ACCENT_QUESTIONS_and_ANSWERS.XLSX
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ACCENT On Boarding 2
- Solicitation number
- W52P1J-18-R-0148
About this file
Amendment 0002 - Questions and Answers
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| SECTION | PAGE NUMBER | VERBIAGE | QUESTION | Government Answer | |
| 1 | Attachment 0001 and Instructions/ Evaluation Criteria, L.3.1M.4 | 53-54 | Offerors must submit proof of having a least one current DoD-PA certification for their proposed cloud service offering(s) (CSO(s)). |
RATINGS:
GO: Offerors provided at least one valid, current, and signed certification letter from the DoD-PA confirming certification.
| NO GO: Offerors did not provide at least one valid, current, and signed certification letter from the DoD-PA confirming certification | Please confirm that it is acceptable for Prime Contractors that are Systems Integrators to provide letters confirming the DOD PA’s for the Prime’s proposed cloud services on behalf of the Prime’s CSP (or CSP reseller) team member. | Who ever is going to do the work needs to show proof | ||||
| 2 | Section L | 53 | Would the government allow for the offeror to include Cover Pages for Sections I, II, and III of the response? | Yes | ||
| 3 | Section L | 53 | Would the government allow for the offeror to include a Table of Contents (TOC) for Sections I, II, and III of the response and not include the TOC in the page limitations? | Yes | ||
| 4 | L-17 52.216-3 & L.1.2 | 51 & 52 | RFP Section L-17 52.216-30 (b) states that “The offeror must specify separate fixed hourly rates in its offer that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit for each category of labor to be performed…” However, RFP section L.1.2 states “…No pricing information is requested at this time. Pricing will be determined at the TO level based on competition, or otherwise identified in the TOR.” | Please confirm that pricing information is not being requested and does not have to be submitted with the proposal for W52P1J-18-R-0148. | correct | |
| 5 | L-17 52.216-3 & L.1.2 | 51 & 52 | RFP Section L-17 52.216-30 (b) states that “The offeror must specify separate fixed hourly rates in its offer that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit for each category of labor to be performed…” | If labor category and rate information is required, please provide labor category names and descriptions for this bid. Also, please specify what section of the proposal shall contain this information. | This information would only be required at the task order level | |
| 6 | L.2.3 | Offerors shall use 8 1/2" x 11 page, using an Arial 12 font point size. | Does this font requirement extend to the entire Arial family of fonts? |
| Are offerors permitted to use a smaller size (such as 10) for tables and graphics? | No, "Arial" Font Size 12 | ||
| 7 | Please advise what is the DOD PA certification? | DoD-PA is an obtained Security classification based on various types of CLOUD hosting (IAAS, PAAS, SAAS) with various impact levels. |
(IAAS- Infrastructure as a service, PAAS- Platform as a Services, SAAS- Software as a Service)
| 8 | Section M.3 | 54 | M.3. Administrative Section and Section I will be Evaluated for Compliance:“The proposal submissions listed above as numbers 1-10 will be evaluated for compliance only. If the proposal does not meet the requirements, it may be rejected. Compliance is defined as providing all information as requested in a usable format.” | Can the government please clarify the reference to "...listed above as numbers 1-10...".? We are unable to find the numbered items in the RFQ or make a direct match to the items listed in Attachment 1. | The intention was to call out the 9 dashes under L.2.3 to be evaluated for compliance only |
| 9 | Previous Solicitation Q&A (09/14/2016) Item #3 | Item #3 Q&A 09/14/2016:“The US Government (USG) is not requiring full Teaming agreement documents. Any document that outlines the team structure is sufficient information to meet this requirement. Teaming agreements are one method of providing the outline of teaming structure. An organizational chart showing how teams will interact is sufficient or just a narrative explanation. A formal teaming agreement is not required.” | Would the government please reaffirm the above guidance given to vendors via Q&A as part of the original ACCENT procurement? | Affirm |
File details come from the government source that posted it.