W56HZV19R0101-0001.pdf

PDF 314 KB Posted Apr 3, 2020

Attached to: Stryker Medium Caliber Weapon System
Solicitation number: W56HZV-19-R-0101
Issued by: Department of the Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 31, 2023

This is a request for proposal for a Stryker Medium Caliber Weapon System. The proposal seeks the production and integration of 269 medium caliber weapon systems onto Stryker vehicles over a five year period, with an option for a sixth year. Offerors must submit proposals by June 8, 2020 in six volumes, and must also submit armor coupons and a production representative system sample. The resulting contract will be a requirements contract with firm fixed price and cost plus fixed fee contract types. The contract will be awarded as a single award based on a best value determination evaluating technical, past performance, price, and small business factors. The affordability threshold is $695.2 million. Production and deliveries are expected to occur over multiple ordering periods. The Army Materiel Command TACOM Life Cycle Management Command will administer the contract.

The document provides requirements for proposal preparation and submission, contract type and award, pricing, production, deliverables, and administration.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
W56HZV19R0101-0008.pdf	PDF	Sep 10, 2020
15-5539.txt	TXT text file	Aug 17, 2020
99-0316.txt	TXT text file	Aug 17, 2020
W56HZV19R0101.pdf	PDF	Feb 3, 2020
Attachment 0002 - DD254 W56HZV-19-R-0101 MCWS RFP.pdf	PDF	Feb 3, 2020

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

Cost Plus Fixed Fee

0001 2020APR03

W56HZV

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

JUSTIN STONER

EMAIL: JUSTIN.D.STONER.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56HZV-19-R-0101

2020FEB03

X 2020AUG10 12:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 104

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: JUSTIN STONER

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-AI/(586)764-0418

Type of Contract 1: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Type of Contract 2: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: System Acquisition Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of this amendment is to make the changes listed below. Unless otherwise noted, all solicitation information, terms, and conditions remain unchanged and in full effect.

The proposal and PRSS submission response date has been extended by 63 days, from 8 June 2020 to 10 August 2020.

Section A Changes:

Previous Language:

A.6.2 Delivery Orders.

A.6.2.1 Delivery order 0001 has an anticipated award date of 04 January 2021. This order shall consist of the production and delivery of

86 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles, Risk Management Testing, Operator Manuals, and Field Level Maintenance Manuals. Risk Management

Testing will be conducted at APG from January 2021 through October 2021. The anticipated delivery of the first production vehicle is on or about 01 January 2022. Subsequent deliveries shall consist of three vehicles in February, five vehicles in March, ten vehicles each month from April through October, and seven vehicles in November 2022.

A.6.2.2 Delivery order 0002 has an anticipated award date of 01 April 2021 and will consist of Interim Contractor Logistic Support(ICLS) for the initial 86 production vehicles and Technical Manual Verification and Authorization.

A.6.2.3 Delivery order 0003 has an anticipated award date of 08 November 2021. This order shall consist of the production and delivery of 83 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles and New Equipment Training (NET) and fielding for the initial order of 86 vehicles. The

Government anticipates the contractor delivering the first three vehicles in early November 2022. Subsequent deliveries shall consist of ten vehicles each month from December 2022 through July 2023.

A.6.2.4 Delivery order 0004 has an anticipated award date of 05 April 2023. This order shall consist of the production and delivery of

42 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles, Engineering Improvements, ICLS and NET and fielding for the 83 vehicles produced under Order

0003, and Technical Manual Re-Verification and Authorization. The Government anticipates the delivery of ten vehicles per month in

April, May, June, and July 2024 with the final two vehicles to be delivered in August of 2024.

A.6.2.5 Delivery order 0005 has an anticipated award date of 01 May 2023 and shall consist of NET and fielding for vehicles provided under orders 0004 and 0006.

A.6.2.6 Delivery Order 0006 has an anticipated award date of 05 April 2024. This order shall consist of the production and delivery of

41 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles and ICLS for the 83 vehicles produced under this order and order 0004. The Government anticipates the delivery of ten vehicles per month in April, May, June, and July 2025 with the final vehicle to be delivered in August of 2025.

A.6.2.7 Delivery Order 0007 has an anticipated award date of 02 August 2024. This order shall consist of the production and delivery of

17 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles and ICLS for the 83 vehicles produced under orders 0004 and 0006. The Government anticipates the delivery of nine vehicles in August and eight vehicles in September of 2025

Updated Language:

A.6.2 Anticipated Delivery Order Schedule and Estimated Quantities. Subject to change based on requirements and delivery order award.

A.6.2.1 Delivery order 0001 has an anticipated award date of 04 January 2021. This order will consist of the production and delivery of

86 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (CLIN 0011), Risk Management Testing (0071), Initial COTS Operator Manual (CLIN 0021), Operator

Manual (CLIN 0031), and Field Level Maintenance Manual (CLIN 0041). Risk Management Testing will be conducted at APG from January 2021 through October 2021. Delivery of the first production vehicle is January 2022. Subsequent deliveries will consist of three vehicles in February, five vehicles in March, ten vehicles each month from April through October, and seven vehicles in November 2022.

A.6.2.2 Delivery order 0002 has an anticipated award date of 01 April 2021 and will consist of Interim Contractor Logistic Support

(ICLS) (CLIN 0091) for the initial 86 production vehicles and Technical Manual Verification and Authentication (CLIN 0112).

A.6.2.3 Delivery order 0003 has an anticipated award date of 08 November 2021. This order will consist of the production and delivery of 83 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (CLIN 0011) and New Equipment Training (NET) (CLIN 0112) and fielding (CLIN 0112) for the initial order of 86 vehicles. The Government anticipates the contractor delivering the first three vehicles in early November 2022.

Subsequent deliveries will consist of ten vehicles each month from December 2022 through July 2023.

A.6.2.4 Delivery order 0004 has an anticipated award date of 05 April 2023. This order will consist of the production and delivery of

42 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (CLIN 0013), Engineering Improvements (CLIN 0113), ICLS (CLIN 0093)and NET and fielding (CLIN

0113) for the 83 vehicles produced under Order 0003, and Technical Manual Re-Verification and Authentication (CLIN 0113). Delivery of ten vehicles per month in April, May, June, and July 2024 with the final two vehicles to be delivered in August of 2024.

2 104

W56HZV-19-R-0101

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

A.6.2.5 Delivery order 0005 has an anticipated award date of 01 May 2023 and will consist of NET (CLIN 0113) and fielding (CLIN 0113) for vehicles provided under order 0004.

A.6.2.6 Delivery Order 0006 has an anticipated award date of 05 April 2024. This order will consist of the production and delivery of

41 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (CLIN 0014) and ICLS (CLIN 0094) for the 83 vehicles produced under order 0004. Delivery of ten vehicles per month in April, May, June, and July 2025 with the final vehicle to be delivered in August of 2025.

A.6.2.7 Delivery Order 0007 has an anticipated award date of 02 August 2024. This order will consist of the production and delivery of

17 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (CLIN 0014) and ICLS (CLIN 0094) for the 83 vehicles produced under order 0006. Delivery of nine vehicles in August and eight vehicles in September of 2025.

Section B Changes:

Previous Language:

B.2.2 Minimum and Maximum. The minimum quantity for each order shall be 15 vehicles, unless otherwise waived by the contractor or the

Top-Up provision in B.2.3 applies. The maximum quantity for an individual order shall be 170 vehicles, while the maximum order for an ordering period shall be 170 vehicles.

Updated Language:

B.2.2 Minimum and Maximum. The minimum quantity for each order shall be 1 vehicle, unless otherwise waived by the contractor or the Top-

Up provision in B.2.3 applies. The maximum quantity for an individual order shall be 170 vehicles, while the maximum order for an ordering period shall be 170 vehicles.

Section C Changes:

Previous Language:

C.6.9.12 The contractor shall remove all backdoors and maintenance hooks from the MCWS application prior to delivery to the Government.

Updated Language:

C.6.9.12 The contractor shall remove all backdoors and maintenance hooks from the MCWS application prior to delivery to the Government.

Maintenance hooks and backdoors are defined as unauthenticated processes or shortcuts created during software development that allow developers access. Unified Software Loader (USL) in not considered a backdoor or maintenance hook.

Previous Language:

C.12.8.13 Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) Technical Manual. The contractor shall create and deliver a BDAR technical manual

IAW MIL-STD-40051-2 and MIL-HDBK-1222. The contractor shall develop expedient methods of repair specific to MCWS-unique components on the MCWS-equipped Stryker. The contractor shall investigate and evaluate use of high performance glues, sealants, or other joining or forming compounds for use in expedient repair. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate materials for MCWS-unique components through controlled exchange, commercial supply, and cannibalization of components from other systems likely to be found in forward operating areas. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate materials for MCWS-unique components likely to be found in forward operating areas. The contractor shall investigate expedient operating methods and actions for MCWS-equipped Stryker vehicle mobility, firepower, and communications operations. The contractor shall develop recommended BDAR kit contents and kit packaging for MCWS-equipped Stryker Crew and Field Level Maintenance. The contractor shall prepare draft BDAR kit purchase description or specification. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate tools and support equipment for MCWS-equipped Strykers from materials likely to be found in forward operating areas (CDRL L015).

Updated Language:

C.12.8.13 Battle Damage Assessment and Repair (BDAR) Technical Manual. The contractor shall create and deliver a BDAR technical manual

IAW MIL-STD-40051-2, MIL-HDBK-1222, and CDRL L015 as specified in the delivery order. The contractor shall develop expedient methods of repair specific to MCWS-unique components on the MCWS-equipped Stryker. The contractor shall investigate and evaluate use of high performance glues, sealants, or other joining or forming compounds for use in expedient repair. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate materials for MCWS-unique components through controlled exchange, commercial supply, and cannibalization of components from other systems likely to be found in forward operating areas. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate materials for MCWS-unique components likely to be found in forward operating areas. The contractor shall investigate expedient operating methods and actions for MCWS-equipped Stryker vehicle mobility, firepower, and communications operations. The contractor shall develop recommended BDAR kit contents and kit packaging for MCWS-equipped Stryker Crew and Field Level Maintenance. The contractor shall prepare draft BDAR kit purchase description or specification. The contractor shall prepare and document potential alternate tools and support equipment for MCWS-equipped Strykers from materials likely to be found in forward operating areas.

Previous Language:

C.14.1.3 The STS portion of this contract shall be priced out on a Cost Plus Fixed Fee basis. The contractor shall review the proposed scope of work in each draft WD and shall provide the estimated hours for support and ODC to complete that effort within 10 business days of the request for proposal and draft WD. Estimated labor hours will be funded at the composite hourly rate for each option year. All material, or ODCs, required to perform STS efforts will be negotiated on a case by case basis. The contractor shall include a milestone chart and itemized projected man hour and material expenditures, with cost information to the PCO. The Government will use this information to determine reasonableness of the hours and cost proposed.

Updated Language:

C.14.1.3 The STS portion of this contract shall be priced out on a Cost Plus Fixed Fee basis, except for Risk Management Testing (RMT) and Production Verification Testing (PVT). RMT and PVT shall be priced on a Firm Fixed Price basis. The contractor shall review the proposed scope of work in each draft WD and shall provide the estimated hours for support and ODC to complete that effort within 10 business days of the request for proposal and draft WD. Estimated labor hours will be funded at the composite hourly rate for each ordering period. All material, or ODCs, required to perform STS efforts will be negotiated on a case by case basis. The contractor shall include a milestone chart and itemized projected man hour and material expenditures, with cost information to the PCO. The Government will use this information to determine reasonableness of the hours and cost proposed.

The following have been added to Section C:

3 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.14.2.14 The contractor shall support integration of existing US Army Tactical Engagement Simulation System (TESS) and support the utilization of the currently fielded Multiple Laser Engagement System (MILES).

C.14.4.13.1 PVT Coupon Testing

The contractor shall provide 45 coupons per armor recipe for testing during PVT. The contractor shall provide a SME to support coupon testing for the duration of the testing. Coupon testing is estimated to last up to 6 weeks.

Section E Changes:

Previous Language:

E.3.1.4 Welding Procedures

The contractor shall develop and deliver Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS) (CDRL P009, Welding Procedure Specifications), Weld

Procedure Qualification Records (PQRs) (CDRL P010), and Welder Qualification Test Records (WQTR) (CDRL P011) in accordance with welding standard(s) as specified in Welding Standards Table 1 (Attachment 0053). The contractor shall follow the appropriate welding standard(s) scope to qualify the welding and weld repair procedures. A weld repair is defined as the act of restoring the functional capability of a defective article in a manner that precludes compliance of the article with applicable drawings or specifications. Weld repairs are generally changes to an unacceptable end product to make it acceptable in accordance with original functional requirements. The contractor shall prepare weld samples and test the weld procedure for qualification in accordance with the appropriate standard(s).

Changes to the Weld Repair Procedures, WPS, PQR, or WQTR that requires requalification, shall be resubmitted as part of the respective

CDRL. The use of pre-qualified weld joints as specified in American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 does not preclude submittal of welding procedures.

Updated Language:

E.3.1.4 Welding Procedures

For all welds that are utilized for the structure of the MCWS, the contractor shall develop and deliver Welding Procedure Specifications

(WPS)(CDRL P009, Welding Procedure Specifications), Weld Procedure Qualification Records (PQRs) (CDRL P010), and Welder Qualification

Test Records (WQTR) (CDRL P011) in accordance with welding standard(s) as specified in Welding Standards Table 1 (Attachment 0053). The contractor shall follow the appropriate welding standard(s) scope to qualify the welding and weld repair procedures. A weld repair is defined as the act of restoring the functional capability of a defective article in a manner that precludes compliance of the article with applicable drawings or specifications. Weld repairs are generally changes to an unacceptable end product to make it acceptable in accordance with original functional requirements. The contractor shall prepare weld samples and test the weld procedure for qualification in accordance with the appropriate standard(s). Changes to the Weld Repair Procedures, WPS, PQR, or WQTR that requires requalification, shall be resubmitted as part of the respective CDRL. The use of pre-qualified weld joints as specified in American

Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 does not preclude submittal of welding procedures.

Previous Language:

E.12.3.2 The prime contractor shall be responsible for itself and its subcontractors to produce and maintain process control data, pre-production approval testing, ongoing quality control and quality control testing, and test reports. This information shall be available upon Government request.

Replaced with:

E.12.3.2 The prime contractor shall be responsible for itself and its subcontractors to produce and maintain process control data, conduct pre-production approval testing, conduct ongoing quality control and quality control testing, and test reports. This information shall be available upon Government request.

Section F Changes:

The following has been added to Section F:

F.1 DELIVERY SCHEDULE FOR DELIVERY ORDERS

(a) Delivery under this contract must conform to the required schedule specified below, unless acceleration is acceptable.

(b) DEFINITIONS:

(1) DAYS means the number of calendar days after the date of contract award when the contractor must deliver the stated quantity (QTY) of supplies.

(2) DELIVERY is defined as follows:

FOB Origin - Contractor is required to deliver its shipment as provided in FAR 52.247-29(a)(1)-(4) by the time specified in the individual contract; or

FOB Destination - Contractor is required to deliver its shipment as provided in FAR 52.247-34(a)(1)-(2) by the time specified in the individual contract. The contractor must take into consideration the length of time necessary to deliver its shipment to the destination designated in the contract, to ensure that the item reaches its destination by the time reflected in the contract.

(1) GOVERNMENT REQUIRED DELIVERY SCHEDULE:

(i) For the first Delivery Order under CLIN 0011, a ramp up shall be at a rate of 1 MCWS equipped Stryker 365 days after receipt of order (DARO), 3 per the second month, and 5 per the third month and will then continue at a rate of 10 per month. For subsequent delivery orders under CLIN 0011, delivery shall be at a rate of 10 MCWS equipped Strykers per month under CLIN 0011.

(ii) For CLINS 0012, 0013, 0014, 0015, and 0016, the first delivery of 10 MCWS equipped Strykers is due 365 days after receipt of order (DARO) and will continue at a rate of 10 per month.

(iii) For CLIN 0141 delivery is due in accordance with each CDRL.

(iv) For CLIN 0021 delivery is due 300 DARO.

(v) For CLINs 0031 and 0032, delivery is due 480 DARO.

(vi) For CLINs 0041 and 0042, delivery is due 665 DARO.

(vii) For CLINs 0051, 0052, 0053, 0054, 0055, and 0056, delivery is due 270 DARO.

(viii) For CLINs 0061, 0062, 0063, 0064, 0065, and 0066, delivery is due 270 DARO.

4 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(d) Accelerated delivery schedule is only acceptable, upon written approval from the PCO. Any accelerated deliveries shall be at no additional cost to the government.

Section J Changes:

The following CDRLS have been edited:

A011

C009

The following CDRL has been added:

A023

L046

The following Attachments have been edited:

The following Attachments have been added:

Section L changes:

Previous Language:

L.2.1.2 Production Representative System Sample (PRSS) Delivery

The Offeror shall deliver a PRSS in support of Volume 1 of its proposal. For this solicitation, a "Production Representative System

Sample" is defined as an asset that consists of a fully functional ICVVA1 platform and integrated Medium Caliber Weapon System (MCWS), which includes a fire control system, ammunition handling system, target acquisition systems, XM813 and Coaxial Machine Gun, which can undergo testing IAW Production Representative System Sample Test Plan (Attachment 0035). Vehicle subsystems will not be accepted as

Production Representative System Samples. See L.2.4 for the PRSS due date; see L.2.8 for delivery instructions.

Updated Language:

L.2.1.2 Production Representative System Sample (PRSS) Delivery

The Offeror shall deliver a PRSS in support of Volume 1 of its proposal. For this solicitation, a "Production Representative System

Previous Language:

L.4.1.1 As part of Volume 1, the Offeror shall provide a System overview of the proposed design for the Medium Caliber Weapon System

(MCWS) equipped Stryker. The Offeror may include text, photos, illustrations, and model/drawing extracts. The overview shall include subsystems and components. The overview shall identify the changes made to the GFM ICVV A1 and XM813 as part of the integration and proposed solution. Additionally, the system overview shall clearly identify all differences between the proposed configuration and the

Production Representative System Sample for all evaluated requirements. The system overview of the proposed configuration shall include the following: MCWS integrated weight summary by subsystem, turret armor configuration, hatch configuration, XM813 configuration, M240

Coax configuration, Ammunition Handling System (AHS) configuration, fire control system description, Vehicle Commander station, Primary

Optic Thermal Imaging System (TIS), Visual Imaging System (VIS), Laser Range Finder, Secondary Optic (if proposed), and Situational

Awareness Camera System.

Updated Language:

L.4.1.1 As part of Volume 1, the Offeror shall provide a System overview of the proposed design for the Medium Caliber Weapon System

Production Representative System Sample. The system overview of the proposed configuration shall include the following: MCWS integrated weight summary by subsystem, turret armor configuration, hatch configuration, XM813 configuration, M240 Coax configuration, Ammunition

Handling System (AHS) configuration, fire control system description, Vehicle Commander station, Primary Optic Thermal Imaging System

(TIS), Visual Imaging System (VIS), Laser Range Finder, Secondary Optic (if proposed), and Situational Awareness Camera System.

Previous Language:

L.4.1.2.2 Subfactor Tier 1 threshold requirements are mandatory performance requirements. The Tier 1 requirements that will be evaluated are defined in TAB 1 Tier 1 Evaluated" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements

Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037). Furthermore, though not evaluated, the Offeror must Self Certify to meet all Tier 1 Requirements in

5 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

TAB 2 Tier 1 Self-Certify" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements Compliance

Matrix (Attachment 0037). Failure to propose to meet Threshold performance for any Tier 1 defined in TAB 1 Tier 1 Evaluated" and TAB 2

Tier 1 Self-Certify" will be considered a deficiency in the proposal, and the offeror will be ineligible for award.

Updated Language:

L.4.1.2.2 Subfactor Tier 1 threshold requirements are mandatory performance requirements. The Tier 1 requirements that will be evaluated are defined in "TAB 1 Tier 1 Evaluated" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements

Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037). Furthermore, though not evaluated, the Offeror must Self Certify to meet Threshold for all Tier 1

Requirements in "TAB 2a-Tier 1 Self-Certify", and certify either "No Integration Impact" or Integration Impact-Complies with Threshold for all Tier 1 requirements in "Tab 2b-Tier 1 Baseline Impacts" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the

Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037). Failure to propose to meet Threshold performance for any Tier 1 defined in

"TAB 1 - Tier 1 Evaluated" and "TAB 2a-Tier 1 Self-Certify", or failure to propose "No Integration Impact" or "Integration Impact-

Complies with Threshold" in "Tab 2b-Tier 1 Baseline Impacts" will be considered a deficiency in the proposal, and the offeror will be ineligible for award.

Previous Language:

L.4.1.2.5 TAB 2 Tier 1 Self-Certify" requirements in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified

Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037), and TAB 5- Tier 4 Self Certify capabilities in the Requirements Compliance Matrix

(Attachment 0009) will not evaluated as part of the Technical Factor/Subfactor(s). However the Government reserves the right to consider this information for the purposes of consistency against the evaluated performance requirements and capabilities identified in Section

L.4.1.2.2 and L.4.1.2.3 above, and any other aspect of the offerors submission in response to this solicitation.

Updated Language:

L.4.1.2.5 "TAB 2a-Tier 1 Self-Certify" and "Tab 2b-Tier 1 Baseline Impacts" requirements in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix

(Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037), and "TAB 5- Tier 4 Self Certify" capabilities in the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) will not evaluated as part of the Technical Factor/Subfactor(s). However the

Government reserves the right to consider this information for the purposes of consistency against the evaluated performance requirements and capabilities identified in Section L.4.1.2.2 and L.4.1.2.3 above, and any other aspect of the offerors submission in response to this solicitation.

Previous Language:

L.4.2.1.2.2 Provide Operator and Maintenance Technical Manuals that resulted in Logistics Support Activity (LOGSA) authentication.

Updated Language:

L.4.2.1.2.2 Development and delivery of a Final Reproducible Copy (FRC) of both Operator and Maintenance Technical Manuals conforming to the content and format of military specification(s) and standard(s). A FRC shall be defined as a the final manuscript, reproducible copy, or electronic media delivery with all necessary changes and corrections incorporated, including final resolution of all comments and recommendations made as a result of a USG-led verification.

Previous Language:

L.4.2.1.3(o) If the submitted contract is for demonstrating past performance of Operator and Maintenance technical manuals, please provide the USG assigned Technical Manual number(s).

Updated Language:

L.4.2.1.3(o) If the submitted contract is for demonstrating past performance of Operator and Maintenance technical manuals, please provide the USG assigned Technical Manual number(s) , USG contract number and/or delivery order the FRC was delivered under, and evidence of acceptance of the FRC. Evidence may be in the form of a DD250, CDRL acceptance confirmation, or invoice acceptance.

Previous Language:

(Attachment 0009) and Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037) into the resultant contract and that its proposed MCWS meets all Threshold requirements listed in TAB 1 Tier 1 Evaluated" and TAB 2 Tier 1 Self-Certify" of both the Requirements Compliance

Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037). The statement shall acknowledge that the offeror's contractual Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (UNLASSIFIED Attachment 0048 and CLASSIFIED Attachment 0050) will be generated by updating the Government's Proposed Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (solicited as Attachment 0001) and the

Governments Proposed Classified Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (solicited as Attachment 0036) with inputs from the

Offerors proposed Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037), respectively; thereby replacing the Government's Proposed MCWS System Performance Specification Attachments (both UNCLASSIFIED and

CLASSIFIED solicited as Attachment 0001 and 0036, respectively). Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents must be fully explained; however, any such exceptions may be grounds for the Contracting

Officer to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process at any time, including before initial evaluation.

Updated Language:

6 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.4.5.3.1 A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the solicitation. The statement of acknowledgement shall specify that the Offeror agrees to incorporate all proposed performance (which includes all evaluated and offeror-certified performance) in the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment

0037) into the resultant contract The statement shall acknowledge that the offeror's contractual Stryker MCWS System Performance

Specification (UNLASSIFIED Attachment 0048 and CLASSIFIED Attachment 0050) will be generated by updating the Government's Proposed

Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (solicited as Attachment 0001) and the Governments Proposed Classified Stryker MCWS System

Performance Specification (solicited as Attachment 0036) with inputs from the Offerors proposed Requirements Compliance Matrix

(Attachment 0009) and Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037), respectively; thereby replacing the Government's

Proposed MCWS System Performance Specification Attachments (both UNCLASSIFIED and CLASSIFIED solicited as Attachment 0001 and 0036, respectively). Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents must be fully explained; however, any such exceptions may be grounds for the Contracting Officer to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process at any time, including before initial evaluation

Section M Changes:

Previous Language:

M.2 (f) The Offeror's proposal contains inconsistencies in the Technical Volume (see M.4.1.1.1.4) or between proposal volumes per M.3.4.

Updated Language:

M.2 (f) Reserved

Previous Language:

M.2 (i) The Offeror proposes to be non-compliant to any Tier 1 requirement(s) in TAB 1 - Tier 1 Evaluated" and TAB 2 - Tier 1 Self-

Certify" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment

0037).

Updated Language:

M.2 (i) The Offeror proposes to be non-compliant to any Tier 1 requirement(s) in "TAB 1 - Tier 1 Evaluated", "TAB 2a - Tier 1 Self-

Certify", and "Tab 2b-Tier 1 Baseline Impacts" in both the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and the Classified

Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037).

Previous Language:

M.4.1.1.3 As a requirement of this solicitation, all proposed performance (which includes both Evaluated and Self-Certify requirements/capabilities) as defined in column G of all TABS of the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and Classified

Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037) will be incorporated in the resultant contract as Stryker MCWS System Performance

Specification (Attachment 0048) and the Classified Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (Attachment 0050). See L.4.5.3.1.

Updated Language:

M.4.1.1.3 As a requirement of this solicitation, all proposed performance (which includes both Evaluated and offeror-certified performance) as defined in column G of all TABS of the Requirements Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0009) and Classified Requirements

Compliance Matrix (Attachment 0037) will be incorporated in the resultant contract as Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification

(Attachment 0048) and the Classified Stryker MCWS System Performance Specification (Attachment 0050). See L.4.5.3.1.

Previous Language:

M.3.4 The Government may conduct a crosswalk between the Offeror's proposal volumes to assess whether the Offeror submitted consistent proposal information as required by L.2.10. Any inconsistency between proposal volumes, which indicates the Offeror has an inherent misunderstanding of the requirements or an inability to perform the resultant contract, may result in an Offerors proposal being rejected, or impacting the Offeror evaluation of the non-price Factors (Technical, Past Performance, or Small Business Participation).

Updated Language:

Delete in its entirety.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

A.1 Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP Overview

A.1.1 The Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicle is a new Stryker variant required to address the capability gap identified within the Armys

Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs). This vehicle will be incorporated in the SBCT structure as a precision lethality capability to support suppression of dismounted infantry and defeat vehicle threats.

A.1.2 Project Management Office-Stryker Brigade Combat Team has taken innovative approaches to Army acquisition by focusing on delivering essential capabilities while under a significantly reduced timeline, as compared to traditional acquisition efforts. Their

7 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

achievements were accomplished by leveraging existing material solutions with proven capabilities coupled with new technologies to meet the requirements.

A.1.3 The Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC) has approved the purchase of 269 total Stryker Lethality 30mm ECP vehicles (3

SBCTs). Procurement beyond the three SBCTs will be revisited in future Program Objective Memorandum planning based on funding availability.

A.2 Solicitation and Contract Type

A.2.1 The resulting contract will be a Requirements contract and encompasses Manufacture/Integration, Systems Technical Support, Interim Contractor Logistic Support, and Integrated Product Support. The two primary contract types are Firm Fixed Price for

Manufacture/Integration and Cost Plus Fixed Fee for Systems Technical Support, Interim Contractor Logistics Support, and Integrated

Product Support.

A.2.2 After contract award, the Government may negotiate Cost Plus Incentive Fee arrangements for Interim Contractor Logistics Support.

A.2.3 Offerors shall submit proposals no later than 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on 8 June 2020 in six separate volumes in accordance with paragraph L.2.1. Offerors shall submit Armor Coupons and a Production Representative System Sample in accordance with

L.2.1.1 and L.2.1.2, respectively.

A.2.4 Information in this solicitation takes precedence over any information shared by the Government preceding the solicitation release, including but not limited to, information shared at Industry Day, draft solicitation, or though Q&As released prior to the issuance of this solicitation.

A.3 Proposal Evaluation

A.3.1 This solicitation is a full and open competition. The Government will utilize Best Value Trade-off Source Selection Procedures in order to determine the proposal with the best value to the Government. The Government intends to award a single contract.

A.3.2 The Government will evaluate offerors proposals based on the evaluation criteria and in accordance with Section M.4 of the RFP:

A.3.2.1 Technical Factor

A.3.2.2 Past Performance Factor

A.3.2.3 Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Factor

A.3.2.4 Small Business Participation Factor

A.4 Affordability

A.4.1 The affordability amount for this RFP is $695.2 million and is inclusive of production and integration of 269 Medium Caliber

Weapon Systems, Initial COTS Operator Manual, Operator Manual, Field Level Maintenance Manual, Risk Management Testing, and Production

Verification Testing. A proposal will be determined Affordable based on the proposed prices(s) for 001X, 002X, 003X, 004X, 007X, and

008X CLINS, as calculated within the VATEP Factor Workbook (Attachment 0052). No proposal, no matter how highly rated under the non-

VATEP Factors, will be considered for award if unaffordable.

A.5 Administrative

A.5.1 Eligibility requirements for award and Rejection Criteria are included in the RFP. Offerors should carefully review the RFP to ensure all requirements for award are met.

A.5.2 Armor Coupons and Production Representative System Samples shall remain in a secured location at the test site (Aberdeen Proving

Ground, MD) until after contract award. Unsuccessful offerors shall coordinate with the PCO to remove contractor property from the PRSS at APG.

A.5.3 Access to Classified, FOUO and Export Controlled Documents: All Offerors must have a valid facility clearance of SECRET or higher in order to respond to this RFP. See the DD Form 254 (Attachment 0001) for security requirements. For Export Controlled information, it is the responsibility of the Offeror, not the Government, to obtain the appropriate export licenses, or process the appropriate export license exemption, necessary for authorization to share information with foreign subcontractors.

A.5.4 Assertion of Restrictions: The offeror shall include in its proposal submission an Assertions of Restrictions IAW DFARS 252.227-

7017 and Attachment 0033 identifying , each of the following: Non-Commercial Technical Data, Non-Commercial Computer Software and

Software Documentation, Commercial Technical Data, and Commercial Computer Software and Software Documentation.

A.5.5 Offerors will have access to their respective test data throughout testing via Vision Digital Systems Library. A final Government test report will be provided to offerors after contract award.

Note: The Executive Summary is provided as a convenience to highlight the program requirements contained within the RFP. In the event of

8 104

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

any inconsistencies, the RFP requirements take precedence.

A.6 Notional Delivery Information

A.6.1 Deliveries or Performance. The following information is provided to assist contractors in the preparation of their proposal.

Specific information regarding deliveries will be provided in each delivery order following award.