Attachment 13 update past performance questionnaire unlimited distro.pdf

PDF 351 KB Posted

Attached to
12 Gauge Breaching, M1030 (AA54) Ammunition Cartridges
Solicitation number
W15QKN24R0034
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) W15QKN24R0034 for the production of Cartridge, 12 Gauge, Breaching M1030 ammunition. The U.S. Army Contracting Command - New Jersey is conducting a competitive source selection and is requesting past performance information from the Offeror's points of contact. The questionnaire evaluates the Offeror's performance in areas such as compliance with specifications, project management, timeliness of deliveries, cost control, and customer satisfaction. Respondents are asked to provide a rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence, along with a rationale for each rating. The completed questionnaire is to be returned to the Contracting Officer by April 2, 2024.

The related federal contract opportunity is for the production of the 12 Gauge Breaching M1030 ammunition, which is compatible with the Mossberg Models 500/590, Remington 870, and Benelli M1014 shotguns. The U.S. Army Contracting Command - New Jersey is issuing the RFP W15QKN-24-R-0034 on behalf of the Office of the Program Manager Maneuver Ammunition Systems. The Government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price Requirements contract with five one-year ordering periods. The estimated total quantity to be purchased is 1,000,000 rounds, with a maximum contractor obligation of 1,680,000 rounds.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W15QKN24R0034-0002.pdf PDF
W15QKN24R0034-0003.pdf PDF
W15QKN24R0034Amendment0001.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

21 March 2024

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF

Maneuver Ammunition Close Combat Center (CCNJ-MC)

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP)

W15QKN24R0034

Dear Sir / Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command – New Jersey (ACC‐NJ) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the

Offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local Government or commercial Contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification

System [NAICS] 332992. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to either Zachary Sinon, Contract Specialist, Zachary.a.sinon.civ@army.mil and

Courtney‐Lynn Fox, Contracting Officer, Courtney‐lynn.t.fox.civ@army.mil, no later than 2:00PM

Eastern Time, 2 April 2024. Submit your completed questionnaire to Zachary Sinon, Contract Specialist, Zachary.a.sinon.civ@army.mil and Courtney‐Lynn Fox, Contracting Officer, Courtney‐ lynn.t.fox.civ@army.mil

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at 520‐669‐

8443, Courtney‐lynn.t.fox.civ@army.mil.

Sincerely, Courtney‐Lynn Fox

Contracting Officer

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND – NEW JERSEY

PICATINNY ARSENAL, NEW JERSEY 07806-5000

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ SubContract No. (if applicable):_________________________________ POC:________________________

Title:________________________ (Name) (E.G. PCO / ACO / TM)

_____________________________________________________________________ (Agency, Telephone No., E‐mail Address & Fax Number)

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal Contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow‐up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does or notify the Contracting Officer at Courtney‐lynn.t.fox.civ@army.mil. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets Contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. The Offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets Contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. The Offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some Contractual requirements. Serious problems with Contractor performance were experienced for which the Contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The Offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most Contractual requirements. Serious problems with

Contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The Offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor / Company Name / Division:

Address:

Program Identification / Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E‐mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

*Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification

Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost

Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________

Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

Address:

E‐mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .