VA797H-17-D-0022-152.docx

DOCX document Posted

Attached to
PHILIPS PACS UPGRADE
Solicitation number
Not on record
Issued by

About this file

VA797H-17-D-0022 36A79719N0599 JA to Fair Opportunity - Logical Follow On - VISN 8 Upgrade - Tampa.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
VA797H-17-D-0022-151.docx DOCX document
VA797H-17-D-0022-151.docx DOCX document
VA797H-17-D-0022-152.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS

Office of Acquisition and Logistics National Acquisition Center P.O. Box 76 Hines, IL 60141

Justification for an Exception to Fair Opportunity FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) – Logical Follow-on

(1) Identification of the agency and the contracting activity.

This Justification for an Exception to Fair Opportunity is on behalf of VISN 8, VAMC TAMPA, FL, and will be executed by, the Veterans Affairs National Acquisition Center (NAC) located in Hines, Illinois.

(2) Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

This activity proposes to issue a sole-source delivery orders against Indefinite Quantity contract VA797H-17-D-0022 awarded to Philips for the purchase of software that is integral to and validated with the current to the Xper Flex hemodynamic monitoring solution at VISN 8, VAMC TAMPA, FL.

(3) A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs, including the estimated value.

The existing Philips Xper Flex hemodynamic monitoring solution at VAMC TAMPA, FL is the last Station within VISN 8 to purchase the software to upgrade and make the Xper Flex hemodynamic monitoring solution current. Any more delays adversely affect patient care because EP procedures in the Cath Lab are being cancelled as a direct result of concern that the equipment will fail again. This is causing a patient safety issue.

The total estimated value is $278,754.00.

(4) An identification of the exception to fair opportunity (see 16.505(b) (2)) and the supporting rationale, including a demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualification or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the exception cited. If the contracting officer uses the logical follow-on exception, the rationale shall describe why the relationship between the initial order and the follow-on is logical (e.g. in terms of scope, period of performance, or value).

The order will be issued on a sole-source basis as a logical follow-on to delivery order VA797H-17-D-0022, in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C).

This follow-on order will be issued on a sole-source basis to the Philips, as the integration and validation are guaranteed without risk of downtime or delay of services due to incompatibility or the need for further integration development. This is upgrading proprietary software and hardware which only the original vendor can secure, implement and support. No other manufacturer can provide the necessary technology to upgrade the current purchased system with the VA, without losing compatibility and functionality of the entire system and, also jeopardizing patient care.

(5) A determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

All items are currently on Philip’s IDIQ contract VA797H-17-D-0022. The quoted price for each item is at or below the IDIQ not-to-exceed contract price, and the IDIQ contract pricing has been determined fair and reasonable by a contracting officer.

(6) Any other facts supporting the justification.

None.

(7) A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the exception to fair opportunity before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services is made.

Future requirements will be handled on a case by case basis and all attempts will be made to provide fair opportunity to all schedule holders.

(8) The contracting officer’s certification that the justification is accurate and complete to the best of the contracting officer’s knowledge and belief.

By signing this justification, the Contracting Officer hereby certifies that the justifications are accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge.

(9) Evidence that any supporting data that is the responsibility of the technical or requirements personnel (e.g., verifying the Government’s minimum needs or requirements or other rationale for an exception to fair opportunity) and which form a basis for the justification have been certified as complete and accurate by the technical or requirements personnel.

By signing this justification, the requiring activity hereby certifies that the justifications are accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge.

(10) A written determination by the approving official that one of the circumstances in (b)(2)(i)(A) through (F) of this section applies to the order.

Based on the information contained herein, a determination has been made that this requirement meets the exception at FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(C) since it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract. All awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.

CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION:

Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(9), I certify that any supporting data that is my responsibility and which forms a basis for the justification is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

//Signed// 09/17/19

Dennis Martinez Date Supervisory Program Specialist

CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION:

Pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(B)(8), I certify that the justification is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

//Signed// 09/17/19

Michael Kuchyak Date Contracting Officer VA National Acquisition Center – Hines High-Tech Medical Equipment Ordering Division

//Signed// 09/17/19

Monica E. Mende Date VA National Acquisition Center – Hines Chief, High-Tech Medical Equipment Ordering-B Division 1 Page Source Selection Info – See FAR 3.104 & FAR 2.101 image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .