Attachment_4_Past_Perform_Questiionaire.doc
DOC document 88 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W81XWH-15-R-0095
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
Past Performance Questionaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amended_Sol_15-R-0095-0003.pdf | ||
| KOsignedPastPerformanceLetter.pdf | ||
| W81XWH-15-R-0095_Amendment_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amended_Sol_15-R-0095-0001.pdf | ||
| NHP_Solicitation_W81XWH-15-R-0095.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment-6_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_for_NHP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment__3_-_NHP_(Per_Diem_ _Diagnostics)_Pricing_Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1-_NHP_Task_Order_1__4May_2016.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_-_SMALL_BUSINESS_PARTICIPATION_FORM.doc.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_7_-_GFE_spreadsheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment__2_-_NHP_Task_Order_PRICING_SHEET_4May2016.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of the Army
US ARMY MEDICAL RESEARCH ACQUISITION ACTIVITY
820 CHANDLER STREET
FORT DETRICK MD 21702-5014
Service Group - 1
9 May 2016
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W81XWH-15-R-0095, “Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Non-human Primates (NHP) Colony Maintenance” Dear Sir/Ma'am:
The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity (USAMRAA) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offeror's on subject the RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that offeror's provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 112990. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to Mr. Nathaniel Reus, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or by Thursday, 2 June 2016, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to Mr. Nathaniel Reus, Contract Specialist, at e-mail: nathaniel.a.reus.civ@mail.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Please direct any questions to Mr. Reus at 301-619-9209.
Sincerely, LAURA A. TOMITZ
Contracting Officer
Enclosure:
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor: _________________________ Contract No.: ________________________
Subcontract No. (if applicable): _________________________
POC: ______________________________
Title: _______________________________
(Name)
(e.g. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor's record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (to be filled in with information obtained from offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR'S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact - Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Management (to include use and control of subcontractors)
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers' Interest
· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Good
· Acceptable
· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to Mr. Nathaniel Reus, Contract Specialist, at nathaniel.a.reus.civ@mail.mil
Thank you for your assistance.
LAURA A. TOMITZ
Contracting Officer
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .