W56HZV_17_R_0162_Questions_with_responses_10_OCT_2017_R5.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted

Attached to
Special tools
Solicitation number
W56HZV17R0162
Issued by

About this file

Industry Questions with Government responses

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W56HZV_17_R_0162_Questions_with_responses_11_OCT_2017_R6.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W56HZV17R0162-0004.pdf PDF
W56HZV17R0162-0003.pdf PDF
W56HZV17R0162-0002.pdf PDF
W56HZV17R0162-0001.pdf PDF
W56HZV17R0162.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1 Question # INDUSTRY INQUIRY GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

1Drawing 03002A5991 calls out FN7 as AA56032-10PTL for Epoxy Based Ink Marking, but not FED-STD color number. Note 6 calls out "...contrasting color..." since anodizing will be black would FED-STD-37875 (white) be acceptable?Yes, white is acceptable.
2Drawing 03002A5992 calls out FN3 as AA56032-10PTL for Epoxy Based Ink Marking, but not FED-STD color number. What color would be acceptable?Black is acceptable
3Drawing 03002A5992, Note #9 calls out maintenance activities with hardware requirements. Should these bolts and washers by added within the quote? If so what are the required quantities of each?Four sets each, per note 9b.
5On Drawing 03002A5993, the 5/8-11 hole should be free of any surface treatments anodize or conversion coating and only the four 8-32 holes receive conversion coating, is this correct?Correct
6To quote the identification markings outlined in note 4 on 03002A5991, note 1 on 03002A5992, and note 4 on 03002A5993, as etched within our CNC mill, is this considered an acceptable method for identification?Etched with CNC is acceptable

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .