RFI_SOLICITATION-18-B-0019_REPAIR_10_BRIDGES_ON_FT_HOOD-FH-24AUG18.pdf

0011192398-0001 AD010216P

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to respond to industry questions.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Aug-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9115118B0019

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Aug-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Aug-2018

CODE

MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING

MISSION CONTRACTING OFFICE (MCO)

36000 DARNALL LOOP, ROOM 1300B

FORT HOOD TX 76544-5095

W91151 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9115118B0019

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The following have been added by full text:

RESPONSE TO INDUSTRY QUESTIONS

RFI Responses Solicitation W91151-18-B-0019

(1) CBW 59: (Sheet CD-108) How will it be determined what concrete is “unsound”?

A: remove any dislodged concrete at spall location as shown on S-509. Remove spalled and delaminated concrete that is already partially or completely disconnected from the main concrete structure. Should the concrete be held together with rebar, but still disconnected, this should be removed as well.

(2) CBM 52: (Sheet CD-104) How will we access the western side of this site? Tracked equipment and construction traffic would damage the existing concrete flume if used as a crossing. The only other option would be substantial clearing beyond our limits of construction A: This is means and methods. Any damage caused by contractor is to be replaced at no additional cost to the government. Access beyond the limits of construction must be cleared with Environmental approval through USACE. The intent of the contract documents is to access the site within the limits of construction provided. How the site is accessed is means and methods. Some tree removal limits for construction path of access within the site limits is expected, but must be kept to a minimum required for the specific equipment required at each location.

Any damage caused by the contractor to site outside of the contract documents and not included in the path of access must be restored to original condition at no additional cost to the owner.

(3) CBW 57: (Sheet CD-106, CS-106) The wingwalls on the west side of this site have substantial separation from the headwall and are beginning to lean. Confirm that there is no repair of wingwalls required for this site.

A: The current condition of the wingwalls is the same as when inspected almost 24 months ago. We are monitoring. The separation is approximately 2-inches and 1-inch out of plumb. No wingwall repairs required under this project for this site. Concur

(4) BVM 27: (Sheet CD-102, CS-102) Where is our access for this site? Please provide instruction.

A: This is means and methods. Access beyond the limits of construction must be cleared with Environmental approval through USACE. The intent of the contract documents is to access the site within the limits of construction provided. How the site is accessed is means and methods. Some tree removal limits for construction path of access within the site limits is expected, but must be kept to a minimum required for the specific equipment required at each location. Any damage caused by the contractor to site outside of the contract documents and not included in the path of access must be restored to original condition at no additional cost to the owner.

(5) All sites:

1. Are we allowed to clear trees outside of our construction limits in order to access sites?

A: Access beyond the limits of construction, but still within the riparian boundary of the stream will need to be cleared with Environmental approval through USACE. Any upland site impacts (outside the riparian boundaries) would need to be cleared through Ft. Hood. The intent of the contract documents is to access the site within the limits of construction provided. How the site is accessed is means and methods. YES. UPON CONTRACT

AWARD, CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SITE PLAN INDICATING PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

LIMITS AND PROPOSED CLEARING. THIS PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED/APPROVED BY DPW-

ENVIRONMENTAL AND THE COR. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS REQUIRED, PRIOR TO PROCEEDING

WITH WORK ONSITE. PLAN SHOULD MINIMIZE IMPACT TO ANY NATIVE HARDWOOD TREES, AS

SPEC SECTION 01 57 20.00 10 (3.6.2.3) WITH RESPECT TO TREE PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT

WOULD APPLY FOR ANY NATIVE HARDWOOD TREES THAT ARE AFFECTED OUTSIDE OF THE

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.

2. Can trees be shredded and the mulch left in place?

A: MULCH SHALL BE STOCKPILED ONSITE IN AN UPLAND AREA. UPON COMPLETION OF

CONSTRUCTION, THE CLEARED AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE DEFINED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL

BE GRADED TO ELIMINATE ANY RUTTING AND MULCH SHALL BE SPREAD ON THE DISTURBED

AREAS WITHIN THE UPLAND AREAS (OUTSIDE THE ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK) OF THE SITE

(MAXIMUM 2" THICK). ANY MULCH REMAINING SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE TO THE FT.

HOOD COMPOST YARD, BUILDING 56132, NEAR NORTH CLARKE RD AND TURKEY RUN ROAD.

MULCH SHALL NOT BE SPREAD IN GRASSY AREAS ADJACENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS;

THOSE AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL STATE. MULCH SHALL ALSO NOT BE

SPREAD WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS DEFINED BY THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS OR WITHIN

THE ADJACENT DRAINAGE CHANNEL.

3. What restoration is required for wetland areas that will be disturbed by construction operations?

A: There are only two wetlands are at BVM27 & CBW59. Restoration would be according to the “CG” drawing notes? The permit for these wetland impacts require no restoration. The disturbed areas must be revegetated per the contract documents, but no additional restoration effort is required.

4. Access on these sites will be difficult. Please provide an access plan for each site.

A: This is means and methods. Concur. See previous answers regarding site access.

5. Is all the tree clearing approved by environmental?

A: Yes, within the limits of construction and outside the migratory bird nesting season, 15 March thru 15

August. Any tree clearing outside the limits of construction would require approval from environmental.

6. Will a SWPPP be required on any sites?

A: NO. Best Practices must be utilized.

7. Does any of the sites require engineering design or plans?

A: Yes, reference the Division 1, specifications for Traffic Control Plans. Non-engineered plans will be required for site utilization as stated in RFI #(5), subparagraph #1 above.

8. Will a lay down yard be available for each site?

A: Yes, reference general notes 3 & 4 on drawings G-003, G-004 & G-005. Proposed laydown area is to be indicated on the Site Utilization Plan submittal for government approval.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

52.252-3 ALTERATIONS IN SOLICITATION (APR 1984)

Portions of this solicitation are altered as follows:

Amendment 01 – Responses to questions from industry (RFIs)

(End of Provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)