RFP W52P1J-19-R-0076 AMD 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Cost Plus Fixed Fee

0001 2019DEC18

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

RICHARD T. DYBDAHL

EMAIL: RICHARD.T.DYBDAHL.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-19-R-0076

2019DEC18

X

X 2020JAN21 02:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 4

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: RICHARD T. DYBDAHL

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRI-VE/(309)782-5719

Type of Contract 1: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

AMD 0001

1. The purpose of AMD 0001 to Solicitation W52P1J-19-R-0076 is to update the issue and closing date and to make material changes in section's L and M:

Issued Closing

From : 2019DEC09 2020JAN10 1400 ET

To : 2019DEC18 2020JAN21 1400 ET

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

2 4

W52P1J-19-R-0076

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

AMD 0001

1. Updates occurred to EAGLE RFP language prior to Contracting Officer's review and posting. To delete prior language and replace the following paragraphs in Section L with the following:

L.4.1.3 A proposal is presumed to represent the Offerors best efforts to respond to the RFP. The Offeror must provide adequately detailed information that complies with the solicitation requirements, allows for meaningful review by the Government evaluators, and affirmatively demonstrates the merits of its proposal. The Offeror shall provide sufficient detail to substantiate the validity of all stated assertions and must not merely repeat the RFP requirements, but rather must provide convincing documentary evidence of how contract requirements will be met. Data not submitted with the proposal, but submitted previously, or presumed to be known (i.e., previous projects performed for the United States Government (USG)) will not be considered. Clarity and completeness are essential. It is the Offerors obligation to submit an unambiguous proposal that clearly reflects the Offerors intended technical approach and establishes cost credibility. If the use of new and innovative techniques is intended, the impact on cost must be explained. As another example, if a business policy decision to absorb a portion of the estimated cost was made, that approach must be stated within the proposal (including any associated calculations).

L.5.4.1.3 A proposal is presumed to represent the Offeror's best efforts in response to this RFP. If a business policy decision was made to absorb a portion of the estimated costs, that approach shall be stated within the Cost/Price proposal (including any associated calculations). The burden of persuasion as to the cost credibility rests with the Offeror.

L.5.4.1.6 The cost/price proposed must be consistent with the Offeror's Technical Proposal.

L.5.4.2.7 The Offeror's firm-fixed-price Transition-in proposal shall include all cost/price elements for performance from notice to proceed until full operational capability within the time allotted in the PWS. As this is a firm-fixed price portion of the overall effort, Offerors will not be able to adjust this price after award; therefore Offerors must perform this portion of the effort at the price proposed.

L.5.4.2.8 The Offerors FFP PMO proposal shall include all cost/price elements required for performance. Each Offeror should carefully consider the location, workload and any other factor(s) relevant to allow the Offeror to formulate the FFP structure in the most cost effective, efficient manner. As this is a FFP portion of the overall effort, Offerors will not be able to adjust this price after award;

therefore, Offerors must perform this portion of the effort at the price proposed.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0002 ***

3 4

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

AMD 0001

1. Updates occurred to EAGLE RFP language prior to Contracting Officer's review and posting. To delete prior language and replace the following paragraphs in Section M with the following:

Under paragraph M.4.1

STEP 2:

b. The Cost/Price Factor will be evaluated and will not be assigned a rating.

d. All proposals which are determined to have Substantial Confidence in Past Performance, an Acceptable rating in Small Business

Participation, with a realistic cost, will move to Step 3.

STEP 3: As stated in M.1.1, the Government will make an award to the responsible Offeror (IAW FAR 9.1) whose proposal complies with the

RFP requirements and is determined to be the lowest total evaluated priced proposal that is determined to be Technically Acceptable with

Substantial Confidence in Past Performance and an Acceptable rating in Small Business with a fair and reasonable Total Evaluated Price.

However, if all Offerors were assessed to have other than Substantial Confidence in Past Performance, the Government reserves the right to award to an Offeror with other than a Substantial Confidence rating in Past Performance. In that event, the Source Selection

Authority will consider all factors and make a best value award decision.

M.5.3 Cost/Price Factor:

M.5.3.1 The total evaluated price will be the total of the Offeror's submitted cost/price proposal as detailed in Attachment 0005 Cost

Price Matrix plus any Government identified probable cost adjustments as determined IAW FAR 15.404-1(d) Cost Realism Analysis. Price analysis shall be used to determine price reasonableness for the total evaluated price. Cost/Price proposals will not be assigned an adjectival rating. The proposal will be evaluated IAW FAR 15.404-1, Proposal Analysis Techniques. Only the offeror who is determined to be the lowest total evaluated priced proposal that is determined to be Technically Acceptable with Substantial Confidence in Past

Performance and an Acceptable rating in Small Business will be evaluated for price reasonableness. The total evaluated price shall not include discounts. If the Offeror shall choose to provide discounts throughout the performance of the contract, it will be documented in the CPARS annual ratings for Cost Control.

M.5.3.2 Cost Realism Analysis. Cost Realism is the process of independently reviewing and evaluating specific elements of the Offeror's proposed cost elements to determine the following: whether the estimated proposed cost elements are realistic for the work to be performed; whether the proposed cost elements reflect a clear understanding of the requirements; and whether the proposed cost elements are consistent with the unique methods of performance described in the Technical Proposal. Cost realism analysis shall be performed on cost reimbursement contracts to determine the probable cost of performance for each Offeror. The probable cost may differ from the proposed cost and should reflect the Government's best estimate of the cost of any contract that is likely to result from the Offeror's proposal.

M.5.3.2.1 The Government will evaluate cost CLINs for Cost Realism. Offerors are cautioned that the Government has concerns with the potential for post-award performance problems related to the cost CLINS if Offerors propose unrealistically low costs. Therefore, the

Government reserves the option of rejecting a proposal if, in the exercise of its judgment, it determines that an Offerors cost CLINS are unrealistically low, regardless of technical merit and/or evaluated costs. The magnitude of any necessary and appropriate Probable

Cost adjustments may be taken into consideration. For example, if as a result of the Cost Realism analysis it becomes clear to the

Government that any necessary upward Probable Cost adjustments are so substantial that they present an unacceptable risk

(notwithstanding an assessed rating of acceptable under the technical factor), the proposal may be rejected and not further considered for award. Therefore, failure of the Offeror to establish the credibility of its proposed cost CLINS may result in a Probable Cost adjustment being made to the costs proposed, and/or the proposal being rejected as unrealistically low and not further considered for award.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0002 ***

4 4