W15QKN17R0023-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2017NOV21

W15QKN

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - NJ

PICATINNY ARSENAL, NJ 07806-5000

TIFFANY NOSTI

EMAIL: TIFFANY.N.NOSTI.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W15QKN-17-R-0023

2017OCT27

X

X 2017DEC18 03:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 19

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: TIFFANY NOSTI

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: ACC-NJ-CC/(973)724-7364

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of Amendment 0001 to Solicitation W15QKN-17-R-0023 is to make the following changes:

1. Extend the Solicitation response date by 21 days

FROM: 27 Nov 2017

TO: 18 Dec 2017

2. Update Section B, Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINS) 0004, 0010, and 0016

FROM: SUBCALIBER BUNKER DEFEAT MUNITION (BDM), 21MM, XM808

TO: SUBCALIBER BUNKER DEFEAT MUNITION (BDM), 21MM, XM808, KIT and clarify that there are two (2) XM808 Subcaliber BDMs per kit

3. Update Section C, Table C.2.3 Other Documents-Mandatory Compliance

FROM: ISO 9001:2008 Quality Systems Management Requirements 01 Sep 2015

TO: ISO 9001:2015 Quality Systems Management Requirements 15 Sep 2015

4. Update Section C, Table C.2.4 Drawings/Documents- Mandatory Compliance to update M141 BDM TDP: NTI Owned Portion (Contractor

Supplied) to include Revision number 52070-15 N.

5. Update Section J, Attachment 0018 has been replaced in its entirety

FROM: BDM Projectile TDP-Distribution D (1,377 Pages) Dated 21 SEP 2017

TO: BDM Projective TDP-Distribution D Dated 03 NOV 2017 (545 pages)

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

2 19

W15QKN-17-R-0023 0001

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

0004 YEAR 1 SUBCALIBER BDM, 21MM, XM808, KIT $ $ _______________________________________ ______________ __________________

NSN: 1055-01-583-9116

COMMODITY NAME: XM808

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Production of the Subcaliber Bunker Defeat Munition

(BDM), 21mm, XM808, Kit shall be in accordance with the Statement of Work and the requirements contained throughout this document.

The Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808, Kit consists of two

(2) Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808s.

Federal Supply Code: 1340

(End of narrative B001)

Packaging and Marking _____________________

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Origin ACCEPTANCE: Origin

0010 YEAR 2 SUBCALIBER BDM, 21MM, XM808, KIT $ $ _______________________________________ ______________ __________________

NSN: 1055-01-583-9116

COMMODITY NAME: XM808

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Production of the Subcaliber Bunker Defeat Munition

(BDM), 21mm, XM808, Kit shall be in accordance with the Statement of Work and the requirements contained throughout this document.

The Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808, Kit consists of two

(2) Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808s.

Federal Supply Code: 1340

(End of narrative B001)

Packaging and Marking _____________________

3 19

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Origin ACCEPTANCE: Origin

0016 YEAR 3 SUBCALIBER BDM, 21MM, XM808, KIT $ $ _______________________________________ ______________ __________________

NSN: 1055-01-583-9116

COMMODITY NAME: XM808

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Production of the Subcaliber Bunker Defeat Munition

(BDM), 21mm, XM808, Kit shall be in accordance with the Statement of Work and the requirements contained throughout this document.

The Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808, Kit consists of two

(2) Subcaliber BDM, 21mm, XM808s.

Federal Supply Code: 1340

(End of narrative B001)

Packaging and Marking _____________________

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Origin ACCEPTANCE: Origin

4 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

C.1 SCOPE _____

This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the requirements for the manufacture, test, inspection, packaging, and delivery of the M141 Bunker

Defeat Munition (BDM). The BDM is a hand-held, single shot, disposable, standoff munition designed to defeat earth and timber bunkers.

The contractor shall provide the necessary tactical munitions, materials, personnel, equipment, data, XM808 Sub-Caliber Trainers & Field

Handling Trainers (FHTs) in accordance with the requirements of this SOW.

C.1.1 Background __________

The United States (U.S.) Army has identified an operational need for a hand held, stand-off munition to defeat earth & timber fortifications (bunkers). The BDM has completed verification and validation testing and is the only system to meet this requirement.

The BDM was type classified for limited procurement in September 1994 and was Full Material Released in December 1999. The U.S. Army and other services utilize the M141 BDM as its primary Bunker Defeating Shoulder Launched Munition (SLM). Originally referred to as the

Shoulder Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon-Disposable (SMAW-D), a nomenclature change was officially processed November 2006 dropping the SMAW-D references and adapting the name as ROCKET AND LAUNCHER 83MM: HEDP BUNKER DEFEAT MUNITION (BDM), M141. The system will be referred to as the BDM in the following paragraphs. This contract will be used to satisfy Army, and other services requirements for

BDM, XM808 Sub-Caliber Trainers and FHTs. The program is being managed by the U.S. Army Program Manager for Close Combat Systems (PM-

CCS) at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey.

C.2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ____________________

The following documents, referenced with the latest or current revision and issue specified, form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of conflict between the applicable documents and this SOW, the SOW shall take precedence. All second tier and below references cited in mandatory compliance documents shall be considered as guidance only. Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

C.2.1 U.S. Military Standards and Specifications Mandatory Compliance ___________________________________________________________

| Document | Title | Date |

| MIL-STD-1168C | Ammunition Lot Numbering and Ammunition Data Card | 11 MAR 2014 |

| MIL-STD-129R | Military Marking for Shipment and Storage | 18 FEB 2014 |

| MIL-STD-1171B | Energetic Material Description Sheets and Propellant Loading Authorization Sheets | 31 May 2016 |

| MIL-STD-882E | Standard Practice for System Safety | 11 May 2012 |

| MIL-STD-31000A | Technical Data Packages | 26 Feb 2013 |

| MIL-STD-1686C | Electrostatic Discharge Control Program for Protection-Electronic Parts, Assemblies, Equipment | 25 Oct 1995 |

| DOD-STD-2101 | Classification of Characteristics | 10 May 1979 |

| MIL-A-70625A | Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment, Design, Testing, and Approval | 21 Apr 1989 |

C.2.2 Handbooks Guidance Only ________________________

| Document | Title | Date |

| MIL-HDBK-61A | Configuration Management Guidance | 07 FEB 2001 |

| MIL-HDBK-2164A | Environmental Stress Screening Process for Electronic Equipment | 19 JUN 1996 |

| MIL-STD-1528A | Manufacturing Management Program | 09 SEP 1986 |

C.2.3 Other Documents Mandatory Compliance _____________________________________

| Document | Title | Date |

| ASME Y14.100 | Engineering Drawing Practices | 30 JUL 2013 |

| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Systems Management Requirements | 15 SEP 2015 |

| ISO 10012 | Measurement Management Systems Requirements-Measurement Processes & Measuring Equip. | 15 APR 2003 |

| ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006 (R2013) | Calibration System Requirements | 26 MAR 2013 |

| ASTM E 543 | Standard Specification for Agencies Performing Nondestructive Testing | 22 JAN 2014 |

| ASTM E-1742 | Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination | 21 SEP 2017 |

| DOD 4145.26M | Contractors Safety Manual for Ammunition and Explosives | 13 MAR 2008 |

| DOD 4500.9-R | Defense Transportation Regulation Part II Cargo Movement | MAY 2008 |

5 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

| AR 190-11 | Physical Security of Arms, Ammunition, and Explosives | 05 SEP 2013 |

| AR 381-12 | Threat Awareness and Reporting Program (TARP) | LATEST |

| DOD 5100.76-M | Physical Security of Sensitive Conventional Arms, Ammunition and Explosives | 17 APR 2012 |

| DOD 4160.21-M | Defense Materiel Disposition Manual | AUG 1997 |

| DOD 4160.28 | Defense Demilitarization: Volumes 1, 2, & 3 | 07 JUN 2011 |

| ISPM 15 | International Stan. Phytosanitary Measures: Reg of Wood Packaging Material Int Trade | 2009 |

| AR 25-2 | Information Assurance | 23 MAR 2009 |

| AR 380-67 | Personnel Security Program | 24 JAN 2014 |

| TB 700-2 | Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Hazard Classification Procedures | 30 JUL 2012 |

| AMC-R 385-100 | Safety Manual | 26 SEP 1995 |

| Executive Order 12843 | Procurement Req. & Policies for Federal Agencies for Ozone-Depleting Substances | 21 APR 1993 |

| JOTP-070 | Joint Ordnance Test Procedure (JOTP) Identification Marking For Munitions | 30 JUL 2013 |

| DOD 8570.01 | DoD Directive IA Training, Certification, and Workforce Management | 23 APR 2007 |

| DOD 8570.01-M | Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program (Incorporating Change 4) | 10 NOV 2015 |

| AR 190-13 | The Army Physical Security Program | 30 Sept 1993 |

| AR 530-1 | Operations Security | SEP 2014 |

| NAS 411 | National Aerospace Standard (NAS) 411 | SEP 2013 |

| EO 12470 | Continuation of Export Control Regulations | MAR 1984 |

| ST/SG/AC.10/1/ | United Nations - Transportation of Dangerous Goods | Latest Rev |

C.2.4 Drawings/Documents Mandatory Compliance ________________________________________

| Documents | Title | Revision |

| SR-RD-TE-09-57 | Detailed Test Plan for the System First Article Test of the BDM | 10 Feb 2009 |

| RTC-13-F5785-0001 | Detailed Test Plan for the Fuze Lot Acceptance Test Plan of the BDM | 01 Oct 2012 |

| RTC-13-F6581-0384 | Detailed Test Plan for the System Lot Acceptance Test of the BDM | 01 Jan 2013 |

| XM808 TDPL | XM808 Sub-Caliber Trainer TDPL (Contractor Supplied) | W15QKN-08-D-0422-0011 |

| BDM FHT TDPL | Field Handling Trainer TDPL (Contractor Supplied) | W15QKN-08-D-0422-0019 |

| M141 BDM USG TDP | M141 BDM TDP: USG Owned Portion | See Attachments |

| M141 BDM NTI TDP | M141 BDM TDP: NTI Owned Portion (Contractor Supplied) | 52070-15 N |

| 12999545 | Two-Dimensional Barcode Ammunition Label Instructions for Ammo & Explosive Containers | E |

| BDM Fuze RFV | BDM Fuze Request for Variation 0422-006 | 21 SEP 2017 |

C.3 REQUIREMENTS ____________

C.3.1 Production of Tactical BDM System and Related Items. ___________________________________________________

The contractor shall perform all tasks required and described in this SOW to produce, manufacture, test, prepare and deliver associated documentation, and deliver the BDM, XM808 Sub-Caliber Trainers, and FHTs in the type and quantities specified in the contract. Except as described elsewhere in this contract, the contractor shall provide all materials, equipment, hard tooling, personnel, and facilities necessary to manufacture, produce, and deliver the types and quantities of deliverables specified by the contract. Manufacture and test for acceptance and delivery of BDM, and related items, shall be in accordance with the item Product Baselines of Contractor Technical

Data Packages (TDPs), Critical Item Fabrication Specifications (CIFS), Weapon Specifications, Request for Variation, and TDPs outlined in C.2.4. Specific Weapon Specifications contained in the TDPs and documents which carry the statement "This specification is inactive for procurement after Month/Year" shall still be considered valid, and shall be used regardless of the date printed in the statement.

All lower level specifications (those referenced in higher level weapon specifications, Mil-Standards, Mil-Specs, etc.) are to be used to the most current revision level. If those specifications are cancelled with replacement, then the replacement specification shall be used. If a lower level specification is cancelled without replacement, then the contractor is to select an appropriate specification for use with approval from the procuring activity.

C.3.2 Manufacturing Planning ______________________

Prior to initiation of production, the contractor shall develop, document, and implement a plan that addresses all the processes and practices required to build and test the contract end item. MIL STD 1528A, Sections 4.1 and 5.3, may be used as guidance. The plan shall identify and describe all processes both normal and critical, with flowcharts to show work flow during manufacturing. The plan shall identify all tooling, test equipment, critical and strategic material, environmental stress screening, and personnel certification and training requirements that are needed to support the identified processes. The plan shall also define in detail the system for their integration into the manufacturing effort. Guidance for Environmental Stress Screening Process for Electronic Equipment can be found in MIL-HDBK-2164A. The plan shall be submitted to the Procuring Activity within 45 calendar days after contract award for

Government review and approval (DI-MGMT-81889) (A001).

C.3.3 Program & Data Management _________________________

6 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.3.3.1 Program Management __________________

The contractor shall establish and maintain program management practices throughout the period of performance. Program management practices shall provide visibility into the contractors organization and the techniques used in managing the program; specifically subcontractor and data management. Documentation shall be readily available to Government representative(s) during planned visits. The contractor shall submit quarterly Progress, Status and Management Reports (DI-MGMT-80227) (A002). These reports shall include a summary of work accomplished during the reporting period, problems encountered, work status in relation to scheduled activities, contract status, work planned for the next reporting period, an overall program schedule, cost data detailing the planned effort, and projected test dates. Each report shall contain all reporting required by this contract.

C.3.3.2 Subcontractor Management ________________________

The contractor is responsible for performance of all contractual requirements and shall institute appropriate management actions relative to subcontractor performance. Requirements that are contractually specified shall apply to subcontractor performance; however, the contractor shall be accountable for compliance by subcontractors and is responsible for ensuring all deliverable products comply with the contract requirements.

C.3.3.3 Data Management _______________

The contractor shall ensure all data is available for Government review to maintain continuity of the system fabrication and supporting documentation. The Government reserves the right to review all data associated with, and developed for, this contract.

C.3.3.3.1 Schedule Planning _________________

The contractor shall maintain an accurate schedule of program events and recommend program schedules, including review and evaluation techniques, which provide for the earliest delivery schedule while satisfying all requirements. The program schedule shall include all significant events and a Program Planning Milestone Chart. The Program Planning Milestone Chart shall depict major tasks and events from start to completion of the contract. The contractor shall notify the Government in writing of any anticipated or projected work stoppages or delays that will impact schedules.

C.3.3.3.2 Assignment of Responsibility and Authority __________________________________________

The contractor shall identify the organizational elements responsible for the conduct of the activities delineated in this SOW. The contractor shall designate a Program Manager (PM) who shall possess sufficient corporate authority to manage, direct, execute and control all elements of the contract. The PM shall serve as the primary point of contact between the contractor and the Government, and be responsible for the coordination of all contractor activities related to the contract. The contractor shall notify the Contracting

Officer in writing of any change to the assigned PM or Key Personnel to the contract.

C.3.3.4 Meetings, Formal Reviews, Conferences, and Audits _________________________________________________

C.3.3.4.1 Contractor Responsibilities ___________________________

The contractor shall plan, host, attend, coordinate, support and conduct the meetings, formal reviews, conferences, and audits (herein called "reviews"). The reviews shall be conducted at Government and contractor facilities. Reviews requiring demonstration and/or examination of equipment shall be conducted at the contractor's facility. All such reviews shall be included in the program schedule.

The Government reserves the right to cancel or reschedule any review, either at critical points during the period of performance, or when program performance problems warrant. A conference agenda shall be prepared for scheduled reviews and submitted to the Government seven (7) days prior to the conference/meeting (DI-ADMN-81249A) (A003). Meeting minutes shall be prepared for scheduled reviews and submitted to the Government within the seven (7) day period following the conference/meeting (DI-ADMN-81250A) (A004).

C.3.3.4.1.1 Post Award Conference _____________________

A post award conference shall be held at the contractors facility, or the place of manufacture, within 30 days after contract award.

The purpose of this review is for the contractor to review and demonstrate to the Government: the management procedures, provide progress assessments, review of technical and other specialty area status, and to establish schedule dates for near term critical meetings/actions. The contractor shall present management, key personnel, and program implementation processes. The contractor shall prepare and submit to the Government the minutes of the post award conference within the seven (7) day period following the conference

(DI-ADMN-81250A) (A005).

C.3.3.4.1.2 In-Process Reviews __________________

In Process Reviews (IPR) will be held on a quarterly, or as needed basis, at a date and location mutually agreed upon. The Government reserves the right to cancel, or require, any review to be scheduled during the period of performance. The contractors progress, management, assurance of compliance with contract requirements, program status, funding, problem identification and resolutions shall be agenda items. The contractor shall provide minutes of the review within the seven (7) day period following the conference (DI-ADMN-

81250A)(A004).

C.3.3.5 Configuration Management ________________________

C.3.3.5.1 Baseline Technical Data Package _______________________________

The Contractor shall maintain formal Configuration Management for the FHT Technical data Package Listing (TDPL). As production items, the BDM and XM808 TDPL shall be under formal U.S. Army Configuration Management. This includes individual component, sub-assembly & assembly dimensional configurations including their materials, coatings, compositions, and functional characteristics. Throughout the

7 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

duration of the contract, the contractor shall perform configuration management to ensure form, fit, function and interface requirements are maintained throughout the contract period for all item TDPs. The contractor's configuration management practices for all BDM and

XM808 Systems shall include a parts management program that shall ensure supplier/vendor parts and components are readily available during the operation and sustainment of each end item. The contractor shall maintain control of the baseline throughout the contract period within 20 calendar days of contract award, the contractor shall provide the Government a complete TDPL as well as the top level assembly and major subassembly drawings including descriptive product data detailing part/document number, revision, and nomenclature for each component, assembly, and associated specification and the respective CIFS documents for each of the deliverable hardware items.

These drawings and specifications will represent the planned build baseline for items identified for production. Guidance for

Configuration Management can be found in MIL-HDBK-61A.

C.3.3.5.2 Product Baseline Changes ________________________

The contractor shall notify the Government of all proposed changes to the BDM and XM808 Systems as well as any proposed product improvements impacting form, fit, function, cost, or schedule. All proposed changes to the baseline TDPs for BDM and XM808 shall be documented on an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), or a Recommended Engineering Change (REC) proposal, and submitted for U.S.

Government approval. Any proposed variations to the TDP shall be documented on a Request for Variation (RFV) form and submitted for

U.S. Government approval. Prior to Government submission for review and approval of ECPs, RECs and RFVs, the contractor shall conduct an initial review to determine if the proposed ECP, REC or RFV may be detrimental to safety, performance, or the user interface.

Results of this review shall accompany the proposal, along with impacted drawings, specifications, analyses, etc., for U.S. Government approval of the ECP, REC or RFV. Requests for ECPs and RECs shall be submitted utilizing DD Form 1692 (DI-SESS-80639D) (A006). RFVs shall be prepared utilizing DD Form 1694 (DI-SESS-80640D) (A007). If the contractor wishes to use configuration management forms other than those listed above, the proposed alternate forms shall be submitted for approval prior to use.

C.3.3.5.3 Maintenance of TDP __________________

The contractor shall be responsible for updating the TDPs as necessary to incorporate any proposed changes or improvements following formal Government approval. Each item TDP is required to comply with MIL-STD-31000A and ASME Y14.100. The contractor shall be responsible for custodial maintenance throughout the contract, and shall provide a list of any updates to the Government in each quarterly report. The contractor's configuration management practices shall include a parts management program that shall ensure supplier/vendor parts and components are readily available during the operation and sustainment of the end item.

C.3.3.5.4 Technical Data Package ______________________

The contractor shall submit electronic copies of the as-built complete TDP to include: a TDPL, the top level assembly drawings, major subassembly drawings including descriptive product data detailing part/document number, revision, and nomenclature for each component, assembly, associated specification, and the respective weapon specification documents for each of the deliverable hardware items within

30 calendar days of hardware delivery (DI-SESS-81003E) (A008). Periodic updates shall be provided to keep the TDPL current throughout the contract.

C.3.4 System Engineering __________________

The contractor shall establish and maintain an effective systems engineering program throughout the production processes, which shall include a reliability and maintainability program.

C.3.4.1 Reliability and Maintainability Program _______________________________________

The contractor shall maintain a comprehensive Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) program to ensure the BDM and related items meet the

R&M standards set forth in their associated Weapon Specifications and Critical Item Fabrication Specifications within the TDPs. The design of each system shall be monitored throughout the entire period of performance (PoP) to identify and assess any changes, which would impact reliability or maintainability. The contractor shall maintain and make available, to the Government, all R&M data on any vendor or subcontractor supplied item. The contractor shall inform the Government of any part or component, which will degrade system

R&M requirements. The contractor shall maintain procedures and controls that ensure products obtained from suppliers, vendors, and subcontractors meet reliability requirements. The contractor shall develop a closed loop failure reporting system, procedures for analysis of failures to determine cause, and documentation for recording corrective actions taken. The Failure Reporting, Analysis, and

Corrective Action System (FRACAS) shall include uniform failure reporting, failure analysis reports and corrective actions. The contractor shall notify the Government of any failure of a critical item from the Critical Item Chacteristic List (CICL).

C.3.5 Quality Assurance

C.3.5.1 Quality Program and Quality Program Plan ________________________________________

The contractor shall have a Quality Assurance Program in compliance with ISO 9001:2008, or an alternate plan approved by the Government.

The contractor shall have a Quality Program that encompasses all technical and manufacturing aspects of production. All supplies and services under this contract shall be controlled by the contractor at all points necessary to assure compliance with contractual requirements. The contractor shall ensure objective evidence of quality conformance is readily available to the Government.

C.3.5.1.1 Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP). ______________________________________

The purpose of the QAPP is to provide complete coverage of all information, instructions, and documentation necessary to produce a quality part, component, equipment, subsystem, or system of high acceptance while maintaining conformity to all contractual requirements. The contractor shall submit a QAPP to the Government for review and approval (DI-QCIC-81794) (A009). Production of hardware under this contract cannot occur until the QAPP is approved by the Government. The contractor shall maintain and implement the

8 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

quality program and all quality assurance provisions incorporated at the time of award. Changes to this program will not be implemented without the written permission of the Contracting Officer. The contractor's quality management system shall ensure product conformance to contractual requirements. The contractor shall ensure they have an implemented, documented, demonstrated ability to maintain the quality management system to be used on the contract. The contractor shall make available all quality management documentation for the

Government to review upon request. The quality program shall encompass all technical and manufacturing aspects of production. All supplies and services under this contracting action shall be controlled at all points necessary to assure conformance to contractual requirements.

C.3.5.2 Control of Suppliers ____________________

The contractor shall establish a supplier network that shall ensure timely delivery of material and parts throughout production to meet the requirements of the BDM, FHT and XM808 systems. The contractor shall maintain control of the quality for all suppliers throughout production. The control techniques shall be defined but not limited to, incoming inspection, source inspection, and monitoring supplier selection, evaluation, and rating techniques. The contractor must inform potential suppliers that the Government reserves the right to inspect their facilities and processes.

C.3.5.3 Government Access to Facilities _______________________________

The contractor shall provide the Government access to prime and subcontractor facilities so that regulatory surveys, inspections and investigations can be conducted.

C.3.5.4 Government Right to Audit _________________________

At any time during this contract effort the Government reserves the right to independently audit or examine the contractors and any subcontractors Quality Management System and Records for compliance to all contractual quality requirements. The contractor shall ensure the necessary provisions are placed in all sub-contractor/vendor purchase orders/contracts to grant the Government access to perform these audits. The contractor shall provide personnel and facilities to support the above audits.

C.3.5.5 Ammunition Lot Numbering and Data Cards (ADCs) ______________________________________________

Ammunition Lot Numbers and Ammunition Data Cards shall be prepared by the contractor for each lot of delivered hardware following the requirements of MIL-STD-1168C (DI-MISC-80043B) (A010). The contractor shall follow the format required by the worldwide web application identified as the Munition History Program (MHP)(https:// mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil). Prior to gaining access to MHP, contractor/facility personnel involved in the preparation of ammunition data cards shall obtain a user name and password for the Army

Electronic Product Support (AEPS) network.

C.3.5.5.1 Hardware Acceptability ______________________

All munitions and hardware provided to the Government shall have satisfied the contractors normal quality assurance, safety requirements, and any Government quality assurance and safety requirements for this contract. The contractor shall provide an

Inspection and Test Report, which details the results of tests and inspections conducted on tactical round sub-assemblies, assemblies, major components, and complete system delivered. An Inspection and Test Report shall be provided for each lot delivered (DI-NDTI-

80809B, Tailored) (A011).

C.3.5.6 Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) __________________________________

The contractor shall perform an audit demonstrating compliance for not less than 100 physical dimensions, with emphasis on critical and major components, to the drawings for the BDM and XM808 Systems. A minimum of three (3) samples shall be verified for each of the PCA physical dimensions selected, and provided to the Government. For components manufactured on multiple cavity molds, tools or equipment, etc., a minimum of three (3) samples produced from each mold cavity, tool or equipment, etc., shall be verified. The contractor shall submit a PCA plan and report for Government approval (DI-SESS-81646B) (A012). The PCA shall be witnessed by a government representative and the contractor shall provide all materials and facilities needed for PCA. All contractor documentation used to document the BDM and/or XM808 Systems, such as drawings, production specifications, component specifications, commercial item descriptions, vendor item descriptions, source control documents, and manufacturing and test procedures, shall be available for review during PCA. A PCA report with all audit results, to include all variable data obtained during the performance of the audit, shall be submitted (DI-CMAN-81022C)

(A013).

C.3.5.7 First Article and Lot Acceptance Test Plans ___________________________________________

The contractor shall submit for review and approval test plans for both contractor and subcontractor First Article Testing (FAT) for major sub-assemblies as well as contractor and subcontractor Conformance Inspection/Lot Acceptance Testing (LAT) for major sub-assemblies 60 calendar days prior to testing (DI-NDTI-80566A) (A014). A FAT is required for the full-up munition, as defined in the

Government FAT Plan (SR-RD-TE-09-57, or latest approved version).

C.3.5.8 FAT and LAT ___________

C.3.5.8.1 First Article Testing _____________________

A FAT is required for the full-up munition, as defined in the Government FAT Plan (SR-RD-TE-09-57, or latest approved version), and shall be conducted at a Government facility. The contractor is responsible for coordination of the full-up munition FAT and will provide a minimum of 15 days notice to the Government prior to commencement of FAT so the testing may be witnessed. The FAT sample is 32 munitions complete with packaging. Concurrent with delivery of the FAT samples, an Inspection and Test Report and Material

Certification data shall be provided for the 32 units addressing all inspection, test (less the dynamic flight tests of the full-up

9 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

munitions), and material certification data. The contractor is authorized to produce major sub-assemblies after successful completion of component/sub-assembly LAT and FAT if applicable. If required by a CIFS document, Weapon Specification, or Item Drawing, a component/sub-assembly FAT must be completed and approved by the Government prior to proceeding with the manufacture of the item. The

Government reserves the right to waive the FAT. The contractor shall provide a representative at the Government Facility/Proving

Grounds for a period of five (5) working days during the FAT, to assist in aiming the weapon and monitoring of the test. The Government will write and distribute the FAT report at the flight-testing of the full-up munition.

C.3.5.8.1.1 Major Sub-Assembly FAT Requirements ___________________________________

The contractor shall conduct component/sub-assembly FAT per the approved drawings, plans, specifications, and criteria outlined in the

BDM TDP and Government approved contractor FAT plan. The contractor shall provide notice to the Government prior to conducting first article testing for the following components/sub-assemblies: the fuze, warhead, propellant, igniter, launch tubes, launcher assembly, rocket motor and rocket motor assembly. The contractor is responsible for coordination of the dynamic portion of the fuze testing, and all sub-assembly FATs, and will provide a minimum of 15 days notice to the Government prior to commencement so the testing may be witnessed. If any subassembly FAT is to be conducted Outside of the Contiguous U.S. (OCONUS), the Government requires a minimum of 75 days notice prior to the start of testing. Neither final assembly, nor mating of major sub-assemblies, shall be conducted until the

Government has approved the dynamic flight test portion of the First Article. Resulting test data shall be provided to the Government for the following items: the fuze, warhead, propellant, igniter, launch tubes, launcher assembly, rocket motor and rocket motor assembly, in the form of a test report (DI-NDTI-80809B, Tailored ) (A015).

C.3.5.8.2 Lot Acceptance Testing ______________________

LAT is required for each lot of the full-up munition and major sub-assemblies produced. Lot Acceptance Testing is also required for each lot of XM808 Systems produced. The contractor is responsible for coordination of the full-up munition, the dynamic portion of the fuze LAT, sub-assembly LATs, and the XM808 LAT, and will provide a minimum of 15 days notice to the Government prior to commencement so the testing may be witnessed. Any LATs occurring OCONUS require 75 calendar days notice to the Government prior to the start of testing. Each lot of full-up munitions and sub-assemblies shall successfully pass the lot acceptance test prior to Government acceptance of the full-up lot of munition, and for the major sub-assemblies, prior to releasing the items to the production floor. The

LAT sample for the full-up munition is 32 end items complete with packaging. Upon Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) Approval, the contractor is authorized to produce major subassemblies after successful completion of subassembly/component lot acceptance testing.

The full-up munition System LAT shall be conducted at a Government facility as defined in the Detailed Test Plan for the System Lot

Acceptance Test of the BDM Plan 2016-2017 (RTC-13-F6581-0384, or latest approved version). All data from this testing shall be kept on file and made available to the Government in an electronic format for a period of twenty (20) years. Resulting test and inspection data, including any anomalies, encountered during the inspection/test of any accepted product shall be provided in a Lot Acceptance Test

Report (LATR) and uploaded in the MHP (https:// mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil)(DI-NDTI-80809B, Tailored)(A015).

C.3.5.8.2.1 Major Sub-Assembly LAT Requirements for the BDM System ______________________________________________________

The contractor shall conduct LAT per the approved drawings, plans, specifications, and criteria outlined in the BDM TDP. The contractor shall provide notice to the Government prior to conducting lot acceptance testing for the following items: the fuze, warhead, propellant, igniter, launch tubes, launcher assembly, rocket motor and rocket motor assembly. The contractor is responsible for coordination of the dynamic portion of the fuze LAT, sub-assembly LATs, and the XM808 LAT, and will provide a minimum of 15 days notice to the Government prior to commencement so the testing may be witnessed. Any LATs occurring OCONUS require 75 days notice to the

Government prior to the start of testing. The dynamic flight-testing portion of the Fuze LAT shall be conducted at a Government facility as defined in the Fuze LAT Plan (RTC-13-F5785-0001, or latest approved version). Resulting testing and inspection data shall be provided to the Government for the following items: the fuze, warhead, propellant, igniter, launch tubes, launcher assembly, rocket motor and rocket motor assembly, in the form of a test report (with approved contractor document format acceptable) (DI-NDTI-80809B, Tailored)(A015).

C.3.5.9 Fuze Inspection _______________

Just prior to assembling the fuze(s) into the warhead, an x-ray or fluoroscopic image shall be obtained and studied to assure that the fuze is in the fully safe, and non-armed, condition. These images shall be retained by the contractor for a period of twenty (20) years, and shall be available for U.S. Government review. The fuze and associated inspection image shall be traceable to the serial number or other identification number of the completed munition. This inspection shall be conducted on 100% of all munitions subjected to FAT, LAT, or delivered to the U.S. Government. Standard Practice for Radiographic Examination can be found in ASTM E-1742. Designs of the inspection equipment and associated inspection procedures shall be provided per the instructions in paragraph C.3.5.10 Acceptance

Inspection Equipment (AIE).

C.3.5.10 Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AIE) _____________________________________

The contractor shall be responsible for providing all inspection and test equipment required to inspect the BDM components, subassemblies, and complete rounds at contractor facilities (except system level firings, including Fuze LATs, conducted at a Government facility). For any Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE), the contractor shall follow requirements of MIL-A-70625A and conduct a prove-out, validating inspection system reliability. ISO 10012 provides requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment, ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006 (R2013) provides general requirements for calibration laboratories and measurement and test equipment, and ASTM E 543 provides standard practices for nondestructive testing. The contractor shall submit designs of all acceptance and inspection equipment used to perform the critical and major examinations and tests per the required drawings and specifications (DI-QCIC-

81006, Tailored) (A016) and Section E - Inspection and Acceptance of this Contract.

10 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.3.5.10.1 Automated Acceptance Inspection Equipment (AAIE) ________________________________________________

C.3.5.10.1.1 Fail Safe Design ________________

All equipment shall utilize fail-safe design following the requirements of MIL-A-70625A. The decision-making logic and the material handling devices (when part of the equipment) shall be normally in a reject mode prior to and during any test. A series of signals indicative of proper test results shall be required to change to the accept mode.

C.3.5.10.1.2 Decision Making _______________

Unless otherwise specified, automated inspection equipment may use either a variable or non-variable output from the inspection element for the decision making process. However, it is preferred that variable output be obtained to maximize the benefits of utilizing statistical process control.

C.3.5.11 Failure Analysis and Corrective Actions Report ______________________________________________

During manufacturing, inspection, or testing on end items, or major components, a failure analysis and corrective action report shall be provided (DI-SESS-81315B) (A017). The contractor shall notify the Government within 24 hours for any critical or major failure. The contractors response to the failure must be approved by the Government prior to acceptance of subsequent lots.

C.3.5.12 Energetic Material Certifications and Restrictions __________________________________________________

Energetic materials used in components, or end items, produced during this effort shall have been manufactured within five (5) years of the date of the delivery order award. Propellant Data Sheet or Energetic Description Sheet of the energetic materials shall be provided along with the LATR and uploaded in the MHP(https:// mhpwarp.redstone.army.mil). This report shall be submitted for each lot or batch processed (DI-NDTI-80809B, Tailored) (A018). Guidelines and a list of all mandatory information required for the preparation of propellant description sheet can be found in MIL-STD-1171B. The Propellant Data Sheet or Energetic Description Sheet from the original date of manufacture must provide the lot and/or batch number, chemical and physical property data, their percentages or other data requirements, specification requirements, and whether energetic materials meet specification requirements. Energetic materials must maintain the original lot numbering configuration and following requirement of MIL-STD-1171B, for traceability purposes, whether purchased from the original manufacturer or a third party supplier. The Government will entertain requests for use of energetic materials manufactured more than five (5) years; however, such requests shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer, as a RFV in accordance with provisions of the contract.

C.3.5.13 Material Certifications _______________________

Material certifications shall be provided for any material that is critical, as well as for all energetic materials present in the component end item. The contractor shall certify the product delivered complies with the design configuration that successfully completed FAT and PCA (DI-MISC-80678, Tailored) (A019). The certification shall include actual test data or inspection results that show compliance within the allowable tolerances. Certificates of conformance shall not be considered as adequate evidence of material certification. Material Certifications shall be submitted to the Government no later than (NLT) 30 calendar days prior to the start of

FAT or LAT and are required for each lot of delivered material.

The following is a list of items which contain critical materials or energetic materials, including but not limited to:

(a) Propulsion Unit

(b) Propulsion Unit Case

(c) Warhead

(d) Booster Pellet

(e) Booster Cup

(f) Inner and Outer Launch Tubes

C.3.5.14 Critical Characteristics ________________________

Each BDM system contains critical characteristics. The contractor shall ensure that the Critical Non-Conformance escape risk to the field is limited to no more than one (1) per one million items delivered. Inspection Equipment shall be evaluated per Acceptance

Inspection Equipment requirements. The contractor shall comply with the requirements outlined in the Contract Data Requirements List

(CDRL) data items, pursuant to authority 52.246-4011 (Section E), which contains additional requirements regarding critical characteristics, guidance for developing the Critical Characteristics Control (CCC) Plan and classifying additional critical characteristics for the Critical Item Characteristic List (CICL). The contractor shall develop a Critical Plan of Action (CPOA) (DI-

MGMT-80004A, Tailored) (A020). The contractor shall also develop a CCC Plan during Year 1 of the Contract (DI-MGMT-80004A, Tailored)(A021A) and shall complete required work to implement and maintain the CCC Plan for the duration of this during Years 2 and 3 of the Contract (DI-MGMT-80004A, Tailored) (A021B). Additionally, a Critical Safety Item Characteristic and Defect (CSICD) Report shall be completed (DI-SAFT-80970A) (A022). The requirements for the Classification of Characteristics for the BDM rounds can be found in DOD-

STD-2101.

C.3.5.15 Rework and Repair of Nonconforming Material ___________________________________________

Rework and Repair are defined as follows:

Rework - The reprocessing of nonconforming material to make it conform completely to the drawings, specifications or contract requirements.

11 19

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Repair - The reprocessing of nonconforming material in accordance with approved written procedures and operations to reduce, but not completely eliminate, the nonconformance. The purpose of repair is to bring nonconforming material into a usable condition. Repair is distinguished from rework in that the item after repair still does not completely conform to all of the applicable drawings, specifications or contract requirements.

Rework procedures along with the associated inspection procedures shall be documented by the contractor and submitted to the Government

QAR for review prior to implementation. Rework procedures are subject to the QAR's disapproval.

Repair procedures shall be documented by the contractor and submitted on a Request for Variation, DD Form 1694, to the Contracting

Officer for review and written approval prior to implementation (DI-SESS-80640D) (A007).

Whenever the contractor submits a repair or rework procedure for Government review, the submission shall also include a description of the cause for the non-conformances and a description of the action taken, or to be taken to prevent recurrence. The rework or repair procedure shall also contain a provision for re-inspection which will take precedence over the TDP requirements and shall provide the

Government assurance that the reworked or repaired items have met reprocessing requirements.

C.3.5.16 Critical Defects and Material Review Board (MRB) Actions ________________________________________________________

Non-conformances to critical characteristics shall not be accepted through MRB actions. In instances where engineering analysis of the non-conformances determines that the existing tolerances or requirements can be changed without degrading product safety, an ECP or REC

(DI-SESS-80639D) (A006), resulting in a drawing, quality assurance provision, or item specification change should be submitted for U.S.

Government consideration as specified in the Configuration Management…