Attachment 0004 - PPEG Form.pdf
PDF 325 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AMCOM FLEET MANAGEMENT CONTRACT
- Solicitation number
- W31P4Q-21-R-0029
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire template for a federal contractor and a solicitation notice for fleet management services. The past performance evaluation questionnaire is a template for respondents to provide feedback on a contractor's previous work. It includes sections for contractors to provide identifying information and for past clients to rate performance on factors such as compliance, project management, timeliness, and customer satisfaction.
The related solicitation notice is for fleet management services at Fort Bliss, Texas and Fort Sill, Oklahoma. It will cover one-base year and four one-year options plus a six-month extension. Services include planning, analysis, establishment, and sustainment of wholesale forward supply activities. The solicitation is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses and will be awarded using the Army's Best Value process. Proposals are due in early January 2021. The Army Materiel Command Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2-101 and FAR 3.104
D-1
APPENDIX D
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
Contractor: Contract No:
Subcontract No. (if applicable):
POC:
Title:
(Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)
(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
D-2
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title: Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E- mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Good
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
D-3
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
D-4
Acceptable
Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
D-5
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .