A.09.03_Solicitation_Enclosure_1_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_20160613.docx

DOCX document 22 KB Posted

Attached to
SURGICAL INSTRUMENT SHARPENING
Solicitation number
W81K02-16-T-0087
Issued by

About this file

ENCLOSURE 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SURVEILLANCE PLAN

For Maintenance and Sharpening of Medical Tools and Instruments

"This plan is provided for information purposes only. The QASP is not a part of the contract. The Government has the right to change or modify inspection methods at its discretion."

A. OBJECTIVE. This plan provides a quality surveillance strategy for repair and maintenance services. The primary purpose of this plan is to provide a basis for the Government’s evaluation of the Contractor’s key areas of performance under this contract. The KO in conjunction with input provided by the COR, will evaluate the Contractor’s performance. Oversight of the Contractor’s performance will assure quality and consistency of contract performance.

B. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE. The key area(s) of the Contractor’s performance that will be evaluated during the term of the task order. The SOW reference will be provided for each performance measurement objective.

C. ASSESSMENT METHOD. Contractor performance is inspected and evaluated on key areas of performance: see chart below.

D. ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL). The degree to which the Government will allow the Contractor’s key areas of performance to vary; the variance from the standard that the Contractor is allowed and the grading/ measurement associated with deviation from the specific performance standard.

E. KEY AREAS OF PERFORMANCE.

The following Performance Measurements Requirement Summary applies. The Government may modify inspection methods in accordance with site specific requirements.

PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE
STANDARD
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
REMEDY
1. Contractor shall provide full service maintenance and repair for emergent and scheduled calls. PWS Paras. 2.2 and 2.3.
Complete tasks as

required by the PWS.

Comply with tasks 100% of the time.
COR will monitor for compliance with input from the Advanced Field Inspection Program (AFIP) Technician.
CDR Issued and Document in CPARs.

2. Contractor shall be available and responsive. PWS Para. 2.1.3.

Instruments and containers shall be restored to a serviceable condition within 12 hours after contractor arrival to facility or on-site repair visit.
Uptime of 98%.
COR will monitor with input from AFIP Technician.
CDR Issued and Document in CPARs.
3. Contractor shall provide service report. PWS Para 2.4.
Faxed or e-mailed within five working days after work completion to COR.
Comply with tasks 100% of the time.
COR will monitor with input from AFIP Technician.
CDR Issued and Document in CPARs.
4. Customer satisfaction. PWS Para. 1.5.5.
Maintain a high level of

customer satisfaction.

No more than one substantiated complaint per 12-month period of the contract.
COR will monitor with input from AFIP Technician.
CDR Issued and Document in CPARs.

5. Combating Trafficking in Persons (awareness program) PWS Para. 1.3.7.

FAR Clause 52.222-50 and FAR Subpart 22.1703.
100% compliance (zero tolerance) regarding trafficking in persons policy.
COR documentation and program review. Any non-compliance must be brought to the immediate attention of the KO.
Document compliance in CPARS. Remedies allowable per FAR 52.222-50 will be taken.

6. Contractor Manpower Report (CMR).

Per PWS Para. 8 Complete Contractor Manpower Report.

Notify COR by the 5th working day of November whether or not completed.
Review CMR records

to ensure it was completed. Contract Specialist and COR Monitors.

Document performance in CPARS using measurements shown below.

STANDARDMEASUREMENTPAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
99% to 100%ExceptionalDocument Past Performance
96% to 98%Very GoodAssessment Report, paying particular attention
95%Satisfactoryto performance that exceeds the standard.
92% to 94%Marginal
92% or LessUnsatisfactory

F. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT. This report shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer monthly (unless otherwise agreed upon between the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s Representative).

G. REPERFORMANCE OF SERVICES. If any of the services do not conform with contract requirements, the Government will require the Contractor to reperform the services in conformity with contract requirements, at no additional cost to the Government. When the defects in services cannot be corrected due to circumstances, the Government may (1) require the contractor to take necessary action to ensure that future performance conforms to contract requirements and (2) reduce the contract price to reflect the reduced value of the services performed. The Contracting Officer may exercise appropriate contractual remedy should the Contractor fail to promptly take the necessary action to ensure future performance is in conformity with contract requirements.

When apparent non-satisfactory work is identified, the Contracting Officer’s Representative shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) and submit to the Contracting Officer for review, use DD Form 2772. The Contractor shall then be required to respond to the CDR. The Contractor shall explain reasons for substandard performance, how performance will be returned to acceptable levels, and how recurrence of the same or like problems will be prevented. The Contracting Officer will evaluate the Contractor's explanation, assess its validity, and determine whether it is acceptable.

The Contractor shall be required to correct/eliminate any deficiencies in services in a timely manner. Notification begins when pertinent documents (e.g., Customer Complaint Record or CDR) are issued to the Contractor. Time of notification and correction of all applicable deficiencies should be entered on all Government documents and retained in the contract file. The Government may execute a deduction in payment for non-compliance when validated by the Contracting Officer.

H. PERFORMANCE RATINGS.

The Government will rate past performance using the following performance standards.

EXCEPTIONAL:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
VERY GOOD:
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
SATISFACTORY:
Performance meets contractual requirements.
MARGINAL:
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
UNSATISFACTORY:
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Other performance evaluation factors that will be monitored and documented in the contractor’s performance records but cannot be quantified by numerical measurements:

Contractor providing personnel exceeding the minimum qualification standards, and/or performance above or below the standard, for above factors, will be documented in the Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for the reporting period.

NOTE: This plan is provided for information purposes only. The QASP is not a part of the solicitation, nor shall it be part of any resulting contract. The Government has the right to change or modify inspection methods at its discretion.

(End of Enclosure 1)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .