DRAFT - Call for Solutions under AOS-CSO _ 15 June 2026 1.docx

CALL FOR SOLUTIONS

AGILE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Contracting Specialist: Sophia Dasilva, sophia.g.dasilva.civ@army.mil

NOTE: Please advise the cognizant Contracting/Agreements Officer and Specialist as soon as possible via the emails above if your organization intends to submit a Solution Brief in response to this Call for Solution.

*Any submissions that are received by the Contracting/Agreements Officer after the suspense date/time listed above will be deemed late and not evaluated. It is the sole responsibility of the company to ensure that its submission is received in the email inboxes listed above before the deadline specified.

This Call for Solution (CFS) may result in the Government awarding more than one FAR-Based contracts or Prototype Other Transaction (OT) Agreements under the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 4022.

1. BACKGROUND.

This requirement reflects Capability Program Executive for Simulation, Training, Test & Threat (CPE ST3's) commitment to transformation by adopting a task-based, outcome-focused, capability-centric, Agile Program Management approach to enterprise Program Management that enables flexibility, responsiveness, and scalability. The contractor will play a critical role in supporting CPE ST3’s mission by developing, demonstrating, iterating, and finally completing an Agile Professional Services performance architecture for application to current and future Performance Based Professional Services requirements.

The following notional/historical staffing is provided as an initial datapoint for offeror consideration in the absence of a defined capacity for the demonstration requirement.

Part I - Agile Professional Services (APS) Historical Workload Profile

Part II - Agile Profession Services – Headquarters (APS-HQ) Historical Workload Profile

2. PROBLEM STATEMENT.

CPE ST3 requires a highly functional, Agile, Performance Based, non-personal services contract architecture (including, but not limited to: Performance Work Statement (PWS), Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP), Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) analog, Transition and Communications Plan) for management of Performance Based Service contracts in satisfaction of Professional Services requirements.

*Note: Separate solutions are requested for each of the following “Parts” of the overall requirement, each Part is anticipated to receive a separate and distinct award in accordance with Section 9, below.

Part I – Agile Professional Services - Subordinate Project Manager / Project Lead (PM/PL) Line Organizations (APS) Part II – Agile Professional Services Headquarters Enterprise Support (APS-HQ)

3. DESIRED SOLUTION OBJECTIVES.

A successful solution should describe and be able to demonstrate through performance demonstration and iteration how contract requirements documents can inculcate Agile program management principles (e.g. SCRUM, SAFe management methods, etc.) into the Government service contracting capability, which will include an advisory role in the development of internal government processes necessary for cultural adoption of Agile principles. All successful Solutions MUST anticipate use and integration of a Government provided instance of Jira, which will be provided to Offerors for use in “Live Pitch” Presentations.

The desired solution will provide an initially acceptable PWS which will be iterated on during ongoing demonstrations through the successful offeror(s) performance of Agile Professional Services for focused acquisition support to enable delivery of foreign and domestic training and testing systems in all (non-inherently governmental) phases of the acquisition lifecycle, including but not limited to requirements development, market research, acquisition strategy formulation, solicitation preparation, source selection support, contract administration, and closeout activities. The selected solution should be functional for use under a wide range of contract types and vehicles, including but not limited to firm-fixed-price, Fixed-Price Incentive Fee, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ), and other hybrid arrangements.

The solution for Agile Performance Based Services must be tailored and flexible to meet the unique needs of CPE ST3’s evolving mission and should demonstrate how it will be cooperatively iterated to refine the PWS and other contract documentation throughout performance activities, ensuring the greatest achievable level of efficiency.

The contractor should take into consideration that all acquisition support activities will be executed in accordance with applicable Federal, Department of War (DoW), and Army acquisition regulations, policies, and best practices.

Performance under the award shall be designed and executed with an explicit intent towards efficiency and transparency that will enable the Government to truly capture the level of effort (LOE) included in satisfaction of the Government capability requirements. The real-time and aggregate LOE data and the expression of the Government requirement as an Agile capacity at an enterprise level will be included as deliverables under any resultant contract/agreement.

While resultant contracts/agreements shall be issued under Firm-Fixed Price or Fixed-Price incentive Agreements (10 U.S.C. §3458(d)), offerors are encouraged to propose separate Incentive structures intended to reduce cost of performance through the Fixed Price period of performance and any future requirements utilizing the developed Business Process and concept of operations.

Customer Engagement - The high-level functional needs include, but are not limited to the following:

1. Agile Program Management and Transformation: The primary need is for a contractor who can implement and manage a comprehensive Agile framework (such as SAFe) across the enterprise while developing an enduring architecture that the Government can utilize across a broad array of professional services. This involves not exclusively providing personnel but actively leading a transformation in how CPE ST3 manages its portfolio.

Key needs include:

· Agile Framework Implementation: Establishing and managing an Agile methodology to improve delivery speed, quality, and responsiveness.

· Outcome-Focused Execution: A shift in mindset from staffing positions to delivering measurable results and completing tasks within a prioritized backlog.

· Process Improvement: Continuously identifying inefficiencies and introducing innovative solutions, including the use of AI platforms, to streamline operations.

· Capacity –Team Based Contract Approach:

· Capacity = A fixed amount of value a team can produce over a fixed period of time.

· Complexity = The difficulty of an item for a team to produce.

2. Specialized Acquisition and Program Support:

The Government requires highly specialized acquisition support services not readily available within its organic workforce. The solution should provide flexible, on-demand, expertise across the entire acquisition lifecycle.

· Full Lifecycle Acquisition Support: From requirements development and market research to contract administration and closeout.

· Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Expertise: Comprehensive support for international programs, including case development, export control compliance, and security cooperation engagement.

· Financial and Resource Management: Support for planning, programming, budgeting, and execution (PPBE), including audit readiness and financial reconciliation.

3. Advanced Technical and Engineering Capabilities:

There is a significant need for a wide range of advanced technical services to support the development, integration, and modernization of the Army's training and testing systems. A commercial solution should offer expertise in:

· Cloud and DevSecOps: Cloud architecture, administration, and secure software development pipelines (CI/CD) in classified and unclassified environments.

· Cybersecurity and Systems Engineering: Expertise in Risk Management Framework (RMF), secure system design, data engineering, and enterprise architecture.

· Specialized Engineering Disciplines: In-depth knowledge in areas such as Radio Frequency (RF), live and virtual aviation training systems, visual and geospatial data engineering, and test and evaluation.

4. Enterprise Operations and Management:

The instant requirement through demonstration requires support in optimizing the headquarters' operational functions and improving organizational efficiency.

· Enterprise Task and Knowledge Management: Managing enterprise-wide tasking systems and implementing a robust knowledge management framework.

· Security and Facilities Management: Providing physical and personnel security support for multiple facilities, including 24/7 operations at Redstone Arsenal.

· Logistics and Property Management: Overseeing property accountability, facilities management, and the cataloging and fielding of equipment.

5. Executive Orders and Directives:

· Executive Order (E.O.) 14222, Implementing the President’s “Department of Government Efficiency” Cost Efficiency Initiative: Emphasizes fiscal responsibility, transparency, and the elimination of waste in federal contracting and requires agencies to justify the necessity of service contracts and prioritize in-house capabilities. SECDEF’s Memorandums with limitations on new contracts or task orders for consulting, advising, assisting, or any professional services performing similar functions.

· E.O. 14271, Ensuring Commercial, Cost-Effective Solutions in Federal Contracts: Requires agencies to prioritize commercially available solutions.

· E.O. 14402, Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting: Establishes that executive branch departments and agencies shall, in procurement, maximize the use of fixed-price contracts.

4. AWARDING INSTRUMENT

IAW with Army Open Solicitation procedures detailed within Solicitation W9128Z-25-S-A002, posted to SAM.gov on 05 May 2026, the Government intends to award two Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) or Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF) type contracts, which may (subject to offeror submission and resulting negotiations) include incentive structures. This Call provides instructions to companies and how the Government will evaluate submissions. This Call for Solution will utilize Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) procedures. Use of a CSO in accordance with DFARS subpart 212.70 is considered to be a competitive procedure for the purposes of 10 U.S.C. chapter 221 and FAR subpart 6.102.

5. CALL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTES

In addition to the general guidelines included in the open solicitation, the following guidelines apply to this Call for Solution.

5.1 General Notes

· Offerors are reminded that all awards are subject to the availability of funds and the Government reserves the right to make multiple awards, a single award, or no award as a result of this Call.

· Only a Contracting or Agreements Officer has the authority to enter into, modify, or execute a binding instrument on behalf of the United States Government. All payment obligations are subject to Congressional appropriations.

· In order to be eligible for award, offerors must:

· Possess a Unique Entity ID and be registered in the System for Award Management prior to award, and maintain active registration throughout the period of performance.

· Register in the prescribed government invoicing system (e.g., Wide Area Work Flow).

· Accurately represent their small business size and status as required, and in accordance with applicable proposed NAICS codes.

· Be determined responsible by the Contracting/Agreements Officer and not be suspended, debarred, or otherwise prohibited from receiving an award.

· Disclose any actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCIs) to the Contracting/Agreements Officer prior to award.

· Be a Domestic (Foreign Owned, Controlled, or influenced (“FOCI”) Mitigated) Small Business United States Entity (or a Domestic non-traditional “FOCI” mitigated vendor of any size), in accordance with the respective proposed Small Business Size Standard.

· Offerors are responsible for monitoring SAM.gov for any amendments or updates to this Call.

· Notice to Offeror(s): The Government reserves the right to cancel this Call, either before or after the closing date. If the Government cancels this Call, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

· The Government may down-select potential awardees under this call for solution

· The Government reserves the right to award more than one (1) award resulting from this Call for Solution or to make no award.

· The Government reserves the right to go directly from Solution Brief to award.

· If the Government exercises its right to go directly from Solution Brief to award, additional information may include detailed pricing, implementation schedules, and technical documentation to support contract negotiations.

· The Government will inform all Offerors whether they have or have not been selected to move forward based on their submitted Solution Brief.

· Those Offerors whose Solution Briefs are deemed “selectable” will be invited to submit a more comprehensive Live Pitch, Oral Presentation or Proposal. At that time, a due date and time for the following phase will be communicated. Once an Offeror has been selected past Phase 1, the Government will communicate directly and solely with the selected Offeror(s), no further amendments to the Call for Solutions will be posted. Submittals must use a standard, readable font (i.e., 14-point Times New Roman), as the document's readability directly impacts the Government's ability to assess the merits of the proposed solution. Offerors are strongly encouraged to use diagrams, graphics, and concise text to effectively convey complex information. For this purpose, landscape-oriented (11 x 8.5 inch) pages are permissible for visuals but will be counted toward the total page limit, which is strictly enforced. Any pages submitted beyond the maximum allowed will be removed by the Government and will not be evaluated.

· The Government may utilize internal Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to assist in the administrative review and analysis of proposals, such as by summarizing content or verifying compliance with solicitation requirements. However, the use of AI is strictly for support purposes; all final evaluation judgments, all final evaluation judgments and the ultimate selection decision are inherently governmental functions. The Government is committed to protecting all offeror proprietary and source selection sensitive information, and any AI tool used will operate in a secure environment, consistent with all applicable data protection regulations, and will not transmit data to external systems.

· Questions are to be sent only to the Contracting Officer and Specialist (POCs) listed in this Call for Solution by July 6, 2026 @ 11:00 AM Eastern Time. The following shall be utilized in the email subject line: "Call for Solution - APS_26-01."

5.2 Overview of Submission Phases

The response process for this Call may consist of the following phases:

Phase 1: Agile Services Solution Brief Offerors will submit a high-level “White-Paper” summary of their proposed solution, addressing the government’s objectives and *Each offeror/team is only allowed to submit a single solution brief.

Detailed submission requirements for Phase 1 are provided in Section 6. Evaluation criteria for Phase 1 are outlined in Section 7. Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be provided via subsequent invitation letters.

Phase 2: Live Pitch Session Selected offerors will be invited to present and discuss their solution in a live or virtual setting, subject to Government determination. Each selected offeror will be provided an instance of Government’s JIRA (sandbox), to demonstrate their Agile Framework Solution.

Phase 3: Solution Proposal Offerors advancing to this phase will be invited to submit a detailed proposal for final evaluation and potential award, this phase may involve additional Oral Presentations prior to final selection. This is the first and only phase in which detailed pricing is submitted.

