Attachment_1_Question_and_Answer_Template_17_Apr_2017.docx

ATTACHMENT 1

QUESTION AND ANSWER TEMPLATE

Offerors who determine that the technical requirements of this RFP require clarifications in order to permit submittal of a responsive proposal are requested to submit all questions in writing to the maximum extent possible within 15 calendar days of release of the RFP. These questions shall be directed to the KO identified above. The USG will issue RFP Questions and answers on www.fbo.gov and acquisition.army.mil, and amend the RFP if necessary to clarify RFP requirements.

Page 94; para b & c

Solicitation states “b) Reference Customer Information Sheet. The Offeror shall provide a list of all points of contact (POC) to whom Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaires were provided to by the Contractor for evaluation by the USG. Reference information shall be submitted in the format referenced in Attachment 6 entitled “Reference Customer Information Sheet”.

c) The offeror shall submit with its Performance Risk Proposal, a copy of the PRAQ Cover Letter (Attachment 6) and a copy of the PRAQ (Attachment 7) with only the following sections filled out: Evaluated Contractor's Information, Respondent Information, Full Time Equivalents (FTE's) provided, and contract information. Do not send PRAQ's to references. For Government contracts, a reference is defined as a government person who has knowledge of the quality of performance provided and who is either a member of the program office, administrative contracting office or end used of the service provided. For civilian contracts, a reference is defined as a person who is either a member of the program office, contracting office or end user of the service provided. DO NOT SEND LETTERS OR QUESTIONNAIRES TO RESPONDENTS, the USG will execute this action.

Our question is: These seem to contradict each other – do we send them or not? And if we send them is it to the rep or the KO? Please clarify.

Page 94, para 4b: The offeror will fill out Attachment 6 and send this document to the USG with their Volume III, Performance Risk Proposal.

Page 94, para 4c: The offeror will send the questionnaire in with their proposal, not to the respondent.

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET – Option Year CLINS

It appears a CLIN was added for each CLIN – It looks like the FY funds for the current year and next year are added into each option year.

Is this correct?

The CLINs listed are from July to July. The fiscal year ends 30 Sep of every year. Funding for travel cannot cross fiscal years. All CLINs will be subject to availability of funds (SAF).

Page 96 Attachment 2 Sanitized The table in Attachment 2 shows the following: Solicitation W81K04-17-R-0010 (Offeror’s CAGE Code) Volume II Technical Quality Proposal VOL II (CAGE Code) Table of Contents DDMMMYY VOL II (Company Name) Personnel DDMMMYY VOL II (Company Name) Work Processes DDMMMYY VOL II (Company Name) Quality Control Plan DDMMMYY VOL II (Company Name) Volume Cross Reference Matrix DDMMMYY VOL II (Company Name) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms DDMMMYY

The naming convention for this volume according to the solicitation is not uniform. Was the naming meant to be as follows instead of what was mentioned in the table: “Cage Code” instead of “Company Name” for all documents in this volume.

You are correct the Unsanitized copy should include the company name and Sanitized copy should include only the Cage Code.

Page 96 Attachment 2 Un-Sanitized & Sanitized

Page 90 Proposal Table of Contents, Vol II Item 5.

VOL II (Company Name) Volume Cross Reference Matrix DDMMMYY

Both sections call for a Cross Reference Matrix, however on page 93(contents for Volume II), it was removed from the volume. Please clarify if it is required or not.

This Cross Reference Matrix was deleted.