. The FAR clause 52.232.16 - PROGRESS PAYMENTS (APR 2012) does not apply to construction contracts os it is being removed from this solicitation. See summary of changes for details.

(End of Provision)

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been modified:

252.236-7001 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS (AUG 2000)

(a) The Government will provide to the Contractor, without charge, one set of contract drawings and specifications, except publications incorporated into the technical provisions by reference, in electronic or paper media as chosen by the Contracting Officer.

(b) The Contractor shall--

(1) Check all drawings furnished immediately upon receipt;

(2) Compare all drawings and verify the figures before laying out the work;

(3) Promptly notify the Contracting Officer of any discrepancies;

(4) Be responsible for any errors that might have been avoided by complying with this paragraph (b); and

(5) Reproduce and print contract drawings and specifications as needed.

(c) In general--

(1) Large-scale drawings shall govern small-scale drawings; and

(2) The Contractor shall follow figures marked on drawings in preference to scale measurements.

(d) Omissions from the drawings or specifications or the misdescription of details of work that are manifestly necessary to carry out the intent of the drawings and specifications, or that are customarily performed, shall not relieve the Contractor from performing such omitted or misdescribed details of the work. The Contractor shall perform such details as if fully and correctly set forth and described in the drawings and specifications.

(e) The work shall conform to the specifications and the contract drawings identified on the following index of drawings:

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A Technical Exhibit A - 52 23-MAY-2019

NFH Drainage Area A

Drawings

Exhibit B Technical Exhibit B- 30 23-MAY-2019 NFH Drainage Area C

Drawings

Exhibit C Technical Exhibit C - 38 23-MAY-2019 NFH Drainage Area E

Drawings

Exhibit D Technical Exhibit D - 211 26-APR-2019 NFH Drainage Specs

Exhibit E Technical Exhibit E - 3173 27-APR-2019 DPW Specifications

Exhibit F TE F- Area A Rev 54 16-JUL-2019 Drawings

Exhibit G TE G- Area A Revised 260 16-JUL-2019 Specs

Exhibit H TE H- Area C Rev Drawings 31 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit I TE I - Area C Revised Specs 260 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit J TE J- Area E Rev Drawings 40 16-JUL-2019

Exhibit K TE K- Area E Revised Specs 260 16-JUL-2019

Attachment 1 Attachment 1-Appendix A 139 02-JUL-2018

(End of clause)

The following have been deleted:

52.232-16 Progress Payments APR 2012

(End of Summary of Changes)