PWS_UTPTask-65-170111_ver._RFI.doc

DOC document 129 KB Posted

Attached to
Military Geospatial Support of Terrain Datasets of Selected Areas (Urban Tactical Planner - UTP)
Solicitation number
W5J9CQ-17-R-0005
Issued by

About this file

Military Geospatial Support of Terrain Datasets of Selected Areas (Urban Tactical Planner - UTP)

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

FOR

THE UTP GEOSPATIAL DATA SET

UTP 65-10

Alexandria, Egypt; Mayjarin and Xebat, Iraq; Miran Shah, Pakistan; Malakal, South Sudan;

Ad Duayn (Addien) and Al Gedaref, Sudan; and Marib, Sadah, and Ta'izz, Yemen With Optional Cities:

Gejiu, Golmud, Gyangze, Guilin, Haifeng, Hami, Hengyang, and Lingui, China 11 January 2016 1.0

PURPOSE

The Army has a validated requirement to obtain this type of geospatial information. The purpose of this document is to acquire contractor support services through a Firm Fixed-Price project to generate Urban Tactical Planner (UTP) geospatial datasets for the specified areas for the Army Geospatial Center (AGC).

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 In 1994 the Defense Science Board (DSB) handed down a directive to investigate MOUT (Military Operations on Urban Terrain) support to the warfighter. The US Army Geospatial Center (AGC) has designed a user-friendly, flexible geospatial information and services tool in the form of an Urban Tactical Planner (UTP). The UTP is an operational geospatial dataset for the urban environment that is capable of functioning as an aid in decision-making when dealing with urban terrain. The UTP supports MOUT, Military Operations other than War (MOOTW), threat assessment, and humanitarian support among other applications.

2.2 The geospatial dataset entails mapping certain terrain and cultural features which have an impact on the urban setting, such as forested areas, ridge lines, drainage features, power lines, various key buildings (as determined from ancillary source), transportation network and bridges. Building areas of similar form and function are grouped as homogeneous polygons called Built-up Terrain Zones (BTZ’s). Additional information is provided for each BTZ to give an indication of the function (e.g. residential) and ease of mobility in the polygonal area (e.g. detached buildings with open space are indicative of favorable mobility between structures by mounted and dismounted infantry). AGC employs both in-house and out-of-house capabilities for the creation of this dataset, deliverable in digital format. The UTP Digitizing Field Guide, Standard Operating Procedures, and Specifications (hereafter referred to as the UTP Field Guide), 17 March 2016 (or later as revised), will be the current guidance, provided upon request.

3.0 SCOPE

3.1 This Performance Work Statement (PWS) addresses the support services required to generate Urban Tactical Planner (UTP) geospatial datasets for the specified areas for the Army Geospatial Center (AGC).

3.2 Dataset Specifications shall be consistent with those of the UTP Field Guide dated 17 March 2016 (or later as revised) and related documents.

3.3 The Contractor shall conduct and track Quality Control (QC) measures for all phases of data set generation and adhere to the approved QC controls. The contractor must provide a Quality Control Plan (QCP) as a part of their submission. This QCP may be included as part of the technical proposal or as a stand-alone document. The QCP shall address how the offeror plans to effectively ensure the quality of their services stated in the PWS.

4.0

PLACE AND PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

4.1 Place of performance: All work shall be performed at the contractor’s site. No travel is required for this project.

4.2 Period of performance: The UTP data sets A003, A004, A005, A006, A007, A008, and A009, with edit corrections as necessary, are required to be delivered no later than 31 August 2017. This contract will end 28 February 2018. With the award of any of the Optional Cities, the Delivery date may be extended accordingly for that city only. Optional cities will only be awarded before 28 February 2018. A kick-off, via telephone, will be conducted within 10 days of the project award. Notification of the start of each city may be made via the monthly report as well as anticipated delivery schedule (See 6.3 below).

5.0

REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

5.1 Minimum necessary Government Furnished Information (GFI) shall be provided to the Contractor prior to commencing work. This minimum necessary GFI is digital and consists of shape files of the mosaicked base image(s) outlines, a readme file with base image parameters, the base image(s) in geo-tiff, and, as available for the AOI, JOG(s), TLM(s), city graphic(s), and SRTM2f all in geo-tiff. Additional GFI (such as hardcopy maps or tourists guides) may become available after award to assist in the extraction of the dataset. Although not presented to the contractor as formal GFI hand-off, the recommendations in the UTP Field Guide for the use of the myriad of internet resources is not only encouraged but expected, e.g. Google Earth, NGA.

5.2 The UTP Field Guide, 17 March 2016, (or later as revised) will be provided as the current guidance. Previously completed UTPs may be referenced for sense of feature display and density; these are available through the AGC PKI website. Prior discussions with and guidance provided by the Government concerning the extraction and portrayal of UTP data will also be used for the cities on this project.

5.3 After project award, the government (AGC) will also provide the required personal geodatabase template, the Analyst Template referred to in the UTP Field Guide, for extraction. The contractor may make changes in the template only at the direction of the government and as specified in the UTP Field Guide; primarily, this is the source field in the template.

6.0

PROJECT OBJECTIVES

6.1 The Contractor shall use all Analytical SOPs and GFI provided by the Government for the analysis and generation of the UTP geospatial datasets for each of the areas specified below in paragraph 7.0.

UTP data set specifications shall be consistent with those of the UTP Field Guide and related documents. The current order of priority is that listed below. The contractor is only responsible for the Level III and IV data extraction described in the UTP Field Guide. Further, the specific road layer-type to be extracted is standard. Should the coordinates below not match the supplied image base, the contractor will immediately contact the COR or the project monitor prior to commencing any effort on that city.

6.2 The UTP geospatial datasets will be delivered in ArcGIS Geodatabase format (ArcGIS 10 is acceptable) along with all base images, maps, and DTED, or SRTMf, as integral data layers ready to go to the finishing routine, per the UTP Field Guide.

6.3 Materials expected within a deliverable include the UTP dataset for the specified study area delivered on CD-ROM or DVD(s). Electronic delivery via AMRDEC will be considered on a case-by-case basis. City datasets should be submitted prior to the delivery date completion as part of phased submittals. The contractor shall develop a work plan that provides a schedule of submittal deliveries over the course of the performance period to demonstrate a progression of work. The final submittal will allow the government sufficient time to adequately provide comment prior to the end of the delivery date. This work shall be coordinated with the COR/project monitor.

6.4 The Contractor shall demonstrate a final, not a draft, version of the UTP prior to the contract completion date. The Government will review and critique the delivered UTP. The Contractor shall incorporate 100% of the Government's requests for changes in the UTP dataset consistent with the current UTP Field Guide and related guidance. The contractor will ONLY make the corrections called for; the contractor will make no other additions or deletions to the data set without permission from the COR/project monitor.

6.5 The Contractor shall have experience in providing expertise in the use of Earth Resources Data Analysis System (ERDAS) Imagine and Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) ArcGIS software and associated modules to capture spatial and attribute data in the analysis and compilation of military terrain (both natural and urban), water resources, and environmental data (or similar studies). Datasets may be extracted in a higher version than specified in the UTP Field Guide; however, only the version specified in the UTP Field Guide will be submitted unless coordination is made prior to the start of extraction as to an acceptable format change. In addition to the extracted version of the data base (e.g. 10.2) a version ArcGIS 10.0 will also be submitted.

6.6 The Contractor shall have experience and expertise in providing support with data management and dissemination: skilled in Windows, able to manipulate data files, proficient in ArcGIS, basic image and map manipulation, possess a basic understanding of databases and data management, and be familiar with National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (NGA) and other common geospatial data formats.

6.7 At this time, the contractor's thorough knowledge of Enterprise Geodatabases in a Microsoft Structured Query Language (SQL) and Spatial Database Engine (SDE) environment is not a requirement for UTP generation but will be in the future.

6.8 The Contractor shall deliver a monthly status report, due by the 15th of the following month. A final report will be delivered 15 days after completion of this contract.

6.9 All deliverables shall be submitted using the following address:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Army Geospatial Center

ATTN: CEAGC-WST (John C. Jens or Elisa Carmona)

Bldg. 2592A

7701 Telegraph Road

Alexandria, VA 22315-3864

6.10 Level of Classification:

Unless specified differently by AGC, this contract will utilize and generate unclassified data with a caveat of “LIMDIS, Destroy as FOUO.” Labeling instructions and examples will be provided. Materials and data obtained through the use of a classified system shall not cause the data set to become classified higher than described here. If necessary, separate guidelines and handling instructions may be issued by the Contract Monitor, which describe the methods used in the display of extracted information. Appropriate security procedures will be used to insure that classified material is protected at its appropriate level. If the inclusion of classified data is required, the contractor shall contact the Contract Monitor for instructions of how to proceed. All unclassified data will be protected using operational security procedures.

7.0.

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: Per paragraphs 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 the Contractor shall use all GFI provided by the Government for the analysis and generation of the UTP geospatial datasets for each of the specified areas below.

CITY
COORDINATES
LEVEL
Upper Left
Lower Right
IIIA
IIIB
IVA
IVB
CDRL
Sadah, Yemen
17 01 29N 043 38 56E
16 52 27N 043 50 10E
X
X
X
X
A003
Mayjarin, Iraq
36 31 21N 042 31 57E
36 19 17N 042 48 39E
X
X
X
X
A004
Xebat, Iraq
36 19 11N 043 35 48E
36 13 25N 043 45 12E
X
X
X
X
A005
Miran Shah, Pakistan
33 04 10N 069 55 35E
32 55 36N 070 09 14E
X
X
X
X
A006
Ta'izz, Yemen
13 47 38N 043 55 13E
13 30 50N 044 11 22E
X
X
X
X
A007
Marib, Yemen
15 34 55N 045 14 02E
15 20 59N 045 28 10E
X
X
X
X
A008
Ad Duayn (Addien), Sudan
11 30 35N 026 04 34E
11 22 59N 026 11 17E
X
X
X
X
A009
Al Gedaref, Sudan
14 07 19N 035 15 03E
13 57 20N 035 29 21E
X
X
X
X
A010
Malakal, South Sudan
09 37 58N 031 36 24E
09 26 35N 031 44 27E
X
X
X
X
A011
Alexandria Northeast, Egypt
31 22 35N 029 41 24E
31 05 35N 030 13 15E
X
X
X
X
A012
Alexandria Southeast, Egypt
31 05 35N 029 29 00E
30 49 33N 029 57 05E
X
X
X
X
A013

OPTION CITY

Gejiu, China
23 26 31N 103 05 31E
23 18 03N 103 12 44E
X
X
X
X
A014
Golmud, China
36 29 41N 094 43 57E
36 18 30N 095 04 45E
X
X
X
X
A015
Gyangze, China
28 58 37N 089 32 30E
28 51 41N 089 43 52E
X
X
X
X
A016
Guilin/Lingui, China
25 26 50N 110 13 22E
25 04 09N 110 27 17E
X
X
X
X
A017
Lingui, China
25 18 28N 110 05 25E
25 08 50N 110 13 22E
X
X
X
X
A017
Guilin/Lingui Airport
25 15 12N 109 59 55E
25 11 16N 110 05 25E
X
X
X
X
A017
Haifeng, China
23 02 27N 115 14 23E
22 54 14N 115 25 03E
X
X
X
X
A018
Hami, China
42 56 22N 093 20 16E
42 45 01N 093 41 56E
X
X
X
X
A019
Hengyang, China
26 57 39N 112 31 53E
26 46 43N 112 43 39E
X
X
X
X
A020

8.0.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:

DELIVERABLE
STANDARD
METRIC

Quality Control Plan – PWS 3.3 Implements procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of analysis errors/defects

Peformance consistent with government- approved quality control (QC) program, which meets the data requirements and format of the UTP Field Guide.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and UTP Field Guide Specifications followed to result in 100% compliance.

Work Plan - PWS 6.3 Schedule of submittal deliveries

Schedule allows sufficient time to accomplish all items specified in the contract PWS and UTP Field Guide.
Approval (with revisions as necessary). Finalized NLT 10 days after schedule first submitted.

Monthly Report PWS 6.8 Monthly status reports

Content shall include the current status of work (including percent completed), and any delays, analysis extraction issues, and/or quality control issues.
No deviation. Content includes one hundred percent (100%) of standard information requested.

Data Set Review PWS 6.0 Data set delivered.

Data set meets the requirements and format of the UTP Field Guide
No deviation from the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and UTP Field Guide Specifications.

Revised Data set PWS 6.4

Revised data set delivered.

Data set revised and all errors/defects identified by the government during the review stage corrected.
No deviation. One hundred percent (100%) of all errors/defects identified by the government during review corrected.

Final Data set PWS 6.4

Timely Delivery of Final data set

Data set delivered within schedule provided in Contractor’s Work Plan. Any adjustment to schedule have been identified early and approved by the project monitor.
Data sets are delivered within the established delivery dates.

Data set Quality PWS 6.3 Quality of delivered data set

Geospatially correct and projected within correct coordinate system as per contract requirements. Root cause analyses/Non-conformances reported & Accepted (Insurance that all data sets, digital pictures, and supporting document files are supplied to completely support all findings and conclusions of the final data set per UTP Field Guide.)
UTP Finishing Routine results in accepable data set. Accuracy and supporting documentation represent 100% Compliance.
AT/OPSEC Training PWS 6.10 and Standard Clause Texts
Required training conducted and train-ing plan for replacement individuals
All (100%) personnel received the required briefing

9.0 Attachments: 22 CDRLs, A, B, and C.

ATTACHMENT A: AT/OPSEC STANDARD CONTRACT PROVISION AND CLAUSE TEXT:

1. "All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities, controlled access areas, or require network access, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. Upon request, the contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. AT Level I awareness training is available at the following website: http://jko.jten.mil/courses/atl1/launch.html; or it can be provided by the RA ATO in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

2a. “The contractor and all sub-contractors employees will be issued a CAC only if duties involve one of the following: (1) Both physical access to a DoD facility and access, via logon, to DoD networks on-site or remotely; (2) Remote access, via logon, to a DoD network using DoD-approved remote access procedures; or (3) Physical access to multiple DoD facilities or multiple non-DoD federally controlled facilities on behalf of the DoD on a recurring basis for a period of 6 months or more. At the discretion of the sponsoring activity, an interim CAC may be issued based on a favorable review of the FBI fingerprint check and a successfully scheduled NACI at the Office of Personnel Management.”

4. "The contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall receive a brief/training (provided by the RA) on the local suspicious activity reporting program. This locally developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the project manager, security representative or law enforcement entity. This training shall be completed within 30 calendar days of contract award and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance with the results reported to the COR NLT 5 calendar days after the completion of the training."

5. "All contractor employees with access to a government info system must be registered in the Army Training Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) at commencement of services, and must successfully complete the DOD Information Assurance Awareness prior to access to the information systems and then annually thereafter in accordance with personnel security standards listed in AR 25-2 (Information Assurance), an appropriate background investigation will be conducted prior to accessing the government information systems."

6. "The Contractor shall develop an OPSEC SOP/Plan within 90 days of contract award. The OPSEC SOP/Plan must be reviewed and approved by the RA OPSEC Officer. The SOP/Plan will include the government's critical information, why it needs to be protected, where it is located, who is responsible for it and how to protect it. In addition, the contractor shall identify an individual who will be an OPSEC Coordinator."

7. "All new contractor employees will complete Level I OPSEC Training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. Additionally, all contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training. OPSEC awareness training is available at the following websites: https://www.iad.gov/ioss/ or http://www.cdse.edu/catalog/operations-security.html; or it can be provided by the RA OPSEC Officer in presentation form which will be documented via memorandum."

8. "All contractor employees and associated sub-contractor employees must complete the DoD IA awareness training before issuance of network access and annually thereafter. All contractor employees working IA/IT functions must comply with DoD and Army training requirements in DoDD 8570.01, DoD 8570.01-M and AR 25-2 within six months of employment."

15. "The Contractor must pre-screen Candidates using the E-verify Program (http://www.uscis.gov/e-verify) website to meet the established employment eligibility requirements. The Vendor must ensure that the Candidate has two valid forms of Government issued identification prior to enrollment to ensure the correct information is entered into the E-verify system. An initial list of verified/eligible Candidates must be provided to the COR no later than 3 business days after the initial contract award."

17. "All new contractor employees will complete annual Threat Awareness and Reporting Program (TARP) Training provided by a Counterintelligence Agent, IAW AR 381-12. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor and subcontractor employee(s) or a memorandum for the record, to the COR or to the contracting officer (if a COR is not assigned), within 5 calendar days after completion of training. Authorized web-based TARP training for CAC card holders is available at the following website: https://www.us.army.mil/suite/page/655474" ATTACHMENT B: Tentative Work Schedules

New Work larger to medium cities:

Issuance of Project: Within 10-days “Kick-Off” Meeting via conference call.

D Date

Work to commence at contractor’s facility (Production Start Date - "Kick-Off Meeting")

D + 30

Progress report of completed work and challenges encountered

D + 60

Progress report of completed work and challenges encountered

D + 90

Progress report of completed work and challenges encountered

D + 120

First submittal of final product delivery due to AGC (at Contractor site as necessary)

Progress report of completed work and challenges encountered

D + 151 AGC QA review of First Submittal completed (May be adjusted due to priority schedule)

D + 161

Adjustments to Final as appropriate by Contractor and delivery to AGC D + 170

Completion date for UTP dataset work

New work medium and smaller cities:

Issuance of Project: Within 10-days “Kick-Off” Meeting via conference call.

D Date

Work to commence at contractor’s facility (Production Start Date - "Kick-Off Meeting")

D + 30

Progress report of completed work and challenges encountered

D + 60

First submittal of final product delivery due to AGC (at Contractor site as necessary)

D + 75 AGC QA review of First Submittal completed (May be adjusted due to priority schedule) D + 85

Adjustments to Final as appropriate by Contractor and delivery to AGC

D + 90

Completion date for UTP dataset work

NOTE: All dates subject to change with notification by AGC; the ultimate required delivery date will be the gauge for intermediate milestones. Dates given are in calendar days not business days.

Criteria for city sizes:

Small <350 sqkm Medium 350 to 1500 sqkm Large >1500 sqkm

Mega-city >2500sqkm or population > 5,000,000 PWS_UTPTask-65-170111.doc page 7 of 10

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .