Vendor Name_Past Perf Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bartlett Experimental Forest Janitorial Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12444824Q4000
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to janitorial services at the Bartlett Experimental Forest. The key details are:
The federal contract opportunity is for Solicitation Number 12444824Q4000, which is a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for janitorial services at three Government-owned facilities - a lab/conference/office building and two quarters buildings - for a one-year period with four one-year option periods. The procurement is set aside for Small Businesses under NAICS code 561720 for Janitorial Services. Proposals are due by 09/16/2024. A site visit with the Contracting Officer Representative is highly encouraged on 09/10/2024. The awarded contractor will be required to provide an adequate number of trained personnel to maintain the facilities on a day-to-day basis, and coordinate with the COR on contract administration. The questionnaire requests the respondent to evaluate the past performance of the contractor across various criteria on a scale of 1 to 5.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Service Contract Act WD 2015-4021.pdf | ||
| Vendor Name_Experience Questionaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| SCHEDULE OF ITEMS - WITH OPTIONS.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No: 12444824Q4000 Bartlett Experimental Forest
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: _____________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: ________________________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: __________________Dollar Amount: $ _____________________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ___________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ___________________Title: _________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________
Email Address: _______________________________
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Alternatively, select N/A where appropriate.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL or N/A |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. |
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. |
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance, the record is inconclusive, or rated area is not applicable.
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 11. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
| 12. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER
Remarks: ________________________________________________________________________________
RETURN BY EMAIL TO no later than COB 13 SEP 2024: gayle.geiger@usda.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .