Amendment 1 - Q and A.pdf

TO ALL BIDDERS AMENDMENT NO.

Date: 08/17/20

Project: Repair Hangar 12 for C-17 Avionics Shop

Project No.: FXSB172828

The following changes, additions, and/or clarifications shall be made to the specifications for the work of the above project.

This addendum forms a part of the contract documents and in case of a conflict between drawings, specifications, and this addendum, the addendum shall govern.

Bid Questions, received 8/4/20 via email from Capt. Koch

Blue was JBER responses, Red is Jacobs’ responses.

1. Please confirm that the items mentioned to be relocated in the Key Notes on Sheet A-02 are from building 8559.

Confirmed, relocations are from building 8559.

2. Please provide enough information about 8559 to determine distance of the move and if there are any obstacles that will need to be removed before moving items out or stairways needed. It is approximately 4 miles from 8559 to the project site, with an airfield fence on both ends. 8559 is a single level building. Site visit to 8559 or video will be made available.

3. The following items are not listed on Sheet A-0.2 as being relocated. Are these all part of

Option 2? Jacobs Response:

These should all be shown to be relocated.

a. (1 & 2 of 2) 28”Dx60”Wx65”H Blue AWP/AWM W/ WHLS

b. +/- 30”x30” Mobile CPU Keybrd. Mont.

c. Tool Box 24”Dx75”W w/ WHLS. & WD. Top

d. 30”Dx40”Wx32”H 1-Red Drwr. Cab.

e. 30”Dx30”Wx60”H 1-Blue Drwr. Cab.

f. 30”Dx30”Wx33”H Secured Storage

g. 24”Dx75”W Tool Box W/WHLS. & WD. Top (two shown on drawings, both say

1 of 1)

h. 29”Dx40”Wx40”H Spectrun 9130 Resistors W/ CATE

i. Two (2) 22”Dx40”Wx40”H Spectrum 9130 W/ CATE

j. 29”Dx40”Wx47”H Spectrun 9130 Resistors W/ CATE

4. A-0.2 Key Notes 11 & 12 call out the wrong sheet number and 11 calls out the wrong detail. FYI Keynote 11 should reference Detail 18/A-.06. Keynote 12 should reference Detail 14/A- .06

5. A-0.4 Detail 2, Section B shouldn’t have the spill containment pallet in this view (older design location if layout shown on A-0.1 is correct). FYI Correct. Keynote 4 and image should be removed.

6. For the paired doors will there be rim exits with removable mullions or mortise lock with flush both on non-active leaf?

Mortise lock w/ flush bolt.

7. M-1.0 Shows FC-1 twice in Detail 2. Which one is FC-2?

Concur, the FC unit located inside the Open Office space is FC-2.

8. Keyed Note #6 is missing from Detail 2 on sheet M-1.1.

Concur, key note #5 should be key note #6 and key note #5 should be disregarded.

9. Keyed Notes #7 & #8 on sheet M-1.1 are referencing CU-1 & CU-2 in the past tense. Please confirm these are to be provided.

Concur, these items should be provided.

10. M-6.0 references HP-1 & HP-2. Please confirm these are the same as CU-1 & CU-2.

Concur, HP-1 is the same as CU-1 and HP-2 is the same as CU-2.

11. Is it possible to have a photo of the roof area where CU-1 & CU-2 or HP-1 & HP-2 will be located?

Photos attached

12. Is it possible to have a photo of the existing CU near this location as indicated on sheet M-1.1? Photos attached

13. Sheet P-2.0 shows a different layout than other plan views. Please confirm the layout on

A-0.1 is correct.

Confirmed – A-0.1 shows the latest equipment and furniture layout.

14. Sheet E-1.0 Keyed Note #2 mentions, “Air National Guard Engineering Technical Letter 15-01-05 Electrical and Communications Engineering from Existing Telecommunication Room to Work Area Outlet”. Should this letter be made available?

This ETL is publicly available as part of the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) and can be found via web search (search ANG ETL 15-01-05).

15. Bid Inquiry: SECTION 284621.11 paragraph 2.1 A Says that the new components must be compatible with and operate as an extension of the existing system. The rest of the paragraphs lists every fire alarm manufacturer available. In order to use compatible devices for the existing fire alarm system is we need to know the existing manufacturer and model of the FA panel. Can you please provide that information?

Manufacturer is Honeywell. I was unable to locate the model, but a picture is attached.

16. Has an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis, Short Circuit Study or, Coordination Study been performed for this building? If these have been performed, can we see the documentation?

None of these studies has been performed to our knowledge.