ATTACHMENT_3_TECHNICAL_QUALIFICATION_EVALUATION_REVISED_26_JUNE_2018.pdf

PDF 163 KB Posted

Attached to
REPAIR WATER LINES IN PARKING LOT 3H
Solicitation number
W52P1J18R5010
Issued by

About this file

Technical Qualification Evaluation Revised 26 June 2018

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION

PROJECT #2017-3523: Repair Water Lines in Parking Lot 3H

Evaluation shall be based upon the Contractor’s proposal. The proposal must demonstrate a thorough understanding of, and compliance with, the Scope of Work (SOW) and associated Request for Proposal (RFP) documents, and demonstrate the experience necessary to successfully complete all work set forth in the SOW. The technical evaluation shall be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. The ratings used and their descriptions are provided below. The Government is not required to request additional information from bidders and therefore considers the bidders’ package complete upon receipt.

Contractors shall take note and ensure bid packages are complete at the time of initial submission.

Incomplete bid packages that do not contain all the requested information or follow the specified format below can, at the discretion of the Government, be rated unacceptable.

The following are the minimum technical qualification requirements which must be addressed in the Contractor’s proposal and determined acceptable in order to be considered for award:

1) The Contractor or their sub-contractor, who performs the work shall have a minimum of five

(5) years of experience installing water distribution systems of a comparable size and scope.

The Contractor shall show five (5) separate project examples from five (5) different years, at least two (2) of which was accomplished within the last five (5) years. The Government defines comparable size as projects installing at least 1000 linear feet of water distribution line. At least two (2) of these projects shall involve the installation of HDPE pipe. At least one

(1) of these projects shall involve the installation of fire hydrant(s). Projects that meet multiple criteria will count towards each criteria.

a. Project data must include the following:

i. Contracting Entity: Private or Government

ii. Project Location and Distribution Pipe Material(s)

iii. Type of Water Distribution (Potable/Fire/Both)

iv. Firm Resume including but not limited to information stated above

v. Optional: Photographs of Project

2) The Designer of Record shall have a minimum of five (5) years of experience designing water distribution projects using AWWA standards that are comparable to the SOW in material, size, and scope. The Contractor shall provide five (5) projects from five (5) different years that meet this criteria that have been designed and stamped by the Designer of Record. At least two (2) of these projects shall have been accomplished in the last five (5) years. The Government defines comparable size as projects installing at least 1000 linear feet of water distribution line. At least two (2) of these projects shall involve the installation of HDPE pipe. At least one of these projects shall involve the connection of services to multiple buildings.

(1) of these projects shall involve connecting the distribution piping to an existing fire sprinkler system. Projects that meet multiple criteria will count towards each criteria. Project data must include the following:

a. Contracting Entity: Private or Government

b. Award Date

c. Project Location and Type of Water Distribution (Potable/Fire/Both)

d. Short description of the implementation of the standards referenced above

e. Resume of Firm or Individual including but not limited to information stated above

f. Optional: Photographs of Project

The Government shall evaluate the Contractor’s proposal against these minimum requirements in order to determine whether the proposal is technically acceptable or unacceptable. The proposal shall be evaluated against the following ratings:

RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Proposal meets all technical qualification requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet all technical qualification requirements of the solicitation.

File details come from the government source that posted it.