Phase 4: Negotiation and Award Offeror Solutions determined to meet evaluation criteria (detailed in Section 7) may be asked to engage in final negotiations intended to (but are not guaranteed to) result in Award; which negotiations shall include finalization of the proposed PWS and other proposed performance requirements document, Price, Incentive Structures, and Period of Performance (Period of Performance is anticipated to be 60-months, with an Option to extend to 66-months). No award shall be made except that 1) the prospective award documents are reasonably expected to result in “successful completion” of the scope of the proposed effort, and 2) the negotiated price can be determined to be fair and reasonable. This is the first and only phase in which detailed pricing is evaluated.

6. SOLUTION SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.1 Phase 1 – Agile Services Solution Brief

6.1.1 Phase 1 – Solution Brief Content

Companies responding to this call shall submit a Solution Brief for evaluation. Submissions are to be sent via email only to the Contracting Officer and Specialist (POCs) listed in this Call for Solution.

Solution Briefs shall not exceed ten (10) written pages using 14-point Times New Roman font. The Government will not consider inserted textboxes/pop-ups or internet links to additional information as part of the Solution Brief and will not consider such information in its evaluation. Solution Briefs are intended to be clear and concise.

Solution Briefs shall include the following at a minimum:

a. Title Page (does not count against page limit)

i. Company Name, Title, Date, Point of Contact Name, E-Mail Address, Phone, Address, and Call reference number. If registered in SAM.gov, include the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Unique Entity Identification code. Note: SAM registration is required for any award.

ii. Ensure the Call for Solutions reference number and topic (i.e., APS) is clearly identified.

b. Executive Summary (one page, counts against page limit)

i. Provide an executive summary of the offeror and its solution.

c. High-Level Solution/Concept (counts against page limit)

i. Describe the unique aspects of your solution/concept and its relevance to the Call and how the solution addresses the problem statement and solution objectives, including a generalized staffing plan.

ii. Describe how the proposed solution/concept fulfills the requirement, its scalability, and the specific benefits it offers in relation to the objectives of this Call.

iii. Provide a proposed schedule (including any proposed/applicable “initial Agile Evaluation” and “transition” phase) and describe how the proposed schedule is achievable for the proposed solution/concept.

iv. Describe the Dynamic Resourcing Strategy used to manage fluctuating task demands without relying on static, dedicated personnel allocations. Include an Agile Team Topology demonstrating how cross-functional talent pools will be structured to swarm priorities and avoid single points of failure. (e.g., centralized staffing, on-site staffing, hybrid, etc.)

v. Talent Capture & Cultural Transformation - explicitly detail the strategy to recruit and retain the highly specialized talent required to execute the mission and describe their Organizational Change Management approach for breaking legacy 'hours-based' habits and integrating personnel into an outcome-driven Agile culture.

vi. A one page (max) Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM).

d. Intellectual Property Statement/Agreement/Disclosures (does not count against page limit)

i. Identify any intellectual property involved in the effort.

ii. Clearly state any associated restrictions on the Government’s use of that intellectual property, proposed licensing models, and data rights assertions. Include a separate disclosure for each partnering company, if applicable. (See Attachment A - Data Rights Assertion Table). DFARS subpart 252.227-7017(d) may be used for formatting.

iii. Provide a clear confirmation that the resultant business process, associated performance documents, requirements and contract deliverables, and all data required to replicate the successfully completed service across future requirements shall be provided to the Government with Unlimited Rights.

e. Key Personnel Resume (2 pages, does not count against limit): Provide the resume of the proposed Agile Program Manager. This individual must demonstrate a minimum of 5 years of Agile experience and leadership of at least 3 completed Agile projects, specifically highlighting experience organizational Agile transformations.

The Government may be unable to evaluate the Solution Brief if a company fails to submit the required contents for Phase 1.

6.2 Phase 2 – Live Pitch

Phase 2 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be outlined in the invitation to this phase, if selected and unless bypassed, which requirements will include at a minimum a live pitch of the tools and capabilities (i.e., Jira, etc.) that the offeror will use. The offeror will demonstrate how they will track and complete tasks, including Backlog Management, workflow visualization utilizing Kanban Boards and task management by utilizing Sprint Boards. The live pitch will provide actionable metrics, such as Sprint Burndown Charts, Velocity Charts, and Control Charts.

6.3 Phase 3 – Proposal

Phase 3 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be outlined in the invitation, if selected, for this phase.

6.4 Phase 4 – Award

This Phase consists of negotiation with, and award to, offerors that have been deemed to have an affirmative evaluation regarding the following questions:

i. Does the proposed Solution have technical and Management Merit in meeting the Government’s “Desired Solution Objectives”,

ii. Does the proposed Solution have potential Benefit and Relevance to the application of Agile structures within the CPE ST3 mission structure, and

iii. Does the proposed Solution represent a Cost Affordable Solution (with regard to funding availability)?

7. EVALUATION PROCESS

All Phases and Steps of the evaluation process are intended to answer three key questions relating to each proposed Solution. All Phases and Steps of the evaluation contribute solely to answering these three questions. Any and all award determinations will be subject to an affirmative evaluation regarding the following questions:

a. Does the proposed Solution have Technical and Management Merit,

b. Does the proposed Solution have potential Benefit and Relevance to the application of Agile structures within the CPE ST3 mission structure under a Fixed Price architecture, and

c. Does the proposed Solution represent a Cost Affordable Solution (with regard to funding availability).

*Note The first two (2) factors are of equal importance and are more important than factor three (3).

7.1 Phase 0 - Gate Evaluation

All submissions to this call for solution will be vetted against the gate criteria in Table 1. Submissions must pass all the gate criteria to be deemed satisfactory for evaluation.

Table 1. Gate Criteria Rubric

7.2 Phase 1 – Agile Services Solution Brief Selection Process

Based on the evaluation, the Solution Brief (i.e. “White Paper”) will be categorized as “Selected for Further Consideration”, “Not Selected for Further Consideration”, or “Retained for Future Consideration.” The selection of one or more submissions into the next Phase will be based on the criteria listed above, degree to which the proposed solution is expected to meet the Government need, and funding availability. Solution Briefs that do not have affirmative answers to the evaluation criteria [1) Does the proposed Solution have technical and Management Merit, 2) Does the proposed Solution have potential Benefit and Relevance to the application of Agile structures within the CPE ST3 mission structure, and 3) Does the proposed Solution represent a Cost Affordable Solution (with regard to funding availability)], may be declined without further review.

Selected for Further Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief has been determined to be of technical merit, represents a feasible and viable solution, and included all required submittals IAW the Call. As such, the Government intends to invite the company to participate in next phase should funding be available.

Not Selected for Further Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief does not represent the necessary degree of technical merit, does not represent a feasible and viable solution and/or did not include all required submittals IAW the Call.

Retained for Future Consideration: The submitted Solution Brief has been determined to be (or have the potential to be) of technical merit, represents (or may represent) a feasible and viable solution, and included all required submittals IAW the Call. As such, the Government retains the right to revisit the Offeror Solution within the next 12-months and invite the company to participate in next phase should funding be available.

Offerors ‘Selected for Further Consideration’ may be invited to participate in subsequent phases, subject to the availability of funds. The Government reserves the right to limit the number of offerors invited to Phase 2 – Live Pitch (unless bypassed) and/or Phase 3 – Solution Proposal. As such, an Offeror’s solution may be evaluated as ‘Selected for Further Consideration’, however, not invited to Phase 2 and/or Phase 3, and instead be identified as “Retained for Future Consideration”.

Solution Briefs, whether selected or not selected for subsequent Phases, will be notified in writing as soon as practicable of their evaluation results, and the Government reserves the right to reconsider and re-initiate Phase 2/3 activities with any offeror that was previously identified as “Retained for Future Consideration”, for a period of 12 months from the date of the offeror’s last prior submission.

The Government reserves the right to bypass Phase 2 into Phase 3 to request a formal proposal should funding be available.

7.3 Phase 2 – Live Pitch

Phase 2 submission requirements and evaluation criteria will be outlined in the invitation to this phase, if selected and unless bypassed, which requirements will include at a minimum a live demonstration of the tools and capabilities (i.e., Jira, etc.) that the offeror will use for tracking, management, and reporting under Agile principles. All offerors invited to participate in this Phase shall receive the same detail regarding the desired information and capabilities to be presented, and shall be afforded equal time for presentation, though specific questions, comments, and discussions relating to presentations will necessarily differ based on the Offeror presentation.

7.4 Phase 3 – Proposal

Phase 3 submission requirements will be outlined in the Request for Proposal (RFP), if selected, for this phase. All complete and valid proposals will be evaluated, resulting in a written Evaluation Decision Document (EDD) which will articulate the subjective analysis of each proposed solution and the rationale behind selection or non-selection decision. Which Evaluation Decision rationale will be provided to the respective Offeror(s) upon notification of non-selection.

7.5 Phase 4 – Award

This Phase consists of final and formal negotiation with, and award to, the offeror (or offerors) that have been deemed to have an affirmative evaluation regarding the following questions:

i. Does the proposed Solution have technical and Management Merit in meeting the Government’s “Desired Solution Objectives”,

ii. Does the proposed Solution have potential Benefit and Relevance to the application of Agile structures within the CPE ST3 mission structure, and

iii. Does the proposed Solution represent a Cost Affordable Solution (with regard to funding availability).

8. NON-GOVERNMENT ADVISORS

As stated in Section I2 of the AOS, non-Government advisors may be used in the evaluation of Solution Briefs, Oral Presentations, Demonstrations/Live Pitchs, Solution Proposals, and finalizing terms for award.

Non-Government advisors will have signed non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with the Government. By submitting a Solution, the Offeror understands that the Government may share proprietary Company information with the identified non-Government advisor(s) for evaluation and administrative purposes only. In addition, the Offeror further understands that it has an opportunity before submitting a Solution Brief to the Government to enter an NDA directly with the non-government advisor(s), and therefore, waives all claims against the Government for any disclosures of proprietary information by the non-Government personnel. Such NDAs are the responsibility of the Offeror, and the Government shall not be a party to them, though the nondisclosure agreement(s) shall not include any additional terms and conditions unless mutually agreed to by the parties to the nondisclosure agreement, in accordance with DFARS 252.227-7025. Companies shall provide a copy of the signed NDAs to the Government with submissions.

9. ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI) (no page limit)

9.1 Offeror OCI Disclosure: The Offeror shall perform an OCI analysis and submit the results of that analysis in addition to the Solution Brief submission. Specifically, the Offeror shall analyze the details of the Call and the implementation of their proposed Solution for actual or potential OCI situations associated with the performance of the Offeror, or any of the Offeror’s proposed teammates or subcontractors, under any contract or agreement the Offeror or the Offeror’s teammates or subcontractors have been or may be awarded by any federal agency or other entity. The Offeror shall describe in detail the methodology used to identify actual or potential OCI issues. The level of detail for OCI analysis may not be the same for all vendors. FAR 9.5 may be used as guidance for OCI analysis. If no conflicts are identified, a risk mitigation plan is not required; however a description of the analysis methodology, and an affirming statement that no conflicts are identified shall be included. This section will not count against submission page limits.

If the Offeror identifies any actual or potential OCIs with respect to the performance of the Offeror or the Offeror’s subcontractors or teammates, the contractor shall provide an OCI Mitigation Plan to be incorporated as an attachment to any resulting contract or agreement. Any proposed avoidance or mitigation techniques shall be consistent with FAR 9.5 and the most recent decisions of the Government Accountability Office and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

9.2 Prohibition on Competing for Both Parts: No Offeror (prime, subcontractor, Joint Venture member, or affiliate) may compete for or support both Part I and Part II, consistent with clarified OCI boundaries.

9.3 Future OCI Restrictions: Participation may restrict future participation in CPE ST3 or ACC‑Orlando requirements where unequal access or impaired objectivity may occur.

9.4 Non-Personal Services Boundary: Contractor personnel shall not perform inherently governmental functions, nor provide labor categories or staffing constructs that imply Government authority, per Executive Order.

9.5 OCI Disclosure Requirements: Offerors must disclose all actual or potential OCIs and may be required to submit an OCI Mitigation Plan.